Senate to Trump on job numbers: Don't shoot the messenger
Why it matters: Trump's decision to fire the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics over weak job numbers sent shockwaves across the Senate.
"When you don't like the message, fire the messenger," Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said, according to Semafor.
When asked if she can still trust the numbers, she responded: "No. That's the problem. And when you fire people, it makes you trust them even less."
Driving the news: Democrats responded with outrage over Trump's announcement he was dismissing Erika L. McEntarfer from the Department of Labor.
McEntarfer was confirmed 86-8 in January 2024, including a yes vote from then-Sen. JD Vance.
"Instead of trying to fix the economy, he shoots the messenger," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said on the Senate floor.
Yes, but: When asked if Trump's move will undermine faith in job numbers, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) replied: "I don't believe economists half the time anyway."
Reality check: Doctoring job numbers would require a conspiracy across several government departments.
Government statistics agencies are historically insulated from politics, as Axios' Neil Irwin notes, so they can tally up activity in a $30 trillion economy.
Flashback: President Obama faced accusations from former General Electric CEO Jack Welch that he fixed the job numbers ahead of the 2012 election.
Zoom in: About two hours after Trump announced he would fire McEntarfer, he received some unexpected — and good — news from the Fed.
One of Biden's appointees, Federal Reserve governor Adriana Kugler, will resign her job next week, the Fed announced.
That will give Trump an opening to fill this fall.
Zoom out: Embedded in Trump's Truth Social post on firing McEntarfer were some of Trump's customary taunts of Fed Chair Jerome Powell, saying he should be put "out to pasture."
But in a separate post, he called for the central bank's board to "assume control" and lower interest rates on its own.
Such an ask faces some long odds, even if Trump's new nominee votes to lower rates the way Trump wants them to.
Wednesday's interest rate vote was 9-2, and while it was the first double dissent since the 1990s, Powell still has the clear majority on his side.
What we're watching: Powell has his detractors in the Senate, but independence is an important principle for many Republican lawmakers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AMD to report Q2 earnings as Wall Street looks to AI, PC sales growth
AMD (AMD) will report its second quarter results after the bell on Thursday, giving Wall Street a better understanding of the AI chip market ahead of rival Nvidia's (NVDA) report later this month. The company stands to benefit from the resumption of its chip sales in China after the Trump administration briefly banned them in April, as well as the potential for pull-forward in CPU sales as manufacturers built up inventory to fend off the impact of tariffs on PC sales. AMD shares are up 47% year to date and 34% over the last 12 months, while Nvidia shares are up 33% and 66%, respectively. For the quarter, AMD is expected to see adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.49 on revenue of $7.4 billion, according to Bloomberg consensus estimates. That would represent a 29% decline in EPS but a 27% jump in revenue. Part of the reason for that is that AMD is expected to take a $700 million hit from the Trump administration's ban on the sale of the company's MI308 AI chips for China. That's far lower than the $4.5 billion write-down Nvidia took in Q1 and the $8 billion it said it would take in Q2 due to the impact of the ban on its own China-specific chip. Trump reversed course on the ban last month, which should help make up for some of those losses in the coming quarters. AMD should also benefit from the launch of its MI350 line of AI chips, designed to go toe-to-toe with Nvidia's Blackwell-powered chips. According to AMD, the MI350 line, which includes the MI350X and MI355X, offers four times the AI compute performance and a 35x increase in inferencing capabilities versus its predecessors. 'We expect AMD to post higher results and higher guidance, as we see improving traditional server demand and latest generation share gains, as well as strong demand for MI355,' KeyBanc Capital Markets analyst John Vinh wrote in an investor note ahead of the company's earnings. AMD's Data Center segment is expected to bring in $3.2 billion in the quarter, up 14% year over year from Q2 2024 when the business generated $2.8 billion. Beyond the Data Center segment, AMD's Client business, which includes sales of CPUs for desktops and laptops, is expected to see $2.5 billion. That's a massive 71% jump versus the $1.4 billion it brought in during the same quarter last year. That anticipated increase is thanks to the anticipated pull-forward in laptop and desktop shipments to combat the Trump administration's tariffs. But it will also hurt sales in the back half of the year. 