Donald Trump in turmoil as Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyer adds fuel to his fears
Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell have fuelled Donald Trump's fears she may speak out, saying he would 'be surprised' if he knew his lawyers were demanding her sentence not be overturned.
Last week, the President's Department of Justice controversially announced that no charges would be brought against Jeffrey Epstein 's high-profile associates, including Prince Andrew. The move has sparked an unprecedented backlash against Trump from within his MAGA supporters, who are furious that no one other than Maxwell, once a close friend of the US leader, has faced justice.
Some of his outraged supporters have even burned their red 'Make America Great Again'. The president himself has since repeatedly lashed out at being asked why no charges have been brought.
Convicted sex trafficker Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years behind bars in the States, has appealed to America's Supreme Court to have her conviction overturned. Her lawyers argue that a 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida between Epstein and the US government protected her.
But a federal appeals court already ruled against the 63-year-old, and Trump's Department of Justice is now calling on the Supreme Court to do the same. The move has led Maxwell's lawyer, David Markus, to question whether the President knows his attorneys are arguing to keep her locked up.
Last week, the Mirror revealed how the president has been left panicked that Maxwell may break her silence and reveal details of his past ties to Epstein. Many Americans believe the Epstein files that Trump had promised to release in full were suddenly shut down after Elon Musk named the US leader as being identified within them.
Now, Markus has added more fuel to the fire by saying he believes Trump would not stop Maxwell's conviction from being quashed due to the non-prosecution agreement. He said: 'I would be surprised if President Trump knew his lawyers were asking the Supreme Court to let the government break a deal. He's the ultimate dealmaker, and I'm sure he'd agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it."
The lawyer added: 'With all the talk about who's being prosecuted and who isn't, it's especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the US government made and broke.' The president's concern is that Maxwell may now decide to speak about his friendship with Epstein in an effort to restore her reputation or retaliate against those she believes left her to take the fall.
While Trump has denied any wrongdoing and insists he severed ties with Epstein years before the financier's 2019 arrest, the pair frequently socialised in the early 2000s, including at Mar-a-Lago.
Maxwell attended events at several of Trump's properties during the same period. The Mirror previously reported how the caged British socialite was considering asking her old pal, the president, for a pardon, as he is in the White House. Trump was a long-time associate of Epstein and Maxwell and was famously videotaped at a party discussing the appearance of young girls who were present during a conversation with the late paedophile.
During his first term in the White House, he was concerned by a US newspaper story in July 2020 about her arrest. It quoted a friend of Epstein as describing Maxwell as believing herself to be "protected by the intelligence communities she and [Epstein] helped with information ... by Prince Andrew, President Clinton and even by President Trump," whom they described as having been "well-known to be an acquaintance of her and Epstein's".
According to New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman's book about Trump, Confidence Man, the US leader tackled his advisers about the story at an Oval Office meeting. "You see that article in the Post today that mentioned me?" he asked aides. When they didn't react, Trump pressed them further, asking: "She say anything about me?"
Maxwell, the Oxford-educated daughter of crooked tycoon Robert Maxwell, was once a fixture in the same Palm Beach and New York elite circles as Trump. The president has acknowledged knowing her for years, and the pair were frequently seen together at high-society events in the 1990s and 2000s.
When Maxwell was first arrested, Trump's response raised eyebrows. "I just wish her well," he said during a White House briefing. "I've met her numerous times over the years, especially since I lived in Palm Beach, and I guess they [Maxwell and Epstein] lived in Palm Beach," he added. "But I wish her well, whatever it is." The remarks had many questioning just how deep their connection ran.
The FBI's decision to end its Epstein probe came as Attorney General Pam Bondi, appointed by the president, faces growing scrutiny over contradictory statements she has made about the case. In February, she confirmed the existence of a non-public list of Epstein's alleged clients, saying there were "tens of thousands of videos and documents" still held by the FBI, some of which allegedly showed "horrific crimes involving minors."
