ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over persecution of women and girls
The warrants also accuse the leaders of persecuting 'other persons non-conforming with the Taliban's policy on gender, gender identity or expression; and on political grounds against persons perceived as 'allies of girls and women.''
The warrants were issued against Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhunzada and the head of the Supreme Court, Abdul Hakim Haqqani.
The court said in a statement that the Taliban have 'severely deprived, through decrees and edicts, girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion. In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender.'
The court's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, sought the warrants in January, saying that they recognized that 'Afghan women and girls as well as the LGBTQI+ community are facing an unprecedented, unconscionable and ongoing persecution by the Taliban.'
Global advocacy group Human Rights Watch welcomed the decision.
'Senior Taliban leaders are now wanted men for their alleged persecution of women, girls, and gender non-conforming people. The international community should fully back the ICC in its critical work in Afghanistan and globally, including through concerted efforts to enforce the court's warrants,' Liz Evenson, the group's international justice director, said in a statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
36 minutes ago
EU migration delegation ordered deported from eastern Libya on alleged entry violations
CAIRO -- CAIRO (AP) — Authorities in eastern Libya refused entry to three European ministers and the EU commissioner for migration on alleged entry violations, apparently after they stopped first in the rival Libyan capital of Tripoli in the west. A statement from the prime minister of the eastern part of Libya, Osama Hammad, said the interior ministers of Italy, Greece, Malta and the EU migration commissioner, Magnus Brunner, were 'persona non-grata' after they were denied entry shortly after their arrival in Benghazi. It said the ministers had entered illegally and had not followed Libyan diplomatic conventions. The ministers were in 'flagrant contravention of established diplomatic norms and international conventions, and through actions that demonstrably disregard Libyan national sovereignty, as well as in violation of Libyan domestic laws,' the statement said. The delegations 'are urged to engage with the Libyan Government in accordance with the principle of reciprocity, as enshrined in international agreements, treaties, and diplomatic custom,' it added. In addition to Brunner, the delegation included Greek Migration and Asylum Minister Thanos Plevris, Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi and Maltese Home Affairs Minister Byron Camilleri. The delegation was visiting Libya seeking tougher migration measures against boats carrying migrants from Libya. The EU has spent years and millions of euros trying to stem the people smuggling operations that have thrived in Libya's lawlessness and brought hundreds of thousands of desperate people to European shores. Libya plunged into chaos after a NATO-backed uprising toppled and killed longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi in 2011. In the chaos that followed, the country split, with rival administrations in the east and west backed by rogue militias and foreign governments. Currently, Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah heads the internationally recognized government in the capital of Tripoli in the west while Hammad heads the administration in the east, where the powerful military commander Khalifa Hifter continues to also hold sway. The EU delegation had met first with Dbeibah, and the deportation incident was apparently caused because the European delegation stopped first in Tripoli, said Greek Deputy Prime Minister Kostis Hadzidakis. Usually foreigners including diplomats coordinate with both administrations if they want to visit western and eastern Libya. Speaking to state-run ERT television in Greece, Hadzidakis said the Tripoli meeting went ahead as planned. 'However, in Benghazi —perhaps because the visit to Tripoli came first — the Benghazi government decided it would not receive the European Commissioner and the three ministers. I don't think that was a constructive move, especially given that the European Union is genuinely trying to find a solution to this very unusual situation — just as it has tried with our other southern and eastern neighbors — on a complex issue like migration." For southern and eastern Libya, which are under the control of Hifter's forces, visitors have to coordinate and get permits from the east-based government, which is allied with Hifter. It's not clear if such permits were sought or granted. In Italy, opposition lawmakers who have criticized the hard-line stance against migration of the government of Premier Giorgia Meloni were quick to point out the irony that her migration minister was deported from a country on alleged immigration violations. 'Piantedosi was turned back from Libya because he was accused of illegal entry,' Democratic Party lawmaker Matteo Orfini wrote on Facebook. 'I was thinking of an ironic comment but I'd say that's good as is.'
