It's time to lock our arms and stand strong for Black rights. Let Mandela guide us
The words of the late Nelson Mandela seem to be more relevant today than they when he spoke them. That is because in this month when we celebrate love, and the history of Black Americans, the love of one's neighbor seems to be off the table. This is because fear has taken the place of love in America.
I almost hate to watch the news or read the paper these days. People are losing their jobs. So, families fear the future — will they be homeless, living out of their cars, or on the streets? Will they be able to feed their children? Clothe them and educate them? Simply put, will they be able to make ends meet at all?
There is the fear of dismantling Social Security, so the elderly, who paid their share each payday, with the hope they would have some kind of security in their golden years, now fear that it can all end with the swipe of a pen. They worry about how they will survive if this happens.
Then, there is the fear that the strides we have made toward equality for all of America's people will abruptly end as laws like the 1965 Voting Rights Act, a landmark civil rights law that outlawed discriminatory voting practices and gave the federal government power to oversee voter registration, was effectively gutted by the U.S. Supreme Court.
You ask, what does love have to do with voting rights? Everything! It's called loving your neighbor as yourself. It's called being concerned about the well-being of others and knowing that we are all in this together.
When love goes out the window, fear comes in to take its place. And fear can cause utter chaos in our country. Already I see signs of it creeping in.
As one who has lived through the post-slavery Jim Crow era and the segregation that it brought, the Civil Rights era and the hope that it brought, I was always amazed at how the battle of segregation and Jim Crow was fought and won, mainly by showing love and concern for each other.
People of all races and cultures joined in the fight for equal rights for Black Americans (and women, too). Some of them even died for the cause of freedom. If that isn't love, then I don't know what love is.
The spirit of all Americans — especially Black Americans — seems to be depressed. And, for good reason, too. Since the pandemic, we've seen many of our books banned. (When I learned that one of the books banned in Florida was the story of Ruby Bridges, who integrated an elementary school in New Orleans when she was only 6, I knew we were in trouble.). Already, much of our history has been snatched away.
But we Blacks know what to do. If our teachers are no longer allowed to teach our children and other children our history (and it could very well happen at any time), the burden falls on us. We must tell our children their history. We must tell it with pride and love, thereby passing it on to those who sit at our feet.
I want to remind anyone who is low in spirit because of the way things are going these days, to take a look back at how far we've come and how we got from there to here. We simply stood strong together. We tried to make our country better. We loved out loud by locking arms and saying, through our actions, that we wouldn't take it anymore.
And so, with arms locked and feet shod with the shoes of freedom, we took to the streets, unafraid. We marched peacefully, prayerfully, purposefully. We knew the task ahead would be hard. There would be fire hoses and spitting dogs and police nightsticks to contend with.
But we marched on, out of love of self and for our fellow human beings. We marched on to Freedomland.
As I write this, it seems like that was so many years ago, and I would never again, in my lifetime, have to go through or witness such a time again. But, my friends, history sometimes really does repeat itself.
Because of the state of America today and the fear of what is to come, we have come full circle. There are rumors of new peaceful protests and boycotts, the tools that helped to bring about freedom for Blacks in the America we love.
But those early protests were not non-violent. Many of the protesters still have the scars to remind them of those days. Others carried the scars with them to their graves.
When I hear of future protests, I think, haven't we been there and done that? We have. We protested proudly, out of love for our fellow human beings and to make our country live up to what it says in the Constitution – that all men are created equal.
And if peaceful protests and boycotts can help us to back on the right track of moving forward, I say let's get rid of the depression that is hovering over us. If it comes to peacefully protesting, let us lock arms once again and do it together.
