West Coast Regional Council chair defends rate rises
Photo:
LDR / Lois Williams
The West Coast Regional Council is defending its rate rises, and contesting figures put out by Taxpayers' Union showing the council topped the country for rate hikes over the past three years.
Council chair Peter Haddock said the figures were flawed.
The West Coast Regional Council's [WCRC] total rates increase this year was in fact 18 percent - higher than the Taxpayers Union figure of 12 percent, he said.
The council itself previously reported the increase as 12 percent, but the figure did not include targeted rates and charges for Civil Defence and the new District Plan.
But the total rate rise over three years was lower than the Taypayers' Union figure of 65 percent, Haddock said.
"Our cumulative rate increase was more than 10 percent less than that … it was still high at 55 percent over three years but there are very good reasons why Coast rates have increased," he said.
The council had previously started to fail on delivering mandatory work programmes because of cost cutting in previous years, and it was running an unbalanced budget, using mining bond deposits and prudent flood protection reserves held on behalf of ratepayers, to cover operational costs, Haddock said.
"As a council, we couldn't continue this approach which amounted to kicking the can down the road," he said.
"It would mean the next generation had to pay for unbalanced budgets just to make increases in WCRC rate requirements look better on paper."
The cost of administering the new combined District Plan had also landed on the regional council, along with the cost of upgrading flood protection for Westport, Franz Josef and Hokitika.
"I know West Coasters are doing it tough, and I know average incomes for many people are considerably less than the rest of the country. But I also know kicking the can along isn't good business practice," Haddock said.
The impact of the 18 percent rate rise on individual ratepayers would vary.
"Those with properties with a higher capital value will pay more rates than those with a lower capital value, that is fair."
"We will not … live beyond our means. The government expects us to be financially prudent, and more importantly, so do Coasters. We've worked hard to rebuild council and ensure it is positioned to deliver for the community."
The WCRC's job was to create the environment for the community and businesses to thrive, the chair said.
"Our environment is dynamic … we've been investing heavily in flood protection work to ensure our communities remain safe and businesses can keep operating."
Striking the right balance between development and management of effects was difficult when those effects took a long time to appear or were not fully understood, but the council had to ensure future generations did not have to pay for its mistakes, Haddock said.
As the council completed the flood protection schemes, the costs passed on to the community would significantly reduce, he said.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
30 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Plan to scrap Taranaki polytech's agriculture courses sparks backlash
A tutor at the course said it was great to be able to give people a pathway into the agriculture and farming industries. Photo: David Hancock A proposal to cut agriculture courses at a Taranaki polytech is being described by farmers as "lunacy". It comes as the dismantling of Te Pūkenga would see 10 polytechs revert to regional governance in January. While the others - including the Western Institute of Technology , or WITT, in Taranaki - would remain within Te Pūkenga, and have to prove their financial viability by mid 2026. Part of WITT's proposal involves scrapping its agriculture courses, which tutor Adrian Edser said was worrying as Taranaki was the heart of New Zealand's dairy and farming industry. "I was gutted, I was gobsmacked, as you can imagine it's a very difficult job at times but we're just passionate about being able to give people that pathway into an industry that really looked after us." Edser said the students did a mix of theory and practical education on a working farm in Egmont Village. It helped students move from school to work, with most securing jobs in the industry, he said. Photo: RNZ / Robin Martin Edser did the course himself 30 years ago before starting his farming career. "Most of the farmers that I've talked to, most of the feedback is that it's lunacy, we have to be doing agriculture here," he said. He said he would be compiling feedback on the proposal to try and fight for the course to stay. "I've spoken to a lot of farmers and their feedback has been the same that we need to do be doing what we can, I'm on a crusade to save agriculture and the students." Meanwhile, Lawrence O'Halloran from the Tertiary Education Union said there was no need for the cuts. He said especially as WITT had already reduced its deficit from a forecast $3.6 million to $2.6m. "We don't believe that there is a need to make these cuts, in particular in terms of agriculture. "Taranaki with the tagline like no other, that's how the region markets itself and rightly so, it is like no other especially in terms of agriculture, particularly dairy. "My understanding is 9.5 percent of New Zealand's dairy herd is located in Taranaki, so to have a polytech in Taranaki with no agriculture course, no teaching of agriculture, that is Taranaki like no other in a very bad way." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
30 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Parliament considering big changes to employment law
A protest seeking higher wages for health technicians, outside Parliament in March 2025. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith Parliament has kicked off a three-week sitting block this week, and the first legislative business was initial debates and votes on three new bills. Two are contentious, including a bill to amend current Employment Relations law. Among its measures, it would restrict or even rule out grievance claims, make it harder for contractors to argue they are employees, and remove various rules relating to new employees. The minister in charge of both the bills is ACT MP Brooke van Velden. She described the intent of the Employment Relations Amendment Bill using a variety of common euphemisms (rebalancing, flexible labour markets, greater certainty, competitive business settings), but also described the proposed changes. Below are the major changes, as described by the minister herself, along with comments by opposition MPs. "Currently a contractor can challenge their employment status in law despite being a contractor … To give greater weight to the intention of the contracting parties, the bill establishes a gateway test establishing an exclusion from the definition of 'employee' in the Employment Relations Act." - Brooke van Velden (ACT) "At the