logo
In the nation's poorest Congressional district, federal funding cuts create perfect storm

In the nation's poorest Congressional district, federal funding cuts create perfect storm

Independent2 days ago
On a sweltering summer day, children leap between rocks along the Bronx River while cyclists pedal on newly paved paths. Kayaks rest on what was once an industrial dumping ground, now transformed into a bustling promenade along the city's only freshwater river.
The Bronx River Greenway, a series of stitched-together waterfront parks built atop once largely abandoned and polluted wasteland, is a hard-fought victory for the country's poorest congressional district — one that locals call a 'beacon of environmental justice' built by federal dollars and water-pollution settlements from the borough's wealthier neighbors.
Now, like thousands of nonprofits around the country, this organization's future is in jeopardy. The Trump administration's sweeping federal grant cuts have left nonprofits nationwide and the communities they serve in precarious straits. But few places face as stark a reckoning as the Bronx, where federal funding has proved indispensable for revitalizing green spaces, protecting survivors of domestic violence, and preventing youth violence.
Over 84% of the 342 nonprofits based in the Bronx rely on federal grants now at risk, according to an analysis by the Urban Institute. It's a significant increase from the 70% of groups vulnerable to government defunding statewide.
In all but two of the country's 437 congressional districts, the typical nonprofit could not cover its expenses without government grants. Nonprofits have increasingly served as contractors for government services — like operating homeless shelters — since the 1960s.
In the Bronx, if such grants were to disappear entirely, the borough's nonprofits could face a collective deficit of nearly 30% — cuts that have begun to force layoffs and austerity on dozens of groups connecting Bronxites to low-cost health care, food assistance, and preschool slots.
'When America sneezes, the Bronx gets the flu,' said U.S. Rep. Ritchie Torres, the Democrat who represents the district. 'I think we in the Bronx feel we have been and will continue to be the hardest hit by the impact of a Trump presidency.'
From revival to reversal
Nestled in a corner of parkland atop the site of an abandoned amusement park, the headquarters of the Bronx River Alliance is among the borough's greenest buildings, boasting nature classrooms, samples of the river's flora and fauna, and a storage space teeming with kayaks and canoes.
In March, the group received formal notice that it would lose $1.5 million in federal grants promised under the Inflation Reduction Act last year for improving water quality and climate-resilience projects. After years of rising momentum, cubicles now sit empty. Leaders held off on hiring in anticipation of cuts, and now they don't know if they'll be able to fill those roles.
'I've met some of the folks who were pulling cars out of the river in the '70s and '80s,' said Daniel Ranells, the group's deputy director of programs. Back then, the area was a 'dumping ground' so inundated with industrial waste, tires, abandoned cars, ovens, and microwaves that 'folks didn't really understand there was a river there.'
That has shifted dramatically in recent years thanks in part to decades of federal investment. Just south of its headquarters, the organization restored salt marshes along the riverbanks of a shuttered concrete plant.
In 2007, the first beaver appeared on the Bronx River in over 200 years — named 'José the Beaver' in honor of former Congressman José E. Serrano, who helped direct millions in federal funds to groups dedicated to the river's restoration.
'The Bronx River is a shining light of environmental justice,' Ranells said, and millions in federal funding over the years has helped 'make it a destination' after years of neglect.
Progress frozen
Now staffers at the Bronx River Alliance describe a sense of 'whiplash' in seeing hard-fought funds dry up and grant language scrubbed of any allusions to racial or environmental justice.
The Bronx River Alliance has joined other nonprofits in suing the Trump administration to unfreeze funds, but the uncertainty has already disrupted years of planning, a reality that has rippled across the neighborhood, leaving few organizations untouched.
Up the street from the Alliance, the office of the Osborne Association, a group that has worked to prevent youth violence for nearly a century, has grown quieter. In April, an email from the Bureau of Justice Assistance stated the remaining $666,000 of a $2 million grant 'no longer effectuates department priorities.'
The cut thrust the nonprofit into 'triage mode,' said Osborne president Jonathan Monsalve, who was forced to lay off three staffers and reduce the number of participants in a diversion program offering young adults facing gun charges an alternative to jail time.
'It's a lifeline for young people, and it's no longer there for 25 more of them,' Monsalve said. 'Without another alternative, it's 25 young people that will see prison or jail time, and that's incredibly frustrating.'
Why the Bronx bears the brunt
The Department of Justice has canceled over $810 million in similar grants to nonprofits working in violence prevention. The Environmental Protection Agency attempted to cancel $2 billion in grants for environmental justice work.
Nonprofit leaders say the cuts hit hardest in the places that can afford them the least. In the Bronx, almost 30 percent of residents live in poverty, the vast majority of whom are Black or Latino, and nearly one in six schoolchildren experience homelessness every year.
'We've had decades of disinvestment in these communities, and we had been starting to see some meaningful investment and community-based solutions that were actually working,' said Monsalve. 'And then all of a sudden that support just gets yanked away.'
The federal government, he said, is essentially telling these communities: 'You aren't a priority anymore. You don't fit the plan.'
For decades, a million-dollar federal grant allowed the victim-service organization Safe Horizon to operate a program that stationed domestic violence advocates in the borough's criminal court.
When the grant came up for renewal this year, it came with new restrictions that CEO Liz Roberts described as 'so extreme, so broad, so radical' that the organization chose to walk away rather than accept conditions which would have prohibited supporting transgender survivors or treating domestic violence as a systemic issue.
It was an agonizing decision given the volume of domestic violence in the Bronx, Roberts said.
It means that hundreds of survivors 'may not have the opportunity to talk to an advocate about their options, about their rights, or about their safety,' she said.
Filling the void
Roberts said she's bracing for more cuts — federal funds make up about 24% of the group's budget — that could force the closure of shelters or reductions to a citywide hotline.
As nonprofits nationwide grapple with similar losses, Roberts said private philanthropy and local governments will need to 'make some smart and thoughtful and principled decisions about where they can help to fill those gaps.'
In places like the Bronx, finding alternative funding is especially challenging. 'The not-for-profit sector is often fragile, and nowhere more so than the Bronx,' Torres said of the district he represents, where organizations tend to be more dependent on government funding than wealthier enclaves.
'Organizations spent hundreds of thousands of dollars simply to apply for a contract and hired staff and made all these plans only to see the written contract disappear,' Torres said. 'It's deeply destabilizing.'
_____
Sara Herschander is a senior reporter at the Chronicle of Philanthropy, where you can read the full article. This article was provided to The Associated Press by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as part of a partnership to cover philanthropy and nonprofits supported by the Lilly Endowment. The Chronicle is solely responsible for the content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Massive spike in threats against Obama after Trump team claims he committed ‘treason'
Massive spike in threats against Obama after Trump team claims he committed ‘treason'

