
CNBC Transcript: U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Speaks with CNBC's 'Power Lunch' Today
WHERE: CNBC's "Power Lunch"
Following is the unofficial transcript of a CNBC interview with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC's "Power Lunch" (M-F, 2PM-3PM ET) today, Tuesday, July 8. Following are links to video on CNBC.com: https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/07/08/howard-lutnick-trump-may-cut-tariff-rates-with-a-few-other-countries.html and https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/07/08/bessent-greer-and-lutnick-may-meet-with-china-on-trade-in-early-august.html.
All references must be sourced to CNBC.
DOMINIC CHU: President Trump's Cabinet meeting just ending moments ago. Tariffs were obviously a very key topic of conversation. So, joining us now is Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who just came from that meeting. Secretary, Mr. Secretary, thank you so much for taking the time to join us. We saw a lot of the conversation that happened within that room, but we want to hear for the record from you, the commerce secretary, about just where you think we are with regard to trade negotiations as a whole as we approach that previously stated July 9 deadline for tariff deals.
U.S. COMMERCE SECRETARY HOWARD LUTNICK: So, you saw 14 letters went out yesterday. You should expect another anywhere from 15 to 20 letters to go out over the next two days, really setting down tariff lines for the key, driving countries. And then we will set out a general letter to the balance, sort of setting out where they're going to be. The president is setting these tariff lines. The president is driving this agenda. This is his agenda. He knows how he wants to play it. And that's what's happening. So we will be setting those tariff rates, and then they go into effect on August 1.
CHU: Secretary, Mr. Secretary, the president may be driving the entire negotiation and conversation, but that doesn't mean that folks like you and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent aren't out there trying to execute the plans, along with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. What do you get as a sense for how these negotiations are going with these multiple parties? Do we feel as though there's going to be a more long, drawn-out, contentious conversation, or do we feel like we're in the seven, eighth, or even ninth inning with many of these major counterparties?
LUTNICK: Oh, we're definitely in the eighth or ninth inning with these counterparties. So what's happened is, many of these countries have made us offers to finally open their markets. You know, they just -- they go slowly, they go with it, and then, finally, they come to the table at the very end, and they start to open their market. And the key is, the president wants to balance our trade deficit with the fact that these countries are finally, finally opening their market. And if you have something like Vietnam where they say, OK, we will really open, open our markets, then the president decides, OK, this is the rate we will do. If you're really going to open your market to our farmers, to our fishermen, to our machines, to our tools, to all of these things going into their country, then, OK, if you're going to give our people that opportunity, I'm willing to cut that rate, which he did with -- obviously, he did it with the U.K. He's done it with Vietnam. My guess is, he will do it with a few other countries. But, basically, if they don't really open their market and they come with these half-baked or a little bit here and a little bit there, the president is saying, look, we have got these huge trade deficits. It's time for you to pay the tariff to trade with the United States of America. Unless you're really going to open, that's how it's going to be.
KELLY EVANS: It's Kelly, Mr. Secretary. And I snapped to attention when I heard the president saying 50 percent tariffs on copper, 200 percent potentially on pharmaceuticals. As we understand it, those -- so, the Commerce Department looks through all those sectors, right, and then make your recommendation. How close to final would you say the recommendations in those two sectors are at this point for 50 percent and potentially 200 percent?
LUTNICK: So, copper is finished. We have done with our study. We have handed the study over to the president. The president knows that he has the ability, since we have studied the market of copper, to set the market tariff for copper. He announced it today at the Cabinet meeting that he intends to go to 50 percent, which will be similar to steel and aluminum, which are both 50 percent, so copper will be 50 percent. And the idea is to bring copper home, bring copper production home, bring the ability to make copper, which is key to the industrial sector, back home to America. We need that kind of production in America. It's important. So that will be out today. You will see the president will TRUTH about it this afternoon, will sign a proclamation, as that goes through the ordinary legal process, within a day or two days. That will come out, but then copper will be set, likely to be put into place the end of July, maybe August 1. So that's copper. With pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, those studies are being completed at the end of the month. And so the president will then set his policies then. And I'm going to let him wait to decide how he's going to do it. He said, if you don't build in America, they're going to be a high rate. But he may consider that if you're building in America to give you the time to build. I think he mentioned that in the Cabinet meeting. Give you time to build, say a year, year-and-a-half, possibly even two years of building, and then the tariff will be much higher. But that – those details will come at the end of the month, and the president will set them.
