Huge catfight erupts along 'America's most dangerous subway line' in Chicago where even cops fear to tread
Footage emerged online earlier this week showing a group of women brawling on the notorious line on June 22 near the 47th Street Station in the Democrat led city.
In the horrifying clip, fellow passengers can be seen running away from the violence, as some can be heard calling out: 'No!', and 'break it up'.
A man can be seen in the middle of the brawl as the women throw punches at each other, at one point he kicks one of the women away.
He appears to try and split it up, other passengers can be seen filming and goading on those involved. Chicago PD couldn't find any logs of the brawl.
Officers did say that on the same day and on the same train a 65-year-old man was involved in a fight with three unknown males, he was rushed to hospital.
The new footage comes only two weeks after a Chicago police officer was attacking by subway riders while patrolling a station, also on the Red Line.
The unidentified officer was standing on the 69th subway station, also on the Red Line, when three riders screamed at him before the confrontation turned violent.
One of the men swung at the officer, who managed to duck, but was knocked off his feet after taking a punch to the ribcage.
He was able to get up, but was immediately surrounded by the three men who swung at him multiple times.
The officer was hit again and was struck so hard he fell against the stopped Red Line subway before hitting the concrete.
One of the officers managed to slip to safety while his comrades kept his attackers at bay until they walked away.
Other videos also emerged showed K9 units and their officers being attacked on the platform.
Just last week cops in the city issued a warning for those traveling on the Red Line after an armed robbery on a platform in the city's North Side.
It happened on an escalator on July 12 just before midday inside the CTA Red Line-Clybourn Station.
They released images of four people wanted in connection with the robbery, who they said hit a man in the face and demanded his wallet.
One of the suspects is said to have pulled out a gun when the victim attempted to recover his wallet.
On July 2nd, a shooting on the Red Line during in the early hours of the morning left a man critically injured.
Police said a 29-year-old man got into a fight with another passenger when they pulled a gun and shot him in the thigh and buttocks.
The suspected shooter fled the scene on another train, Chicago Police confirmed on Friday that no suspect has been taken into custody and they are still investigating.
In early May, police said they were looking for 14 suspects who allegedly beat and robbed a couple on the line.
Cops said the mob of 14, a mixture of young men and women, pulled a knife on them and used pepper spray during the incident.
Other clips have also emerged on social media showing frequent brawls on trains and platforms on the Red Line.
Police figures show that crime is up 42 percent over a four-year period in the city, although it is down 14 percent compared to 2024 between January and June.
A study by the Illinois Policy found that the Green Line was the worst in the city, with the Red Line closely following in second place.
Police data said that those riding the Red Line were the second-most likely to be a victim of a crime, with 1.7 out of every 100,000 rides ending in a crime.
Citywide, about 1.3 out of every 100,000 rides starting at a CTA station or platform ended in a crime.
The most common crime was battery. Second was deceptive practices, such as bait-and-switch schemes or counterfeiting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Exclusive: Aspiring CBP officer sues after being rejected over ‘religious' ayahuasca tea use
An aspiring U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer is suing after getting rejected for the job by admitting she consumes ayahuasca during biweekly religious ceremonies. Juliana Reis, a Brazilian-American member of União do Vegetal, a Christian reincarnationist sect that regularly drinks a sacramental ayahuasca tea to, the group contends, 'heighten spiritual understanding and perception, and bring the practitioners closer to God.' The tea contains various compounds and often produces a hallucinogenic experience. 'Religious practitioners ritually prepare the tea and consider it sacred, much as Catholics believe the wine and host they take at communion to be holy,' according to União do Vegetal, otherwise known as UDV. But when Reis revealed this during the pre-employment polygraph exam that all CBP applicants undergo, the job offer was withdrawn, according to a federal religious discrimination lawsuit filed Tuesday. DHS policy disqualifies any job-seekers who have used a substance classified as a Schedule I drug – which the tea contains – within the three years preceding their submission of an employment application. In 2006, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the right of UDV members to import and use ayahuasca, which contains the powerful hallucinogen DMT, ending a years-long dispute between the church and the federal government. The UDV uses a tea called hoasca, or, ayahuasca, as a religious sacrament, Reis' complaint explains. Ayahuasca tea is prepared by brewing two plants together with water, one of which contains dimethyltryptamine – DMT – a drug regulated under the Controlled Substances Act. However, the Department of Homeland Security, of which CBP is a component agency, still considers the drug's use to be disqualifying, even though Reis emphasized that she did so 'for spiritual purposes only,' according to her suit, which names Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem as the sole defendant. 'Her religious practice is recognized as something very similar to Native Americans with peyote,' attorney Kevin Owen, one of the lawyers representing Reis, told The Independent. 'We think that DHS has made a wrong decision here, and that our client shouldn't have been denied a job with CBP just because of her religious observance.' Owen said that UDV's ayahuasca use is a 'bona fide' spiritual custom, and that the Trump administration has professed a strong commitment to religious accommodation – which is what Reis, who was turned down by CBP under the Biden administration, is now seeking. In May, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order establishing a so-called Religious Liberty Commission, intended to guard against 'threats' to unfettered religious practice. 