Australia's biggest battery now on standby to prevent NSW power blackouts
The Waratah Super Battery will also allow NSW to use and transmit more energy, applying further downward pressure on electricity prices, experts say.
The battery, built on the site of the former Munmorah coal-fired power station on the Central Coast, has added 350MW of battery capacity to the energy grid since plugging in last September.
Waratah's backstop system was brought online on Friday, making it the largest energy system integrity protection scheme (SIPS) in the country.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
The NSW energy minister, Penny Sharpe, said the battery was a crucial addition to state infrastructure.
'As it comes online, it will help power our homes and businesses while stabilising the grid to avoid blackouts,' she said.
In the event of blackout risks or power surges from bushfires, lightning strikes or other disruptions, the battery would activate as a shock absorber and steady the state's energy supply, Ahmad Ebadi, a senior project manager at Transgrid, said.
'[The battery system] monitors 36 transmission lines in real time across NSW, detects overloading and responds in seconds … to increase generation,' he said.
More power could be transmitted and used across NSW once the battery's full capacity of 850MW comes online; that is expected by the end of 2025.
Operating at full capacity, the battery would ease the urgency of building more energy transmission, said Dylan McConnell, an energy systems researcher at UNSW.
'By increasing the utilisation of your existing transmission network, you can actually reduce the need to build more transmission in the future,' he said.
'Ideally, it [means] lower electricity prices in the long run.'
An agreement with the NSW government will mean the battery reserves 700MW of its capacity for the system-protecting service during the day in summer. Waratah can store and discharge energy like other big battery projects.
The project was one of 12 battery systems to enter the national energy market in the year to June – more than doubling grid-scale battery discharge, the Australian Energy Market Operator (Aemo) reported in July.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Investment in big batteries has accelerated in 2025. More projects are under construction, including one at Eraring, the site of the nation's biggest coal-fired power station, and another at former coal plant Liddell.
The NSW government in 2024 extended Eraring's operations to 2027 after Aemo in 2024 warned its retirement would increase blackout risks. More coal-fired power stations are scheduled to retire in coming years.
Anna Freeman, acting chief policy and impact officer at the Clean Energy Council, said the Waratah battery would help reduce the state's reliance on coal.
'[It] is capable of holding as much energy as half an Eraring coal-fired power station and plays a pivotal role in ensuring that NSW can push ahead with confidence to a future powered by renewables,' she said.
Tim Buckley, the director of Climate Energy Finance, said the battery's delivery could help bring energy prices down by supporting more green energy projects to completion.
'It will [help] more wind and solar and firming capacity into the grid, all of which means we will see electricity prices stabilise and then progressively, hopefully come down over time,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ed Miliband is teeing Labour up for yet another Scottish pummelling
It would come as too great a shock to the Government to admit that Donald Trump is right and Ed Miliband wrong. But it's true anyway, at least in terms of the recognition by the US president of the massive national resource that the North Sea's oil and gas fields are to the UK. This is a recognition that the Labour Energy Secretary seems to be resisting. Miliband has presided over a calamitous decline in the number of jobs in the North Sea in the year since his party regained power at the 2024 general election. More than 13,000 jobs – about 37 every day – have gone, even as the Government chooses to stand firm on its commitment not to grant any new oil and gas exploration licences in the North Sea and our dependence on foreign energy supplies grows. According to the Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) trade association, 57,200 out of a total of 117,900 jobs, both directly and in the broader supply chain, were lost in the decade after 2013. In almost any other industry, such devastation for families and the economy would have been marked by protest marches, a Government lobbying campaign and at least a handful of folk songs. But oil workers are not miners, even if their industry looks to be heading the same way. Preventing the issuing of new exploration licences might please the small number of teenagers and bored pensioners who have the time and energy to throw soup around art galleries and close off main thoroughfares as part of their campaign against oil, but it has also led to a significant dependence on foreign imported oil and gas – 47 per cent of our total energy needs in the first quarter of this year, according to Miliband's own department. That's nearly ten per cent higher than in 2019. It threatens to be a vicious economic cycle: fewer domestic jobs in the North Sea oil sector means less tax revenue for the Treasury, while increased imports of oil and gas risk Britain's carbon emissions targets because of the very act of transporting it across the globe. Never was the temptation for a department – or a cabinet minister – to virtue signal their green credentials greater, even at the risk of losing high-skilled, well-paid jobs in a sector that has proved indispensable to Scotland and the wider country in the last 50 years. The chief political problem for Miliband and his officials – and indeed the entire political class – is that the real narrative about climate change, if told honestly, is not one that would prove popular with voters. Reducing our carbon footprint was always going to be expensive and painful. So in order to sweeten that pill, politicians of all parties started talking about a 'just transition'. This essentially means the replacement of old jobs that are dependent on oil with new, shiny jobs that are carried out by smiling university graduates with hard hats standing in fields full of windmills. The reality, however, is that that transition will not be as smooth or as painless as our political leaders want it to be. The modern job market is not subject to the whims of governments, except at the margins, and the transition, as amply shown by the job loss figures in the last decade, will be messy and painful. Yet the pretence is seen as necessary, otherwise voters simply won't vote for parties that support saving the planet, and so the greater good must be prioritised over short-term goals like employment and prosperity. Miliband could ameliorate the damage done to the North Sea jobs market by easing up on his ideological opposition to new drilling licences. During his recent visit to Scotland, president Trump described the North Sea as a 'treasure chest', but observed also that the Government 'have essentially told drillers and oil companies that 'we don't want you'.' This is evidently true. So long as the Government maintains its North Sea windfall tax on the industry, refuses to grant new drilling licences and depends on increasing volumes of foreign oil imports, there is very little for the industry, and the individuals and families that rely upon it, to look forward to. With the imminent winding down of the Grangemouth oil refinery and the loss of hundreds of jobs there – the site is to be converted to an import terminal for finished fuel – Scotland is set to be hit hardest by this Government's energy strategy. And Scottish voters may well severely punish Labour in the next election: could 2029 be another 2015? Historically, Labour in office has frequently found ways of compromising its high-minded socialist principles if that was what was necessary for defending the livelihoods for working people. Such compromises were swiftly condemned by those on the party's Left. Now we have a cabinet minister who, in another age, would have been one of those critics. If a new, imaginative and economically serious path is to be charted out of the industrial vandalism currently being wrought on the North Sea, a new Energy Secretary might have to lead the way.
Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan clinches landmark $6.5 billion warship deal with Australia to counter China
SYDNEY/TOKYO, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Japan clinched a landmark A$10 billion ($6.5 billion) deal on Tuesday to build warships for Australia, marking Tokyo's most consequential defence sale since ending a military export ban in 2014 as it steps away from postwar pacifism to counter China. Under the agreement, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (7011.T), opens new tab will supply the Royal Australian Navy with three, upgraded Mogami-class multi-role frigates built in Japan from 2029. Eight more frigates will be built in Australia. Designed to hunt submarines, strike surface ships and provide air defence, the highly automated warships can be operated by just 90 sailors, half the crew of Australia's aging Anzac-class frigates. Australia plans to deploy the ships to defend critical maritime trade routes and its northern approaches in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, where China's military footprint is expanding. "It's going to be really important in terms of giving our navy the capability to project, and impactful projection is at the heart of the strategic challenge," Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said at a briefing. The Mogami, emblematic of a global shift toward versatile modular warships, offers more firepower and a 4,000 nautical miles more range than the current fleet. "It takes our general purpose frigates from being able to fire 32 air defence missiles to 128," including "the most advanced", defence industry minister Pat Conroy said at the briefing with Marles. The deal also anchors Japan's push to forge security ties beyond its alliance with the U.S. to counter China. The defence industry partnership "makes it harder for China to play Japan and Australia off against each other and sends a concerted signal to Beijing that both countries are willing to make their quasi-alliance a functioning reality' said Euan Graham, a senior analyst for defence strategy at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. The successful frigate bid eases the sting of 2016, when Australia rejected a Japanese submarine program, also led by MHI, in favour of a French design. Canberra scrapped that project in 2023, opting instead to build nuclear-powered submarines with the United States and Britain under the AUKUS pact. "We took that lesson to heart. The Australian government recognized not only the technical strengths of our ships but also the unified commitment of both government and industry," Japan's Minister of Defence Gen Nakatani said at a briefing in Tokyo. The initial order for three Japanese-built frigates will be Australia's largest naval purchase since the AUKUS agreement, while the remaining eight ships are expected to be constructed by Austal ( opens new tab in Western Australia. "We are currently focusing on establishing maintenance operations in Australia for the ships built here and are beginning communication with local companies," Hiroshi Nishio MHI's chief financial officer, said after the company released its latest quarterly earnings. However, with Japan's biggest defence contractor untested in managing overseas military projects, MHI will tap other business units to support the work, Nishio added. Officials from both countries said pricing, sustainment, and the transfer of production to Australia remain key issues to settle before a finalized contract can be signed early next year. MHI's Mogami frigate was selected over German company ThyssenKrupp ( opens new tab Marine Systems' MEKO A-200 in a meeting of the Australian government's national security committee. Shares in MHI jumped 5.7% in Tokyo. Austal closed up 7.94%, buoyed by assurances from Canberra of a pipeline of shipbuilding work, including the Mogami program. ($1 = 1.5456 Australian dollars)
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
India's Exide Industries beats first-quarter profit estimates on better demand
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Indian battery maker Exide Industries ( opens new tab reported a higher-than-expected first-quarter profit on Tuesday, helped by higher demand for its products. The company's profit after tax rose 14.6% year-on-year to 3.2 billion rupees ($36.45 million) in the three-month period ended June 30. Analysts, on average, expected a profit of 3.02 billion rupees, as per data compiled by LSEG. Revenue from operations rose 4.6% to 45.1 billion rupees, while total expenses rose 3.7%, led by a 9% growth in cost of materials consumed. For further earnings highlights, click (Full Story) KEY CONTEXT Exide operates through two primary verticals, business-to-business and business-to-consumer, both of which serve automotive clients, with roughly two-thirds of its revenue derived from the automotive sector. Exide makes batteries for two-, three- and four-wheelers. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization margin improved to 12.2% during the quarter compared to 11.5% a year ago, driven by better price realisation, improved product mix, the company said in a statement. Rivals Bosch ( opens new tab reported a higher first-quarter profit on Monday, while Amara Raja Energy & Mobility ( opens new tab is yet to report quarterly results. PEER COMPARISON * The mean of analysts' ratings standardised to a scale of Strong Buy, Buy, Hold, Sell, and Strong Sell ** The ratio of the stock's last close to analysts' mean price target; a ratio above 1 means the stock is trading above the PT APRIL-JUNE STOCK PERFORMANCE -- All data from LSEG -- $1 = 87.7860 Indian rupees