EVANS: Got it. Thank you. Thank you for the clarity on all of those fronts. Obviously, our audience is closely tuned into what's going to happen there. Also, on the case of China, I remember, when you talked to Brian Sullivan a little while ago, you said, look, like, that's squarely your kind of purview, your remit, figuring out that trade relationship. I'm left a little bit confused as to whether we have reached a trade deal or not. I think the president made some remarks in that direction in the past couple of weeks, but it was unclear what ended up happening. So with rare earths as well, there still seems to be a little bit of confusion on whether those rare earth magnets are coming in, in kind of decent amounts and everything there. Can you just bring us up to speed? What is the trade situation? And is that an open or closed negotiation at this point?
LUTNICK: OK, so we are settled with a 30 percent increased tariff. And then, during President Trump's first term, he had a 25 percent tariff. So, on much of China, they're paying 55 percent. And, on the balance, they're paying 30 percent. And that's where we have settled things for the time being. Now, they have agreed to approve our licenses on rare earth magnets. And, to their credit, they have been doing it swiftly and expeditiously. We decided we were satisfied with the movement that they were making. And so we took down our countermeasures. We started shipping ethane and software products to them and airplane parts and things like, that we're sort of balancing our relationship between the two of us. But we're in a pretty good place now. I think we're going to meet in early August and we're going to start kicking off a bigger trade conversation between the two largest economies in the world, China and the United States of America. So that's going to be kicked off in early August with myself, Secretary Bessent and Ambassador Greer. We will all be going together. We will be meeting our counterparts from China. And we will have a bigger -- start the process of a bigger conversation. I think that's going to take some time. But at least we're beginning the process of having a bigger conversation.
CHU: There's also -- there's also, Mr. Secretary, more of a conversation now built around the European Union. Our own Silvia Amaro out in Europe was speaking to some of the top diplomats out there. And she had made at least reference to this idea that they are saying progress is being made, that there is -- there's still a ways to go, but that there might actually be carve-outs or certain concessions there as you work towards an overarching trade deal with the European Union. Can you take us through how you feel those negotiations are going right now? It is a massively significant trade relationship. We're talking not just about beverage, alcohol and airplane and auto parts, but also many different goods that go between our countries and the bloc over there across the Atlantic.
LUTNICK: So, Europe is our biggest trading partner, and we have a $235 billion trade deficit, meaning they sell us more than we sell them. And that's because they block us on cars and they block us -- they don't pay for pharmaceuticals. All those topics, we need to settle. And it wasn't going anywhere for a while. The president then put out a TRUTH that said, look, if you're not going anywhere, you can pay us 50 percent. Their leaders called President Trump and said, no, no, no, no, no, we will get down to brass tacks and do it. And then they started making us real offers. The European Union, to their credit, has now made significant, real offers, meaning we're going to take down our barriers, we're going to open our markets to American farmers, ranchers, fishermen, really open their markets, and let Americans, finally American entrepreneurial spirit finally get to sell to Europe. The president's got those deals on his desk and he's thinking about how he wants to play them. And this is very tricky, because they have a huge trade deficit. So they have got to pay, but they're really going to bat, trying to say, look, we want to open our markets to you. We want to create a more balanced and fair relationship. Please, Mr. President, think about it. And that's what's on his desk right now. And that's really, really tricky, but he's thinking about it.
EVANS: Lastly, we have had a couple of people point out, as we put these tariff levels back on, should the markets be reacting the way they were on April 2? And maybe there will be a delayed reaction or maybe it's -- you know what I'm saying? Can you kind of wear a little bit of both of your hats here both as a market maker and also as somebody working on optimal policy theoretically? Do you expect any more weakness as we churn through the effect of what these higher tariffs now will be? And it's odd that we had a huge panic a couple months ago, and now we seem to be taking this in stride.
LUTNICK: Well, I think the markets should be taking it in stride, because, remember, there was all that fear that, if you set tariffs, there would be inflation, which there obviously is not inflation. There would be -- this would happen. And, obviously, none of those things happened. You have the whole world paying 10 percent now, and China paying 30 percent additional, and what's happened to the world? Stock market reaching new highs, America taking in more than $30 billion a month in revenues. So the world's gotten comfortable with the fact that Donald Trump knows what he's doing and he's out to make a better deal for America than these horrible trade deals of the past. So that's where we are. I think what you will see is these countries come and open their markets to President Trump and say, will you make us a better deal if we open our market? The president's going to go country by country, decide. Even when he sets the letter, you have seen in the letter, he said, if you change the way you treat America, we will listen and we will think about it.
