
Family who moved into newly-renovated home is stunned to discover they are squatters amid worrying trend
A family who thought they were moving into their a dream home instead walked into the middle of a housing nightmare in the latest 'squatter scam' that is sweeping the country.
Homeowner Mike Haskell believed he was just hours away from finalizing the sale of a freshly renovated four-bedroom, two-bath property in the quiet suburb of Windsor Mill, just outside Baltimore.
Haskell had poured tens of thousands of dollars into the home refurbishing it with new fixtures, modern appliances, and even professional staging.
But what began as a routine real estate transaction suddenly turned into a bizarre and costly standoff with strangers who should never have even been there in the first place.
The day before closing, Haskell received a simple phone call from a prospective buyer that upended everything.
'The buyer last night drove by and saw a moving truck in the driveway. They thought it was maybe being unstaged for advertising,' Haskell told WJLA. 'I said, "No, that was done way earlier. There should be nobody there."'
When Haskell raced to the home that he was selling, what he saw left him stunned: a U-Haul was parked in the driveway, the locks had changed, and the for-sale sign had suddenly been removed.
Inside, a man and woman together with their two small children looked to be have been living comfortably for at least a week and claimed they had a legal right to be there - despite Haskell owning the property.
The family hadn't randomly broken into the home nor snuck into a property they believed to be abandoned.
According to the couple, they moved in after finding the property through an ad posted on social media offering access to so-called 'last resort' home for a one-time payment of just $7,500 in cash.
The pair said they met the poster of the advert outside the Windsor Mill property, handed over the money, and signed what appeared to be a lease - despite the fact that the person making the transaction had no legal ownership or control of the home.
The family moved in claiming they were completely unaware that their lease was in fact worthless.
'I really did lose my money,' the man told ABC7. 'But… where do we get compensated at?'
The family ultimately acknowledged they were 'unlawfully occupying' the home and that their presence had jeopardized Haskell's pending sale.
When Haskell called Baltimore County Police, he expected swift action but officers classified the situation a civil matter, despite there being clear signs of fraudulent entry.
According to the official report the case was treated not as a criminal offense, but as a landlord-tenant dispute.
Such bureaucratic bottlenecks are becoming increasingly common across the US with the scam appearing to play on rising housing insecurity and legal loopholes that are ripe for exploitation.
Civil courts are often the only recourse for homeowners facing unauthorized occupation, and the legal process to remove squatters can drag on for months or years, even for those those with fake or nonexistent leases.
'It is currently more difficult to get squatters out than getting a delinquent tenant out,' said attorney Bruce Ailion of Re/Max Town & Country to Realtor.com.
'The key to protecting yourself from squatters is preventing them from entering in the first place,' Ailion said, urging property owners to invest in cameras, high-grade locks, and regular surveillance.
What makes the case especially alarming is the organized nature of the scam.
According to Spotlight on Maryland, several houses across Baltimore County have been fraudulently listed by users promoting 'last resort' homes on social media platforms.
Victims who are often vulnerable families in desperate need of housing are asked to pay lump sums in cash in exchange for fraudulent documents and access to homes they do not legally control.
One ad posted on social media offered access to so-called 'last resort' or 'squatter homes' for a one-time payment of just $7,500 in cash
'These are not isolated incidents. They know who [the scammer] is, and I'm not quite sure why an arrest has not been made,' Haskell said.
Haskell claims the woman who showed the property to the couple is actively orchestrating similar scams across the county.
Despite her alleged involvement in multiple cases, she has not been charged.
'I want to see law enforcement, prosecutors, and government officials hold these people accountable,' Haskell said.
Desperate to salvage the sale of his home, Haskell ultimately agreed to a 'cash for keys' deal - a controversial tactic in which a property owner pays the unauthorized occupants to leave quietly.
He handed over $3,000 in cash to the couple, who then agreed to vacate and surrender the keys.
The family then packed their belongings back into the U-Haul and drove off.
At one point, the man had turned to Haskell to ask him for recompense.
'It would be nice if I could get compensated something… like a hotel? Something? Money?'
David Metzger, a real estate attorney, advises sellers to proceed with caution.
'As soon as you list a home for sale or lease, invest in cameras and security systems.'
But even those may not be enough. Once inside, squatters gain a legal foothold that makes eviction an uphill battle.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
2 days ago
- Times
Flutter's FanDuel faces US lawsuit over predatory marketing
S ince he took office in December 2020, the mayor of Baltimore, Brandon Scott, has been on a mission to address the the city's challenges. Crime has dropped, with murders falling 20 per cent last year. Scott has also been tackling the city's empty, abandoned houses, investing in youth services and repairing its crumbling infrastructure. This year, he took on another challenge: the damage he says is being done by the growth in online sports betting. In April he launched a lawsuit against gambling firms, including FanDuel, which is owned by Flutter Entertainment, based in Dublin. Scott alleged that FanDuel had been targeting some of the most vulnerable Baltimoreans, inducing them to bet beyond their means and using sophisticated and misleading sales tactics to do so.


