Fundamentals of GCC policy on conflicts in Middle East
MARIAM MOHAMED ALJNEIBIThe columnist is a writer with the think-tank firm TRENDS Research & AdvisoryThe Middle East continues to face a web of overlapping tensions that shape its political and security landscape. While the risk of escalation remains real, these challenges also present an opportunity for regional actors to promote dialogue and restraint.The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have adopted a measured approach rooted in neutrality, balanced diplomacy, and a commitment to international law. They maintain relations with all parties involved in regional disputes – and internationally, too – while rejecting any attempts to impose dominance through force.Alongside diplomatic efforts, the Gulf states continue to enhance their security readiness, contributing to broader regional and global initiatives aimed at de-escalation. Their refusal to engage in retaliatory military action reflects a deliberate choice to prevent further instability.Conflicts in Gaza, Lebanon and Israeli-Iranian tensions are stark reminders of the volatility. For the Gulf states, geographic proximity makes the stakes especially high. Their populations and economies are directly exposed to the fallout of any escalation.In navigating these interconnected challenges, the GCC's consistent focus on diplomacy and stability offers a pragmatic path in a region often at risk of spiraling deeper into crisis.Any conflict in any part of the region can send shockwaves across the entire Middle East and may drag in actors with no direct stake in the original dispute. This is particularly true when global economic interests are at risk or when armed proxy groups resort to violence under the pretext of linking the interests of one party to another. Such dynamics endanger critical infrastructure, including energy facilities, civilian sites, industrial zones, and logistical networks, while disrupting transportation and trade flows.The position of GCC states is based on a fundamental pillar, which is maintaining security and stability. The region cannot afford further attrition, having already endured a series of wars that impeded its economic development. For this reason, Gulf countries prioritise building and the use of state resources for growth and sustainable development.Even amid complex regional dynamics and ongoing conflicts, they remain committed to advancing prosperity and improving the quality of life for their people, with a clear and ambitious outlook towards the future.Alongside this focus on development, Gulf countries use their foreign policies as tools to defuse conflict zones, diversify their alliances with Eastern and Western partners, and intensify diplomatic efforts to contain the scope of conflict in the Middle East.Countries such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Oman often lead de-escalation efforts through regional and international mediation, seeking calm and stability to facilitate the success of economic diversification plans and to ensure peace, security, business, trade, tourism and growth.The GCC does not shy away from thorny issues or obstacles. They actively pursue every opportunity to stabilise the region, whether through economic partnership agreements or reconciliation with regional actors, in pursuit of calm and stability.They also apply diplomatic pressure where needed to secure both immediate and long-term gains for the Arab region. This approach has enabled improved economic relations without having to align with one axis against another.The GCC countries engage in negotiations and mediation on complex issues, but they firmly refuse to be a party to any armed conflict, directly or indirectly. They will not allow any party to use their territory, airspace, or waters to launch aggression against another country, while reserving the right to self-defence and the protection of their lands, people, infrastructure and economic assets from any form of threat.The balanced position of the GCC countries, which is rooted in respect for sovereignty and a desire to calm conflicts and wars in the Middle East, is built on clear criteria for stability. It reflects a form of active neutrality, rejecting engagement in conflict and favouring diplomatic solutions.
In addition to that, Gulf countries recognise the urgency of diversifying energy export routes to reduce risks, strengthening their domestic front, maintaining strategic balance with wisdom, and deepening joint Gulf coordination until a comprehensive regional and security cooperation framework for the Middle East is established.
Source: Aletihad - Abu Dhabi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
Joint Statement on Israel's Knesset approval of declaration to impose sovereignty over occupied West Bank
24 July 2025 14:54 ABU DHABI (WAM)The United Arab Emirates, the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Republic of Indonesia, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the State of Palestine, the State of Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Republic of Türkiye, the League of Arab States and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), strongly condemn the Israeli Knesset's approval of the declaration calling for the imposition of the so-called 'Israeli sovereignty' over the occupied West Bank, considering it a blatant and unacceptable violation of international law, and a flagrant breach of relevant UN Security Council resolutions, foremost among them Resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), and 2334 (2016), all of which affirm the invalidity of all measures and decisions that seek to legitimise the occupation, including settlement activities in the Palestinian territory occupied since above-mentioned countries reaffirm that Israel has no sovereignty over the Occupied Palestinian Territory, stressing that this unilateral Israeli move has no legal effect and cannot alter the legal status of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly East Jerusalem, which remains an integral part of the also emphasise that such Israeli actions only fuel the growing tension in the region, which has been exacerbated by the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip and the resulting humanitarian catastrophe in the countries call on the international community, including the UN Security Council and all relevant stakeholders, to uphold their legal and moral responsibilities, and implement urgent steps to halt Israel's illegal policies aimed at imposing a fait accompli by force, undermining the prospects for a just and lasting peace, and the two-state solution. Furthermore, the countries reaffirm their commitment to the two-state solution in accordance with resolutions on international legitimacy and the Arab Peace Initiative, and to the establishment of an independent, sovereign Palestinian state on the June 4, 1967 lines, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Lebanon's Hezbollah rejects US roadmap as ‘surrender'