Let's honor Nelson Mandela's memory and let it be a lesson in love.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
3 minutes ago
- Politico
How the National Portrait Gallery got tangled in MAGA politics
EYE OF THE BEHOLDER — Amy Sherald, the distinctive artist renowned for her stylized portraits of Black Americans like former first lady Michelle Obama, pulled her upcoming exhibition, 'American Sublime,' from the National Portrait Gallery last week, saying that the museum feared her painting of a trans woman posed like the Statue of Liberty could offend President Donald Trump. The museum maintains that it never suggested removing the painting, but rather that it pitched an accompanying video to 'contextualize the piece.' In any case, the show's D.C. run is over before it began. Sherald's withdrawal highlights the Trump administration's pressure campaign on the Smithsonian's various museums, following a March executive order scrutinizing 'improper ideology' in its displays and the recent ouster of the gallery's longtime director, whom Trump accused of supporting 'DEI' and attempted to fire — a decision the Smithsonian challenged, saying he lacked the authority to make it — before she announced her resignation. But it also underscores something that predates Trump, a tension at the heart of the Portrait Gallery's mission that has ensnared it in controversy since long before MAGA was a glimmer in the president's eye. On the one hand, it's an arts institution, ostensibly dedicated to freedom of expression, aesthetic innovation and elevating the country's artistic genius. On the other, it's a government organization beholden to the whims of politics, the sensibilities of elected officials and the tastes of voters, many of whom aren't exactly fans of cutting-edge art. For politicians, the provocations and ambiguities of the avant-garde can be a political liability — or a cudgel with which to batter the other side. It was 2010 when the Portrait Gallery walked face-first into one of the most notorious censorship scandals to hit the fine art world in recent American history. The brouhaha surrounded a 1980 video piece titled, A Fire in My Belly, by the late writer and artist David Wojnarowicz, a polemic and highly celebrated contemporary of East Village luminaries like Keith Haring, Nan Goldin and Jean-Michel Basquiat. Wojnarowicz died of AIDS at age 37 in 1992, but the piece appeared in a 2010 show that the Portrait Gallery called 'the first major museum exhibition to focus on sexual difference in the making of modern American portraiture,' drawing the ire of the Catholic League and House Republicans, who seized on an 11-second shot of ants crawling over a crucifix. For the conservative gay writer Andrew Sullivan, himself a Christian, there was no mistaking the work as blasphemous. 'To see a rejected Jesus left on the cross and on the ground to be covered by ants, is, in this context, clearly neither offensive nor heresy,' he wrote at the time. But to the Catholic League's Bill Donohue, it was 'hate speech,' and congressional Republicans like House Speaker John Boehner and Virginia Rep. Eric Cantor leapt at the whiff of culture war. They threatened to cut the gallery's federal funding, calling the video offensive to Christians and casting it as a misuse of taxpayer dollars — even though the gallery did not use public funds to stage the exhibition, which was privately funded. The secretary of the Smithsonian, G. Wayne Clough, unilaterally caved to the censorship demands — a decision that proved to be a lose-lose, inviting condemnation from free-speech advocates but failing to fully alleviate pressure from the right, which continued to advocate for funding cuts and the takedown of the entire exhibition. (Clough, who left the role in 2014, defended his choice to censor the show, saying it allowed the rest of the exhibit to stand.) The gallery's commissioner, James T. Bartlett, resigned in protest. And the Andy Warhol Foundation, which had backed the show with grant money, vowed to never support the gallery again — a pledge it upholds to this day. The censorship scandal followed debates from the late 1980s and early 1990s over the National Endowment for the Arts and its support of artists who explored queerness, sexuality or religious imagery. In 1989, Goldin staged a show in New York about the AIDS crisis that included in its catalogue an essay by Wojnarowicz excoriating religious and political leaders for fomenting homophobia and exacerbating the epidemic. In response, the NEA withdrew a grant it had awarded the exhibition. (That money was later partially restored, under the condition that it would not support the catalogue.) The American Family Association, a champion of the Christian right, cropped images of sex acts from Wojnarowicz's artworks into mailers that it circulated around the country with headlines like, 'Your tax dollars help pay for these 'works of art.'' Wojnarowicz won a lawsuit against the group in New York for violating his copyright and misrepresenting his work, though he was awarded only $1 in damages. The backlash to the NEA funding of Wojnarowicz's art was part of a broader uproar over the sexually explicit photography of Robert Mapplethorpe and the accusations of blasphemy levied against Andres Serrano's 'Piss Christ,' a darkly enigmatic photograph of a crucifix submerged in the artist's urine. All of which presaged the gallery's apparent skittishness over Sherald's portrait of a Black, transgender Statue of Liberty today. But the latest dustup also breaches into new censorious territory. The political arguments over artists in the past, while often explicitly homophobic, largely focused on the supposed obscenity or blasphemy of their work — nudity, sex, religious iconography. However disingenuous, these criticisms appealed to deeply held discomfort in straight society surrounding