Letters, June 26
Opinion
Double standard?
In Tuesday's Business section (June 24), there was a story on page B7 about B.C. billionaire and aspiring department store tycoon Ruby Liu (Hudson's Bay receives approval for sale of three leases to B.C. mall owner). In it, The Canadian Press reporter Tara Deschamps described Liu as 'a striking figure, clad in a hot pink and lime green floral shirt with a black blazer and paired with dark boots and a white Louis Vuitton purse' when she appeared at a recent Ontario Superior Court date in Toronto.
Directly below it on the same page was a story about Tesla CEO Elon Musk, another billionaire with ties to Canada (Musk bets robotaxis will give Tesla needed public lift).
Try as I might, however, I could not find a single sentence The Associated Press reporter Bernard Condon wrote about what Musk was wearing when he made his comments about driverless Tesla robotaxis. Musk's signature MAGA ball caps were not even mentioned!
Why the double standard? It couldn't possibly be because Ruby Liu is a woman, could it?
Nigel Moore
Winnipeg
Merge to the left? No.
Re: The Tory future may lie with the Liberals, Deveryn Ross, Think Tank, June 24
The notion that Manitoba's Progressive Conservative party must abandon its conservative principles and effectively merge with the Liberals under a new centrist banner not only defies political logic, it also betrays the core identity of the party itself.
The PC party was founded on conservative values of fiscal responsibility, respect for tradition, individual freedom and support for strong families and communities. It is those values that many Manitobans want as their representative. Substituting in Liberal-lite policies under the guise of 'competitiveness' isn't a solution; it's a capitulation that would only alienate our base without guaranteeing broader appeal.
The last federal election reminded us how easy it is to write political obituaries — but it also proved that new leadership can reinvigorate a discouraged base.
Conservatives are very much alive in Manitoba and Winnipeg; we're not some relic for a museum display. While we recognize that there are relationships to rebuild and forgiveness to seek, that hard work is already underway.
Obby Khan's apology in the legislature for the landfill failures, along with deputy leader Jeff Bereza's face-to-face apology to National Chief Cindy Woodhouse, are signs of that effort. Hard work is hard for a reason, but it matters.
I want to see this work continue, and I believe a strong, principled Conservative alternative can and will emerge in Manitoba.
Vanya Reimer
St. Norbert
Scam the scammer
The next time you receive a suspected scam phone call, do not immediately hang up. Listen to the caller and then calmly say, 'This phone call is being recorded for police tracking purposes. PLEASE DO NOT HANG UP.'
Believe me, they will hang up. If they do, it was a scam call. Works for me, twice in the past few days.
Barry Hadfield
Winnipeg
Trees needed
Re: Delay, delay and yet more city delays by Erna Buffie, Think Tank, June 23.
Erna Buffie, I am with you. I'm sure you feel that you are butting your head against a brick wall in a number of important areas with regard to city services.
The city is dragging its feet in establishing a City Trees Bylaw.
Like Erna, I feel that trees on public property should be protected, but also those on private property, unless there is a very good reason for them to be cut down. Our city is losing its trees at a very rapid rate; we need them now more than ever to help reduce the effects of climate change, which is the main reason for raging forest fires all over the province.
If seven other Canadian cities can pass this type of bylaw, why can't Winnipeg?
Also, we should not stall in applying for grants to buy land for parks and green spaces. These are so important to our city for young, old and all those in between. So are safe walking and bike paths. The Climate Action Plan adopted by the city seven years ago, which includes improving active transportation routes, should also be implemented as soon as possible.
After all, 2030, the year the city hopes to reach its climate action goals, is right on our doorstep; there is no more time for delays!
Marlene Beaty
Winnipeg
No to perks
Re: A provincial office in Washington makes sense, Dec. 17 – Kinew set to name U.S. trade envoy, June 19 – Kinew hires new trade rep, June 24
I agree a provincial trade office in Washington, D.C. makes sense, especially during this time of tariff threats and trade turmoil. Being onsite and able to meet with people in person is likely going to be really important if Manitoba's interests are to be properly represented and presented.
I also think the choice of the trade representative is an interesting and perhaps inspired one: Alberta-raised, dual U.S./Canadian citizenship, has worked as a reporter in Winnipeg, Ottawa, and Washington. Lots of life and work experience on how things work where it matters.
