logo
The Best Diets to Help Prevent Constipation, According to a New Study

The Best Diets to Help Prevent Constipation, According to a New Study

Yahoo10-07-2025
Reviewed by Dietitian Emily Lachtrupp, M.S., RDThis study found that Mediterranean and plant-based diets may prevent constipation.
Vegetables, nuts and healthy fats had the strongest associations.
Start incorporating these foods into your meals and snacks to lower constipation risk.If you've ever struggled to poop, you know how annoying, and sometimes painful, it can be. Constipation is clinically defined as having fewer than three bowel movements a week. But that's not all. If your stools are hard, dry or lumpy, or you have to strain to get them out, you might be constipated. And if you're able to go but feel like you can't get it all out? That's also a sign of constipation.
If you can relate to any of this, know that you're not alone. About 16% of American adults have symptoms of constipation. This number increases to 33% for those over 60. And constipation can be costly. Some experts estimate that people with constipation and commercial health insurance average $8,700 more annually in health care costs compared to people without constipation.
Typically, increasing fiber and fluid intake are two things that are recommended to help get things moving. But a new study done by researchers at Mass General Brigham in Boston has a few more suggestions regarding diet and which foods may help. They published their findings in the journal Gastroenterology. Let's break down what they found.
Researchers drew data from three large, previously conducted, long-term U.S. studies: the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII) and the Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study (HPFS). The NHS started in 1976 and included 121,700 female nurses; the NHSII included over 116,400 female nurses and began in 1989. Starting in 1986, the HPFS enrolled just over 51,500 male health care workers.
From these cohorts, researchers pulled data on participants who met their criteria, resulting in almost 28,000 women from the NHS with an average age of 78, about 56,000 women from the NHSII with an average age of 61, and over 12,200 men from the HPFS with an average age of 79.
They also took data on demographics, including age, sex, race, smoking status, physical activity, medical history, medications, supplements, BMI and socioeconomic status.
Constipation was assessed in biannual questionnaires, asking, 'In the past year, have you been bothered by constipation for at least 12 weeks (not necessarily consecutive)?'
Individuals with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation subtype (IBS-C) were identified by answering yes to the constipation question, plus to 'If yes, were your bowel movements associated with abdominal pain?' Researchers defined chronic constipation as having a bowel movement every three or more days.
In all three cohorts, food frequency questionnaires were completed every four years. The FFQs included 131 food and beverage items, asking how often and how much participants ate. Responses were converted into average servings per day. Researchers then applied this to five different eating patterns, resulting in scores for each one, including the alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED) score, plant-based diet index (PDI), low-carb diet (LCD) score, Western diet and the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) score. The EDIP attempts to quantify the amount of inflammatory food you eat by tracking 18 food groups that may raise inflammatory markers in the body.
Based on their scores, participants were placed into groups called quintiles. The quintiles ranged from low to high scores.
During the study follow-up periods, which were 25 to 30 years, there were over 7,500 cases of chronic constipation. After running statistical analyses, including adjusting for confounding factors (e.g., demographics and fiber intake), researchers found:
Compared to the lowest groups, the groups that scored highest on Mediterranean diet and plant-based diet experienced a 16% and 20% decreased risk for constipation, respectively.
The groups that scored highest on the inflammatory diet scale (EDIP) and Western diet scale were associated with a 24% and 22% increased risk for constipation, respectively.
Among the individual dietary components, higher intake of all types of vegetables, nuts and salad dressing were associated with lower risks for constipation.
Comparing the highest quintile (Q5) to the lowest (Q1), greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet and a plant-based diet were associated with a 25% and a 27% decreased risk for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, respectively.
