Court dismisses R27 billion damages claim against Department of Science and Innovation
Image: File
The Durban High Court has dismissed a man who is demanding R27 billion in damages from the Department of Science and Innovation. The man represented himself and used jargon and acronyms that the court found difficult to comprehend.
Melusi Christopher Ntuli applied for a summary of judgement in this court against the department. A summary judgement is issued by the court without going to trial. His particulars comprised four separate claims and when totaled together they amounted to R27bn.
Additionally, the court said his claim for judgement summary was some 921 pages. It also said Ntuli's claim appeared to revolve around two devices: a chargeless electric engine and a PSDC motor.
'The claims are based on the unconstitutionality, illegality, marketing, and infringement of the intellectual property rights (IPRs) due to the respondents' (the department) Grassroots Innovation Programme (GIP),' Ntuli said in his affidavit.
Ntuli claims that his intellectual property rights have suffered reputational damages. He said the IPRs have a damaged reputation and has suffered the sum of R5bn. The other claim is that the department had no legal grounds for using the IPRs and therefore it has suffered a loss and damaged reputation of R2bn.
Ntuli also said the department was not entitled to promote the electric engine through GIP and said the IPRs have suffered R10bn on damaged reputation. Another claim is R10bn for infringed rights of intellectual property.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'From this whistle-stop tour through the plaintiff's claim, it is clear that he seeks unliquidated damages from the defendant,' Judge Robin Mossop said.
He said a claim is liquidated if it is fixed either by agreement or by an order of court, or is capable of swift and easy computation.
'There is no such agreement in this instance on the amounts claimed by the plaintiff, nor have the amounts been determined by a court. It is impossible to calculate how the amounts claimed have been calculated,' Judge Mossop added.
Judge Mossop said that if he understood the papers drafted by Ntuli correctly about his claims, it appears that he invented the devices. He said it appeared that Ntuli held intellectual property rights to the devices and that the department had accepted the use of these devices into its programme called GIP.
Judge Mossop said he did not understand what a PSDC motor is and what GIP is for, as neither of these was explained.
Mossop said the department raised its defences properly. Janse van Rensburg, a State attorney, said Ntuli's claim was not liquidated and said this court lacked jurisdiction to deal with this matter, as Ntuli stated that the department was based in Pretoria.
Moreover, Judge Mossop advised Ntuli to seek legal assistance.
'It seems to me that it would be beneficial for him (Ntuli) if he acquires legal advice to help him deal with the difficulties that he is inevitably going to face. If he cannot afford such assistance, I have arranged for my registrar to provide him with the local address of Legal Aid South Africa,' Judge Mossop said.
Ntuli was given leave to defend the action, and Judge Mossop said costs were reserved for decision by the trial court.
nomonde.zondi@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Artsolar's gag order on Independent Media lifted, a court victory for media freedom
Oxford supermarkets managing director, Brett Latimer, who complained about Artsolar allegedly misrepresenting itself by claiming to have sold him locally manufactured solar panels whereas they were allegedly imported from China. Image: Bongani Hans IT is a victory for media freedom following the withdrawal of an interdict, which a Durban company that earned R90 million in government funding through allegedly falsely claiming to manufacture solar panels, had obtained against whistle-blowers. Artsolar had, earlier this year, obtained an interdict against the Independent Media Group at the Durban High Court, which, as a result, could not report on the matter. After Artsolar obtained the interdict, other media houses, such as Ground Up, which were not gagged, reported extensively about the details of the misrepresentation and gagging of the media. The court officially withdrew the interdict against Independent Media and Oxford Supermarkets, which was a whistle-blower in the matter, on Tuesday, following Artsolar informing the court that it was no longer proceeding with its action. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Hence, Artsolar incurred legal costs 'on party and party scale C'. The company obtained the interim interdict in March at the same court, with Independent Media being informed about the hearing of the application at the last hour. When asked if Independent Media can now freely write about the allegations that Artsolar imported the panels from China without fear of legal reprisal, their lawyer, Advocate Carina Jacob, said 'Yes'. Artsolar's contract manager, Yaadhna Harilal, said the interdict was to prevent the publication of defamatory allegations arising from a private commercial dispute. Harilal said Artsolar withdrew the interdict as it had already entered the public domain, 'and little purpose remained in pursuing the matter'. 