However, in light of all the things we need to spend money on here, from infrastructure to home care and health care to affordable housing, I strongly suggest that it should be a low-budget affair. Not more staff than is really needed, no outrageous salaries or perks, no unnecessary travel (and when necessary, not in business class), and no palatial residences and swank offices.
This is, after all, about public service.
Gerald Farthing
Winnipeg
Safety first
Regarding Tom Brodbeck's column on the major changes coming to Winnipeg Transit this Sunday (Curtain rising on long-overdue transit overhaul; will traffic-weary drivers hop aboard?).
He makes important points about the need for change, but fails to mention the major issue causing people to ride less; public perception of transit safety.
No improvement to frequency of service will matter if users are afraid while riding the bus.
Neil Coligan
Winnipeg
No secrets
Re: Due process followed, Letters to the Editor, June 24
Ian McIntyre is correct that the provincial council of the Manitoba Teachers' Society is the supreme decision-making authority for MTS. However, the provincial council must exercise that power within its bylaws.
Those bylaws give the authority to hire the executive director to the provincial executive. The bylaws also provide the provincial council the authority to suspend a bylaw, but this requires unanimous consent.
Given the controversy surrounding the recent decision of provincial council to directly hire the executive director, some of it coming from those who were delegates, I am surprised that there was unanimous consent on bylaw suspension.
All this may not matter to retired members such as myself, but I'm certain it does matter to many of the 16,000 dedicated active members, as they contribute more than $15 million in annual dues with an expectation for an organization committed to transparency and not having secrets.
James Bedford
Winnipeg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Clothes with colours that marry science, nature and design
These in-their-own-words pieces are told to Patricia Lane and co-edited with input from the interviewee for the purpose of brevity. Roya Aghighi partners with microbes and other living organisms to design and manufacture colours. This 34-year-old from Vancouver co-founded Lite-1 to harness the power of microorganisms to transform organic waste into sustainable, eco-friendly colourants at scale. It won the 2025 Web Summit Vancouver's PITCH competition for early stage start-ups. Tell us about your project. Imagine clothes that change colour or paintings that evolve or buildings that change hues with the position of the sun! Biofabrication means going beyond usual norms to build the perfect marriage between science, nature and design. Lite-1 works with, rather than against, natural systems to make colourants. In a process similar to brewing beer, our emerging technologies, including synthetic biology and biofabrication microbes, turn waste into clean colourants while repurposing thousands of tonnes of waste into microbial food and away from landfills, preventing significant methane emissions. Once scaled, we will prevent vast quantities of harmful, toxic dyes and protect billions of litres of fresh water from contamination. Our closed-loop, fully circular system will eliminate the harmful effects of working with the toxic chemicals currently used in making colourants. No petrochemicals will be needed. We are starting by supplying the fashion industry, but our products can be used for any application, from house paint to food dyes. Lite-1 is creating high-quality jobs in Canada's innovative bio-tech sector. Our customers will benefit from reduced energy consumption and avoid taxes imposed by the European Union on products that rely on pollution for their manufacture. Roya Aghighi partners with microbes and other living organisms to design and manufacture colours. This 34-year-old from Vancouver co-founded Lite-1 to harness microorganisms to transform organic waste into sustainable, eco-friendly colourants. Backed by reputable investors, we work with major global manufacturers and brands and will launch our product shortly. How did you get into this work? Growing up in Tehran, I could often taste the pollution in the air. My mother is a fashion designer and I have always been interested in the industry. I began as a designer but was distressed by the environmental and social costs of manufacturing beautiful clothes. Fashion is our second skin — a truly intimate connection with the material world and colour is so important. But I was not satisfied to be part of a system that clothed and beautified us at the expense of other people and the environment. I invented Biogarmentry, clothes that are alive and photosynthesize like plants. One day, an accidental contamination in my lab showed me that tiny organisms can create beautiful colours. At the same time, my co-founder Sarah Graham had a similar experience in her lab. She was harnessing the power of microorganisms to manufacture pearls and witnessed the promising capabilities of bacteria as a source for colour production. We decided to join forces to use natural systems to overhaul colour manufacturing. We now grow colours at the lab in non-environmentally invasive processes, instead of relying on non-renewable, toxic resources. We are transforming the colour industry so beauty and function coexist harmoniously. What makes it hard? Start-ups mean everyone wears many hats and there is never enough time. I have the privilege of working with a team who bring their top-flight education and skills to their passion for making the world safer, and our shared understanding that we are running out of time. What worries you? Of course, I worry about the animals facing extinction and the accelerating impacts of climate change. But more than anything, I worry that all the hard work we've poured into solutions will be erased, dismissed or delayed until it's too late to tackle the big issues. I worry we're becoming a passive society, quietly accepting rules and limits imposed by those who show no real care for building a safer, more just future for everyone. What gives you hope? The next generation is astounding in their knowledge of the challenge and their capacity to imagine creative solutions. What would you like to say to other young people? Curiosity is a superpower. Don't accept that things are the way they have to stay. Consider the source of the information you are given. Dig deep for your own answers. Consider the reality that the natural world can help us if we let it. What about older readers? While many of our choices feel limited, we can still choose to pause and ask deeper questions: What systems am I supporting? What are the unseen consequences of this choice now, in the near future, and for the generations to come? Awareness starts with curiosity, and even small moments of reflection can ripple into real change.
