logo
Exclusive Trump's tariff plan signals historic break from global trade: Yergin

Exclusive Trump's tariff plan signals historic break from global trade: Yergin

Al Arabiya02-04-2025
A new tariff regime set to be unveiled within hours by US President Donald Trump marks what may be the single most dramatic break from the global economic order since the end of World War II. According to renowned author and economic historian Daniel Yergin, we are witnessing a 'reversal of an eight or nine decade trend' away from free trade, ushering in a new era defined by tariff walls, trade nationalism, and protectionism.
Speaking to Al Arabiya News' Hadley Gamble on the eve of what is expected to be a major announcement from Trump detailing a sweeping new American tariff regime, Yergin warned that the assumptions underpinning decades of global economic integration were now being overturned.
'I've heard the Secretary of Commerce say what we want to do is build a tariff wall around the United States,' said Yergin. 'We're kind of going back to the years of William McKinley at the end of the 19th century, which was a very complicated time because you had a couple of major financial panics at the same time.'
Yergin, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and Vice Chairman of S&P Global, is one of the most influential voices in energy and geopolitics. His books, including The Prize, The Quest, and The New Map, are considered foundational texts for understanding global energy systems and their geopolitical implications.
'What we're seeing,' he added, 'is a reversal of an eight or nine-decade trend that began in 1934 under Franklin Roosevelt… to a view that the United States has been taken advantage [of], even though the United States has been doing better than any of the other industrial nations. And so we're at a great turn in history.'
This new period of economic nationalism, Yergin said, is deeply intertwined with the US-China rivalry. He noted that protectionist instincts were already present during the Biden administration but have become more pronounced under Trump.
'The Biden administration was also rather protectionist… famously, Joe Biden did not invite Tesla and Elon Musk to the electric vehicle summit at the White House in 2021, allegedly because it was not a union shop,' he said.
The tariffs are likely to reshape global supply chains and the future of advanced manufacturing. But Yergin cautioned that while announcements of new American factories abound, the jobs may not follow.
'The factories that will be built – this is an age of robotics. They're not going to be bringing jobs. This is not going to take us back to Detroit or Cleveland or Youngstown, Ohio. These are going to be different types of factories.'
Yergin described the unfolding trade war as part of a much broader 'great recalibration' – a moment in which countries are being forced to re-evaluate not only their trading relationships, but also their energy systems, economic structures, and geopolitical alignments.
On the energy front, Yergin delivered a sobering assessment. 'The energy transition is in need of a major rethink,' he told Gamble. 'A lot of the expectations, a lot of the planning, a lot of the spending was really crystallized during COVID, when demand was down and prices were down… And the consequence of that is that you had these straight lines, linear lines, that went to 2050 net zero, when almost half the world's emissions were not even covered by them.'
Far from displacing fossil fuels, he argued, the rise of renewables has come alongside a resurgence in oil and coal.
'2024 wind and solar were at the highest levels they ever were. 2024 oil and coal were at the highest levels they were ever. And natural gas would have been there, except for Russia's invasion of Ukraine,' he said.
Despite enormous political capital invested in green agendas, the numbers tell a different story: 'In the latest data we had – in 2022, 81 percent of the world's energy was hydrocarbons. In 2023 it was 80.5 percent. A one half of 1 percent change.'
That sluggish progress, Yergin explained, is not merely a failure of will, but a reflection of scale and feasibility.
'The numbers used for the Baku UN conference would say about 5 percent of world GDP over a number of years has to be spent [on the transition]. Now, developing countries don't have 5 percent of their GDP.'
Even developed nations are constrained.
'In Washington… there's this problem of this $36.5 trillion debt where the interest payments are greater than defense spending. So, you know, just the money's not there to do [it] on scale.'
Added to that, the growing electricity demands of artificial intelligence threaten to increase fossil fuel reliance.
'We saw this at the [CERAWeek] energy conference – electricity for AI. And in the United States, that means more natural gas going into it.'
Yergin warned that all these dynamics point to an energy future that is messy, uneven, and politically fraught.
'The notion that you're just going to draw a line and get to net zero by 2035 – that's why we say the energy transition is going to be multi-dimensional. It's going to unfold at different paces in different regions, with different mixes of technology and of critical importance, different priorities by different governments.'
Those different priorities are already leading to divergent strategies. In Europe, the rise of populism is fueling a backlash against regulatory excess and green targets.
'You're going to see it a lot in the battles over the budget, and you're also going to see it in the rise of the populist parties.'
Russia, according to Yergin, wasn't without its problems either. Sanctions had not stopped the war economy. It had, however, said Yergin, driven Moscow into the arms of Beijing.
'Russia's basically become an economic dependency of China,' he said.
Yergin concluded by reiterating his view, the world had entered an unpredictable new phase. The long-dominant assumptions about free trade, clean energy, and global integration are now under siege.
'It is recalibrating and reassessing and recognizing that those simple graphs that go to 2050 – [that] is not the way the world's going to go,' he stated.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Morally repugnant': US Cardinal hits out at Trump's immigration policy
‘Morally repugnant': US Cardinal hits out at Trump's immigration policy

