At Trump's urging, Thailand and Cambodia to meet for cease-fire talks
Some analysts see this dispute as a test of US and Chinese influence in Southeast Asia, where Washington and Beijing are competing for dominance. Thailand is a US treaty ally and hosts dozens of military exercises with the United States; China is the largest trading partner of Thailand and Cambodia, which hosts a naval base largely funded by Beijing. Instability in the two Southeast Asian nations could jeopardize the strategic and economic interests of the two world powers.
On Saturday, Trump said, he called Hun Manet and Phumtham, adding that they had agreed to work out a cease-fire to the conflict, which has killed at least 34 people. On Sunday, the State Department said Secretary of State Marco Rubio had spoken by phone with his counterparts in Thailand and Cambodia, urging them to lower tensions immediately and agree to an end of the conflict.
Advertisement
But sporadic skirmishes flared between Thai and Cambodian troops along the two countries' disputed border early Sunday, underscoring the challenge of resolving an increasingly bitter and long-running conflict, one of the deadliest ever between the two Southeast Asian neighbors. Analysts said that both countries could also be seeking to grab territory before an agreement was signed.
Rubio said he had told Cambodia's deputy prime minister and foreign minister, Prak Sokhonn, and Thailand's foreign minister, Maris Sangiampongsa, about Trump's desire for peace. On Saturday, Trump said he would not negotiate trade deals with Cambodia and Thailand until they stopped the fighting.
On Sunday, Phumtham said he had told Trump that Thailand had agreed in principle to a cease-fire and had asked Trump to inform Cambodia that talks should take place as soon as possible. He added that he would 'like to see sincere intention from the Cambodian side.'
But the deputy spokesperson of the Thai army, Colonel Richa Suksuwanont, distinguished between Trump's conversation with the Thai leader and what was happening on the ground.
'The troops in the battlefield are still following battle strategies,' he said in a statement. 'Thailand confirms that the cease-fire will happen only when Cambodia reaches out to us themselves for negotiation.'
The conflict flared after two months of tension over contested territory. In the last outbreak of deadly battles between the countries, from 2008 to 2011, 34 people were killed, according to an academic paper. This year, that death toll was reached in less than a week.
Hun Manet said he hoped Thailand would not go back on its cease-fire vow. He added that the Thais had violated a similar promise made after Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim negotiated with both sides on Thursday. Malaysia is the chair of the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, to which Cambodia and Thailand also belong.
Advertisement
Thai and Cambodian forces exchanged fire Sunday along the border, near the site of a temple, claimed by both countries, known as Prasat Ta Khwaiq to the Thais and Prasat Ta Krabey to the Cambodians. The deputy Thai army spokesperson, Richa, said the first shots were fired by Cambodia into Thai territory in several areas, including into civilian homes, early Sunday.
Lieutenant General Maly Socheata, a spokesperson for the Cambodian Defense Ministry, said Cambodia 'categorically rejects and condemns in the strongest terms the baseless and irresponsible accusation by Thailand that Cambodia initiated hostilities.'
She said Thailand's forces started shelling Cambodian territory at 2 a.m. and expanded their operations to Prasat Ta Krabey and near another ancient temple also claimed by both countries, called Prasat Ta Moan Thom by the Cambodians and Prasat Ta Muen Thom by the Thais. The site is where violence first erupted Thursday.
At 6 a.m., Thailand sent in tanks and troops to 'invade' in multiple areas, according to Maly Socheata.