However, last week, Trump's US Department of Justice stated that it had concluded its review and had "no further information" to share with the public. The abrupt reversal prompted questions for the White House.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Bondi, saying: "She was referring to the entirety of all of the paperwork, all of the paper, in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes… and I'll let her speak to that." The contradiction intensified criticism that the Trump administration has failed Epstein's victims, many of whom have accused the justice system of protecting the powerful while offering only one conviction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Labour MPs resist ‘backsliding' Supreme Court trans judgment
Labour MPs have deemed the Supreme Court's ruling on the definition of a woman as 'completely unnecessary' and a 'backslide' on rights, months after the judgment. Analysis by The Times of responses to constituents from Labour MPs found politicians claimed the ruling was being weaponised by the far right and that 'bigots [would] feel empowered by a false belief that the law is now on their side'. The Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that the definition of a woman, in terms of the Equality Act, must be based on biology. It meant that for a service, such as a domestic abuse refuge, to claim to be single-sex, it would have to exclude transgender women. Although many letters sent by MPs, and seen by The Times, featured generic stock responses, an analysis of more than 50 pieces of correspondence revealed how some MPs continued to push back against the ruling and cast doubt over forthcoming guidance being produced by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), the equality regulator. Andrew Western, a work and pensions minister and the MP for Stretford & Urmston, told one constituent that he believed the case was 'completely unnecessary' and he appreciated 'the fear and distress that has resulted' from it. Josh Newbury, the MP for Cannock Chase, said in a letter it was 'clear in my view that trans women are women and that trans men are men'. He said the Supreme Court ruling did not contradict that but that 'the misinterpretation of, and fallout from, the ruling has wrongly brought this into question'. He said: 'I do not believe it is morally right for trans people to be excluded from single-sex spaces designated for their gender.' In another letter Noah Law, the MP for St Austell and Newquay, said the ruling could 'be used as an excuse to discriminate against transgender people'. He said he feared the ruling would 'serve as a backslide' and added: 'It is, ultimately, not down to any court to decide how people feel living in their own skin, and it seems like obvious common courtesy to let people live in a way that makes them feel happy and safe.' • The trans rights age gap: 'It's infuriating when Mum argues about loos' Emily Darlington, the MP for Milton Keynes Central, suggested the 'far right' was exploiting the issue to sow division. She said: 'The UK is increasingly at odds with European peer countries on trans rights, and anti-trans rhetoric is gaining influence in public and policy spheres.' Louise Haigh, the former transport secretary, said the Equality Act had previously 'rightly been interpreted as inclusive of trans people, including trans women, except in specific and proportionate circumstances'. She said there were some settings where it was right to have space reserved for biological women. Calvin Bailey, the MP for Leyton and Wanstead,wrote: 'In addition to trans people, those who are non-binary or who don't match the gender expectations of others could equally face greater risks of abuse or humiliation. These impacts will be all the worse if the public debate becomes even more toxic and bigots feel empowered by a false belief that the law is now on their side.' Others attempted to take a more balanced approach. In one letter Antonia Bance, the Labour MP for Tipton, Wednesbury and Coseley, told a constituent that she backed the Supreme Court and that in some cases single-sex spaces based on biological sex were 'necessary'. However, she said the guidance being drawn up by the EHRC was unlikely to settle matters. She said: 'I doubt anyone will be entirely satisfied with the outcome — which more than likely will be a messy British compromise.' Bance, who describes herself in her letter as 'a lesbian woman out and proud for the last 26 years', told her constituent that 'civil rights for trans people are non-negotiable'. She said transgender people must be treated with dignity and respect, and added: 'We still have some way to go to make sure no trans person is victimised or discriminated against.' However Bance also said that previous jobs in women's prisons and the domestic abuse sector had shaped her view. She said: 'We need clear rules to ensure that women are safe, and that they can expect privacy and dignity when they are vulnerable — for example because they have directly experienced male violence, or because they are sleeping, receiving intimate care, changing their clothes or showering.' She said these cases were few but 'therefore I support the court's judgment that woman means biological female — it is a clear and commonsense position'. She rejected suggestions that ministers were following an 'overtly transphobic agenda or attacking trans or women's rights'. Alistair Strathern, the MP for Hitchin, told one constituent: 'While