Saudi Gazette

time37 minutes ago

  • Saudi Gazette

‘Morally repugnant': US Cardinal hits out at Trump's immigration policy

ROME — A prominent Catholic Church leader and ally of Pope Leo XIV has strongly criticized the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, describing the rounding up and deportation of immigrants as 'inhumane' and 'morally repugnant.' In a wide-ranging interview with CNN, Cardinal Robert McElroy, the Archbishop of Washington, DC, also voiced strong opposition to Trump's major tax and spending bill, warned of the risks of US and Israeli strikes on Iran, and discussed his view of the role of women in the church. 'It's right to be able to control our borders. However, what's going on now is something far beyond that,' the cardinal told CNN on Tuesday. 'It is a mass, indiscriminate deportation of men and women and children and families which literally rips families apart and is intended to do so.' McElroy was appointed to lead the archdiocese in the US capital by Pope Francis in January, the month of Donald Trump's presidential inauguration. He was among the more than 100 cardinals who took part in the conclave that elected the first American pope in May. McElroy, who spoke to CNN in Rome on the same day that Trump visited a migrant detention center in Florida known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' said the 'mechanism' being used was the 'creation of fear' among 10 million undocumented people in the US – 'the great majority' of whom had worked hard and contributed to society. 'This is simply not only incompatible with Catholic teaching, it's inhumane and is morally repugnant,' he added. 'The scenes that occurred in Los Angeles where you saw mass agents of the government descending on car washers and Costco parking lots to round up whoever they can round up is not a sign of going after those who have criminal convictions.' Trump has said his tough immigration policies are necessary to keep criminals off US streets and to ease the burden on US institutions. He has embraced the sinister image of a migrant detention facility surrounded by swampland and reptiles. 'It's known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which is very appropriate, because I look outside and it's not a place I want to go,' Trump said Tuesday. McElroy argued that the government had a right to deport people convicted of 'serious crimes,' adding that the problems with immigration were rooted in an American political system that had failed to address immigration law and reform over the last 15 years. But McElroy said people were now 'afraid even to go to church' after the Trump administration removed the policy that prohibited immigration agents from making arrests in sensitive areas, like churches. 'What is behind this?' he asked, referencing the stricter immigration policies and enforcement tactics. 'I fear that one of the main things behind it, in the minds of many who are pushing it, is the sense that the people who are coming to our country now are of a different kind. 'And that's been a great theme in American culture and history all through our country's immigration, when the Irish came, when the Italians came, when the Poles came, the refrain has been the same, 'these are inferior people,' and that's what's going on now... it's an outrage.' The cardinal, a former Bishop of San Diego, is one of several Catholic bishops who have spoken out against Trump's migration policies. But Vice President JD Vance, a devout Catholic who converted in 2019, earlier this year suggested the bishops' criticisms of the Trump administration's policies were motivated by financial interests because the church receives federal funding to resettle immigrants. McElroy hit back in the interview, saying the government funding was far from sufficient to cover the programs and the church had to pick up the shortfall. 'Those who say that haven't done the math on what the church has been contributing over and above what the government has contributed to these programs,' he added. Since his election, Pope Leo has urged respect for migrants, describing himself as 'the descendant of immigrants, who in turn chose to emigrate.' McElroy said that while Leo XIV spoke about immigration in a 'universal' context, 'when you look at what he's saying, it has clear implications for us.' During the interview, Cardinal McElroy also criticized Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' – a sweeping piece of legislation that would extend tax cuts and increase funding for national security, partly paid for by the biggest cut to the federal social safety net in decades. He's recently signed a letter with other bishops and faith leaders opposing the bill. He said it appeared that millions would 'ultimately lose their health care because of this bill so that billionaires can receive greater tax cuts,' adding: 'There's something radically wrong with a society that takes from the poorest to give to the wealthiest. It's just wrong.' In a statement, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson rejected the criticism – particularly that leveled at the Trump agenda bill. 'The American people elected President Trump, not a DC Archbishop, to serve as their President,' Jackson said. 'President Trump is fulfilling the mandate the American people gave him in November to turn his campaign promises – like no tax on tips, social security, and overtime – into law. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill will be one of the most successful pieces of legislation ever passed and will supercharge our economy to benefit all Americans.' When it came to church reforms and priorities for Pope Leo, McElroy talked about the importance of addressing the role of women. He said this topic had been an 'immensely powerful current' during recent Vatican assemblies, the synod, which looked at questions of church renewal and looked at how to include more women in decision making roles. 'The major thrust has to be look at where women 'aren't' and then ask why?' McElroy supports ordaining women as deacons, who carry out functions like a priest but without saying Mass or hearing confessions, which he says is consistent with the church's theology. 'It's a controversial question within the church,' he admits, 'but I think it would be important to move in that direction.' Cardinal McElroy's candidacy for Washington DC was bolstered by his doctorate in political science from Stanford University, which he was awarded for a thesis on moral norms in foreign policy. He told CNN that the recent US attacks on Iran's nuclear sites could encourage other countries to develop nuclear weapons to defend themselves. He said it was 'critically important' to maintain 'non-proliferation' of nuclear weapons. 'My great fear is that the lessons that nations will take away from this intervention against Iran is that if they have nuclear weapons then they won't be subject to this sort of attack,' he said. 'I think that's an open question. Will this encourage more proliferation because the incentives are stronger now or clearer now, and that's very ominous.' Finally, the cardinal said he believes that Chicago-born Pope Leo would make a visit home – although he did not know when. 'I think when he does come to the United States it will be a great moment for our country.' — CNN