Hezbollah's first response to the US roadmap for Lebanon came in a speech earlier this month by the group's leader, Naim Qassem, who declared: 'We are a people who do not surrender.' US Special Envoy Tom Barrack has proposed a plan to Lebanon's top officials that would see the full disarmament of Hezbollah within four months. In return, Israel would halt its strikes and withdraw its forces from positions it still occupies in southern Lebanon. In his address, Qassem reiterated Hezbollah's readiness to discuss all matters, including its weapons, but only within the context of a Lebanese national dialogue, and not under American pressure or threats. Last week, Hezbollah MPs said that recent parliamentary hearings have shown there is room for national consensus on key sovereignty-related issues. One of the main concerns increasingly raised by the international community has been the deepening crisis of trust between foreign powers and the Lebanese leadership, particularly the president and the prime minister. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Western diplomatic sources told Middle East Eye that foreign governments remain sceptical about the Lebanese state's ability to implement weapons containment and broader reforms. According to sources close to Hezbollah, the group's recent messaging has been intentional and clear: it rejects the US proposal outright, viewing it not as a basis for negotiation but as a surrender document - and therefore unacceptable. 'Total surrender' Barrack, who is also special envoy for Syria, returned to Beirut this week for his third visit in just over a month, continuing discussions around the US-backed roadmap for Lebanon. The plan includes the disarmament of non-state armed groups, long-overdue economic reforms, and improved relations with Damascus. From Hezbollah's perspective, the flurry of visits, meetings, and press conferences led by Barrack "carries no blessing". Sources close to the group say Hezbollah rejects the idea of disarmament while Israeli occupation and threats persist. Nawaf Salam is failing to rebuild Lebanon - while bending to US-Israeli interests Read More » However, it remains open to negotiating the transfer of its weapons to the Lebanese army within the framework of a national defence strategy. For months, Lebanon has requested that the US serve as a security guarantor, ensuring that Israel fully withdraws its forces and stops targeting Hezbollah members - strikes that have persisted despite the ceasefire - should the group begin surrendering its weapons. However, when asked on Monday whether Washington would guarantee the Israeli withdrawal, Barrack responded that the US "has no business in trying to compel Israel to do anything". Barrack also told reporters that the US was not going to force Hezbollah to disarm, or sanction the country if progress is not achieved. While Hezbollah has handed in some weapons from depots in the country's south to the Lebanese army, Israel says the group is violating the ceasefire by attempting to re-establish itself. Hezbollah has opposed Israeli pressure on the Lebanese army to destroy any weapons it receives from the group, viewing it as an attempt to prevent their integration into Lebanon's national defence strategy. The sources cited one incident in which the Lebanese army took possession of a rocket launcher from a Hezbollah depot but did not destroy it. This prompted an immediate warning from the international monitoring committee established after the ceasefire, chaired by a US general. The same sources said an earlier US proposal had been more reasonable than what they described as Barrack's offer of 'total surrender'. Pressure and preconditions Washington has set firm conditions: a clear, written timeline for implementation starting in south Lebanon and expanding northward, swift execution within weeks, and full weapons containment by the end of the year. It also calls for direct international monitoring of every step, including documented access to Hezbollah's weapons depots, photographic evidence of the arms, and a public acknowledgment from Hezbollah endorsing the disarmament mechanism. Can the US push Lebanon to normalise with Israel? Read More » In parallel, Lebanon has outlined its own set of demands: full Israeli compliance with the ceasefire, the activation of the international monitoring committee, and the continued presence and role of the United Nations Interim Force, Unifil, in Lebanon. Beirut has also requested assurances regarding the situation in Syria, reflecting growing concern among Lebanese factions about the fallout from recent developments, particularly in the Druze-majority Sweida province. The sectarian violence in Syria has further complicated the Lebanese security landscape. Observers say that the ongoing violence and Israeli attacks on Syria has reinforced Hezbollah's argument for holding onto its weapons as a means of protecting vulnerable communities. During his previous visit to Beirut earlier in July, Barrack said he was satisfied with the Lebanese government's response to the US proposal. Still, he warned that without a serious commitment from Lebanon, neither the West nor the Gulf appear ready to provide support for the country's recovery. 'Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and now the UAE are coming in and saying, 'If we can get to where everybody can just calm down, we will help redevelop that portion of Lebanon,' which is huge,' Barrack told reporters. 'They are ready to provide [funding]' once Hezbollah is disarmed, he said.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
More than 500,000 flour bags needed to avoid collapse, Gaza's media office says
The Government Media Office in Gaza has said that more than 500,000 flour bags per week are needed in the enclave to avoid a humanitarian collapse. Gaza's hospitals have recorded more than 115 deaths related to 'famine and malnutrition' amid a near-total Israeli blockade, it said in a statement issued on Telegram, adding that false narratives regarding the entry of aid trucks are being spread. 'We categorically deny these claims, as they are completely untrue and represent a dangerous alignment with the misleading narrative of the 'Israeli' occupation, and a deliberate distortion of the truth of the ongoing crime,' it added. The media office called on "all countries of the world, without exception, to immediately break the siege, permanently open the crossings, and allow the entry of baby milk and aid to more than 2.4 million people besieged in the Gaza Strip'.