'Similar to [Intel], we expect AMD Client to benefit from tariff-related pull-in of demand in Q2, and that same benefit to likely reverse in 2H, leading to below-seasonal Q3/Q4,' BofA Global Research analyst Vivek Arya wrote in an investor note. 'For [Intel], new Street estimates for [Client Computer Group] now point to +4%/+2% [quarter-over-quarter growth] in Q3/Q4, below +7%/+4% prior to Q2 earnings and also below typical +9%/+4%,' Arya added. 'However, for AMD, we highlight Street estimates already embed the demand normalization, with Client estimates of +2%/+0% in Q3/Q4 well below typical +15%/+14%.' Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rolex, luxury watchmakers brace for Trump's tariffs on Swiss imports
Switzerland is bracing for a big tariff hike on its exports, and its watch industry could take the brunt if President Trump hits Alpine nations with an enhanced 39% tariff for its exports, slated to start on Aug. 7. The Swiss watch industry employs thousands of artisans at various watchhouses that pump out millions of wristwatches and clocks each year. The industry also employs thousands in corporate and retail roles too. In 2024, Swiss watch exports hit $29.5 billion, second only to manufactured items like pharmaceuticals and chemical products, with the US being Switzerland's main trade partner. A tariff at these levels could crush demand for new Swiss watches. 'A 39% markup could make even a stainless-steel Submariner at retail jump from $10,000 to nearly $14,000,' secondhand dealer Bob's Watches CEO Paul Altieri said to Yahoo Finance. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Altieri noted that Bob's Watches' demand for pre-owned models is on the rise, with buyers hoping to avoid the tariff price surge. Indeed, watch prices have already been rising in the US when Swiss exports were hit hit a 10% tariff earlier this year. Morgan Stanley and its data partner WatchCharts found that prices for luxury watchmakers like Patek Philippe (up 6.9%), Audemars Piguet (up 6.7%), and Richemont's ( Vacheron Constantin (up 6.5%) have risen the most in its second quarter industry report. And these tariff-fueled price hikes won't just be situated in the US but will likely affect global customers too, argued watch trading site Subdial, which runs an online watch marketplace and releases its own watch index with Bloomberg. 'If they increase prices in the US only, we may see a knock on effect in other markets. It seems more likely that brands will increase prices across all geographies (so as to maintain pricing parity, an important principle within luxury), and just accept lower margins on US stock on account of tariffs,' a spokesperson for Subdial said. Price hikes will push more of these buyers to the secondhand market, where the selection is vastly wider and deals can be found, the Subdial spokesperson added. The big watch houses and retailers aren't saying much at the moment about where prices are headed. Swiss-based Swatch Group ( is the largest watch producer in the world and counts brands like Omega, Blancpain, Breguet, and, of course, Swatch, in its portfolio. A spokesperson for the group said the company would not comment at this time. Geneva-based Rolex, which is estimated to produce over a million luxury watches a year, is in the tariff crosshairs. A Rolex spokesperson did not respond to Yahoo Finance when sought for comment. Watches of Switzerland (WOSG.L) is one of Rolex's top retail partners and operates certain 'monobrand' Rolex-only boutiques. 'We note the announcement of the proposed new US tariff rate on imports from Switzerland due to come into effect on 7th August and will continue to work closely with our brand partners to mitigate any potential impact,' the company said in a statement to Yahoo Finance. Mitigating the impact in this case likely means passing on tariff costs to customers and/or absorbing a small percentage. And this is because the effect of full passage to customer would be huge. For Rolex and Watches of Switzerland, the tariff effects may not be as severe since they operate their own certified pre-owned (CPO) watch programs. Last year Rolex bought Bucherer, the jewelry and luxury watch retailer that operates the Tourneau chain in the US. New watch buyers could shift to these CPO programs and still keep revenue flowing. But as Bob's Watches points out, used prices are climbing in sympathy as demand rises. Interestingly, Trump's tariffs on the Swiss could actually hurt his own business interests. Last year, Trump licensed his name for a range of Trump-branded watches, with models dubbed 'Fight Fight Fight" and 'Mugshot suit,' as well as a $100,000 Swiss-made tourbillon movement watch in solid 18K gold. Pras Subramanian is the lead autos and wealth reporter for Yahoo Finance. You can follow him on X and on Instagram. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Redistricting battles in Texas and elsewhere: Will courts play a role?: ANALYSIS