moment, there is a test of the real nature of the job … 'is this actually an employment relationship or is it a contracting relationship?' That's what our judges can do at the moment. This bill takes that away. It says if you have the word 'contractor' written in a document, then you're a contractor. Well, this is against all the international examples, this [is] totally different to the common law that applies in many other countries that we compare ourselves to, and is an absolutely disgusting, unprecedented attack on workers' rights." - Camilla Belich (Labour) "I'm introducing a suite of changes to address this imbalance, which are: removing eligibility for any remedies for employees whose behaviour amounts to serious misconduct; removing eligibility for reinstatement into a role and compensation for employees who contribute to the situation that led to the personal grievance; clarifying that the Employment Relations Authority and Employment Court have the full spectrum of remedy reductions - up to 100 percent - available to them; requiring the Authority and Court to consider if the employee's behaviour obstructed the employer's ability to meet their obligations to act as fair and reasonable employers; and increasing the threshold for procedural error to shift the focus solely to whether any errors in the employer's process resulted in the employee being treated unfairly." - Brooke van Velden (ACT) "In an employment relationship, often there is a situation where an employee may do something that is not 100 percent perfect; an employer might do something which is not 100 percent perfect. The situation that they're bringing in says if the employee is anything less than perfect, they can't get their remedies." - Camilla Belich (Labour) "It's going to heighten the workers' vulnerability to be unjustifiably dismissed. And it's great if you have employers that are good, but, unfortunately, this opens the doors, as it does for many situations, for those worst-practising businesses and employers. That's why employees' rights were put in place in the first place. …This gives the employers more power. When you're in a climate where there isn't a heck of a lot of work, that then creates an opportunity for employers to exploit the most vulnerable." - Debbie Ngarewa-Packer (Te Pāti Māori) "This bill introduces an income threshold of $180,000 per annum, above which a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal cannot be pursued. … By making it easier to remove poorly performing managers and executives while giving new talent a chance, I expect to help improve management capability and thereby lift economic performance across New Zealand." - Brooke van Velden (ACT) "The first thing that they're doing is actually making it so anyone earning over $180,000 in New Zealand can be fired at will." - Camilla Belich (Labour) "Currently, if an employer is party to a collective agreement that covers the work of the new employee, an employee's individual employment agreement terms must reflect the terms of the collective agreement for the first 30 days of their employment. This is known as the '30-day rule'. …The bill removes the requirement that the terms of a new employee's employment agreement should reflect the terms of the applicable collective agreement for the first 30 days of employment. …The employer would still need to inform an employee that a collective agreement exists." - Brooke van Velden (ACT) "The 30-day rule acts as a lifeline. It gives kaimahi time to consider union membership before being pressured into an individual agreement. Without this rule, employers could use the divide and rule tactics, which is real - the peer pressure to keep Māori kaimahi, to keep Pasifika kaimahi, to keep those who are not savvy on what their rights are, on weaker contracts from day one. And that's a really tough position to claw back from. It allows employers to opt out of collective conditions on day one, and it creates a race to the bottom." - Debbie Ngarewa-Packer (Te Pāti Māori) The minister in charge of the bill, Brooke van Velden did not mention this aspect of the 30-day rule: that the new law removes any obligation of employers to inform new staff of the option of joining a union, or facilitating that option. "It removes the obligation to provide an active choice in which the employer asks the employee whether they want to join their relevant union and receive that advocacy." - Ginny Andersen (Labour) "We have a regulatory impact statement where all of the information in relation to international obligations is redacted. And why is this? Because we have free-trade agreements with lots of different countries that state that our employment situation should not decrease - and I bet you that that's exactly what it says in this regulatory impact statement. They won't share it with the House." - Camilla Belich (Labour) The Employment Relations Amendment Bill will be considered by the Education and Workforce Committee, which will be asking for public feedback on the bill. *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Second round of FTA talks with India start in Delhi
Trade Minister Todd McClay says both sides are "making meaningful progress". Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone New Zealand has commenced a second round of free trade negotiations with India in New Delhi. "We have been advancing discussions with India since the launch of FTA (free trade agreement) negotiations in March, including in-person talks in Delhi in May, a series of virtual engagements and a second round of negotiations taking place this week," Trade Minister Todd McClay said. "There has been good engagement from both sides, and we're making meaningful progress. "While there's still significant work ahead, both countries are committed to securing a high-quality, commercially meaningful agreement." The negotiations follow Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's trip to India in March, with both countries agreeing to restart free trade negotiations a decade after earlier talks stalled. The previous negotiations, which took place between 2011 and 2015, were hindered by obstacles, particularly around New Zealand's dairy exports. Talks ended after India joined the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which the South Asian nation exited in 2019. India is New Zealand's 12th two-way trading partner, with total trade value reaching $3.14 billion in 2024. India is New Zealand's 25th largest goods export market - valued at $718 million - mainly in forestry and agricultural products, including wool, timber and apples. "The New Zealand-India FTA will create valuable opportunities for both New Zealand and Indian exporters to diversify their export destination and expand two-way trade between our two countries," the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said in an overview of the two nations' relationship on its website.