EVANS: Right.
LUTNICK: I think what you're going to see is, rates will be a little lower than they were on April 2 because these countries are opening their markets, and then some countries will come forward with such good deals that they will literally change their rate. But that's what we're doing every day. We're talking about the offers. We had piles of offers in his office on Monday, piles of offers, saying, what do you think of this offer? What do you think of that offer? What do you think of this offer? And the president's deciding what the rate is because he's called it dead right up until now. And I think he's got the bull by the horns. And America's going to be so much better off, hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars better off, per year.
EVANS: Right.
LUTNICK: So, if you wanted to bet on anything, you would bet on President Trump and you would bet on America.
EVANS: And we will see if the market continues to agree with that as we get closer to August 1 and beyond. Secretary Lutnick, thanks for making the time and joining us after that meeting today. We appreciate it.
LUTNICK: My pleasure. Good to see you
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
Padilla to propose bill easing immigrant residency rules
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) is introducing a bill that would amend decades-old requirements for immigrants seeking permanent status — another long-shot proposal amid the Trump administration's immigration raids. The big picture: Congress has not passed a major immigration overhaul since 1986, resulting in residency requirements that are now over 50 years old. Zoom in: Under a bill that Padilla will announce Friday, the Immigration Act of 1929 would be amended so some immigrants may qualify for lawful permanent resident status if they have lived in the U.S. continuously for at least seven years. The current registry cutoff date is January 1, 1972 — more than 50 years ago. The change would provide a pathway to a green card for DACA recipients and those who had temporary protective status (TPS) State of play: The proposal comes as the Trump administration is letting TPS deals expire and going after what could be hundreds of thousands more immigrants who were given humanitarian "parole" under former President Biden. Many of those immigrants are being detained at immigration court hearings and are being placed in removal proceedings. What they're saying:"Roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants live in the United States today, yet most have no way to earn permanent legal status," Padilla's office said in a statement. "The overwhelming majority of these undocumented immigrants have established roots in the U.S. They work in essential jobs and pay taxes." His office said Padilla will formally introduce his bill on Monday. Reality check: Republicans control both chambers in Congress and such immigration proposals are hardly getting heard. Reps. María Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.) and Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) have introduced the DIGNITY Act of 2025, a bill that is lingering in the House, which focuses on border security, mandatory E-Verify, asylum reform and legal immigration reform. Zoom out: Padilla's latest bill comes after he and Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) introduced a bill that would ban federal immigration agents from wearing most face coverings but require them to wear visible ID during public enforcement operations. That long-shot proposal comes following images of masked, heavily armed immigration agents snatching people off the streets and taking them away in unmarked cars have shocked many Americans. What we're watching: The pressure to rein in some of ICE's enforcement tactics does have support among some conservatives worried over policing.


USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Terrific guy': The Trump-Epstein party boy friendship lasted a decade, ended badly
Long before the little black book, before the conspiracy theories, before one died by suicide in jail and one ascended to the White House, Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump were poster boys for '90s New York City excess. Parties. Models. Mansions. They danced with cheerleaders at Mar-a-Lago and dined with celebrities in Manhattan. Trump flew on Epstein's private jet between New York – where they lived blocks apart − and Florida, where they owned mansions 2 miles from each other. Their lives intersected over decades, with Epstein once claiming he introduced Trump to his third wife, Melania. 'Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein were both horny rich guys with an eye for young models,' Michael Gross, author of the 1995 book 'Model: The Ugly Business of Beautiful Women,' told USA TODAY. Now, their friendship plagues Trump's second term in the White House. More: Who is Ghislaine Maxwell? DOJ turns to Jeffrey Epstein's ex-partner. Trump hasn't been accused of any wrongdoing in the Epstein case, but he is among the dozens of politicians, actors and tech leaders connected to the billionaire who was first convicted in 2008 of paying teenage girls for sex acts and accused in 2019 in a sprawling sex trafficking scheme. Epstein died before he went to trial on those charges. Though dead nearly six years, Epstein now dominates Trump's agenda amid a tornado of outrage since the White House and Department of Justice tried to close the book on the case after the president and his closest allies – including the attorney general and the FBI director – spent years claiming Democrats had suppressed evidence of an Epstein 'client list' and a wider child abuse conspiracy. More: Can Trump