Russia becomes first nation to recognize Afghan government since 2021 Taliban takeover
Russia becomes first nation to recognize Afghan government since 2021 Taliban takeover

Saudi Gazette

timean hour ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Russia becomes first nation to recognize Afghan government since 2021 Taliban takeover

MOSCOW — Russia has become the first nation to recognize the Taliban government of Afghanistan since it took power in 2021, announcing on Thursday it has accepted an ambassador from the Islamist group. 'We believe that the act of official recognition of the government of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan will give impetus to the development of productive bilateral cooperation between our countries in various fields,' the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement. 'We see significant prospects for cooperation in the trade and economic area with an emphasis on projects in the fields of energy, transport, agriculture, and infrastructure,' the statement continues. 'We will continue to assist Kabul in strengthening regional security and combating the threats of terrorism and drug-related crime.' The statement by the Russian ministry was accompanied by a photo of the new Afghan ambassador to Russia, Gul Hassan Hassan, handing his credentials to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko. In a post on X, alongside pictures of Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi meeting with Russian Ambassador to Kabul Dmitry Zhirnov, the Taliban's foreign ministry hailed the decision as positive and important. Russia's recognition is historically significant. The former Soviet Union fought a 9-year war in Afghanistan that ended with Moscow withdrawing its troops in 1989 following their defeat by the Afghan mujahideen, some of whom later founded the modern Taliban. In the aftermath of the 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan, Russia was one of a few nations to maintain a diplomatic presence in the country. Russia removed its designation of the Taliban as a terrorist group in April 2025. While the Taliban has exchanged ambassadors with China and the United Arab Emirates, and has a long-standing political office in Qatar, those countries do not recognize it as the government of Afghanistan. The lack of recognition has not prevented Afghanistan's new rulers from doing business with the outside world. In 2023, a Chinese oil company signed an oil extraction deal with the Taliban. Moreover, the Taliban has angled for the recognition of another former adversary: the United States. Efforts have reportedly ramped up since US President Donald Trump began his second term earlier this year. March 2025 saw the release of two Americans from Afghanistan, along with the US removing millions of dollars of bounties from three Taliban officials. People familiar with American conversations with the group told CNN in April that the Taliban has proposed numerous steps toward US recognition, including the creation of an embassy-like office within the US to handle Afghan issues. 'You need to be forthcoming and take a risk,' US officials told the Taliban during a March meeting to secure an American prisoner's release, according to the person familiar with the proceedings. 'Do this, it will likely open up the door for a better relationship.' It wasn't the first time the US had diplomatically engaged with the Taliban. In the last year of his first term, Trump reached an agreement with the group for a full US withdrawal by 2021. The deal achieved a chaotic fulfillment as the Taliban swept to power during former US President Joe Biden's first summer in the White House. — CNN