'Such actions undermine all efforts toward peaceful resolution and expose Thailand's clear intent to escalate rather than de-escalate the conflict,' Maly Socheata said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The winners and losers in US-EU trade deal
The US and EU have struck what is being billed as the largest trade deal in history, after talks in Scotland. It actually resembles the framework for an agreement rather than a full trade deal, with details still unclear. But the headline figures announced by President Donald Trump and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen do offer clues about which sectors and groups could be hit hardest or have most to gain. Follow reaction live Trump - winner After promising new trade deals with dozens of countries, Trump has just landed the biggest of them all. It looks to most commentators that the EU has given up more, with instant analysis by Capital Economics suggesting a 0.5% knock to GDP. There will also be tens of billions of dollars pouring into US coffers in import taxes. But the glowing headlines for Trump may not last long if a slew of economic data due later this week show that his radical reshaping of the US economy is backfiring. Figures on inflation, jobs, growth and consumer confidence will give a clearer picture on whether Trump's tariffs are delivering pain or gain. US consumers - loser Ordinary Americans are already aggrieved at the increased cost of living and this deal could add to the burden by hiking prices on EU goods. While not as steep as it could have been, the hurdle represented by a 15% tariff rate is still significant, and it is far more pronounced than the obstacles that existed before Trump returned to office. Tariffs are taxes charged on goods bought from other countries. Typically, they are a percentage of a product's value. So, a 15% tariff means that a $100 product imported to the US from the EU will have a $15 dollar tax added on top - taking the total cost to the importer to $115. Companies who bring foreign goods into the US have to pay the tax to the government, and they often pass some or all of the extra cost on to customers. Markets - winner Stock markets in Asia and Europe rose on Monday after news emerged of the deal framework. Under the framework, the US will levy a 15% tariff on goods imported from the EU. While this rate is significant, it is less than what it could have been and at least offers certainty for investors. The agreement is "clearly market-friendly, and should put further upside potential into the euro", Chris Weston at Pepperstone, an Australian broker, told AFP. European solidarity - loser The deal will need to be signed off by all 27 members of the EU, each of which have differing interests and levels of reliance on the export of goods to the US. While some members have given the agreement a cautious welcome, others have been critical - hinting at divisions within the bloc, which is also trying to respond to other crises such as the ongoing war in Ukraine. A big Trump win but not total defeat for Brussels French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou commented: "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission." He was joined by at least two other French government ministers as well as Viktor Orban, the Hungarian leader, who said that Trump "ate von der Leyen for breakfast". Carmakers in Germany - loser The tariff faced by importers bringing EU cars to the US has been nearly halved, from the rate of 27.5% that was imposed by Trump in April to a new rate of 15%. Cars are one of the EU's top exports to the US. And as the largest manufacturer of cars in the EU - thanks to VW, Mercedes and BMW - Germany will have been watching closely. Its leader, Friedrich Merz, has welcomed the new pact, while admitting that he would have welcomed a "further easing of transatlantic trade". That downbeat sentiment was echoed by the German carmaking trade body, the VDA, which warned that even a rate of 15% would "cost the German automotive industry billions annually". Carmakers in the US - winner Trump is trying to boost US vehicle production. American carmakers received a boost when they learned that the EU was dropping its own tariff on US-made cars from 10% to 2.5%. Theoretically that could result in more American cars being bought in Europe. That could be good for US sales overseas, but the pact is not all good news when it comes to domestic sales. That is down to the complex way that American cars are put together. Many of them are actually assembled abroad - in Canada and Mexico - and Trump subjects them to a tariff of 25% when they are brought into the US. That compares with a lower tariff rate of 15% on EU vehicles. So US car makers may now fear being undercut by European manufacturers. EU pharmaceuticals - loser There is confusion around the tariff rate that will be levied on European-made drugs being bought in the US. The EU wants drugs to be subject to the lowest rate possible, to benefit sales. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not covered by the deal announced on Sunday, under which the rate on a number of products was lowered to 15%. But von der Leyen said they were included, and a White House source confirmed the same to the BBC. Either scenario will represent disappointment for European pharma, which initially hoped for a total tariffs exemption. The industry currently enjoys high exposure to the US marketplace thanks to products like Ozempic, a star type-2 diabetes drug made in Denmark. This has been highlighted in Ireland, where opposition parties have pointed out the importance of the industry and criticised the damaging effect of uncertainty. Ireland 'not celebrating' Trump's EU deal US energy - winner Trump said the EU will purchase $750bn (£558bn, €638bn) in US energy, in addition to increasing overall investment in the US by $600bn. "We will replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of US LNG [liquified natural gas], oil and nuclear fuels," said Von der Leyen. This will deepen links between European energy security and the US at a time when it has been pivoting away from importing Russian gas since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Aviation industry in EU and US - winner Von der Leyen said that some "strategic products" will not attract any tariffs, including aircraft and plane parts, certain chemicals and some agricultural products. That means firms making components for aeroplanes will have friction-free trade between the huge trading blocs. She added that the EU still hoped to get more "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for wines and spirits, in the coming days. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
12 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Social Security quietly backtracks on unpopular benefit change