'The broader context meant the matter no longer aligned with our original legal objectives, and continued litigation would not advance the company's strategic interest or benefit our stakeholders. 'We are engaging directly with the relevant parties, and any substantive regulatory queries will be addressed with the appropriate authorities through the proper channels,' said Harilal. She could not say whether the company was continuing to import solar panels. Independent Media and the Amabhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism, which joined the matter as a friend of the court for media freedom, had come down heavily against the interdict. 'On a collective basis, it is a good thing because journalists stuck up for a journalist when you were let down. 'It shows that the industry (media) is a force to be reckoned with, and you will continue to do it,' said Jacob. Oxford was prohibited from disclosing details about the importation of solar panels. It had raised the matter with various organisations, including the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), which was also prevented from investigating the allegations. Artsolar, which operates a factory at the New Germany Industrial Park outside Pinetown, had claimed to be a 100% manufacturer of solar panels. However, it emerged that Artsolar had misled its potential clients and IDC, which had invested R90 million in the company on the basis that it was a 100% proudly South African manufacturer. Oxford's managing director, Brett Latimer, had purchased panels to install on the rooftops of his shopping centre in Hillcrest. On the completion of the installation, Latimer discovered empty boxes of the panels, which indicated that the panels were produced by Chinese company Einnova Solarline Energy Corporation Limited. Artsolar ordered the panels, which were shipped to the country via the Durban Port. Artsolar's former employees, Kandace Singh and Shalendra Hansraj, who had since gained employment with Oxford, backed Latimer's finding with more evidence. Latimer filed complaints against Artsolar with the IDC and also laid a criminal charge at the Hilcrest police station. He also complained to the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC), the International Trade Administration Commission of SA (ITAC), Proudly South African, and the Independent Power Producer Office (IPPO). Latimer later alerted this Independent Media reporter to expose what he viewed as corruption. However, as Independent Media was working on the story after completing its investigation, Artsolar obtained an interdict against the story. Singh, Hansraj, and Latimer were gagged from talking about the matter, which Artsolar considered defamatory. This forced Independent Media to abandon this story while its lawyers were in the process of overturning the interdict. Jacob said that by taking the matter to court, Artsolar shot itself in the foot because it attracted the attention of other media houses. She said the gagging of the media and Oxford seemed to have been used to prevent the IDC from investigating the matter. 'They used an order to stop a journalist for an ulterior purpose, and that's what we said in the affidavit that they used you to stop an investigation, because the reality is they knew that if they brought an interdict against that (IDC investigation), no one could get it,' said Jacobs. Oxford's lawyer, Mahomed Shoaib Omar, said the case against Artsolar was strengthened by his clients' successful subpoena of a Durban Port's clearing agency to produce bills of lading. 'The bill of lading disclosed that 99% of the solar panels were imported from China and not locally manufactured,' said Omar. Omar said IDC's forensic auditor, Charl Naude, had completed the forensic investigation, which was now being reviewed by the IDC. 'When the IDC joined the court process as the respondent, the court granted an order, and then the forensic auditor interviewed Latimer, Singh, and Hansraj and obtained the relevant information. 'The current situation is that the IDC, based on the internal forensic report, will have to consider what to do in this matter,' said Omar. Omar said the withdrawal of the interdict meant that Oxford had been vindicated. 'Artsolar represented that the solar panels that were sold to Oxford were manufactured at the Artsolar factory, whereas they were imported from China, and this is substantiated by the bills of lading that were produced,' said Omar. He said Oxford could lodge a civil action by bringing forward a summons to set aside the R5 million panel purchase transactions. 'The DTIC also advanced R28 million to Artsolar, which is separate from R90 million that the IDC had advanced,' said Omar. When contacted for comment, IDC corporate affairs head Tshepo Ramodibe said Artsolar's withdrawal of the interdict against his entity cleared the way for it to proceed with its investigation into the allegations. 'In line with policy, the IDC does not publicly disclose investigation outcomes. Any decisions regarding funding will be guided by governance protocols once the investigation is concluded,' said Ramodibe. The DTIC has not responded to confirm the R28 million, which Omar said was advanced to Artsolar.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Court victory for media freedom: Artsolar's gag order on Independent Media lifted