pardon Ghislaine Maxwell? When does Jeffrey Epstein co-conspirator get out? "We already know almost everything there is to be known about the Epstein files. The story isn't Epstein anymore. It's Donald Trump talking about Epstein," says Mike Rothschild, author of "The Storm is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything. Trump's MAGA movement has rebelled after being promised lurid Epstein revelations by the very officials who now say there are none. On July 22, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, sent the House of Representatives on an early summer recess to prevent passage of a bipartisan measure forcing the DOJ to release its Epstein documents. "The GOP is so intent on not talking about Epstein and not releasing any details, it makes you wonder if there is something they don't want released," Rothschild said. "It starts driving you toward conspiracy theory." More: Trump's Epstein problem grows: Even his voters want more files released On July 22, Trump said the Epstein furor was 'sort of a witch hunt,' and railed against the media, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama. One day later, the Wall Street Journal and CNN reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump in May that he was named multiple times in the government's files on Epstein. But long before Epstein's conviction and questions about who might want his secrets buried, he and Trump were charter members of a decadent New York party scene. When Donald met Jeffrey Epstein and Trump met, it's believed, in 1990 when Epstein bought a mansion 2 miles from Trump's Mar-a-Lago club and estate. Born seven years and a borough apart in New York, Epstein was from Brooklyn and Trump from Queens. They partied hard, but neither drank alcohol. Trump was living loud in 1990. He had divorced his first wife, Ivana, with whom he had three children, and was dating model Marla Maples. Epstein was rich and single, a former high school teacher running his own financial advisory firm. Trump was known for hosting parties at the Plaza Hotel, which he owned at the time, that attracted rich men and younger women. 'If they were checking IDs, it was to make sure the girls were young enough,' Gross, who's known Trump for more than 40 years, said jokingly. It wasn't enough to simply invite models to events: Trump started his own agency and Epstein invested in one. Trump launched Trump Models in 1999. It represented Melania Knauss, who would later become his wife, and signed on teen models such as Alexia Palmer. More: Speaker Mike Johnson to shut down House early amid Jeffrey Epstein drama Epstein would later invest in Jean-Luc Brunel's MC2 modeling agency. Brunel had been banned from his former agency in Europe after accusations of abuse. Trump and Epstein were 'representative of a type that has nibbled at the edges of the modeling business. If you're in the market for women as sex toys, a higher echelon of that is models. They are, by definition, beautiful women. They also are beautiful young women,' Gross says. 'You can go from there.' Brunel was suspected of transporting girls or young women for Epstein. In 2022, less than three years after Epstein's death, he died by suicide in a French jail. 'Rhythm is a Dancer' In July 2019, after Epstein's arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump said in the Oval Office that he was 'not a fan' of the financier. But it wasn't always that way. In 1992, Epstein joined Trump for a party at Mar-a-Lago, where a video shows Trump chatting and laughing next to Epstein. Trump sways to the Eurodance hit 'Rhythm is a Dancer,' as the pair hang with cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins. Later that year, Trump and Epstein would again meet at Mar-a-Lago, at an invite-only event for a 'calendar girl' competition organized by George Houraney, according to the New York Times. The Florida businessman had created the event at Trump's request. "At the very first party,' Houraney told the Times, 'I said, 'Who's coming tonight? I have 28 girls coming.' It was him and Epstein.' Epstein moved into one of the largest private homes in Manhattan in 1995, a townhouse previously owned by billionaire Victoria's Secret owner Les Wexner. Trump was 1 mile away in a penthouse at Trump Tower. 'Terrific guy,' he famously told New York magazine in 2002 for a story that called Epstein an "international money man of mystery." 'He's a lot of fun to be with," Trump said. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." 'I sort of get away with things' When his modeling agency never quite took off, Trump turned to beauty pageants. In October 1996, he bought Miss Universe, Miss USA, and Miss Teen USA. In a 2005 interview with Howard Stern, Trump bragged about his access to contestants, some of whom were as young as 14. 'I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else and no men are anywhere …. I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it,' Trump told Stern. 