'It shall be the policy of the executive branch to vigorously enforce the historic and robust protections for religious liberty enshrined in Federal law,' Trump's EO read. 'The Founders envisioned a Nation in which religious voices and views are integral to a vibrant public square and human flourishing and in which religious people and institutions are free to practice their faith without fear of discrimination or hostility from the Government.' According to Owen, there are very few cases that are as clear-cut as the one he and co-counsel Gary Gilbert and Brian Sutherland are bringing on behalf of Reis. 'A lot of times, it's muddier, or a bit grey,' he said. 'I don't think the facts here will be in dispute.' CBP and a spokesperson from Noem's office did not respond to requests for comment. Reis was born in Espirito Santo, Brazil and became a naturalized American citizen in 2009. She became a devoted follower of UDV, which was founded in Brazil in 1961 and now includes more than 21,000 adherents in 11 countries, about 10 years ago, according to her complaint. Reis' congregation in Boca Raton, Florida, meets biweekly, usually on the first and third Saturdays of the month, although it 'sometimes holds extra services,' the complaint goes on. 'Like the other members of the UDV, Ms. Reis participates in the sacramental use of ayahuasca when she attends UDV services,' it says. 'When she drinks ayahuasca tea, she feels the effect of DMT, the active psychotropic ingredient, but she drinks it only for sacramental purposes.' The UDV's use of ayahuasca is legal under federal law, which provides an exemption under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, according to the complaint. In October 2018, some three years after Reis joined the UDV, Reis applied for a position as a CBP officer. On December 4, 2018, the complaint says she received a provisional employment offer from CBP at the GS-7 pay rate, which comes with a starting salary of just over $40,000. To complete the process, Reis would be required to undergo a pre-employment procedure consisting of a medical exam, fitness exam, drug test, structured interview, polygraph exam and background investigation, the complaint states, noting that Reis successfully passed the medical and fitness exams, along with the interview. Next, Reis was scheduled to sit for the polygraph, known colloquially as a 'lie detector test,' which she did in March 2021, according to the complaint. 'Ms. Reis was asked several questions about drug use during the exam,' the complaint states. 'When the polygraph examiner asked her about [her] use of psychoactive substances, she disclosed her membership in the UDV and explained her religious use of ayahuasca.' The polygraph examiner asked 'extensive questions' about the UDV, all of which Reis answered fully, and later told her she 'was doing well,' the complaint contends. During a lunch break, the complaint says the examiner contacted an adjudicator at CBP's Personnel Security Division to inquire about Reis' use of ayahuasca. The adjudicator told the polygraph examiner that 'the admission to recent drug use disqualified Ms. Reis,' and when Reis returned from lunch, she was informed that the test was over, the complaint states. 'At this time, Ms. Reis executed a voluntary written statement for the report of the exam, which explained that she was a 'member of the Uniao do Vegetal…' that her church imports the ayahuasca from Brazil, and that she drinks the tea only at church services and 'for spiritual purposes only,'' according to the complaint. Still, it says, on April 1, 2021, DHS officially found Reis 'unsuitable' for employment with CBP, and four days later sent her an email telling her that the tentative job offer had been rescinded over her ayahuasca use. She subsequently appealed to the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, unsuccessfully, to intervene, with their final decision coming on May 8, 2025. Reis then filed suit. Reis' adherence to 'the precepts of the UDV Church, including the regular consumption of sacramental ayahuasca tea,' has been recognized as lawful by the Supreme Court and is protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,the complaint maintains. At the same time, it alleges that CBP 'refused to consider [Reis] for employment because of her religious belief and practice,' and wanted to 'avoid providing her with reasonable religious accommodation.' This, the complaint argues, constitutes religious discrimination in violation of Title VII and accuses CBP of acting 'in bad faith and in willful and wanton disregard for [Reis'] federally protected rights.' 'When we went thru the EEOC process and got an administrative decision that wasn't what we had hoped for, we figured we had to go to district court,' Owen, Reis' the attorney, told The Independent. 'She has a sincerely held religious belief, and therefore it's going to be covered by Title VII.' On Monday, one day before Reis filed suit, the Trump administration further expanded religious liberties for government workers, allowing federal personnel to proselytize on the job. 'Federal employees should never have to choose between their faith and their career,' U.S. Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor said in a press release. 'This guidance ensures the federal workplace is not just compliant with the law but welcoming to Americans of all faiths. Under President Trump's leadership, we are restoring constitutional freedoms and making government a place where people of faith are respected, not sidelined.' The federal government 'is supposed to be a model employer,' according to Owen, noting that he hopes Reis' lawsuit will spur wider changes for public-sector workers. 'Our client wants to make this situation a case not only vindicating her rights, but also for other people to make sure their religious practices aren't violated under the law,' Owen said. Reis says in her suit that she has suffered 'emotional distress, inconvenience, humiliation, and other indignities' as a result of the 'discriminatory conduct' by CBP and DHS. She is now seeking damages, to be determined by a jury, for lost wages and benefits, compensatory damages, and punitive damages, plus attorney's fees and court costs.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Massachusetts lawmakers propose pay raise for public defenders to end a legal crisis