depictions of sex — and particularly gay sex — as well as Christian symbols. Opposition to Sherald's painting, however, dispenses with these critiques altogether. You'll find no genitalia or supposedly profaned crosses in the portrait. It is a decidedly G-rated image. Were it not for the hackneyed title, Trans Forming Liberty, you could easily miss the transness of its subject entirely. Frankly, it's a boring painting — obvious, even ham-fisted in its invocation of a civic image, perhaps, but nothing remotely approaching the frankness or transgression of Wojnarowicz, Mapplethorpe and Serrano. Nonetheless, the White House celebrated the cancellation, with one official telling The New York Times it was a 'principled and necessary step.' In a sense, then, Sherald gave Trump exactly what he wanted, complying with a demand before it came — just as law firms and media organizations that bent the knee to the administration have been accused of 'anticipatory compliance.' The Trump administration has been successful in erasing trans people from government websites and documents. Now, apparently, it's winning in galleries, too. Ironically, that may increase the visibility of the portrait, which most of the country would not have seen if it hadn't splashed onto their phones along with the headlines. That was certainly the case for Wojnarowicz. After the gallery pulled his video, the media attention posthumously catapulted his name beyond the niche world of fine art and back into the political mainstream. The Museum of Modern Art and the New Museum, among others, screened the censored video. And in 2018, the Whitney staged a landmark retrospective of his work called History Keeps Me Awake at Night that effectively canonized Wojnarowicz, who has surged in popularity among young queer creatives. 'The most powerful moments of the exhibition have a moral grandeur rare in contemporary art,' wrote Philip Kennicott of the retrospective in the Washington Post, 'as it becomes clear that not only was Wojnarowicz fully cognizant of the tools being used against him, he made the onslaught the subject of his work.' Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at dylonjones@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @tdylon_jones. What'd I Miss? — Trump: Epstein 'stole' young woman from Mar-a-Lago spa: President Donald Trump said today that Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' young women from his Mar-a-Lago beach club spa decades ago. 'People were taken out of the spa, hired by him. In other words, gone,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. 'When I heard about it, I told him, I said, listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it's spa or not spa … And he was fine. And not too long after he did it again. And I said outta here.' The anecdote comes a day after Trump said that he severed ties with the disgraced financier and child sex offender, who died in prison by suicide six years ago, after 'he stole people who worked for me.' — Trump administration moves to repeal climate 'holy grail': The Environmental Protection Agency proposed repealing the federal government's bedrock scientific declaration on the dangers of greenhouse gases — in a legally risky move by President Donald Trump's administration to undo regulations on fossil fuels. The so-called endangerment finding, which the Obama administration issued in 2009, laid out a comprehensive case for how human emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases threaten human health and welfare. Rescinding it undermines the legal basis for most EPA climate rules, including limits on power plant and vehicle emissions. The elimination of the finding is sure to draw legal challenges from blue states and environmental groups, who note that decades of scientific research backs up the conclusion that planet-warming pollution from the use of oil, natural gas and coal are altering the Earth's climate. — Trump fired court-appointed Habba replacement, records show: President Donald Trump moved to fire the career federal prosecutor New Jersey judges picked to be acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, according to court records filed today. The Department of Justice revealed Trump's decision in an email filed with a federal judge in Pennsylvania, who is preparing to weigh in on an escalating fight between the Trump administration and the federal bench in New Jersey. The filing underscores Trump's direct involvement in a bid to keep his former personal attorney, Alina Habba, as New Jersey's top federal prosecutor, despite the expiration last week of her 120-day tenure as interim U.S. attorney and New Jersey judges selecting prosecutor Desiree Leigh Grace to serve in Habba's place. — Trump says 10-day deadline for Russia to broker ceasefire in Ukraine starts today: President Donald Trump said today that Russia must agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine by Aug. 8 or risk sanctions, accelerating a deadline that was previously up in the air. Trump in July set a 50-day deadline for the agreement with Ukraine, threatening tariffs if a deal was not made. On Monday, during his meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, he said he was shortening this deadline to '10 or 12 days.' Aboard Air Force One on today, on his way back to the United States, Trump said the clock was ticking and it was '10 days from today.' 