Korea's extra holidays fuel travel abroad, not local economy: National Assembly report
Released Thursday, the report examined the impact of this year's extended Seollal New Year holiday in January, when the government added a temporary holiday on the 27th. That move created a six-day break, intended to encourage local consumption.
Instead of spending more at home, nearly 3 million South Koreans went abroad, marking the highest monthly figure for outbound travel on record.
According to NARS, the number of Korean overseas tourists in January rose 9.5 percent from December and 7.3 percent year-on-year.
Credit card data showed a brief bump in domestic tourism-related spending on Jan. 27, with major issuers BC Card and Shinhan Card reporting a 60 percent jump in spending compared to the previous Monday. But overall domestic tourism spending in January fell by 7.4 percent from December and 1.8 percent year-on-year, according to the report.
Export and production indicators also declined. Exports in January dropped 10.2 percent from the same month in 2024, while industrial output fell 1.6 percent month-on-month and 3.8 percent from the year before.
Although these results stem from multiple economic factors, NARS noted that the reduced number of working days during the extended holiday likely contributed to the slowdown.
These concerns are resurfacing now as public attention turns to the upcoming October holiday stretch.
With national holidays already scheduled from Oct. 3-9, many are speculating whether the government will declare Friday, Oct. 10 a temporary public holiday, effectively creating a 10-day break. The Lee Jae-myung administration has not expressed any official position.
The NARS report cast doubts on extended holidays leading to an increase in domestic spending, particularly as international travel becomes more accessible.
Beyond the economic issue, the report raised the issue of the public not benefiting equally from temporary holidays. Providing sufficient rest periods for the public is another key reason for temporary holidays, as Korean workers logged 1,872 hours on average, which is about 130 hours more than the OECD average.
But businesses with fewer than five workers are not subject to the legal clause that provides the basis for the temporary holidays, specifically Article 55 of the Labor Standards Act. This means an estimated 10 million workers nationwide employed at such businesses could be excluded from the benefits.
The same clause mandates a substitute off-day for holidays that overlap with weekends or other public holidays, which is also not applied to the aforementioned smaller businesses.
The NARS report recommended moving away from one-off holidays and toward broader reforms.
Expanding substitute holiday coverage and shifting fixed-date holidays to weekday observance, as seen in countries like the US, could ensure more predictable and equitable rest for all workers. 'Rest should be a universal right,' the report said, 'not a privilege granted occasionally or unequally.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Korean shipbuilders' global ambitions depend on skilled labor, local support
Korea's top shipbuilders are eyeing expansion in the United States and India to capture rising demand for naval and strategic shipbuilding, but their plans hinge on securing skilled workers and government support to avoid the pitfalls that plagued earlier overseas ventures. The country's two largest players, HD Hyundai and Hanwha Ocean, are pressing ahead with new partnerships and investments. HD Hyundai has teamed up with India's state-run Cochin Shipyard and US shipbuilders Huntington Ingalls and Edison Chouest Offshore. Meanwhile, Hanwha Ocean, backed by an 800 billion won ($582 million) rights offering from its parent Hanwha Aerospace, is pursuing additional overseas opportunities following its acquisition last year of Philly Shipyard in Pennsylvania. Both companies aim to secure early access to surging demand for naval and commercial vessels, especially as countries seek to counter China's growing dominance in global shipbuilding. Experts, however, warned that significant challenges remain in human resources. Despite the appetite for expansion, neither the US nor India currently has the workforce or infrastructure to build large commercial or naval vessels at the scale Korean firms are accustomed to. 'Even if they operate a yard overseas, the first challenge they will face is a lack of process know-how and skilled workers,' said Kim Myung-hyun, an ocean engineering professor at Pusan National University. The US builds only about five commercial vessels a year, compared with a global capacity of roughly 1,300. India accounts for less than 1 percent of the world's shipbuilding output. Such limited domestic industries mean both countries lack not only experienced shipbuilders but also local suppliers of essential components, which can constitute around 60 percent of a vessel's value. 'Ship manufacturing, where adapting to diverse orders is key, still relies heavily on skilled labor trained on-site,' said an industry veteran. 