Canada News.Net
3 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Access to Nature Shouldn't Be a Privilege
In Canadian politics, few ideas cut across party lines as cleanly as how much we love nature. Policies on protecting our environment-and opinions about what harms it-vary widely. But you can bet that any campaign ad, throne speech or holiday message is likely to include a reference to the Maple Leaf along with the Rocky Mountains, our prairies and forests, the Great Lakes, our coastlines or the High Arctic. Nature is used as a kind of shorthand for who we are and what we value, writes Mathieu Roy for Policy Options. But, he adds, when a new government puts that belief as a core item in its agenda, as Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberals appear to have done, we must ask: What does it mean to say nature is central to Canadian identity and what would it take to translate that into reality? This is not just a philosophical question. It's a call to action. If we take the claim seriously-and we should-it carries at least three practical obligations: expanding access to nature for all Canadians, protecting more of the land that defines us, and building natural infrastructure, like parks and trails, to connect us to nature-and each other. Most Canadians agree that nature is part of who we are, as evidenced in a recent poll by EKOS, a public-opinion research firm. But for many, being able to enjoy nature daily is limited or out of reach. Urbanization, neighbourhoods with few parks, trails that can only be reached easily with a car and the rising cost of living make it harder for people to experience the physical and mental benefits of time spent outdoors. If nature is a core part of our identity, access to it shouldn't be a privilege. It should be a right. That means investing in public spaces that bring nature closer to where people live, including more green spaces, trails and community-led outdoor programming. Such funding is fundamental to fostering a deeper connection with nature, promoting belonging, improving health and supporting local culture. To protect nature-a pillar of the Liberal campaign platform in the April election-we need more than regulations. Under a global biodiversity framework agreed to in 2022 at the COP15 conference in Montreal, Canada has committed to increasing access to green spaces (forests, parks and agricultural land) and blue spaces (lakes, rivers and wetlands), especially in urban areas. It has also promised to integrate nature into how we live plan and build. This target recognizes that people need to care about nature to protect it and are more likely to do so when nature is a part of their everyday lives. No government can achieve this goal alone. Partnerships with Indigenous communities, non-profit organizations and local experts play an important role in supporting a connection to nature and making conservation a mainstream, dinner-table subject. We need to build natural infrastructure that reflects who we are and what we care about. Prioritizing the country's network of trails is a strong example. They support low-carbon transportation, protect green spaces, act as firebreaks during climate emergencies, provide corridors for wildlife and stimulate local economies. These aren't soft benefits. They are measurable returns on public investment and serve to anchor nature in our daily lives. The ecological benefits of the Trans Canada Trail are valued at an estimated $82 million annually. On top of that are the health benefits for the 2.6 million Canadian adults who use it, estimated to save $1.7 billion in health-care costs. Too often treated as an afterthought, this kind of infrastructure unites a country and reflects public values. It deserves centre stage in our national vision. National parks systems, trail networks or innovative public transportation routes all illustrate how shared infrastructure can transcend utility and become a source of collective pride. The Carney government has an opportunity to lead on this front by championing projects that not only connect Canadians but embody our shared values and reflect our deep connection to the land. Investing in the relationship between people and nature is one of the most powerful and unifying choices the new government can make if it wants to fulfil its promise to protect the environment, grow our economy and embrace our national identity. That means going beyond a mention of the Maple Leaf during question period. It means working to embed nature into the lives of Canadians through improved access, robust protection and sustainable development.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Is Canada now free of internal trade barriers? Read the fine print
