logo
Calls to make low-cost IVF more accessible in Australia

Calls to make low-cost IVF more accessible in Australia

Vikki Mai Murphy always knew she wanted to be a mum but after months of negative pregnancy tests she and her partner Sean realised they would need some extra help.
Following a round of intrauterine insemination (IUI), where prepared sperm is placed directly into a woman's uterus, Ms Murphy was thrilled to finally see a positive result for the first time.
But almost eight weeks later, she discovered the pregnancy was ectopic and would have to be removed.
In the resulting surgery she lost one of her fallopian tubes and doctors told her she would need to undergo IVF in order to successfully fall pregnant in future.
"I just bawled and kept asking if I could still have my babies ... it just crushed me," Ms Murphy told AAP.
The couple began to explore their IVF options and quickly realised the cost per round would be between $10,000 and $15,000.
"We both just decided we wanted to throw everything at it and worry about the costs later," Ms Murphy said.
For many people hoping to become parents, cost-of-living pressures are deterring them from fertility treatment.
With Australia posting a record-low fertility rate in 2024, experts say low-cost IVF options will be crucial to addressing the decline in births.
The average number of children born per woman was 1.51 in 2024, well below the 1.8 in 2014.
In 2022, almost 109,000 IVF cycles were performed resulting in the birth of 20,058 babies.
Almost half of Australians surveyed by Connect IVF said fertility services were not affordable.
Connect IVF was one of the few affordable clinics in an industry that had been driven by a wave of corporatisation, director Brendan Ayres said.
"(Our clinics) see a broad section of Australians and we get a disproportionate number of people from lower socioeconomic groups who need fertility treatment," he said.
"We also have a number of patients who have been to other clinics and paid tens of thousands of dollars without success and are at their financial wits' end."
Ms Murphy discovered Connect IVF by a chance internet search and the clinic was able to accommodate her for her next menstrual cycle.
"The cost was substantially lower than other clinics because they bulk-billed the IVF cycle," she said.
"It also allowed us to pay for a private obstetrician during my pregnancy, which we wouldn't have been able to afford if we'd had to pay up to $15,000 for the IVF."
Ms Murphy ended up with four embryos from the round, which led to her three-year-old son Beau and one-year-old daughter Maia.
"I love being a mum. It was such a journey and if I could have just looked into the future and seen my babies it would have made such a difference," she said.
"People might think if they pay more money there might be more chance of having a baby, but I have friends who have paid thousands more than us with no success."
While the Australian government supports parts of IVF through Medicare, it was not linked to the consumer price index, meaning the gap increased over time, Mr Ayres said.
"Australia is a world leader in the technology of IVF but the funding hasn't followed," he said.
"There also needs to be additions to Medicare item numbers to expand to all areas such as donor IVF which currently isn't covered."
Vikki Mai Murphy always knew she wanted to be a mum but after months of negative pregnancy tests she and her partner Sean realised they would need some extra help.
Following a round of intrauterine insemination (IUI), where prepared sperm is placed directly into a woman's uterus, Ms Murphy was thrilled to finally see a positive result for the first time.
But almost eight weeks later, she discovered the pregnancy was ectopic and would have to be removed.
In the resulting surgery she lost one of her fallopian tubes and doctors told her she would need to undergo IVF in order to successfully fall pregnant in future.
"I just bawled and kept asking if I could still have my babies ... it just crushed me," Ms Murphy told AAP.
The couple began to explore their IVF options and quickly realised the cost per round would be between $10,000 and $15,000.
"We both just decided we wanted to throw everything at it and worry about the costs later," Ms Murphy said.
For many people hoping to become parents, cost-of-living pressures are deterring them from fertility treatment.
With Australia posting a record-low fertility rate in 2024, experts say low-cost IVF options will be crucial to addressing the decline in births.
The average number of children born per woman was 1.51 in 2024, well below the 1.8 in 2014.
In 2022, almost 109,000 IVF cycles were performed resulting in the birth of 20,058 babies.
Almost half of Australians surveyed by Connect IVF said fertility services were not affordable.
Connect IVF was one of the few affordable clinics in an industry that had been driven by a wave of corporatisation, director Brendan Ayres said.
"(Our clinics) see a broad section of Australians and we get a disproportionate number of people from lower socioeconomic groups who need fertility treatment," he said.
"We also have a number of patients who have been to other clinics and paid tens of thousands of dollars without success and are at their financial wits' end."
Ms Murphy discovered Connect IVF by a chance internet search and the clinic was able to accommodate her for her next menstrual cycle.
"The cost was substantially lower than other clinics because they bulk-billed the IVF cycle," she said.
"It also allowed us to pay for a private obstetrician during my pregnancy, which we wouldn't have been able to afford if we'd had to pay up to $15,000 for the IVF."
Ms Murphy ended up with four embryos from the round, which led to her three-year-old son Beau and one-year-old daughter Maia.
"I love being a mum. It was such a journey and if I could have just looked into the future and seen my babies it would have made such a difference," she said.
"People might think if they pay more money there might be more chance of having a baby, but I have friends who have paid thousands more than us with no success."
While the Australian government supports parts of IVF through Medicare, it was not linked to the consumer price index, meaning the gap increased over time, Mr Ayres said.
"Australia is a world leader in the technology of IVF but the funding hasn't followed," he said.
"There also needs to be additions to Medicare item numbers to expand to all areas such as donor IVF which currently isn't covered."