Oxford supermarkets managing director, Brett Latimer, who complained about Artsolar allegedly misrepresenting itself by claiming to have sold him locally manufactured solar panels whereas they were allegedly imported from China. Image: Bongani Hans IT is a victory for media freedom following the withdrawal of an interdict, which a Durban company that earned R90 million in government funding through allegedly falsely claiming to manufacture solar panels, had obtained against whistle-blowers. Artsolar had, earlier this year, obtained an interdict against the Independent Media Group at the Durban High Court, which, as a result, could not report on the matter. After Artsolar obtained the interdict, other media houses, such as Ground Up, which were not gagged, reported extensively about the details of the misrepresentation and gagging of the media. The court officially withdrew the interdict against Independent Media and Oxford Supermarkets, which was a whistle-blower in the matter, on Tuesday, following Artsolar informing the court that it was no longer proceeding with it. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Artsolar incurred legal costs 'on party and party scale C'. The company obtained the interim interdict in March at the same court, with Independent Media being informed about the hearing of the application at the last hour. When asked if Independent Media can now freely write about the allegations that Artsolar imported the panels from China without fear of legal reprisal, its lawyer, Advocate Carina Jacob, said 'Yes'. Artsolar's contract manager, Yaadhna Harilal, said the interdict was to prevent the publication of defamatory allegations arising from a private commercial dispute. Harilal said Artsolar withdrew the interdict as it had already entered the public domain, 'and little purpose remained in pursuing the matter'. 'The broader context meant the matter no longer aligned with our original legal objectives, and continued litigation would not advance the company's strategic interest or benefit our stakeholders. 'We are engaging directly with the relevant parties, and any substantive regulatory queries will be addressed with the appropriate authorities through the proper channels,' said Harilal. She could say whether the company was continuing to import solar panels. Independent Media and the Amabhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism, which joined the matter as a friend of the court for media freedom, had come down heavily against the interdict. 'On a collective basis, it is a good thing because journalists stuck up for a journalist when you were let down. 'It shows that the industry (media) is a force to be reckoned with, and you will continue to do it,' said Jacob. Oxford was prohibited from disclosing details about the importation of solar panels. It had raised the matter with various organisations, including the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), which was also prevented from investigating the allegations. Artsolar, which operates a factory at the New Germany Industrial Park outside Pinetown, had claimed to be a 100% manufacturer of solar panels. However, it emerged that Artsolar had misled its potential clients and IDC, which had invested R90 million in the company on the basis that it was 100% proudly South African manufacturer. Oxford's managing director, Brett Latimer, had purchased the panel to install on the rooftops of his shopping centre in Hillcrest. On the completion of the installation, Latimer discovered empty boxes of the panels, which indicated that the panels had been produced by Chinese Einnova Solarline Energy Corporation Limited. Artsolar ordered the panels, which were shipped to the country via the Durban Port. Artsolar's former employees, Kandace Singh and Shalendra Hansraj, who had since gained employment with Oxford, backed Latimer's finding with more evidence. Latimer filed complaints against Artsolar with the IDC and also laid a criminal charge at the Hilcrest police station. He also complained to the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC), the International Trade Administration Commission of SA (ITAC), Proudly South African, and the Independent Power Producer Office (IPPO). Latimer later alerted this Independent Media reporter to expose what he viewed as corruption. However, as Independent Media was working on the story after completing its investigation, Artsolar rushed to court to obtain an interdict against the story. Singh, Hansraj, and Latimer were gagged from talking about the matter, which Artsolar considered defamatory. This forced Independent Media to abandon this story while its lawyers were in the process of overturning the interdict. Jacob said that by taking the matter to the court, Artsolar shot itself in the foot because it attracted the attention of other media houses. She said the gagging of the media and Oxford seemed to have been used to prevent the IDC from investigating the matter. 