The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Justin Tucker suspension: Everyone loses as ex-Ravens kicker penalized
And, yeah, some rookie you've never heard of is going to benefit from the fact that Baltimore had already cut ties with Tucker, creating an open job to compete for in training camp. But there are no winners from this sad saga. There are most definitely losers, though, and they are as follows: Justin Tucker Duh. On the one hand, he ought to be grateful the NFL's announcement was, per usual, devoid of details regarding his violation of the league's personal conduct policy. And unlike the penalty the league levied against Cleveland Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson three years ago, in what can only be described as similar circumstances - at the time, 24 women had filed civil suits against him involving allegations of sexual misconduct during massage therapy sessions - Tucker has not been fined nor ordered to undergo treatment or an evaluation. Watson was and had to pay $5 million. But Tucker is radioactive. Last season was decidedly the worst of his 13-year career. Still the most accurate kicker in NFL history, he converted a career-low 73.3% of his field-goal attempts. It gave the Ravens a convenient excuse to cut a 35-year-old who was at the top of his positional compensation scale. And in light of the sexual misconduct allegations made by Baltimore-area massage therapists for incidents that reportedly occurred between 2012 and 2016, no team was likely to touch Tucker before the league completed its investigation into the matter - and there will undoubtedly be less consideration for him now given he won't be eligible to return until Nov. 11. But this runs deeper. Again, the NFL didn't offer details as to why it had suspended Tucker, though The Baltimore Banner reported them in spades. All the while, Tucker, a practicing Catholic, has denied them, characterizing the website's reporting as "unequivocally false" - yet also won't appeal his suspension. Take that for what it's worth. At this point, it seems unlikely Tucker plays in the NFL again. And what appears to be the final chapter of his once enviable career has probably delivered a fatal broadside to his Hall of Fame candidacy given the high bar his position already demanded. In a statement issued last month and attributed to executive vice president and GM Eric DeCosta, he said, "Sometimes football decisions are incredibly difficult, and this is one of those instances," when explaining why the Ravens released Tucker with three years left on his four-year, $22 million extension. Anyone paying more than a scintilla of attention knew the move involved far more calculus than that, but that's how the Ravens chose to frame it. They missed the mark. This is the same organization that was spotlit by the Ray Rice situation in 2014, when the team's top running back was seen on video assaulting his fiancee in an elevator. He was eventually released and never played another NFL snap after being indefinitely suspended. Following the issuance of Watson's penalty in 2022, head coach John Harbaugh said of the Ravens' stance about player misconduct, "Basically, we're kind of zero tolerance. You have to know the truth, you have to try to understand the circumstances, but we've stayed away from that particular situation - when we draft players, when we sign them as free agents. "I'm glad that we have that policy." (For what it's worth, the Ravens just spent a second-round pick on linebacker Mike Green, who's been accused of sexual assault multiple times in the past.) More: Opinion: NFL's suspension of kicker Justin Tucker is essentially a guilty verdict Any profession has people who are less-than-savory characters. The NFL is no different, but its scandals make headlines that members of Fortune 500 companies (or far less notable ones) rarely draw. It's just baffling the Ravens - a well-run, first-rate organization by nearly every other measure, on or off the field - would further jeopardize their brand. They undoubtedly carefully parsed their announcement signaling Tucker's departure. DeCosta also thanked him for his "many contributions" to the franchise (meaning its win total). It's fine that the club took its time before cutting the cord while doing its own due diligence on the matter. But given the circumstances, "The Ravens have released Justin Tucker" always seemed to be about the extent of what he deserved. The victims In the event crystal clarity is needed here, victims are not "losers." But the NFL's verdict offers further credence that they've lost too much. According to The Banner's reporting, 16 massage therapists from eight local spas shared horror stories about Tucker's alleged misconduct. It's important to note he has not been charged with a crime, and the statute of limitations in Maryland to file a civil action against him is long past. Sadly, this is often how it goes whenever women are exploited. They won't see a penny in the aftermath of their trauma, which could be very difficult to escape for the balance of their lives. Nobody's lost more than them, and that can't be forgotten. All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY's 4th and Monday newsletter.


The Independent
4 days ago
- The Independent
NFL suspends former Ravens kicker Justin Tucker for first 10 weeks of the season amid slew of off-field allegations
NFL star Justin Tucker has been suspended for the first 10 weeks of the upcoming season, following a slew of allegations of inappropriate sexual behavior. Tucker is a former kicker for the Baltimore Ravens, and received his suspension on Thursday, after being accused of violating the NFL's personal conduct policy. The 35-year-old became a free agent after the Ravens released him last month in the aftermath of reports that he was accused of inappropriate sexual behavior by over a dozen massage therapists. Allegations against Tucker first emerged in January, when The Baltimore Banner reported that six massage therapists from eight Baltimore-area spas had shared their first-hand accounts with the outlet. The outlet reported that the NFL star repeatedly exposed himself to the masseuses, touched two of them with his exposed penis and also several times left what appeared to be ejaculate on the massage table. By February a total of 16 had come forward. All said Tucker's actions occurred between 2012 and 2016. Two of the spas said the player's behavior was so bad that he had been banned from the premises. After the initial allegations emerged, Tucker said that he has never received any complaints from a massage therapist or been told he was not welcome at a spa or other place of business. His 10-week suspension takes effect on August 26, which is roster cutdown day, and will be eligible for reinstatement on November 11. Tucker is still able to try out with and sign with a team. If he is signed, he can attend training camp and participate in preseason games. A five-time All-Pro, Tucker has played his entire 13-year career with Baltimore. He's considered one of the best kickers in NFL history, although 2024 was his worst season.