US Supreme Court allows Trump to deport migrants held in Djibouti to South Sudan
US Supreme Court allows Trump to deport migrants held in Djibouti to South Sudan

Saudi Gazette

timean hour ago

  • Saudi Gazette

US Supreme Court allows Trump to deport migrants held in Djibouti to South Sudan

WASHINGTON — The US Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the Trump administration to deport to South Sudan a group of migrants who have been held for weeks on a military base in Djibouti. The high court's unsigned order came days after a majority of justices allowed the administration to deport certain migrants to countries other than their homeland with little notice. But that June 23 decision kicked off a legal skirmish about the specific group of migrants being held in Djibouti. A lower court had put their removal back on hold, prompting the Trump administration to race up to the Supreme Court. The court's decision Thursday sided with the administration, over the dissent of two liberal justices, and allowed officials to remove the migrants at issue to South Sudan. The Supreme Court said that its earlier decision applied the lower court's actions 'in full.' A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled that the Supreme Court's decision last month didn't apply to eight migrants held in Djibouti because their court-ordered process was required by a separate ruling the administration never appealed. The migrants, including some from Cuba, Vietnam and Laos, were being held in a converted Conex shipping were diverted to Djibouti on their way to South lower court's order involving the migrants in Djibouti 'cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that' the Supreme Court later paused, the majority said on Thursday. 'Such a remedy would serve to 'coerce' the government into 'compliance' and would be unenforceable given our stay of the underlying injunction,' the court Elena Kagan, a member of the court's liberal wing, supported the decision. She wrote a brief concurring opinion noting that she had disagreed with the Supreme Court's original decision to allow the third-country removals to continue.'But a majority of this court saw things differently, and I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this court has stayed,' she of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said the migrants would be in South Sudan by Friday.'These sickos will be in South Sudan by Independence Day,' she said in a statement. 'A win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people. We thank our brave ICE law enforcement for their sacrifice to defend our freedoms.'Attorney General Pamela Bondi also celebrated the decision in a post on social media Thursday afternoon.'Yet another rogue district judge has been rebuked by the Supreme Court thanks to the tireless work of dedicated DOJ attorneys,' Bondi said on X, adding that President Donald Trump 'will continue to exercise his full authority to remove killers and violent criminal illegal aliens from our country.'The decision drew a sharp dissent from the court's two other liberals, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.'What the government wants to do, concretely, is send the eight noncitizens it illegally removed from the United States from Djibouti to South Sudan, where they will be turned over to the local authorities without regard for the likelihood that they will face torture or death,' Sotomayor wrote.'Today's order clarifies only one thing,' she wrote. 'Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial.'The court's decision last month was a significant win for the administration, which is attempting to rapidly deport migrants. One major hurdle for previous administrations has been dealing with countries who refuse to receive the return of their own nationals who have come to the groups describe the situation in South Sudan as dire. The United Nations recently warned about food insecurity in the country, which is also facing political instability and escalating violence. But the Trump administration is seeking to speed deportations by removing migrants to countries other than their homeland if their homeland will not accept so-called third-country removals have run up against the Convention Against Torture, ratified by the Senate in 1994, that generally bars deportation or extradition to countries where there is a possibility that the migrant might be tortured. The law is vague about how an administration is supposed to make that determination and what process rights a migrant is Trump administration has said that in cases where it has received 'assurances' from a foreign government that a migrant removed there will not be tortured, officials do not have to notify a Cuban national, for instance, that he is being deported to South Sudan. In cases in which the government has not received those assurances, Department of Homeland Security policy requires the migrant to be notified so they can make a fear-of-torture an unsigned order on June 23 over a dissent from the court's liberal wing, the Supreme Court allowed the administration to continue that policy for now while the underlying legal challenge the Supreme Court's senior liberal, slammed the Trump administration's handling of the migrants in a fiery dissent and accused the court of 'rewarding lawlessness' by siding with Trump. — CNN

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store