OTTAWA – Federal and provincial leaders are working to dismantle internal trade barriers that push up the cost of goods and make it harder to do business within Canada. But anyone expecting all of them to be gone by tomorrow should read the fine print. Throughout the spring federal election campaign, Liberal Leader Mark Carney repeatedly vowed to 'eliminate' interprovincial trade barriers and create 'free trade by Canada Day.' The rhetoric has been at times confusing and the political scorecard on this one is hard to track. With July 1 just a day away, Carney's government has passed its planned changes into law — but it's more like the start of a conversation than the final word. 'It's a starting gun and it's starting a lot more activity and work, which is honestly the really exciting part,' said internal trade expert Ryan Manucha. 'If any of this was easy, it would have been done.' Manucha writes on the topic for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think tank and authored the book, 'Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada's Quest for Interprovincial Trade.' 'When I'm advising governments, I say, 'Don't think of this as a light switch,'' he said. 'We are changing the way that everyone approaches the concept of regulation and risk here, and so it's going to take some time.' The rush to break down internal barriers to trade comes in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war with Canada. One study estimates that existing internal trade hurdles cost the economy some $200 billion a year. Manucha said Canada has talked about this problem for decades but is only addressing it seriously now — and it would 'never have happened had we not had Trump.' He said the introduction of the Carney government's bill on internal trade was 'incredible to see' because the idea was just 'an academic theory maybe even as little as eight months ago.' Bill C-5, the omnibus bill that reduces federal restrictions on interprovincial trade and also speeds up permitting for large infrastructure projects, became law on June 26. An analysis of the law by McMillan Vantage says that 'this legislation would not achieve' the elimination of all internal trade barriers. When Carney made his campaign promise, he was talking about cutting red tape put up by the federal government — not the rules set by the provinces, which have the most authority in this area. The prime minister described this effort as a sort of quid pro quo with the provinces. 'We're getting rid of a bunch of duplicative federal regulations. We're going to have a principle of one project, one review — and in exchange, they're going to agree to eliminate all the barriers to trade and labour mobility,' Carney said at a rally in Kitchener, Ont., on March 26. 'The federal government committed that we will sweep away all of our impediments by Canada Day. Free trade by Canada Day.' But Canada's internal trade barriers won't all be eliminated by then — not even all the federal ones. Canada's supply management system for dairy products, which sets provincial production quotas, will remain in place. Quebec also retains language requirements that will stay in place. Credit unions have complained that the new law does not break down barriers to their expansion into multiple provinces. Bill C-5 aligns federal requirements for goods and services with provincial ones if they cross provincial or territorial borders. It allows the provincial requirement to replace a federal one if the rules are 'comparable.' Ottawa likes to point to energy efficiency standards. A washing machine made in B.C. that meets the provincial standard still needs to meet additional federal standards before it can be sold in Alberta or Ontario. But this new law means the B.C. standard would replace the federal one. The law also eliminates redundant licensing requirements for labourers. Federal regulators would have to recognize provincial occupational certifications. So just how many federal barriers does the bill eliminate? That's hard to sort out. A lot of the details will have to wait until regulations are drafted — a process that will involve consultations with affected industries. 'I don't really know what this legislation could end up doing because a lot of veto power, a lot a discretion still rests with the regulatory authorities,' Manucha said. 'According to the text of that legislation, it would seem like meat inspection would come off. Is (the Canadian Food Inspection Agency) really going to allow for interprovincial trade and inspection of meat coming from non-federally licensed abattoirs? I don't know.' There is no comprehensive list of existing internal trade barriers. Even some lobby groups have told parliamentarians they don't know how many barriers their own industries face. There isn't even consensus on what all counts as a trade barrier. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'In the provincial legislation in Ontario, they're talking for many occupations having a 30-day service standard for how long it'll take for credentials to be recognized,' Manucha said. 'Nova Scotia, meanwhile, is on the 10-day turnaround time. That's less than a third. Can you call the 30-day versus 10-day a trade barrier?' Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, who has repeatedly stated that most of the barriers are at the provincial level, testified to the Senate that she will meet with her provincial counterparts on July 8 to discuss next steps. One major obstacle is in Freeland's crosshairs: Canada's patchwork of interprovincial trucking regulations. 'One of three areas that I will be putting on the agenda at that meeting is trucking,' she said on June 16. 'It should be a lot easier than it is to drive a truck from Halifax to Vancouver. We need to get rid of conflicting requirements.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025.