Lawmakers in Massachusetts have reached a deal to give public defenders a pay raise in hopes of ending a legal crisis that led to cases being dropped and defendants who couldn't get lawyers being released from jail. But the deal was widely criticized by private attorneys who handle a bulk of cases for indigent clients, raising doubts as to whether the pay raise will be enough to end a work stoppage public defenders launched in May. The stoppage has led to more than 120 cases being dropped, including some for serious crimes such as domestic abuse and assaulting a police officer. Dozens more defendants were released from jail because they had no legal counsel. As many as 3,000 defendants have been without attorneys. The deal lawmakers will vote on Thursday calls for spending $40 million to double the number of attorneys who work for the state Committee for Public Counsel Services and allows for hiring 320 more public defenders by the end of fiscal 2027. It also would raise the hourly rate paid to private attorneys who work as public defenders by $20 an hour over two years, a 30% increase. The committee's chief counsel, Anthony Benedetti, applauded the proposed funding increase and called it 'the most significant progress ever made toward improving Bar Advocate pay and strengthening the statewide right to counsel.' But Sean Delaney, speaking at press conference surrounded by private attorneys who handle a bulk of the cases, said the plan was inadequate and called on lawmakers to reject it. Many advocates, he said, would continue refusing new cases unless their rates are increased $35 an hour in fiscal year 2026 and $25 an hour the year after. The challenges were on display in a Boston courtroom last week, when case after case was dropped due to the 'Lavallee protocol.' It requires cases be dropped if a defendant hasn't had an attorney for 45 days and that the defendants be released from custody if they haven't had representation for seven days. Several of those cases involved assaults on police officers and domestic violence. One suspect allegedly punched his pregnant girlfriend in the stomach and slapped her in the face. Another case involved a woman who was allegedly assaulted by the father of her child, who she said threatened to kill her and tried to strangle her. Earlier this month, a judge in Lowell struggled to balance the need for public safety with the requirements of the Lavalle protocol. Judge John Coffey considered more than a dozen defendants for release, choosing to keep the most serious alleged offenders — including a man accused of running down and badly injuring a police officer — behind bars. He released at least three suspects, including a woman jailed for a probation violation. The woman, Edith Otero, 52, of Boston, yelled out: 'Thank you, your honor. God Bless you.' Outside the court, Otero said she had been in jail since the end of June and that it had been 'very, very depressing' to attend court hearings without legal representation. She said she had a litany of health issues and it was 'wonderful' to finally be out. 'I thank the Lord,' Otero said, speaking to reporters from a wheelchair.
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Brawl erupts in airport after man slapped woman for refusing to get up from seat next to his wife
An irate businessman was arrested after he slapped a female lawyer during an argument over a seat inside an airport terminal in Colombia. The brawl unfolded after the aggressor, Héctor Santacruz, walked over to the bench at Gate 9 in El Dorado International Airport in Bogotá on Sunday night and asked Claudia Segura to stand up from her seat. A heated discussion ensued, in which Segura declined to give up her seat so that Santacruz could sit next to his wife, Karen de Santacruz. Santacruz towered over Segura, as the argument escalated and he suddenly slapped her cell phone out of her hands and struck her in the face. Three passengers, including a woman, intervened to defend Segura as they shoved the man back, before his own wife stood up and got involved. Multiple people could be heard shouting at Santacruz for attacking Segura. A separate video showed Segura lying on her back while she was tended to by an airport work. Santacruz's wife gathered their belongings as he was escorted by an airport police officer. Segura, who is a government contractor, told El Tiempo newspaper that the was waiting for her flight to depart and was looking for a place to sit so that she could continue to work on her laptop. 'When I got to the waiting area, everything was completely full, and I only saw one empty chair,' she recalled. 'I didn't have any bags or clothes on me to indicate it was occupied, so I sat down.' Segura said that Santacruz's wife told her that the seat was occupied but she countered by telling her that it was not occupied. She had just finished a work-related phone call when Santacruz threatened her and said: 'Get up or I'll get you up.' Segura held her ground when Santacruz turned to another passenger and asked them to make sure they were recording the showdown. 'He hits me on the hand, knocks off my phone, and hits me hard in the face and head. The magnitude of the impact knocked my earring off,' she said. Segura said that the police took her to a local urgent care center in the town of Engativá for a medical evaluation and that she had to share the same vehicle as her attacker. 'I am affected and very afraid,' she said. Santacruz's wife released a video apology on Wednesday and condemned his behavior after her design business was bombarded with criticism. 'The person shown physically assaulting a woman is my husband. And you don't know how much it hurts me to say this out loud,' Karen said. 'And it really hurts me as a woman, as a mother, as the founder of Khala, because all of this goes against what we want, what we've been working on for so many years.' 'I know that when things like this happen, it's easy to point fingers, judge, and dismiss,' she added. 'But I also know that many of us have made mistakes at some point in our lives. 'But as the old saying goes, let he who is without sin cast the first stone. This doesn't mean it's right, because it isn't. 'No, I don't condone it, I don't approve of it, and I won't remain silent. I reject it from the bottom of my heart because I believe in dignity, in boundaries, and in respect.'