These results suggest that greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet or a plant-based diet reduces the risk of chronic constipation. This is independent of fiber intake. In other words, researchers adjusted for total fiber intake and still found that, even by taking away any influence fiber might have on constipation, these eating patterns still helped reduce the risk of constipation.
In particular, they found that tomatoes, cruciferous vegetables, leafy green vegetables and dark yellow vegetables appeared to be the primary dietary components driving the protective associations between the aMED and PDI with reduced risk of constipation.
Eating patterns that increased the risk of constipation included the Western diet and EDIP. The Western diet, sometimes referred to as the typical American diet, is characterized by high intake of red or processed meats, refined grains, french fries, high-fat dairy products, sweets, desserts and butter.
In addition to vegetables, researchers also found strong associations between nuts and healthy fats with reduced risk of constipation. Since researchers adjusted for fiber, they essentially removed fiber's effects on constipation for analysis. This suggests that there is some other component in these foods that is responsible for reducing the risk of constipation.
'Although the study did not specifically address the mechanisms by which these diets were protective, we suspect that bioactive compounds found in vegetables and nuts—such as polyphenols, antioxidants and healthy fats (e.g., monounsaturated fats)—likely contribute to constipation prevention,' says senior study author Kyle Staller, M.D., M.P.H. 'These benefits are most likely driven by the way they impact our gut microbiome, the community of bacteria and other microbes that live in our gut. It's possible that these foods promote the growth of beneficial gut bacteria that produce compounds that we think may be beneficial to the lining (and therefore function) of the gut, like short-chain fatty acids.'
Still, Staller says that fiber is still a key nutrient for avoiding constipation and supporting a healthy gut.
If you're not ready to go all in with the Mediterranean or plant-based diets, you can start adding the foods that seem to have more influence over constipation, according to this study: tomatoes, cruciferous vegetables, leafy green vegetables, dark yellow vegetables, nuts and healthy fats, like olive oil. Need some inspiration? Try our Roasted Squash & Lentil Kale Salad to get your leafy green/cruciferous and dark yellow veggies, plus olive oil. Or our mouthwatering Tomato Salad with Lemon-Basil Vinaigrette to get your fill of tomatoes and olive oil.
If you're ready to go for it, a great place to start is with our 7-Day Mediterranean Diet Meal Plan for Beginners or our 7-Day Mediterranean Diet Meal Plan for a Healthy Gut. The Mediterranean diet is loaded with fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, seeds, seafood, lean protein, healthy fats and a little dairy.
If you're interested in trying a meal plan with no meat, but a little yogurt or kefir, check out our 7-Day Plant-Based Diet Meal Plan for Beginners. If you think plant-based means boring, this will change your mind!
Other habits that can influence constipation include physical activity, stress and fluid intake. And while alcohol may help you go, these study authors caution against using it as a constipation cure, since it can have negative consequences on your gut health and other organs, including your brain. Plus, in the long run, regularly imbibing can increase chronic inflammation, which, in turn, increases disease risk—exactly the opposite of what you're trying to accomplish.
This study suggests that the Mediterranean and plant-based diets are associated with lower rates of constipation. On the other end of the spectrum fall the Western diet and inflammatory diets, which are associated with higher rates of constipation. According to these researchers, it's not just fiber that contributes to a reduced risk of constipation. The antioxidants in vegetables, nuts and healthy fats also appear to contribute. There are many reasons the Mediterranean diet has been ranked as the healthiest eating pattern for several years. Following the Mediterranean diet also helps reduce disease risk, including heart disease, dementia, osteoporosis and macular degeneration. Now we can add constipation to the list.
Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As wrestling fans reel from the sudden death of Hulk Hogan, a cardiologist explains how to live long and healthy − and avoid chronic disease
As wrestling fans reel from the sudden death of Hulk Hogan, a cardiologist explains how to live long and healthy − and avoid chronic disease