'They used an order to stop a journalist for an ulterior purpose, and that's what we said in the affidavit that they used you to stop an investigation, because the reality is they knew that if they brought an interdict against that (IDC investigation), no one could get it,' said Jacobs. Oxford's lawyer, Mahomed Shoaib Omar, said the case against Artsolar was strengthened by his clients' successful subpoena of a Durban Port's clearing agency to produce bills of lading. 'The bill of lading disclosed that 99% of the solar panels were imported from China and not locally manufactured,' said Omar. Omar said IDC's forensic auditor, Charl Naude, had completed the forensic investigation, which was now being reviewed by the IDC. 'When the IDC joined the court process as the respondent, the court granted an order, and then the forensic auditor interviewed Latimer, Singh, and Hansraj and obtained the relevant information. 'The current situation is that the IDC, based on the internal forensic report, will have to consider what to do in this matter,' said Omar. Omar said the withdrawal of the interdict meant that Oxford has been vindicated. 'Artsolar represented that the solar panels that were sold to Oxford were manufactured at the Artsolar factory, whereas they were imported from China, and this is substantiated by the bills of lading that were produced,' said Omar. He said Oxford could now proceed to lodge a civil action by bringing forward a summons to set aside the R5 million panel purchase transactions. 'The DTIC also advanced R28 million to Artsolar, which is separate from R90 million that the IDC had advanced,' said Omar. When contacted for comment, IDC corporate affairs head Tshepo Ramodibe said Artsolar's withdrawal of the interdict against his entity cleared the way for it to proceed with its investigation into the allegations. 'In line with policy, the IDC does not publicly disclose investigation outcomes. Any decisions regarding funding will be guided by governance protocols once the investigation is concluded,' said Ramodibe. The DTIC has not responded to confirm the R28 million, which Omar said was advanced to Artsolar.
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Last chance to enter Durban Fashion Fair
THE eThekwini Municipality is inviting fashion designers from across South Africa to apply for the opportunity to showcase their designs at the 14th annual Durban Fashion Fair (DFF). The DFF, one of Africa's influential fashion events, will take place from September 17 to 19, at The Station Urban Event Space. Applications close on Thursday July 31, 2025. Chairperson of the eThekwini economic development and planning committee, councillor Thembo Ntuli, reaffirmed the city's investment in the programme. ALSO read: Durban Fashion Fair model search kicks off this June He said the showcase is part of the city's broader commitment to developing the creative industry and empowering entrepreneurs in the fashion sector. 'As eThekwini Municipality, we invest in fashion because it drives inclusive economic development and job creation. The programme supports radical economic transformation by empowering emerging creatives. This year, 24 emerging designers have received training and mentorship since March, covering both creative and business aspects. These mentees will have the opportunity to showcase at the DFF in September,' added Ntuli. With the theme, 'The Awakening', the DFF 2025 promises to shine the spotlight on bold creativity, while celebrating local talent and amplifying both new and established voices in the fashion space. Over the past decade, the DFF has grown into a vital platform, not only showcasing fashion, but shaping careers. Many past participants have gained access to buyers, business partnerships, and international opportunities. Makhosi Ntshangase of Sista Fellas, a 2019 DFF mentee and Rising Star winner, credits the showcase for successfully launching her career. 'Apart from the equipment I received, DFF was my key to unlocking doors of opportunity. I learnt the business of fashion, networked, and eventually signed a consignment deal with Edgars. I encourage both emerging and established designers to seize this opportunity as it can elevate your brand.' To apply online, visit the website: For more from Northglen News, follow us on Facebook , X or Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok. Click to subscribe to our newsletter – here