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Massive spike in threats against Obama after Trump team claims he committed ‘treason'

Threats made online against former president Barack Obama spiked over the weekend after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused him of a years-long coup attempt against President Donald Trump. Gabbard has claimed Obama and his top officials ran a 'treasonous conspiracy' by insinuating they manufactured an investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election to undermine Trump's first election. Hours after she made the claim, on July 18, violent rhetoric about Obama surged on platforms such as Truth Social, Telegram, and Gab, with some calling for his arrest, imprisonment, and execution. That rhetoric was intensified after the president posted an artificial intelligence-generated video of Obama being arrested and continued to re-post Gabbard's claims throughout the weekend. By July 19, threatening comments targeting Obama rose from three to 56 – a more than 1,700 percent increase, according to the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism. Truth Social users posted rhetoric calling for a 'firing squad,' a 'public hanging,' and 'streaming' his execution live – all while decrying Obama for the alleged treason. One user called for Obama's execution by using memes of a guillotine, electric shock chair, and public hanging platform. For years, Trump has blamed Obama and other Democrats for abusing power to facilitate investigations or indictments into himself. Since taking back the White House, Trump has promised to conduct a campaign of retribution against those he believes have targeted him. The documents Gabbard referred to as evidence of Obama's meddling show that the Obama administration wanted a review of the allegations against Russia before leaving office and pressured intelligence agencies to work quickly. spokesperson for Obama denied Gabbard's allegations, calling them 'bizarre,' 'ridiculous,' and 'a weak attempt at distraction. The Independent has asked the White House for comment. The Global Project Against Hate and Extremism said similar violent rhetoric increased on Gab, a platform known for platforming right-wing extremists. Between July 17 and July 20, comments targeted Obama as treasonous and deserving punishment rose from nine to 48, a more than 400 percent increase. A review of targeted comments made on Telegram in the same timeline revealed that threats against Obama rose from zero to 12. A White House spokesperson told Newsweek that, "President Trump and the entire administration strongly condemn all forms of violence. The Trump administration also believes in accountability and that individuals who participate in criminal activity should be held to the fullest extent of the law.

