logo
Columbia Protester Mahmoud Khalil Freed from ICE Detention

Columbia Protester Mahmoud Khalil Freed from ICE Detention

Yomiuri Shimbun21-06-2025

Former Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil was freed from detention on Friday after a federal judge ordered his release, ruling that the government's efforts to keep him in custody were highly unusual and potentially a form of punishment for his political views.
Khalil was the first noncitizen activist to be arrested and detained by the Trump administration this year as it launched a crackdown on what it said was antisemitism on college campuses.
Khalil, a legal permanent resident, was arrested in New York in March and flown to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in Louisiana. In April, his wife gave birth to their first child, Deen.
U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz of New Jersey said Friday that prosecutors had not provided a legitimate justification for Khalil's continued detention.
The government's bid to keep Khalil detained based on a relatively minor alleged immigration infraction when he is neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community is 'highly, highly, highly unusual,' Farbiarz said.
The facts of the case suggest that there is 'at least something to the underlying claim' that the government is using the immigration system to punish Khalil for his activism, the judge said. 'And of course that would be unconstitutional.'
Just before 8 p.m., Khalil walked out of the detention center in Jena, Louisiana, flanked by his lawyers and wearing a kaffiyeh, a symbol of Palestinian solidarity.
No person 'should actually be detained for protesting a genocide,' Khalil said. 'Justice will prevail.'
The first thing he hopes to do after 104 days in detention, he said, is 'just hug my wife and son.'
The judge's order to release Khalil on bail marks the latest setback for the Trump administration in its pledge to detain and deport what it has termed 'pro-jihadist' students, with federal courts delivering a string of defeats to the government in recent weeks.
One by one, the targeted students and scholars have been released as judges have taken a dim view of the rationale offered by prosecutors for their detentions. The lawyers for the detainees have said their arrests are a form of unconstitutional retaliation for their activism in opposition to the war in Gaza.
Those freed in recent weeks include Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish graduate student grabbed by masked federal agents outside her apartment; Mohsen Mahdawi, a Palestinian student detained at his citizenship interview; and Badar Khan Suri, an Indian scholar at Georgetown University seized outside his home in Virginia.
Federal courts have 'uniformly rejected the Trump administration's efforts to target international students' and green-card holders based on their speech, said Elora Mukherjee, a law professor at Columbia University. Taken together, Mukherjee said, the rulings send a clear message that the administration 'shouldn't be snatching up peaceful protesters and those who write op-eds.'
Khalil had been detained far longer than any other targeted student and has not been accused of any crime.
Instead, officials initially relied on an obscure provision of immigration law to arrest him and launch deportation proceedings.
The provision allows the secretary of state to determine that a noncitizen's presence in the country would harm a 'compelling' foreign policy interest. In a March memo, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that Khalil's participation in 'antisemitic protests' fostered a 'hostile environment for Jewish students' and undermined U.S. foreign policy.
Last month, Farbiarz found that the provision of immigration law cited by Rubio was probably unconstitutional because of its vagueness, and last week, Farbiarz blocked the Trump administration from continuing to detain Khalil on foreign policy grounds.
However, prosecutors subsequently said they were detaining Khalil based on a different rationale, namely their allegation that he had omitted information on his application for permanent residency.
His lawyers deny that claim. Farbiarz also noted previously that the government 'virtually never' detains immigrants solely on that basis.
Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, called Farbiarz a 'rogue district judge' and said Friday's ruling was 'yet another example of how out of control members of the judicial branch are in undermining national security.'
'The Trump administration acted well within its statutory and constitutional authority to detail Khalil,' McLaughlin said in a statement, adding that she expects a higher court to vindicate that position.
While Khalil was released on bail in his federal detention case, his immigration proceeding will continue. On Friday, an immigration judge in Louisiana denied Khalil's request for bond – a decision overruled by Farbiarz's order.
For Khalil and his family, there was relief and exultation. 'We can finally breathe a sigh of relief and know that Mahmoud is on his way home to me and Deen, who never should have been separated from his father,' Noor Abdalla, Khalil's wife and a U.S. citizen, said in a statement.
Khalil was born and raised in a refugee camp in Syria and went to college in Lebanon. He and his wife moved to the United States in 2023 to begin his graduate studies at Columbia. That fall, protests over the Israel-Gaza war erupted.
Khalil was a prominent leader in the protests who interacted with the media without disguising his identity. While President Donald Trump has called him a 'Radical Foreign Pro-Hamas Student,' the government submitted no evidence in the case to back up those assertions. Instead, friends and colleagues described Khalil as someone who defused tensions and acted as an intermediary between student protesters and the university administration.
Several Jewish students at Columbia wrote letters to the court attesting to his commitment to nonviolence and dialogue, and Khalil told CNN last year that 'antisemitism and any form of racism has no place on campus and in this movement.' Khalil missed his graduation from Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs in May because of his detention.
Khalil was freed without any form of GPS monitoring, and ICE officials will return his green card, although they will retain his passport. Under the terms of his release, he will be able to travel to New York, Michigan, New Jersey and Louisiana, as well as to Washington for lobbying and legislative purposes.
Khalil has remained cautious through his long detention and separation from his family, but was ebullient on Friday, his lawyers said.
'It's an enormous relief that Mahmoud's nightmare of arrest and detention is coming to an end,' said Baher Azmy, legal director at the Center for Constitutional Rights and one of Khalil's lawyers, adding that it should not have taken this long to free him.
'Americans should be grateful that there is someone who is willing to fight so hard for our collective First Amendment freedom against this obvious authoritarian tactic that threatens all of us,' Azmy said. 'We all owe a debt of gratitude to Mahmoud.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Transnational Origins of Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry
The Transnational Origins of Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry

The Diplomat

time2 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

The Transnational Origins of Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry

Donald Trump's self-proclaimed 'victory' in his chip war against Taipei is premised on a fundamental misunderstanding of how we got to where we are. TSMC Chairman and CEO C.C. Wei (right) speaks while U.S. President Donald Trump looks on during a joint announcement of a new $100 billion TSMC investment in the United States, Mar. 3, 2025. Nowhere is the logic of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policy more obviously flawed than his attempt to reshore semiconductor manufacturing to the United States. Following Trump's March claim that Taiwan 'stole' its chip industry from the U.S. and his suggestion that Taipei should pay for American protection, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company announced a further $100 billion investment in its Arizona plant. Flanked by TSMC Chairman C.C. Wei at a White House meeting, Trump touted the investment – which will reportedly add new wafer fabs, advanced packaging facilities, and an R&D center to existing infrastructure – as ensuring the 'most advanced AI chips' would now be manufactured in the United States. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said it was proof that Trump's tariff policy was bringing manufacturing and investment back to America. Yet neither of these statements is tenable. At best, the Arizona plant will turn out 3-nanometer chips by 2028, a level Taiwan reached in 2022. For each incremental improvement in the United States and elsewhere, you can be sure Taiwan will have moved commensurately several steps ahead. Echoing the views of industry experts, the Danish policy analyst Jonas Parello-Plesner, a former diplomat stationed in Washington during Trump's first term, has written of his confidence that 'the holy grail' of cutting-edge chips will remain in Taiwan. Based on his conversations with policymakers in Taiwan, there is no way Taipei is relinquishing its silicon shield. As for the idea that the chips industry will 'return' to U.S. shores at any substantive level, few see this as feasible. First there's the obvious issue of cost. 'Making chips at scale in the U.S. is obviously going to be more expensive,' says Honghong Tinn, author of 'Island Tinkerers,' a social history of Taiwan's computer and semiconductor industry. 'So, they would probably need huge subsidies,' continues Tinn, who is also an assistant professor in the Program in the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. In fact, a subsidy of at least $6.6 billion was already in place under the CHIPS and Science Act (often shortened to the CHIPS Act), a bipartisan law passed under the Biden administration in 2022. The act oversaw the first stage of TSMC's Arizona plant, with $65 billion invested to establish the initial fabs at the site. While the precise details are murky, many analysts have argued that further investments in and development of the site were covered by the initial agreement reached under the law. Absent any details to differentiate it from the provisions and deals that were already in place under the CHIPS Act, there is no indication of how the Trump administration intends to bring back chip manufacturing to the United States. 'Trump's decisions show not only that he doesn't trust foreign countries, including Taiwan, but also that he doesn't understand his own Silicon Valley that well,' says Chang Kuo-hui, a professor and research fellow at National Taiwan University's Graduate Institute of National Development.