Vikki Mai Murphy always knew she wanted to be a mum but after months of negative pregnancy tests she and her partner Sean realised they would need some extra help.
Following a round of intrauterine insemination (IUI), where prepared sperm is placed directly into a woman's uterus, Ms Murphy was thrilled to finally see a positive result for the first time.
But almost eight weeks later, she discovered the pregnancy was ectopic and would have to be removed.
In the resulting surgery she lost one of her fallopian tubes and doctors told her she would need to undergo IVF in order to successfully fall pregnant in future.
"I just bawled and kept asking if I could still have my babies ... it just crushed me," Ms Murphy told AAP.
The couple began to explore their IVF options and quickly realised the cost per round would be between $10,000 and $15,000.
"We both just decided we wanted to throw everything at it and worry about the costs later," Ms Murphy said.
For many people hoping to become parents, cost-of-living pressures are deterring them from fertility treatment.
With Australia posting a record-low fertility rate in 2024, experts say low-cost IVF options will be crucial to addressing the decline in births.
The average number of children born per woman was 1.51 in 2024, well below the 1.8 in 2014.
In 2022, almost 109,000 IVF cycles were performed resulting in the birth of 20,058 babies.
Almost half of Australians surveyed by Connect IVF said fertility services were not affordable.
Connect IVF was one of the few affordable clinics in an industry that had been driven by a wave of corporatisation, director Brendan Ayres said.
"(Our clinics) see a broad section of Australians and we get a disproportionate number of people from lower socioeconomic groups who need fertility treatment," he said.
"We also have a number of patients who have been to other clinics and paid tens of thousands of dollars without success and are at their financial wits' end."
Ms Murphy discovered Connect IVF by a chance internet search and the clinic was able to accommodate her for her next menstrual cycle.
"The cost was substantially lower than other clinics because they bulk-billed the IVF cycle," she said.
"It also allowed us to pay for a private obstetrician during my pregnancy, which we wouldn't have been able to afford if we'd had to pay up to $15,000 for the IVF."
Ms Murphy ended up with four embryos from the round, which led to her three-year-old son Beau and one-year-old daughter Maia.
"I love being a mum. It was such a journey and if I could have just looked into the future and seen my babies it would have made such a difference," she said.
"People might think if they pay more money there might be more chance of having a baby, but I have friends who have paid thousands more than us with no success."
While the Australian government supports parts of IVF through Medicare, it was not linked to the consumer price index, meaning the gap increased over time, Mr Ayres said.
"Australia is a world leader in the technology of IVF but the funding hasn't followed," he said.
"There also needs to be additions to Medicare item numbers to expand to all areas such as donor IVF which currently isn't covered."
Vikki Mai Murphy always knew she wanted to be a mum but after months of negative pregnancy tests she and her partner Sean realised they would need some extra help.
Following a round of intrauterine insemination (IUI), where prepared sperm is placed directly into a woman's uterus, Ms Murphy was thrilled to finally see a positive result for the first time.
But almost eight weeks later, she discovered the pregnancy was ectopic and would have to be removed.
In the resulting surgery she lost one of her fallopian tubes and doctors told her she would need to undergo IVF in order to successfully fall pregnant in future.
"I just bawled and kept asking if I could still have my babies ... it just crushed me," Ms Murphy told AAP.
The couple began to explore their IVF options and quickly realised the cost per round would be between $10,000 and $15,000.
"We both just decided we wanted to throw everything at it and worry about the costs later," Ms Murphy said.
For many people hoping to become parents, cost-of-living pressures are deterring them from fertility treatment.
With Australia posting a record-low fertility rate in 2024, experts say low-cost IVF options will be crucial to addressing the decline in births.
The average number of children born per woman was 1.51 in 2024, well below the 1.8 in 2014.
In 2022, almost 109,000 IVF cycles were performed resulting in the birth of 20,058 babies.
Almost half of Australians surveyed by Connect IVF said fertility services were not affordable.
Connect IVF was one of the few affordable clinics in an industry that had been driven by a wave of corporatisation, director Brendan Ayres said.
"(Our clinics) see a broad section of Australians and we get a disproportionate number of people from lower socioeconomic groups who need fertility treatment," he said.
"We also have a number of patients who have been to other clinics and paid tens of thousands of dollars without success and are at their financial wits' end."
Ms Murphy discovered Connect IVF by a chance internet search and the clinic was able to accommodate her for her next menstrual cycle.
"The cost was substantially lower than other clinics because they bulk-billed the IVF cycle," she said.
"It also allowed us to pay for a private obstetrician during my pregnancy, which we wouldn't have been able to afford if we'd had to pay up to $15,000 for the IVF."
Ms Murphy ended up with four embryos from the round, which led to her three-year-old son Beau and one-year-old daughter Maia.
"I love being a mum. It was such a journey and if I could have just looked into the future and seen my babies it would have made such a difference," she said.
"People might think if they pay more money there might be more chance of having a baby, but I have friends who have paid thousands more than us with no success."
While the Australian government supports parts of IVF through Medicare, it was not linked to the consumer price index, meaning the gap increased over time, Mr Ayres said.
"Australia is a world leader in the technology of IVF but the funding hasn't followed," he said.
"There also needs to be additions to Medicare item numbers to expand to all areas such as donor IVF which currently isn't covered."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese government pushes forward with prescription medicine cap at $25
Albanese government pushes forward with prescription medicine cap at $25