The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Few see falling birth rates as a priority: Survey
Few Americans see falling birth rates as a national priority, according to a new survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. When asked in the Thursday survey about how large of a problem declining birth rates in the U.S. is, 28 percent of respondents said it is a major issue while 44 percent called it a minor one. Twenty-seven percent didn't consider it a problem at all. The U.S. birth rate fell to an almost record low last year, per preliminary data. A vital statistics rapid release report published earlier this year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that about 3.6 million babies were born in the U.S. last year, a 1 percent increase from a record low number of births two years ago. The U.S. birth rate consistently dipped following the Great Recession in 2007, with births slightly rising in 2021, per CDC data. Some Republican leaders in recent months have emphasized pronatalism, encouraging Americans to have more children. Top proponents include former White House adviser Elon Musk and Vice President Vance. Americans, however, said the cost of raising children is more of a problem, per Tuesday's poll. In the AP-NORC survey, 76 percent said childcare costs are a big issue while just 18 percent considered it to be a minor one. Five percent of respondents said it was not a problem at all. The AP-NORC poll took place from June 5 to 9, with 1,158 people and a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court lets Trump move forward with large-scale staff cuts for now
WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on July 8 lifted a federal judge's order pausing the Trump administration's large-scale staffing cuts and agency restructuring, boosting the president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. In an unsigned and brief opininon, the justices said they are not ruling on the legality of a specific reorganization plan. But, the court said, the district judge was wrong to stop the administration from moving ahead with changes to agencies. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, calling it the 'wrong decision at the wrong moment, especially given what little this Court knows about what is actually happening on the ground.' "Yet, for some reason, this Court sees fit to step in now and release the President's wrecking ball at the outset of this litigation," Jackson wrote. Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that while she agrees with Jackson that any changes must comply with previous congressional directives, Trump's executive order instructed agencies to follow the law. 'The plans themselves are not before this Court, at this stage, and we thus have no occasion to consider whether they can and will be carried out consistent with the constraints of law,' she wrote. Sotomayor said the district judge can now consider whether that's happening. The mass federal layoffs were challenged by a group of unions, non-profits and local governments who argued the administration can't make such sweeping changes without Congress. In a joint statement, the coalition said the court's decision "has dealt a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that the American people rely on in grave jeopardy." The groups vowed to keep fighting. If the administration is allowed to plow forward while courts are weighing in, they've argued, it will be impossible to restore the agencies even if their challenge is ultimately successful. "There will be no way to unscramble that egg," lawyers for the unions and other challengers had told the Supreme Court. The administration argued President Donald Trump doesn't need "special permission" from Congress' to lay off thousands of federal employees. And it's not in the government's, or the taxpayer's interest, to have to wait for the litigation to play out before cutting the workforce, lawyers for the Justice Department said. "Every day that the preliminary injunction remains in effect, a government-wide program to implement agency RIFs is being halted and delayed, maintaining a bloated and inefficient workforce while wasting countless taxpayer dollars," the Justice Department told the Supreme Court. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco halted the layoffs, ruling on May 22 that the approximately 20 affected agencies won't be able to function as Congress intended. For example, she said, Congress established the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health but the administration wants to eliminate nearly all of its 222 employees. And the Social Security Administration, which was also established by Congress, has struggled to respond to Social Security recipients since staff reductions began, wrote Illston, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton. A divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals backed Illston's decision. Two of the three judges − both of whom were appointed by Democratic presidents − said the administration's 'unprecedented' attempt to restructure the federal government is so broad that it was difficult to fully capture the magnitude in their court order. Writing for the majority, Judge William Fletcher also said the administration failed to provide 'a single piece of evidence' for why it would suffer an irreparable injury if Trump can't immediately fire the workers. Judge Consuelo Callahan, who was appointed by a Republican president, dissented. She wrote that the courts were interfering with Trump's 'lawful conduct.' More: Thousands of federal employees are on a roller coaster of being fired, rehired The administration has aggressively challenged the pauses federal judges are putting on the president's policies as they're being litigated. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Federal government layoffs: Supreme Court sides with Trump for now