Trump Touches a Raw Nerve in Delhi
Trump Touches a Raw Nerve in Delhi

The Diplomat

time3 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

Trump Touches a Raw Nerve in Delhi

The U.S. president has not only disregarded Indian sensitivities with his recent comments on mediation but is also cozying up to Pakistan. India's relationship with the United States is under strain. On June 18, Trump hosted Pakistani Army Chief Gen Asim Munir for a lunch meeting at the White House. While his courting of Munir was probably aimed at enlisting Pakistan's support for U.S. military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and sealing deals on cryptocurrency and trade in critical minerals, the meeting is likely to have involved discussions and decisions that will impact India. 'There would have been a quid pro quo,' an Indian government official told The Diplomat on condition of anonymity. 'Trump would have agreed to provide Pakistan with new military aid and to boost its military capabilities through the sale of advanced fighter aircraft, among other things. Given Trump's newfound interest in mediation and peace-making, he could have promised Munir that he would push India to accept a settlement of the Kashmir conflict.' Trump's meeting with Munir came days after General Michael Kurilla, commander of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), described Pakistan as a 'phenomenal partner' of the U.S. in countering terrorism and praised its role in the 'arrest and extradition' of Islamic State Khorasan terrorists. Kurilla's high praise of Pakistan's contribution as a counter-terrorism partner marks an important shift in the Trump administration's perception of Pakistan. In 2017, Trump had slammed Pakistan for providing 'safe havens for terrorist organizations, the Taliban, and other groups that pose a threat to the region and beyond.' Although the U.S. had given Pakistan billions of dollars in aid, 'they are housing the very terrorists that we are fighting,' he said. The Trump administration's newfound appreciation of Pakistan's value in countering terrorism comes at a time when India has stepped up highlighting Islamabad's role in supporting anti-India terrorism. The U.S. support to India on this matter has disappointed Delhi in recent months. Although the U.S. expressed solidarity with India after the terrorist attack at Pahalgam on April 22, it did not support India's right to self-defense once India's launched military strikes on Pakistan, adopting instead a cautious, even neutral position, calling for a quick end to the military exchanges. Despite India's opposition to third parties intervening in India-Pakistan conflicts, the U.S. reportedly brokered the May 10 ceasefire. Not only did the ceasefire come at a time when the war was going against Pakistan, but also, Trump repeatedly boasted about having mediated the agreement and arm-twisting the two sides with trade deals to end the war. This did not go down well in India. Trump hyphenated or equated India with Pakistan, which Delhi loathes. Besides, he put the Narendra Modi government in an embarrassing spot as India has traditionally opposed third-party mediation in its conflicts with Pakistan. In effect, the U.S. president 'undermined carefully developed political understandings on key issues, especially on Kashmir and Pakistan,' C. Raja Mohan, distinguished fellow at the Council for Strategic and Defence Research, wrote in the Indian Express. Among the 'understandings' that Trump disregarded with his 'loose cannon comments was India's long-standing opposition to third parties playing a role in settling India-Pakistan conflicts,' the government official said. Washington's praise of Pakistan's counterterrorism efforts was particularly offensive to New Delhi as it came less than two months after the Pahalgam attack. Trump's courting of the Pakistani military, which India sees as the patrons of the anti-India terrorist groups, was particularly distasteful. 'Public opinion in India now tends to see the U.S. as an unreliable partner,' Ajay Bisaria, a former Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan, told DW. It wasn't supposed to be this way. Trump's re-election as president was welcomed in India. Trump 2.0 was expected to work in India's favor. After all, despite bilateral differences on the Russia-Ukraine war and hiccups on immigration and trade issues, India-U.S. bilateral relations warmed during Trump's first term, benefiting from not only the personal rapport between Trump and Modi but also the strong bipartisan consensus that existed in the U.S. on the importance of India-U.S. cooperation. With Trump back in the White House, India-U.S. relations were expected to deepen, especially since the new Trump team had several officials of Indian origin or said to be closer to India on India-Pakistan issues. However, things have not gone according to that script. Since February, thousands of Indian nationals have been deported back to India for illegally entering the U.S. They were sent back in chains on a 40-hour flight home. Indian foreign ministry officials reportedly objected to their shackling and raised the issue with their American counterparts. But that did not alter the U.S. mistreatment and humiliation of Indian nationals. Then, with regard to the imposition of 'reciprocal tariffs' on U.S. trade partners, Trump showed India no leniency. While the 26 percent tariff imposed on India is lower than that on several Asian countries, the U.S. has sealed a deal with China. With little over a week to go for the July 9 deadline, a trade deal with India remains elusive. Should India be worried about the downturn in its relations with the U.S.? Not overly. The U.S. has warmed up to Pakistan and its generals in the past as well, and India has weathered previous crises that emerged from fraying ties with Washington. Besides, the India-U.S. partnership today enjoys bipartisan consensus in the U.S., and draws its resilience and strength from the firm institutional foundation, shared strategic vision, converging interests and structural logic that defines the partnership. U.S. national security documents not only see India as a 'major defense partner' but also as a 'like-minded partner and leader in South Asia and the Indian Ocean, active in and connected to Southeast Asia,' and a 'driving force of the Quad and a net security provider in the region.' The U.S. is no doubt important for India, but so is India to the U.S. In its response to the Trump-Munir meeting, India said last week that it is 'confident' that India's relations with the U.S. would continue to be the 'most consequential partnership of the 21st century.' 'Our partnership with the United States is wide ranging, grounded in shared democratic values and growing strategic convergence,' MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. This confidence stems from the broad and deep foundation on which the India-U.S. partnership is based. And yet India must not underestimate Trump's capacity to damage bilateral relations in pursuit of his interests. Without responding shrilly to every remark that he makes, India should be proactive in protecting the partnership. While the White House plays a central role in foreign policy making, there are other actors, including the U.S. Congress, business corporations, civil society and the Indian diaspora, whose support India must draw upon. The powerful Indian diaspora is known to have played a key role in swinging U.S. foreign policy decisions in India's favor in the past, as with the India-U.S. civilian nuclear deal. Unfortunately, it has been reduced to playing cheerleaders at Modi-Trump public events in recent years. Instead, India should draw on the diaspora's connections to articulate not the narrow vision of any party or person, but the long-term interests of the country.