7NEWS

timean hour ago

  • 7NEWS

Albanese government pushes forward with prescription medicine cap at $25

Medicines listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) will be capped at $25 per prescription from the start of 2026, down from the current $31.60, with the Albanese government to introduce laws confirming the changes this week. The major federal election promise will also see the price of PBS scripts frozen at its current level of $7.70 for pensioners until 2030. The changes will cost taxpayers $200 million per year, but are likely to be popular with voters. The Coalition matched the policy during the election and is likely to see the bill pass through parliament relatively quickly. However, Labor used the policy during the federal campaign in April and May to run a scare campaign accusing Peter Dutton and the Opposition of being 'Trump-Lite' and wanting a US style health system. The Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, says: 'The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare'. 'We said we would make cheaper medicines even cheaper - that is exactly what we are doing,' Albanese said. 'This is another example of cost of living relief that helps every Australian. The Health Minister, Mark Butler, says the last time PBS medicines cost no more than $25 was 2004 – more than 20 years ago. 'The Albanese Government has been focused on delivering cheaper medicines for Australians,' Butler said. 'Cheaper medicines are good for the hip pocket and good for your health.' The Albanese Government has started the first two sitting weeks of its second term trying to keep the focus on its election promises. Last week it introduced bills to cut HECS debt by 20 percent, entrench penalty rates in workplace agreements, and safety reforms for the childcare sector.