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

As wrestling fans reel from the sudden death of Hulk Hogan, a cardiologist explains how to live long and healthy − and avoid chronic disease

On July 24, 2025, the American pro wrestling celebrity Hulk Hogan, whose real name was Terry Bollea, died at the age of 71. Hogan had chronic lymphocytic leukemia and a history of atrial fibrillation, or A-fib, a condition in which the upper chambers of the heart, or atria, beat irregularly and often rapidly. His cause of death has been confirmed as acute myocardial infarction, commonly known as a heart attack. Hogan became a household name in the 1980s and has long been known for maintaining fitness and a highly active lifestyle, despite having had 25 surgeries in 10 years, including a neck surgery in May. Hogan's death has brought renewed attention to the importance of maintaining heart health through exercise. Many people think that bodybuilders are the 'picture' of health. However, the truth is that too much muscle can increase strain on the heart and may actually be harmful. It may seem ironic, then, that people who exercise to extreme levels and appear healthy on the outside can, in fact, be quite unhealthy on the inside. As the director of sports cardiology at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, I see patients of all age groups and at varying levels of fitness who are interested in promoting health by incorporating exercise into their lifestyle, or by optimizing their current exercise program. Exercise is the foundation for good health When people think of vital signs, they usually think about things such as heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, breathing rate and blood oxygen levels. However, the American Heart Association also includes 'fitness' as an additional vital sign that should be considered when determining a patient's overall health and risk of heart disease, cancer and death. While fitness may be determined in various ways, the best way is by checking what is known as peak oxygen uptake, or VO2 max, through a specialized evaluation called a cardiopulmonary exercise test. These can be performed at many doctors' offices and clinics, and they provide a wealth of information related to overall health, as well as heart, lung and skeletal muscle function. Exercise is one of the most effective interventions to prolong life and reduce the risk of developing chronic diseases throughout life – in effect, prolonging lifespan and improving health span, meaning the number of years that people spend in good health. In fact, a large study done by the Cleveland Clinic found that a low level of fitness poses a greater risk of death over time than other traditional risk factors that people commonly think of, such as smoking, diabetes, coronary artery disease and severe kidney disease. When it comes to brain health, the American Stroke Association emphasizes the importance of routine exercise and avoiding sedentary behavior in their 2024 guidelines on primary prevention of stroke. The risk of stroke increases with the amount of sedentary time spent throughout the day and also with the amount of time spent watching television, particularly four hours or more per day. Regarding cognitive decline, the Alzheimer's Society states that regular exercise reduces the risk of dementia by almost 20%. Furthermore, the risk of Alzheimer's disease is twice as high among individuals who exercise the least, when compared to individuals who exercise the most. There is also strong evidence that regular exercise reduces the risk of certain types of cancer, especially, colon, breast and endometrial cancer. This reduction in cancer risk is achieved through several mechanisms. For one, obesity is a risk factor for up to 13 forms of cancer, and excess body weight is responsible for about 7% of all cancer deaths. Regular exercise helps to maintain a healthy weight. Second, exercise helps to keep certain hormones – such as insulin and sex hormones – within a normal range. When these hormone levels get too high, they may increase cancer cell growth. Exercise also helps to boost the immune system by improving the body's ability to fight off pathogens and cancer cells. This in turn helps prevent cancer cell growth and also reduces chronic inflammation, which left unchecked damages tissue and increases cancer risk. Finally, exercise improves the quality of life for all people, regardless of their health or their age. In 2023, Hulk Hogan famously quipped, 'I'm 69 years old, but I feel like I'm 39.' The optimal dose of exercise Major health organizations, such as the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society and Department of Health and Human Services, all share similar recommendations when it comes to the amount of exercise people should aim for. These organizations all recommend doing at least 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity exercise, or at least 75 minutes per week of vigorous-intensity exercise. Moderate exercises include activities such as walking briskly (2.5 to 4 miles per hour), playing doubles tennis or raking the yard. Vigorous exercise includes activities such as jogging, running or shoveling snow. A good rule of thumb for figuring out how hard a specific exercise is is to apply the 'talk test': During moderate-intensity exercise, you can talk, but not sing, during the activity. During vigorous intensity exercise, you can say only a few words before having to stop and take a breath. There is a lot of solid data to support these recommendations. For example, in a very large analysis of about 48,000 people followed for 30 years, the risk of death from any cause was about 20% lower among those who followed the physical activity guidelines for Americans. Life can be busy, and some people may find it challenging to squeeze in at least 150 minutes of exercise throughout the course of the week. However, 'weekend warriors' – people who cram all their exercise into one to two days over the weekend – still receive the benefits of exercise. So, a busy lifestyle during the week should not prevent people from doing their best to meet the guidelines. What about the number of steps per day? In a new analysis in The Lancet, when compared with walking only 2,000 steps per day, people who walked 7,000 steps per day had a 47% lower risk of death from any cause, a 25% lower risk of developing heart disease, about a 50% lower risk of death from heart disease, a 38% lower risk of developing dementia, a 37% lower risk of dying from cancer, a 22% lower risk of depression and a 28% lower risk of falls. Historically, people have aimed for 10,000 steps per day, but this new data indicates that there are tremendous benefits gained simply from walking 7,000 steps daily. It's never too late to start One question that many patients ask me – and other doctors – is: 'Is it ever too late to start exercising?' There is great data to suggest that people can reap the benefits even if they don't begin an exercise program into their 50s. Being sedentary while aging will cause the heart and blood vessels to stiffen. When that happens, blood pressure can go up and people may be at risk of other things such as heart attacks, strokes or heart failure. However, in a study of previously sedentary adults with an average age of 53, two years of regular exercise reversed the age-related stiffening of the heart that otherwise occurs in the absence of routine exercise. And it is important to remember that you do not have to look like a body builder or fitness guru in order to reap the benefits of exercise. Almost three-quarters of the total benefit to heart, brain and metabolic health that can be gained from exercise will be achieved just by following the guidelines. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: William Cornwell, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Read more: Light exercise can yield significant cognitive benefits, new research shows Heart rate zones aren't a perfect measure of exercise intensity, but regularly getting your heart pumping is still important for fitness Tracking daily step counts can be a useful tool for weight management – an exercise scientist parses the science William Cornwell does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