I respect the independence of the judiciary, the UK Supreme Court and its decision, I share the concerns of many, including colleagues, of some of the risks and uncertainties opened up by the ruling. These risks have seemed exacerbated by the interim guidance from the EHRC that opens more questions than it answers.' All MPs were contacted for comment. Labour Women's Declaration, a group which backs sex-based rights, said the responses were 'both disappointing and deeply concerning' and risked leaving the public confused over the party's position. A spokeswoman said: 'Of particular concern are the number of MPs and peers who are openly saying that the rights of trans people are under threat. This not only calls into question the legitimacy of the Supreme Court judgment which explicitly states the ruling 'does not remove protection from trans people', it actively fuels fear within the very community they claim to support.' She said: 'We now call upon the government to maintain their resolve and remind outlier Labour MPs, who seek to push their own agenda, of their duty to uphold the law.' Maya Forstater, chief executive of the charity Sex Matters, said that leadership was needed so that MPs understood the law. She said: 'Every government has backbench rebels. But when they make dismissive and factually incorrect statements that run directly counter to the government's stated position, it's a failure of leadership to let them stand.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Protest held outside Canary Wharf hotel housing asylum seekers
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump attacks ‘racist sleazebag' Charlamagne tha God after radio host criticized him on Lara Trump's show
President Donald Trump launched a bruising attack on radio host Charlamagne tha God on Truth Social early Sunday morning after The Breakfast Club host suggested the president's devoted base would pivot to a more traditional conservative candidate after the Epstein Files situation. Referring to Charlamagne, whose real name is Lenard McKelvey, as a 'racist sleazebag,' Trump claimed the radio host is a 'Low IQ individual' who does not know anything. 'He's a Low IQ individual, has no idea what words are coming out of his mouth, and knows nothing about me or what I have done,' Trump said before listing his international and domestic successes. The president's comment was made after Charlamagne joined Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law, on her Fox News show My View. On the show, Charlamagne said that traditional Republicans would capitalize on the MAGA base's disgruntlement with Trump to change the Republican Party. 'I think there is a political coup going on right now in the Republican Party,' Charlamagne told Lara Trump. 'I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back.' Charlamagne was referring to the fallout between the president and some members of his base after refusing to release the Epstein Files – information the government collected while investigating convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump did not specify whether or not one specific comment from Charlamagne set him off, but the president's anger toward the radio host was tangible in his Truth Social post. 'The very wonderful and talented Lara Trump, whose show is a big ratings success, put racist sleazebag Charlamagne 'The God' (Why is he allowed to use the word 'GOD' when describing himself? Can anyone imagine the uproar there would be if I used that nickname?).' Trump, who has repeatedly compared himself to Jesus Christ, wrote. Recently, the president has been sensitive about the Epstein Files situation, occasionally snapping at reporters who ask about it. Trump had promised to release the Epstein Files, which many had speculated contained a list of high-profile individuals associated with Epstein and his alleged decades-long sex trafficking scheme involving girls and women. However, senior officials in the Trump administration poured cold water on the speculation, confirming there was no 'client list' and Epstein died by suicide while in federal jail in 2019. As a result, some MAGA supporters pushed back on the president, accusing him of failing to keep a promise to protect high-profile individuals, potentially including himself, from being associated with Epstein. Although Trump and Epstein were friends years ago, the president has maintained that he did not have a relationship with Epstein by the time he faced formal allegations of sexual abuse. Last month, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump sent Epstein a 'bawdy' birthday letter referencing 'secrets' – however, Trump has also denied that and sued the Journal for libel. While Trump has not been accused of any formal wrongdoing or charged with any crime, his proximity to Epstein, someone he once called a friend, has heightened conspiracy theories that the government is withholding documents that could reveal embarrassing information about high-profile individuals. Appearing in the files also does not indicate that an individual has committed any wrongdoing. Charlamagne maintained that the situation may give traditional conservatives, such as Nikki Haley, the chance to swoop in and appeal to MAGA voters. 'They know that this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up, the MAGA base isn't letting this issue go,' Charlamagne said. 'And for the first time, they know they can probably take their party back and not piss off the MAGA base.'