Kyodo News Digest: June 30, 2025
Kyodo News Digest: June 30, 2025

Kyodo News

time5 hours ago

  • Kyodo News

Kyodo News Digest: June 30, 2025

KYODO NEWS - 6 hours ago - 15:00 | All, Japan, World The following is the latest list of selected news summaries by Kyodo News. ---------- Japan gov't says China's lifting of import ban on seafood "positive" TOKYO - China's removal of its blanket import ban on Japanese seafood implemented in August 2023 is a "positive" move, a government spokesman said Monday. Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki said the government will continue to urge China to remove the remaining ban on fisheries produce from 10 prefectures including Fukushima imposed since the March 2011 nuclear disaster. ---------- Trump shows no willingness to compromise on Japan auto tariffs WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump made clear in an interview broadcast Sunday that he has no plans to roll back hefty auto tariffs imposed on Japan, despite its strong opposition expressed in now-stalled negotiations. Trump said his administration is ready to unilaterally send letters "starting pretty soon" to Japan and many other trading partners informing them of tariff rates for their exports to the United States. ---------- Japan PM to consider best governing framework after July poll TOKYO - Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Sunday he will consider what will be "the most appropriate" framework for his coalition government after a crucial election next month for the House of Councillors where his ruling coalition is seeking to retain its majority. In an interview with Kyodo News, Ishiba called securing a majority of the 248-member upper chamber a "must-attain" goal but said it is not an easy task, at a time when conservative supporters are increasingly looking to alternatives to his Liberal Democratic Party. ---------- Japan's May industrial output up 0.5% on strong production machinery TOKYO - Japan's industrial output in May rose 0.5 percent from the previous month, marking the first increase in two months, lifted in part by metal molds used in vehicle manufacturing and other production machinery, government data showed Monday. The seasonally adjusted index of production at factories and mines stood at 101.8 against the 2020 base of 100, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said in a preliminary report. It followed a revised 1.1 percent decrease in April. ---------- Dozens sent to hospital near Tokyo after student sprays "insecticide" YOKOHAMA - Dozens of people were taken to a hospital from a high school near Tokyo on Monday after a student exposed them to what he claimed was an "insecticide" spray, police said. None of those affected are thought to be seriously injured, local police in Zama, Kanagawa Prefecture, said. The student at Sagami-Koyokan Senior High School told the police he "jokingly sprayed" the substance, they added. ---------- Harley-Davidson Japan faces fine over excessive sales quotas TOKYO - Japan's antitrust watchdog is set to fine the domestic unit of motorcycle company Harley-Davidson Inc. around 200 million yen ($1.4 million) for imposing excessive sales quotas on dealers in violation of the antimonopoly law, sources close to the matter have said. The Japan Fair Trade Commission will also issue a cease and desist order to Harley-Davidson Japan K.K., based in Tokyo, over pressuring dealers by implying their exclusive sales contracts might not be renewed if they failed to meet the quotas, leading some to buy unsold motorcycles themselves. ---------- China to invite Trump to Sept. military parade marking WWII victory BEIJING - China is planning to invite U.S. President Donald Trump to a military parade scheduled for Sept. 3 in Beijing's Tiananmen Square to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, sources familiar with the matter said Sunday. The United States, meanwhile, has proposed that Chinese President Xi Jinping visit the country during the same month, coinciding with a U.N. General Assembly meeting in New York, the sources said. ---------- Sumo: Onosato aims to buck trend, win Nagoya meet in yokozuna debut ANJO, Japan - Newly promoted Onosato said Monday he aims to win the upcoming Nagoya Grand Sumo Tournament as a yokozuna debutant and add his name to the small group of wrestlers to achieve the feat. The 25-year-old star will compete for the first time as a grand champion at the 15-day tournament opening July 13 at the new IG Arena. Video: Mt. Shinmoe eruption in southwestern Japan

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store