
US households face bigger income loss than Trump's $300 billion tariff revenue
Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the US, so far in 2025, had garnered around $100 billion in tariff income, which could triple to $300 billion by the end of the year. And while Trump claims the tariffs 'will start being paid' from August 1 by the countries they are imposed on, the loss of income for American households from higher prices will exceed the government's revenues on account of the higher duties on foreign goods.
According to non-partisan policy research centre The Budget Lab at Yale, all tariffs levied up to July 9 in 2025 — assuming they stay in force in perpetuity — will lead to a 1.8 per cent increase in prices in the short-run, which is equivalent to an annual income loss of $2,367 for each household, on average.
With the Census Bureau estimating the number of US households at just over 127 million, this results in a total income loss of $302 billion for American households this year.
The Budget Lab's calculations assume the US Federal Reserve does not react to the tariffs, which are estimated to bring down GDP growth in 2025 by 70 basis points (bps) and 40 bps in the long run — equivalent to an annual GDP loss of $110 billion in 2024 prices. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate is seen rising 40 bps by the end of 2025.
To be sure, the gains for the US government from the tariffs could end up being higher than just $300 billion considering the reciprocal tariffs were suspended for 90 days as various countries negotiated trade deals with the Trump administration.
According to the Budget Lab, the tariffs levied so far in 2025 could raise the government's revenue by a net $2.2 trillion over 2026-35. This is lower than the US Congressional Budget Office's own estimate of tariff income of about $2.8 trillion over 10 years, which Bessant said this week was 'probably low.'
Starting July 7, Trump has sent 'letters' to 22 countries informing them of the tariff that would apply to goods imported into the US from their shores starting August 1. This interim pause until next month, according to ANZ Asia Economist Krystal Tan, 'appears to be a calculated negotiation tactic – designed to increase the pressure on trading partners to accelerate talks and offer deeper concessions'.
However, the list is littered with names that the US stands little to gain from. Of the 22 countries on whom the US has levied tariffs as of July 9, eight – Laos, Myanmar, Serbia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Libya, Tunisia, Brunei, and Moldova – enjoyed a goods trade surplus of less than $1 billion in 2024. In fact, these eight countries' goods trade surplus with the US in 2024 was a mere $3.79 billion, up from $3.11 billion in 2023.
And yet, these countries have been slapped with tariffs ranging from 40 per cent – Laos and Myanmar, who had a goods trade surplus of $763 million and $577 million, respectively, with the US in 2024 – to 25 per cent. Moldova, which faces a tariff of 25 per cent, had a goods trade surplus of just $85 million with the US last year. All these rates are in addition to any sector-specific tariffs.
Then there is Brazil, which has attracted the highest tariff rate of 50 per cent for non-trade reasons, with Trump complaining in his letter to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva that the treatment of his predecessor Jair Bolsonaro – who is on trial for his alleged coup attempt following a loss to Lula in the 2022 elections – was a 'disgrace' and a 'witch hunt'. The US, ironically, enjoyed a goods trade surplus of almost $7 billion with Brazil in 2024.
On the whole, the 22 countries to have received Trump's letters so far had a combined goods trade surplus of $264 billion in 2024, up 8 per cent from 2023. However, this year-on-year increase hides a few key points. One, the US' surplus or deficit with nine of these countries – Brazil, Myanmar, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Iraq, Libya, Algeria, Japan, Malaysia, and Brunei – had improved in 2024 from 2023. In fact, the increase in the deficit last year was due to just two countries – South Korea and Thailand – both of whom face a 25 per cent tariff. Both are also key trade partners for the US.
'It is undoubtedly interesting that Trump is targeting South Korea and Japan, the two most important allies in Asia. Whether this will help to build a united front with these countries against their major global rival, China, remains to be seen,' Commerzbank economists Bernd Weidensteiner and Christoph Balz said in a note on July 8.
Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy.
... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Over 20 states sue Trump over $6.8 billion frozen funds for after-school, summer programmes
More than 20 states have sued US President Donald Trump over the freezing of about $6.8 billion in funding for after-school, summer programmes and other programmes. The states have argued that the Donald Trump administration has violated the US Constitution by not considering Congress's sole authority over spending. (Bloomberg) Attorney generals or governors from 24 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration in federal court in Providence, Rhode Island. They argued that the US department of education and the office of management (OMB) and Budget brought chaos to schools across America by freezing funding for six programmes approved by Congress. North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson told ABC News, "This is plainly against the law." He went on to explain from a legal standpoint that this is "against the Constitution, against the Impoundment Act. This is not a hard case". According to the Impoundment Control Act, 1947, Congress must note and review the executive branch withholdings of budget authority. This requires the President to report any such withholdings to Congress. ALSO READ | 20 US states sue Trump administration over sharing of medical aid data with deportation officials While the Trump administration has been going after Ivy League universities head-on, freezing millions and billions of dollars in funding, the freeze also extended to the money used to support migrant farm workers and their childrens' education, recruitment and training of teachers, English proficiency learning and academic enrichment, besides the after-school and summer programmes. The lawsuit filed against Trump said that his administration was legally required to release the funds to the states by July 1, Reuters reported. Instead, the education department notified them on June 30 that the funds would not be released under those programmes as per the deadline, citing the change in administration as its reason. At the time, an OMB spokesperson reportedly said, "ongoing programmatic review" of education funding and said initial findings showed what he termed as a misuse of grant funds to "subsidize a radical leftwing agenda." The department also raised objections to the grant money being used to support scholarship for immigrant students and LGBTQ-themed lessons. The Democratic-led states said that the freeze has resulted in cancellations of summer school and after-school programmes and the halting of other initiatives, with little time for schools to fill in the gaps in their budget. ALSO READ | Trump administration sues California over transgender athletes in schools The states have argued that the Trump administration has violated the US Constitution by not considering Congress's sole authority over spending and went against the federal administrative law by freezing funds without any logical explanation. They also said that the administration failed to abide by the Impoundment Control Act, which prevents the executive branch from single-handedly refusing to spend funds approved by Congress unless certain procedures are followed. Jackson further told ABC News, "If the courts don't act promptly, the consequences will be dire." He warned that districts face the threat of immediate harm as the school year is nearing. The North Carolina Attorney General said that the massive effect of the pause could also result in the firing of about 1,000 educators in the district. "Everybody knows when it comes to juvenile crime, you want a safe place for teenagers to be able to go, to be able to keep them out of trouble," Jackson said, adding that elimination of after-school programmes across the US has never been considered a "good idea". ALSO READ | 12 states sue Donald Trump administration in trade court to stop tariff policy Alabama State Superintendent of Education Eric Mackey said that this will affect the students with the "greatest need". He told ABC News, "The loss of funding for those rural, poor, high poverty school districts, is just going to be, you know, more fuel for the fire that makes it more difficult to educate children in those communities." Christy Gleason, executive director of Save the Children Action Network, which provides after-school programming for 41 schools in rural areas of Washington and across the South, where the school year is set to begin as soon as August, said, "Time is of the essence." "It's not too late to make a decision, so the kids who really need this still have it," she added.