'The girls are standing there with no clothes on, and so I sort of get away with things like that,' he said. Tasha Dixon was competing in the Miss USA pageant in 2001 in Gary, Indiana, when she, a former Miss Arizona, met Trump. He walked in, she told CNN, as contestants changed into their bikinis. The theme that year was empowering women. "Who do you complain to? He owns the pageant,' she said. As Trump approached his third marriage − and alleged affairs, which he denies, with an adult film star and a former Playboy playmate − court testimony shows his friend Epstein was abusing teenagers. Sometime in the summer of 2020, a 16-year-old Mar-a-Lago locker room assistant was recruited into Epstein's circle by Epstein's procuror and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. She would later accuse Epstein of years of sexual abuse. Virginia Giuffre died by suicide last April at the age of 41. A lenient plea deal Epstein received from Florida state and federal prosecutors in 2008 included restitution to 36 victims. A 2019 federal indictment cited "dozens" of victims. The breakup In 2003, the Wall Street Journal reported, Epstein received a leather-bound volume of tributes from friends for his 50th birthday. A lewd message in the book was attributed to Trump, the paper reported. It ended: 'Happy Birthday − and may every day be another wonderful secret.' (Trump denied writing the letter and has sued the Wall Street Journal over the report.) A year after Epstein turned 50, Trump, in his book "Trump ‒ How to Get Rich," described a call from a person he called "the mysterious Jeffrey." "As mysterious as Jeffrey is, he's one of the few people I know who can get by on just a first name," Trump wrote. "My staff never asks for a last name in his case, which in a way puts him up there with Elvis." But that year, Epstein and Trump fell out over an oceanfront mansion in Palm Beach called Maison de l'Amitie − the House of Friendship. Trump outbid Epstein for the estate, paying $41 million, and in 2008 flipped it for $95 million to a Russian billionaire. Other reports say they broke after Ghislaine Maxwell solicited the daughter of a Mar-a-Lago member and her father complained to Trump. 'The fact is that the president kicked him out of his club for being a creep," said White House Communications Director Steven Cheung. Maxwell is now serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking a minor to Epstein for sexual abuse. After her 2020 arrest, when asked if Maxwell might cut a deal with prosecutors, Trump said: "I just wish her well." On July 24, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as a criminal defense lawyer for Trump, flew to Florida to meet Maxwell at a women's prison. 'Boring stuff' Trump and Epstein appear to have not spoken for 15 years before his death. As Epstein continues to dog his presidency, Trump says he's bewildered by the attention. 'I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody," he told reporters. "It's pretty boring stuff.'


USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump wins again: Columbia's $200 million fine will reshape higher education
Liberals have howled for months over President Trump's targeting of Ivy League universities. I doubt they'll view the Columbia agreement as a win for students and for our nation as whole. But it is. In an agreement ripped from the pages of President Donald Trump's "The Art of the Deal," Columbia University has agreed to pay $200 million fine to the federal government to settle accusations that the school failed to protect Jewish students from antisemitism on campus. The move is a capitulation to Trump's harsh rebuke of elite universities because of the rampant antisemitism unleashed on campuses after the Hamas terrorist attack against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. This is a win for Trump, a scathing reprimand of higher education and a message of hope for American Jews. Jewish students were told to flee campus Columbia agreed to pay the $200 million fine to resolve multiple civil rights investigations centering on its failure to stop antisemitic protests on campus. The threats were so severe that a rabbi warned Jewish students to flee campus a day before the start of Passover in April 2024. Columbia also has agreed to appoint an independent monitor to update the federal government on its compliance with civil rights laws and to pay an additional $21 million fine to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. These are mind-boggling agreements by one of the country's most elite universities. Opinion: Liberals claimed Trump would end democracy. They were wrong again. In March, Trump cut off $400 million in federal funding to Columbia and launched investigations into 59 other colleges and universities because of their admissions policies and the antisemitic protests on their campuses. If you had told me then that Columbia would bow the knee to Trump just four months later, I'd have laughed. Trump is reshaping higher education Columbia's agreement to pay a $200 million fine is a strong indication that Trump was right about widespread antisemitism on campus. Even so, liberals have howled for months over Trump's targeting of Ivy League universities, and I doubt they'll view the Columbia agreement as a win for students and for our nation as whole. It is, though, and they should. Trump also froze Harvard University's funding over hiring policies that elevated diversity, equity and inclusion ideology over merit-based appointments. Progressives called Trump a "despot in the making" and an enemy of free speech. But Trump was in reality standing against a culture on university campuses that promoted progressive values to the exclusion of dissenting opinions. Conservative students were shunned. And Jewish students were targeted because of Israel's defense of its citizens. Columbia is now paying the price for that intolerance. Opinion: In-N-Out owner places order to go − out of California I hope the Columbia settlement helps reshape higher education in the Ivy League and beyond. Institutions that accept taxpayer dollars must be held accountable for antisemitism and other forms of discrimination. Because Trump took a stand − and took the heat from progressives and the news media − things may finally change for the better at Columbia. Ball to you, Harvard. You next? Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@ and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here.