The Social Security Administration made a big announcement recently, but it was not popular. The announcement was intended to save the government money and improve efficiency - a big focus for the Trump administration, which came into office and made creating the Department of Government Efficiency its top priority. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Over half a million Social Security benefit recipients were slated to be impacted by the shift, but it has drawn many objections, including from lawmakers who have expressed serious concern about its impact. In light of all this pushback, Social Security has now quietly backtracked. The change isn't going to happen starting September 30, 2025, after all. Here's more about the proposed benefit change, along with insight into why it was scrapped. Social Security had planned to revolutionize the benefits delivery process as part of its efforts to enhance efficiency. Specifically, the intent was for paper checks to be stopped permanently beginning September 30, 2025. Lawmakers have long desired to make this change, and there has officially been a rule requiring electronic delivery of benefits for well over a decade since 2011. However, no one in the past took decisive action to stop sending paper checks. Related: Social Security's 2026 COLA will be good news for older Americans The White House wanted to be the administration that put an end to physical checks. A July 2025 notice posted on the Social Security Administration's website stated: "Starting September 30, 2025, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will no longer issue paper checks for benefit payments. This change is part of a broader government-wide initiative to modernize payment systems and enhance service delivery." The announcement about shifting to paper checks outlined some of the reasons why the Social Security Administration made this plan, including: Improving speed and efficiency, as direct deposits are quickerCost savings, because sending out a paper check costs the government $0.50, while it's possible for the government to make a direct deposit of a Social Security check for just $0.15Better security, since paper checks are 16 times more likely to be stolen Because of these benefits, the government said that Social Security recipients would have two options for receiving payments after September - direct deposit or a Direct Express card. Related: AARP CEO shares blunt 9-word warning about Social Security While there were clearly some good reasons for shifting away from paper checks, the decision was also a very unpopular one. The reason: There was serious concern that people who most need their benefits would lose access because they are unbanked or underbanked. Some Social Security recipients face barriers to opening bank accounts. These include being unable to afford account fees, being ineligible due to previously overdrafting or other problems, or lacking a government-issued ID needed to open an account. Senator Elizabeth Warren was a vocal critic of the plan to switch, commenting on a press call, "There are about 600,000 Americans who still receive their paper checks - it's a small fraction of people who receive Social Security payments, but it's a population that often needs checks through paper." More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Warren met with Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano, and after that meeting, the Administration backtracked on the change. Warren announced on July 23 that Commissioner Bisignano had agreed to keep sending out physical checks to those who need them, and an SSA spokesperson confirmed this to both CBS MoneyWatch and Kiplinger. While the Administration has agreed to cancel the unpopular change, it will still be pushing people to switch to electronic means of receiving payments by communicating about the benefits of making the change and explaining how to do it. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
USA Today
12 minutes ago
- USA Today
Leaders of Thailand and Cambodia hold ceasefire talks in Malaysia
PUTRAJAYA, Malaysia, July 28 (Reuters) - The leaders of Cambodia and Thailand were meeting in Malaysia on Monday to try to reach a ceasefire deal on the fifth day of their fierce border conflict, amid an international effort to halt the fighting. The Southeast Asian neighbours waging their deadliest conflict in more than a decade accuse each other of starting the fighting last week, before escalating it with heavy artillery bombardment and Thai air strikes along their 817-km (508-mile) land border. Photographs from the Thai and Malaysian governments showed the Chinese and U.S. ambassadors to Malaysia attending Monday's meeting in the administrative capital of Putrajaya, held at the residence of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who chairs the ASEAN regional bloc. "The purpose of this meeting is to achieve an immediate 'ceasefire', initiated by President Donald Trump and agreed to by the Prime Ministers of Cambodia and Thailand," Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said in a post on X. More: Trump urges Thailand, Cambodia ceasefire with trade talk Hun Manet posted photographs of the meeting, showing a U-shaped formation of tables, with himself and the Thai premier seated opposite each other, Anwar at a head table and Chinese and U.S. officials at separate tables behind Anwar. Anwar had proposed ceasefire talks soon after the border dispute erupted into conflict on Thursday, and China and the United States also offered to assist in negotiations. The tension between Thailand and Cambodia has intensified since the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief skirmish late in May. Both sides reinforced border troops amid a full-blown diplomatic crisis that brought Thailand's fragile coalition government to the brink of collapse. More: Thailand, Cambodia exchange heavy artillery as fighting expands for second day Trump said he believed both Thailand and Cambodia wanted to settle their differences after he told both their leaders in weekend telephone calls that he would not conclude trade deals with them unless they ended the fighting. Thailand's leader said there were doubts about Cambodia's sincerity ahead of the negotiations in Malaysia. "We are not confident in Cambodia, their actions so far have reflected insincerity in solving the problem," Acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai told reporters before he left for talks. "Cambodia has violated international law, but everybody wants to see peace. Nobody wants to see violence that affects civilians." Cambodia has strongly denied Thai accusations of having fired at civilian targets, saying instead that Thailand put innocent lives at risk. It has called for the international community to condemn Thailand's aggression against it. Even after the peace talks were announced, both sides reported clashes in border areas on Monday. In the Thai province of Sisaket, Reuters reporters came across an evacuated village about 20 km (12 miles) from the border. Splintered wood and twisted beams were all that was left of a house hit by artillery fire after its residents left. Power lines drooped over the damaged house, and debris was scattered by the road. The windows of nearby houses were shattered, scattering broken glass. The area was largely deserted, with stores and restaurants closed, and only military vehicles, tanks and a few cars seen on a nearby four-lane road as random bursts of distant artillery fire pierced the eerie silence. (Reporting by Panarat Thepgumpanat, Panu Wongcha-um, and Devjyot Ghoshal in Bangkok, Shoon Naing in Sisaket, Chantha Lach in Phnom Penh, Danial Azhar and Mandy Leong in Putrajaya and Kanishka Singh in Washington; Writing by John Mair; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)