India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
24 states sue Trump administration over $6.8 billion education funding freeze
An administrative fight is heating up over the Trump team's decision to block over $6 billion in education grants. More than 20 states have filed a lawsuit to restore funding for after-school programs, summer camps, and other learning opportunities, mostly for students from low-income major program affected is the 21st Century Community Learning Centres initiative. This program helps about 1.4 million children by offering free tutoring, enrichment activities, and childcare through organisations such as Boys & Girls Clubs, the YMCA, and public areas are particularly suffering from the freeze. Republican congressional districts are home to 91 of the 100 school districts that receive the most funding from these grants, according to a report by the left-leaning think tank New America. States like Georgia, Florida, West Virginia, and California are home to a large number of these districts. The Trump administration says the pause on funding is to make sure that the programs match the president's priorities. The Office of Management and Budget mentioned concerns about how the money is being used, including whether the programs support undocumented immigrants or LGBTQ+ CLOSURES WITHOUT FUNDSAcross the country, local organisations are struggling to keep their programs running. In Rhode Island, the state government had to step in with emergency money to keep summer camps open. But other groups say they may not be able to survive much Boys & Girls Club of America, which has 926 clubs, warned that some of their locations might start closing within weeks if the funding isn't released. The YMCA and Save the Children have also said that many of their centres are at risk."Time is of the essence," said Christy Gleason from Save the Children Action Network. Her organisation supports after-school programs in 41 rural schools across Washington state and the southern US, where school begins as early as some Republican officials are worried. Georgia schools superintendent Richard Woods, a Republican, said, "I deeply believe in fiscal responsibility, which means evaluating the use of funds and seeking out efficiencies, but also means being responsible — releasing funds already approved by Congress and signed by President Trump."Many fear that if the delay continues, working parents will lose valuable support, and children will miss out on safe and enriching spaces after school. Programs like these offer not only learning but also meals, supervision, and Gleason added, "It's not too late to make a decision so the kids who really need this still have it."- EndsWith inputs from APTune InMust Watch


India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
One of the worst real estate deals ever made: Trump on Gaza
US President Donald Trump on Monday called the Gaza Strip "one of the worst real estate deals ever made." He criticised how Gaza was formed, saying Israel gave up valuable "oceanfront property.""The Gaza strip. I call it the Gaza strip. One of the worst real estate deals ever made. They gave up the oceanfront property. One of the worst deals ever made," he Gaza strip. I call it the Gaza strip. One of the worst real estate deals ever made. They gave up the oceanfront property. One of the worst deals ever Clash Report (@clashreport) July 14, 2025advertisementHe made these comments during the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. Trump also said that Israel might hand over control of Gaza to the United States in the future. A day earlier, Trump said he hoped talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas would be resolved soon. He told reporters, "We are talking and hopefully we're going to get that straightened out over the next week."The US has been backing a 60-day ceasefire plan. This plan includes a gradual release of hostages, Israeli troops pulling back from parts of Gaza, and peace talks to end the ENVISIONS GAZA AS A RESORTFor several months, Trump has suggested turning Gaza into a resort area like the "Middle Eastern Riviera." He said US officials could lead efforts to rebuild the area. Trump's Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, may be involved in the planning."There could be something fairly soon to talk about," Trump said, hinting that he may soon present detailed ideas for Gaza's future. He has talked before about building luxury hotels and tourist attractions in the war-damaged is not the first time Trump has talked about Gaza in such terms. In February, Trump said the US would "take over" the enclave, saying a plan could turn it into the "Rivera of the Middle East." "The US will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it, too. We'll own it," Trump no official plan has been shared yet. The Gaza Strip is currently suffering from a terrible conflict. Since the war began in October 2023, tens of thousands of people have died or been conflict started on October 7, 2023, when Hamas militants attacked Israel. They killed about 1,200 people and took 251 hostages into Gaza. Officials believe around 20 of those hostages are still response has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to health officials in Gaza. Nearly all of Gaza's 2 million residents have been displaced.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersMust Watch