U.S. envoy visits distribution site in Gaza as humanitarian crisis worsens
U.S. envoy visits distribution site in Gaza as humanitarian crisis worsens

Los Angeles Times

time4 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

U.S. envoy visits distribution site in Gaza as humanitarian crisis worsens

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip — President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff visited southern Gaza on Friday amid international outrage over starvation, shortages and deadly chaos near aid distribution sites. With food scarce and parcels being airdropped, Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee toured one of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's distribution sites in Rafah, Gaza's southernmost city. Chapin Fay, the group's spokesperson, said the visit reflected Trump's understanding of the stakes and that 'feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority.' All four of the group's sites are in zones controlled by the Israeli military and have become flashpoints of desperation during their months of operation, with starving people scrambling for scarce aid. Hundreds have been killed by either gunfire or trampling. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots at people who approach its forces, and the foundation says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired warning shots to prevent deadly crowding. Witkoff's visit comes a week after U.S. officials walked away from ceasefire talks in Qatar, blaming Hamas and pledging to seek other ways to rescue Israeli hostages and make Gaza safe. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that Witkoff was sent to craft a plan to boost food and aid deliveries, while Trump wrote on social media that the fastest way to end the crisis would be for Hamas to surrender and release hostages. Officials at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza said they have received the bodies of 25 people, including 13 who were killed while trying to get aid, including near the site that U.S. officials visited. GHF denied anyone was killed at their sites on Friday and said most recent incidents had taken place near United Nations aid convoys. The remaining 12 were killed in airstrikes, the officials said. Israel's military did not immediately comment. International organizations have said Gaza has been on the brink of famine for the past two years. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the leading international authority on food crises, said recent developments, including a complete blockade on aid for 2 1/2 months, mean the 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in Gaza.' Though the flow of aid has resumed, including via airdrops, the amount getting into Gaza remains far lower than what aid organizations say is needed. A security breakdown in the territory has made it nearly impossible to safely deliver food to starving Palestinians, much of the limited aid entering is hoarded and later sold at exorbitant prices. At a Friday press conference in Gaza City, representatives of the territory's influential tribes accused Israel of empowering factions that loot aid sites and implored Witkoff to stay several hours in Gaza to witness life firsthand. 'We want the American envoy to come and live among us in these tents where there is no water, no food and no light,' they said. 'Our children are hungry in the streets.' In a report issued Friday, Human Rights Watch called the current setup 'a flawed, militarized aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths.' 'It would be near impossible for Palestinians to follow the instructions issued by GHF, stay safe, and receive aid, particularly in the context of ongoing military operations, Israeli military sanctioned curfews, and frequent GHF messages saying that people should not travel to the sites before the distribution window opens,' the report said. It cited doctors, aid seekers and at least one security contractor. Since the group's operations began in late May, hundreds of Palestinians have been killed in shootings by Israeli soldiers while on roads heading to the sites, according to witnesses and health officials. The Israeli military has said its troops have only fired warning shots to control crowds. Responding to the report, Israel's military blamed Hamas for sabotaging the aid distribution system but said it was working to make the routes under its control safer for those traveling to aid sites. GHF did not immediately respond to questions about the report. The group has never allowed journalists to visit their sites and Israel's military has barred reporters from independently entering Gaza throughout the war. International condemnations have mounted as such reports trickle out of Gaza, including from aid organizations that previously oversaw distribution. A July 30 video published Thursday by the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs showed an aid convoy driving past a border crossing as gunfire ricocheted off the ground near where crowds congregated. 'We were met on the road by tens of thousands of hungry and desperate people who directly offloaded everything from the backs of our trucks,' said Olga Cherevko, an OCHA staff member. Some of Israel's traditional allies have moved toward recognizing Palestinian statehood hoping to revive prospects of a two-state solution. Germany has thus far refrained from doing so. On a tour in the occupied West Bank, the country's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, Germany's foreign minister called on Israel to be open to making peace and said Hamas militants should lay down their weapons and release the hostages. Speaking in the Christian-majority village of Taybeh, Wadephul called Israeli settlements in the West Bank a key obstacle to a two-state solution. He condemned settler violence and destruction, and criticized the Israeli military for failing to do more to prevent the attacks. The frequency of settler attacks in the West Bank have increased since the war between Israel and Hamas began, according to the United Nations. The conflict erupted on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and abducting 251 others. They still hold 50 hostages, including around 20 believed to be alive. Most of the others have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians. The ministry operates under the Hamas government. The U.N. and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties. Shurafa, Metz and Frankel write for the Associated Press. Metz reported from Jerusalem and Frankel from Tel Aviv.

