Land value tax in Wales could replace council tax and rates
The former first minister said the Welsh Government continues to explore the feasibility of LVT as used in countries such as Denmark and Singapore.
Professor Drakeford has long supported a LVT, arguing those who have the privilege of ownership should pay something back for that privilege.
LVT is levied on the value of the land rather than the property itself.
Proponents argue LVT is easier to collect, more efficient and difficult to avoid, while discouraging speculation and encouraging people to bring idle land back into use.
Professor Drakeford told the Senedd: "I am anxious to see this discussion move beyond the theoretical and into the realms of the practically possible.
He explained that the Welsh Government has invited tenders to test approaches to valuing land, with submissions for every aspect of the work.
The finance secretary said: "I want to use the coming months to test the boundaries of what might be possible in the next Senedd term.
"Let's open the door to more radical, fundamental and progressive reform in the future."
He added: "The current system is unfairly weighted against those who experience difficulty in paying.
"I want to shift the focus from harmful escalation towards supportive prevention."
He stated ministers will introduce a new council tax appeals process by April 2026 that will be "easier to navigate and provide a better, modern system for taxpayers".
Peter Fox agreed that council tax is regressive by nature "and that it will never really become a fair local tax".
Mr Fox accused the Welsh Government of increasing tax on families "by stealth" through underfunding councils which, in turn, pass on the shortfall to people.
He called for reform of the "outdated and flawed" funding formula.
Professor Drakeford replied: "Almost every local authority in Wales will agree that the formula needs revision – nobody can agree on how that should be done.
"The 22 local authorities each believe that the formula uniquely disadvantages them."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British firms being investigated for ‘helping Iran'
A number of British businesses are being investigated by the Government for potentially evading sanctions against Iran's nuclear programme, it has been reported. The Treasury has identified nine suspected breaches of Britain's rigid sanctions regime against the country. The sanctions are intended to discourage Iran's nuclear weapons programme and punish the country for violations of human rights and hostile actions against allies of the UK, such as Israel. The Office for Financial Sanctions Implementation, part of the Treasury, revealed in its annual review this week that it had opened the investigations. It did not name the companies or individuals under suspicion or investigation. The firms are understood to be under suspicion of avoiding sanctions to assist Iran with its nuclear weapons programme. A Government spokesman said: 'We are committed to ensuring that sanctions are robustly enforced, potential breaches investigated and appropriate action taken.' The OFSI does not comment on specific active cases. The Government currently sanctions around 200 organisations and individuals based in or linked to Iran because of alleged involvement in the country's nuclear weapons programme. Last year, it said it was prepared to trigger 'snapback' sanctions against Iran over nuclear deal breaches. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, said he would trigger a new round of sanctions against the Islamic Republic to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons. The UK remains a participant of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, known as the Iran nuclear deal, and can therefore unilaterally force a return to sanctions if it considers that Iran has violated the terms of the deal. The nuclear deal was significantly weakened by the US withdrawal in 2018 under the first Donald Trump administration, although major signatories, including the UK, France and Germany, remain committed in theory. Last week, Mr Trump approved US strikes on some of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear enrichment facilities. It followed a series of smaller strikes by Israel in the preceding days, launched by Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, after he claimed that Iran had enough highly enriched uranium to produce nine atomic bombs. Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly said that Iran ' can never have a nuclear weapon ' but called for de-escalation in the war between Iran and Israel, which lasted for 12 days before a ceasefire was brokered. The Prime Minister is understood to have received an hour's notice from the White House before the US strikes on Iran took place. The British Government quickly made clear that it had played no role in the operation.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Fresh blow for Musk's DOGE as it loses power to award $500B in federal funds
The US DOGE Service, the repurposed government agency tasked with carrying out Elon Musk 's Department of Government Efficiency agenda to cut a trillion dollars in federal spending, has reportedly lost access to a key government website responsible for distributing roughly $500 billion in annual awards, the latest blow to the initiative after Musk's acrimonious split from the Trump administration earlier this month. Earlier this year, DOGE reportedly assumed effective control of a clearinghouse for federal funding opportunities, requiring new proposals to be sent to a DOGE-controlled mailbox for review before being posted. In the ensuing months since the April policy change, grant opportunities reportedly piled up inside the mailbox, leaving funds at risk of going unspent before the end of the government fiscal year at the end of September. On Thursday, federal officials were instructed to stop running grant proposals through DOGE, The Washington Post reports. 'Robust controls remain in place, with DOGE personnel embedded at each agency, assisting secretaries' offices in reviewing grants daily,' the White House said in a statement about the report. 'Agency secretaries and senior advisors will continue to implement and leverage the controls initially established by DOGE to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse, retaining full agency discretion to determine the appropriate flow of funds at the project level.' The reported process change is the latest hurdle for DOGE. The effort, whose figures have repeatedly been shown to be filled with errors and omissions, appears to have fallen short of Musk's bold promises to rapidly cut major portions of federal spending, with some estimates pegging the true figure of savings achieved at about $180 billion, compared to Musk's goal of some $1 trillion. Numerous DOGE efforts have been paused or shot down in court, and federal agencies are scrambling to hire back many of the employees laid off in Musk's slash-and-burn revamp of federal spending. Still, even with Musk out, the administration remains committed to achieving some major reductions, including a DOGE-style clawback of $9.4 billion in cuts to foreign aid and pubic media spending that's already passed the House. Russell Vought, a major force behind the arch-conservative Project 2025 police blueprint and current director of the Office of Management and Budget, has said DOGE's work will continue apace even without Musk. "Many DOGE employees and [full-time employees] are at the agencies, working almost as in-house consultants as a part of the agency's leadership," he testified this month. "And I think, you know, the leadership of DOGE is now much more decentralized."
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Most Brits think Labour has done a bad job in its first year of government, damning poll finds
MOST Brits think Labour has done a bad job in its first year of government, a damning poll has found. Fifty-four per cent believe Sir Keir Starmer's party has flopped since it stormed into power with a huge majority last July. 1 And even a third of those who voted for Labour at the election now think the party is doing a bad job, compared to 37 per cent saying it has done well. More people, 29 per cent, think the previous Tory government was doing a better job than Labour, while 26 per cent believe the reverse. Sir Keir's approval rating remains low at -35 per cent, behind Tory leader Kemi Badenoch on -24 per cent and Reform UK's Nigel Farage on -9. The survey was carried out by pollsters Opinium this week. James Crouch, their head of policy and public affairs, said: 'As Labour marks its first year in office, the public's mood is pessimistic. 'A majority believe the government has underperformed There is a sense of little to no visible progress on their key promises to rebuild Britain.'