'And then we're going to put on tariffs,' Trump added, 'and I don't know if it's going to affect Russia, because he wants to, obviously, probably keep the war going.' — Senate Banking advances first large, bipartisan housing package in a decade: The Senate Banking Committee unanimously advanced landmark housing legislation today, marking a rare area of overwhelming bipartisanship in a divided Congress. The Renewing Opportunity in the American Dream to Housing Act of 2025, sponsored by Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and ranking member Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), includes proposals that aim to expand and preserve the housing supply, improve housing affordability and access, advance accountability and fiscal responsibility, and improve oversight and program integrity. — Democrats sue over efforts to defund Planned Parenthood: California Attorney General Rob Bonta and 22 other Democratic attorneys general and governors are suing the Trump administration over a bid to strip federal funds from Planned Parenthood clinics. 'We need to just call it what it is: punishment for Planned Parenthood's constitutionally protected advocacy for abortion,' Bonta said at a press conference Tuesday morning. Congressional Republicans have wanted to cut funding to Planned Parenthood since Trump's first term. If they're successful, about 200 of the 600 clinics the nonprofit operates around the country could close, with over half of them in California. AROUND THE WORLD U.K. TO RECOGNIZE PALESTINIAN STATE — Keir Starmer has committed to recognizing a Palestinian state ahead of September's United Nations General Assembly, Downing Street announced today. The British prime minister told a special meeting of his Cabinet that 'now was the right time to move this position forward' because of the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza and the diminishing prospects of a peace process. He said that the U.K. will recognize a Palestinian state in September unless the Israeli government takes 'substantive steps' to end the crisis in Gaza and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a two-state solution. Israel swiftly dismissed the move as a 'reward for Hamas.' EU CONSIDERS PENALTIES — European Union countries are moving toward agreeing a plan to punish Israel over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza but stopped short of triggering the penalty at a meeting in Brussels today. The European Commission has proposed partially suspending Israel's association agreement with the EU, to curtail the country's access to a key research and development program for start-ups. The plan comes in response to a Commission review that found Israel was in breach of its human-rights obligations under the terms of the deal. EU countries' ambassadors discussed the Commission's proposal at a meeting today but there was no qualified majority in favor of pressing ahead with it now, according to three diplomats speaking to POLITICO on condition of anonymity because the matter is sensitive. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP DRESSING THE PART — If you go to a Pitbull concert these days, you'll likely find yourself in a sea of fans wearing bald caps, suits and fake goatees, mimicking the artist's signature look. Fans dressing up like musicians — parkas for Oasis, cowboy boots and hats for Beyoncé, feather boas for Harry Styles — has become a key part of the concert-going experience since the pandemic. Expense and hard to get concert tickets have turned shows into an occasion to go all out, and some artists have used fans' desire to dress like them to build community and expand their reach with fashion and brand deals. The Economist reports on this new era in concert going. Parting Image Jacqueline Munis contributed to this newsletter. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democrats try again to revive the Voting Rights Act but face long odds
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats reintroduced a bill Tuesday to restore and expand protections enshrined in the Voting Rights Act of 1965, their latest long-shot attempt to revive the landmark law just days before its 60th anniversary and at a time of renewed debate over the future administration of American elections. Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia unveiled the measure, titled the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, with the backing of Democratic leaders. The bill stands little chance of passage in the Republican-led Congress, but it provides the clearest articulation of Democrats' agenda on voting rights and election reform. The legislation would reestablish and expand the requirement that states and localities with a history of discrimination get federal approval before changing their voting laws. It would also require states to allow same-day voter registration, prevent voters from being purged from voter rolls if they miss elections and allow people who may have been disenfranchised at the ballot box to seek a legal remedy in the courts. 'Democracy is the very house in which we live. It is the framework in which we get to fight for the things that we care about,' Warnock said. 'These last seven months have reminded us that we ought not take any of it for granted. We are literally in a fight for the life of the republic.' Warnock was joined by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, as well as Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Cory Booker of New Jersey and Alex Padilla of California. The senators were flanked by dozens of activists, including voting rights advocates, environmental campaigners, faith leaders and union organizers. The reintroduction comes at a precarious moment for the Voting Rights Act. The enforcement mechanisms of the law have been removed or hampered by two decades of court rulings and lapsed congressional reauthorizations. And an unusual push by Republicans in several states to redistrict congressional maps five years ahead of schedule has also raised questions about the effectiveness of the law in protecting voters. State lawmakers have enacted dozens of laws in recent years that voting rights activists argue restrict access to the ballot, especially for people of color, poorer communities and people with disabilities. Schumer