Australia called to lift on global health as US yields
Australia called to lift on global health as US yields

West Australian

time2 hours ago

  • West Australian

Australia called to lift on global health as US yields

Australia must come to the party with more money to combat climate-related health issues, antimicrobial resistance and future pandemics. That's the bottom line of research that indicates the well-off nation is not pulling enough weight on the world stage to understand, anticipate and respond to emerging international health threats. The Australian government spent just under $630 billion on health between 2017 and 2023, according to a report commissioned by the Australian Global Health Alliance. About $35 billion was directed to health and medical research but just $2 billion was specifically set aside for global research. The country must increase and realign its funding to address and anticipate global health challenges more effectively, the report said. "Despite commendable efforts, Australia's investment in global health research lags behind its international peers," it said. "Key areas such as the impact of climate change on health, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemic preparedness are notably underfunded." Alliance executive director Selina Namchee Lo said the global scientific community was successful in rapidly delivering vaccines and treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. But where it fell short was equity, with some of the hardest-hit countries missing out. "What we're saying is equity is not optional for global health," Dr Lo told AAP. Another report, also commissioned by the alliance with Pacific Friends of Global Health, detailed the impact of two Australian-backed global public private partnerships in the Indo-Pacific. Australia has collectively poured more than $2.5 billion into The Global Fund and Gavi since 2000, helping to immunise more than 100 million children and save lives in the region. But the country's level of foreign aid has been been in "significant decline" since 2012, stagnating at $US3 billion annually over the past seven years. The multilateral aid landscape is "under pressure" after the US and UK reduced their commitments, the report said. It comes after US President Donald Trump's administration dismantled the US Agency for International Development, cutting funding to its aid programs worldwide. Dr Lo, who has nearly three decades experience in global and international health, said the abrupt exit of USAID left communities "in the lurch". "It's never good to have one group, whether it's a philanthropist or a country, be a monopoly," she said. "Because when they pull out, this is what happens." The Indo-Pacific still accounts for 25 per cent of global infections, with 6.7 million people in the region living with HIV and malaria rampant in Papua New Guinea. Pacific Friends of Global Health chair Brendan Crabb wants Australia to take up the mantle. "As the US administration dramatically steps back from global health leadership, Australia has a critical opportunity to convene and partner with Asia Pacific countries to advance the health priorities of the region," the Burnet Institute chief executive said.

Australia called to lift on global health as US yields
Australia called to lift on global health as US yields

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Australia called to lift on global health as US yields

Australia must come to the party with more money to combat climate-related health issues, antimicrobial resistance and future pandemics. That's the bottom line of research that indicates the well-off nation is not pulling enough weight on the world stage to understand, anticipate and respond to emerging international health threats. The Australian government spent just under $630 billion on health between 2017 and 2023, according to a report commissioned by the Australian Global Health Alliance. About $35 billion was directed to health and medical research but just $2 billion was specifically set aside for global research. The country must increase and realign its funding to address and anticipate global health challenges more effectively, the report said. "Despite commendable efforts, Australia's investment in global health research lags behind its international peers," it said. "Key areas such as the impact of climate change on health, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemic preparedness are notably underfunded." Alliance executive director Selina Namchee Lo said the global scientific community was successful in rapidly delivering vaccines and treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. But where it fell short was equity, with some of the hardest-hit countries missing out. "What we're saying is equity is not optional for global health," Dr Lo told AAP. Another report, also commissioned by the alliance with Pacific Friends of Global Health, detailed the impact of two Australian-backed global public private partnerships in the Indo-Pacific. Australia has collectively poured more than $2.5 billion into The Global Fund and Gavi since 2000, helping to immunise more than 100 million children and save lives in the region. But the country's level of foreign aid has been been in "significant decline" since 2012, stagnating at $US3 billion annually over the past seven years. The multilateral aid landscape is "under pressure" after the US and UK reduced their commitments, the report said. It comes after US President Donald Trump's administration dismantled the US Agency for International Development, cutting funding to its aid programs worldwide. Dr Lo, who has nearly three decades experience in global and international health, said the abrupt exit of USAID left communities "in the lurch". "It's never good to have one group, whether it's a philanthropist or a country, be a monopoly," she said. "Because when they pull out, this is what happens." The Indo-Pacific still accounts for 25 per cent of global infections, with 6.7 million people in the region living with HIV and malaria rampant in Papua New Guinea. Pacific Friends of Global Health chair Brendan Crabb wants Australia to take up the mantle. "As the US administration dramatically steps back from global health leadership, Australia has a critical opportunity to convene and partner with Asia Pacific countries to advance the health priorities of the region," the Burnet Institute chief executive said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store