As Democrats search for ways to delay, if not defeat, Republican efforts to redraw election maps for political gain ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, they say, they may not find much help from federal courts. A landmark 2019 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court -- Rucho v. Common Cause -- removed federal judges almost entirely from the business of mediating disputes over partisan gerrymandering. "Excessive partisanship in districting leads to results that reasonably seem unjust. But the fact that such gerrymandering is incompatible with democratic principles does not mean that the solution lies with the federal judiciary," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts. The ruling effectively shut the courthouse door on legal challenges to creatively-drawn electoral maps that dilute the influence of certain voters based on party affiliation. MORE: How redistricting in Texas and other states could change the game for US House elections "Federal judges have no license to reallocate political power between the two major political parties, with no plausible grant of authority in the Constitution, and no legal standards to limit and direct their decisions," Roberts concluded in the opinion. Race, however, is a different matter -- and one that the Supreme Court has recognized a limited role for judges in examining under the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Section 2 of the Act prohibits the denial or abridgment of the right to vote on account of race, which has historically been interpreted to include the drawing of congressional districts that "crack" or "pack" communities of color in order to limit their influence. As recently as 2023, the high court said lower courts could intervene in "instances of intensive racial politics where the excessive role [of race] in the electoral process ... den[ies] minority voters equal opportunity to participate." MORE: Abbott threatens to oust Democrats who fled Texas over redistricting Some Democrats have begun alleging that the Texas GOP effort (and those in other states) is racially motivated. "They're coming in and cracking up parts of Austin voters and then merging my district with [Democratic] Congressman [Lloyd] Doggett's district, all with the intended effect of making it so that voters of color have less of a say in their elections, and so that Donald Trump gets his preferred member of Congress," Texas Democratic Rep. Greg Casar told ABC's Selina Wang on Sunday. Former Obama attorney general turned voting rights advocate Eric Holder told ABC News "This Week" co-anchor George Stephanopoulos on Sunday he is contemplating the possibility of new litigation under the Voting Rights Act. "This really exacerbates that which they've already done and strengthens the case that we have brought," Holder said of Texas' Republicans' redistricting efforts. A race-based challenge to any new Texas congressional map would get through the courthouse door, but it could ultimately face a skeptical Supreme Court, which has increasingly looked to eliminate any racial considerations under the Constitution. The justices are already considering a case from Louisiana involving the competing interests of the Equal Protection Clause and Voting Rights Act when it comes to race. Plaintiffs allege race was impermissibly used to create a discriminatory districts under Section 2; opponents argue that requiring a creation of new map that explicitly accounts for race is itself a violation of colorblind equal protection. When the court hears arguments this fall, there are signs several of the justices could seek to have Section 2 strictly limited or struck down entirely. "For over three decades, I have called for a systematic reassessment of our interpretation of §2," wrote Justice Clarence Thomas in June. "I am hopeful that this Court will soon realize that the conflict its §2 jurisprudence has sown with the Constitution is too severe to ignore." Ultimately, despite widespread public complaints about gerrymandering and the challenges it creates, the most likely and lasting solution may lie in legislatures and Congress. "The avenue for reform established by the Framers, and used by Congress in the past, remains open," Chief Justice Roberts wrote in Rucho. Proposals for fair districting criteria and independent commissions have circulated in statehouses and Congress for years. On Monday, one Republican lawmaker — Rep. Kevin Kiley of California — introduced a bill to ban mid-decade redrawing of congressional maps nationwide. Such a proposal could halt the state redistricting "arms race" now underway if it was adopted, though that looks highly unlikely.