Trump fires back at reports he's trying to destroy Musk's companies
Trump fires back at reports he's trying to destroy Musk's companies

Daily Mail​

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump fires back at reports he's trying to destroy Musk's companies

President Donald Trump shot back at reports that he will try to destroy the companies of former best friend Elon Musk, clarifying his intent when it comes to the world's richest man. Trump had previously threatened to take away the billions in government contracts that Musk's various companies hold. The duo had a very public fallout over Trump's one big beautiful bill, which resulted in each man making threats against the other But the president now says he wants Musk to 'thrive.' 'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before! The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us,' Trump wrote. The clarification came after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked in her briefing on Wednesday if Trump supports federal agencies contracting with Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI. 'I don't think so, no,' she replied and then added she would speak to the president about the matter. xAI won a contract for up to $200 million with the Department of Defense, alongside Anthropic, Google and OpenAI, last week. Additionally, this week, xAI unveiled a suite of products for U.S. government customers, which it refers to as Grok for Government. Trump and Musk have had a hot and cold relationship since the Tesla founder left government service in May. After his departure, Musk publicly turned on Trump's signature bill, complaining it would increase the country's debt and undo much of the savings his Department of Government Efficiency had sought. Trump was furious at Musk's public criticism and, at one point, responded: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' 'We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon,' Trump added. Musk, for his part, threatened to start a third political party to go after Republican candidates and posted on his X account that the reason the Jeffrey Epstein files hadn't been released because Trump is in them. He later took that post down.

The clearest sign yet that progressive darling AOC has White House ambitions
The clearest sign yet that progressive darling AOC has White House ambitions

Daily Mail​

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The clearest sign yet that progressive darling AOC has White House ambitions

Progressive 'Squad' leader Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has raised more money than anyone else in the House of Representatives. The millennial New York Democrat has even raised more cash than Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., Trump's closest ally in Congress and the third in line to the presidency. AOC, 35, has received a whopping $15.4 million dollars this year in donations, Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings show. Johnson has raised about half of that for his personal campaign, around $8.7 million, according to FEC filings. There's been wide speculation that she is amassing a major war chest to launch a bid for Senate or even the White House in 2028. Prediction sites have placed the New York Democrat among the most likely to run for the presidency next election. And the markets think she could even win her party's nomination. AOC has a 15 percent chance of securing the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028, according to Kalshi, only California Gov. Gavin Newsom has higher odds at 20 percent. Her prospects and popularity have skyrocketed as she has toured the country and pushed back loudly against the Trump administration both in Congress and online. 'She is trading on her national profile to go where the dollars are,' Jacob Neiheisel, a political professor at the University of Buffalo, recently told the New York Post. 'It's become incredibly easy to pull dollars from all across the country,' he added. Earlier this year she toured the country with Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont from February until June where they regularly filled out stadiums, spectacles akin to rallies hosted by President Donald Trump. Their 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour pulled in well over 100,000 attendees across a dozen states. 'In Q2, AOC raised $5.8m from over 161,000 individual donors and an average donation of just $17,' her campaign manager Oliver Hidalgo-Wohlleben, posted earlier this month. 'In 2025, over 342,000 individual donors have donated to the campaign with only four who have gave the max amount.' 'AOC is one of the few candidates to take zero corporate pac or lobbyist money,' he shared. 'We are 100% grassroots funded.' Many of her small dollar contributions come from outside her district in Queens. According to FEC filings, the majority of her funding comes from California. 'People willing to call out [President] Trump's corruption and Washington Republicans' extremism the loudest definitely attract the most attention and dollars,' John Lapp, former executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee told the Wall Street Journal. The most 'provocative stars in the Democratic party' will raise the most money, he said. AOC has stepped into the spotlight that Sanders used to occupy in his previous presidential campaigns, a champion for the working class. She is easily one of the most, if not the most, identifiable progressives in the entire party. Her frequent attacks aimed at Trump admin officials online, where she denounces their actions on immigration, tariffs, healthcare and virtually every other policy area, have also been a crucial point of resistance for the Democrats. Trump himself frequently bashes her on his Truth Social app - a badge of honor among Democrats these days - and AOC's accolades are stacking up fast. 'Stupid AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, one of the 'dumbest' people in Congress, is now calling for my Impeachment, despite the fact that the Crooked and Corrupt Democrats have already done that twice before,' the president wrote last month. 'Mr. President, don't take your anger out on me — I'm just a silly girl,' AOC wrote back. 'Take it out on whoever convinced you to betray the American people and our Constitution by illegally bombing Iran and dragging us into war. It only took you 5 months to break almost every promise you made.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store