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. Just Beat EPS By 19%: Here's What Analysts Think Will Happen Next
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. Just Beat EPS By 19%: Here's What Analysts Think Will Happen Next

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. Just Beat EPS By 19%: Here's What Analysts Think Will Happen Next

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC) shareholders are probably feeling a little disappointed, since its shares fell 7.1% to US$71.32 in the week after its latest second-quarter results. It looks like a credible result overall - although revenues of US$5.0b were in line with what the analysts predicted, GE HealthCare Technologies surprised by delivering a statutory profit of US$1.06 per share, a notable 19% above expectations. Following the result, the analysts have updated their earnings model, and it would be good to know whether they think there's been a strong change in the company's prospects, or if it's business as usual. We thought readers would find it interesting to see the analysts latest (statutory) post-earnings forecasts for next year. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Taking into account the latest results, the consensus forecast from GE HealthCare Technologies' 19 analysts is for revenues of US$20.4b in 2025. This reflects a reasonable 2.2% improvement in revenue compared to the last 12 months. Statutory earnings per share are expected to shrink 5.9% to US$4.62 in the same period. In the lead-up to this report, the analysts had been modelling revenues of US$20.3b and earnings per share (EPS) of US$4.13 in 2025. There was no real change to the revenue estimates, but the analysts do seem more bullish on earnings, given the decent improvement in earnings per share expectations following these results. See our latest analysis for GE HealthCare Technologies There's been no major changes to the consensus price target of US$88.00, suggesting that the improved earnings per share outlook is not enough to have a long-term positive impact on the stock's valuation. There's another way to think about price targets though, and that's to look at the range of price targets put forward by analysts, because a wide range of estimates could suggest a diverse view on possible outcomes for the business. The most optimistic GE HealthCare Technologies analyst has a price target of US$110 per share, while the most pessimistic values it at US$73.00. This shows there is still a bit of diversity in estimates, but analysts don't appear to be totally split on the stock as though it might be a success or failure situation. Another way we can view these estimates is in the context of the bigger picture, such as how the forecasts stack up against past performance, and whether forecasts are more or less bullish relative to other companies in the industry. It's clear from the latest estimates that GE HealthCare Technologies' rate of growth is expected to accelerate meaningfully, with the forecast 4.4% annualised revenue growth to the end of 2025 noticeably faster than its historical growth of 3.6% p.a. over the past three years. By contrast, our data suggests that other companies (with analyst coverage) in a similar industry are forecast to grow their revenue at 8.2% per year. It seems obvious that, while the future growth outlook is brighter than the recent past, GE HealthCare Technologies is expected to grow slower than the wider industry. The Bottom Line The most important thing here is that the analysts upgraded their earnings per share estimates, suggesting that there has been a clear increase in optimism towards GE HealthCare Technologies following these results. Fortunately, the analysts also reconfirmed their revenue estimates, suggesting that it's tracking in line with expectations. Although our data does suggest that GE HealthCare Technologies' revenue is expected to perform worse than the wider industry. There was no real change to the consensus price target, suggesting that the intrinsic value of the business has not undergone any major changes with the latest estimates. Keeping that in mind, we still think that the longer term trajectory of the business is much more important for investors to consider. We have estimates - from multiple GE HealthCare Technologies analysts - going out to 2027, and you can see them free on our platform here. Don't forget that there may still be risks. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for GE HealthCare Technologies that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store