promised that Democrats would 'fight fire with fire' to protect voting rights. And Warnock warned of 'an authoritarian movement that is afoot right now in our country,' before denouncing a special session called by the Texas legislature to redistrict the state's legislative and congressional maps. President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans are backing the effort, which they hope will net the GOP several seats in the House of Representatives and help them hold the House majority. Democrats first introduced the updated Voting Rights Act in 2021, when the party had unified control of Congress. The bill came in response to several years of states enacting restrictive voting laws following the Supreme Court's 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down the section of the Voting Rights Act that required some states to seek federal approval for legislative maps and election policies. The bill passed the House twice in that Congress but failed to pass the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. Rep. Terri Sewell of Alabama reintroduced a House version in March. The bill is named after John Lewis , the longtime Democratic congressman and civil rights activist who died in 2020. Warnock represents Lewis' home state, while Sewell represents Selma, Alabama, the city where Lewis organized during the Civil Rights movement and was bludgeoned by state troopers during a peaceful protest on the Edmund Pettus Bridge, known as Bloody Sunday. A picture of Lewis was positioned behind the senators as they spoke about the bill. Blumenthal, the Connecticut Democrat, said that Lewis' 'stare is unrelenting. He's going to hold us accountable.' ___ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Democrats try again to revive the Voting Rights Act but face long odds
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats reintroduced a bill Tuesday to restore and expand protections enshrined in the Voting Rights Act of 1965, their latest long-shot attempt to revive the landmark law just days before its 60th anniversary and at a time of renewed debate over the future administration of American elections. Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia unveiled the measure, titled the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, with the backing of Democratic leaders. The bill stands little chance of passage in the Republican-led Congress, but it provides the clearest articulation of Democrats' agenda on voting rights and election reform. The legislation would reestablish and expand the requirement that states and localities with a history of discrimination get federal approval before changing their voting laws. It would also require states to allow same-day voter registration, prevent voters from being purged from voter rolls if they miss elections and allow people who may have been disenfranchised at the ballot box to seek a legal remedy in the courts. 'Democracy is the very house in which we live. It is the framework in which we get to fight for the things that we care about,' Warnock said. 'These last seven months have reminded us that we ought not take any of it for granted. We are literally in a fight for the life of the republic.' Warnock was joined by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, as well as Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Cory Booker of New Jersey and Alex Padilla of California. The senators were flanked by dozens of activists, including voting rights advocates, environmental campaigners, faith leaders and union organizers. The reintroduction comes at a precarious moment for the Voting Rights Act. The enforcement mechanisms of the law have been removed or hampered by two decades of court rulings and lapsed congressional reauthorizations. And an unusual push by Republicans in several states to redistrict congressional maps five years ahead of schedule has also raised questions about the effectiveness of the law in protecting voters. State lawmakers have enacted dozens of laws in recent years that voting rights activists argue restrict access to the ballot, especially for people of color, poorer communities and people with disabilities. Schumer promised that Democrats would 'fight fire with fire' to protect voting rights. And Warnock warned of 'an authoritarian movement that is afoot right now in our country,' before denouncing a special session called by the Texas legislature to redistrict the state's legislative and congressional maps. President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans are backing the effort, which they hope will net the GOP several seats in the House of Representatives and help them hold the House majority. Democrats first introduced the updated Voting Rights Act in 2021, when the party had unified control of Congress. The bill came in response to several years of states enacting restrictive voting laws following the Supreme Court's 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down the section of the Voting Rights Act that required some states to seek federal approval for legislative maps and election policies. The bill passed the House twice in that Congress but failed to pass the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. Rep. Terri Sewell of Alabama reintroduced a House version in March. The bill is named after John Lewis, the longtime Democratic congressman and civil rights activist who died in 2020. Warnock represents Lewis' home state, while Sewell represents Selma, Alabama, the city where Lewis organized during the Civil Rights movement and was bludgeoned by state troopers during a peaceful protest on the Edmund Pettus Bridge, known as Bloody Sunday. A picture of Lewis was positioned behind the senators as they spoke about the bill. Blumenthal, the Connecticut Democrat, said that Lewis' 'stare is unrelenting. He's going to hold us accountable.' ___