'Even with a shared language and culture, training new workers takes time, so imagine how much harder it was overseas.' Without sufficient skilled labor and local supply chains, Korean shipbuilders risk relying on components and personnel from overseas, undermining the cost advantages of overseas production and potentially adding significant expenses. In response, Korean firms are looking to governments in Washington and New Delhi for support to help bridge these gaps. US President Donald Trump announced in March potential tax exemptions and plans to establish a special White House office dedicated to shipbuilding. India, meanwhile, is investing $2.2 billion in its shipbuilding sector to bolster capacity and competitiveness. Korean companies view these measures as essential for overcoming local constraints and aligning shipbuilding projects with national security and naval expansion goals in both countries. Yet experts warn that government policies are still at an early stage and uncertainties remain. 'For instance, it remains unclear how much of the demand for US naval vessel construction and maintenance will go to Korean shipbuilders, even if they invest in the US, or what specific roles they might be assigned,' said Yang Jong-seo, a researcher at the Overseas Economy Institute of the Korea Export-Import Bank. 'A range of issues, including regulations, the potential role of Korean workers and the scope of local participation, must be clarified. This may require formal talks between governments to ensure Korean firms are not disadvantaged in negotiations.' Despite these plans, the shadow of past failures still looms large. In the 2010s, Korean shipbuilders suffered heavy losses in overseas ventures. Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering, now Hanwha Ocean, sold its Mangalia yard in Romania for 29 billion won — about half its initial investment. Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction and STX Offshore & Shipbuilding, once ranked among the world's top 10 shipbuilders, collapsed under losses at overseas yards in Subic, the Philippines, and Dalian, China. The central lesson is that future success abroad will depend not only on political partnerships but also on building skilled local workforces and stable supply networks, according to experts. 'Relying solely on cheap labor, the yards struggled to compete with China's even lower-cost, government-backed offerings,' the industry veteran said.
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Kospi could soar 50% in 2 years: JPMorgan
Bullish calls from local, global analysts cite policy alignment, surging liquidity, strong investor sentiment Once deemed wishful thinking, an ambitious target for 5,000 points for South Korea's benchmark Kospi is now firmly on the radar, with JPMorgan Chase & Co. forecasting the index could climb over 50 percent from current levels within just two years — if the government follows through on its pledge to accelerate corporate governance reforms. The bullish forecast was reported by Bloomberg on Saturday, citing a note from JPMorgan strategists. 'Korea remains a key overweight market in Asia and among emerging markets,' the strategists wrote, as cited by Bloomberg. 'The Kospi Index, which has gained 32 percent so far this year and is approaching a record high, could reach around 5,000.' JPMorgan upgraded Korean equities to 'overweight' from 'neutral' earlier this week, pointing to President Lee Jae Myung's efforts to narrow the "Korea Discount" — the persistent valuation gap with peers like Japan and Taiwan — and deliver what the bank called 'the next phase of governance reforms' during his five-year term. In pledging to lift the Kospi to 5,000 points, Lee has promised measures aimed at improving shareholder returns, raising transparency and strengthening corporate accountability. The target represents a 57 percent gain from Friday's close of 3,176. 'We continue to recommend adding on any volatility as long as the reform process remains on track,' the strategists said. 'Any volatility in global or regional equities over the summer on tariff concerns, growth slowdown, bond market volatility could thus quickly invite buying.' Investor enthusiasm over Lee's agenda is already rippling through markets. The Kospi has surged 18 percent from below 2,700 points ahead of his June 3 election, repeatedly testing near-four-year highs over the past month. With a six-month gain of 32 percent, it ranks among the world's top-performing indexes and leads Asia in 2025. On Friday, the country's benchmark index climbed to an intraday high of 3,216.7 points — breaking above the 3,200 level for the first time in 46 months, since September 2021. A day earlier, the rally had pushed its total market capitalization to a record 3,000 trillion won ($2.2 trillion). JPMorgan projected Kospi could surpass its all-time high this year, projecting a trading range of 3,200 to 3,500. The previous peak was an intraday high of 3,316 on June 25, 2021. Other market watchers echoed the upbeat view, pointing to policy momentum and a broader market rerating as key drivers of continued gains. 'The recent alignment of policy moves — a rate cut by the central bank, the supplementary budget and pro-market measures — has fueled Korean equities more strongly than ever,' said Byun Jun-ho, a strategist at IBK Securities. 'We expect this trend to continue into the second half.' Ample liquidity is also underpinning the rally. 'About 65 trillion won in retail investor deposits remains on hold, while foreign buying continues and inflows into domestic equity funds are rising sharply,' said Na Jung-hwan of NH Investment & Securities. 'We anticipate this liquidity will keep flowing into sectors and stocks benefiting from policy-driven momentum.' JPMorgan added that foreign investment — typically a key driver of the Kospi — has been relatively subdued in the first half this year compared to 2024, leaving room for further inflows. 'Given the interest we receive from global investors, we believe investors are looking for better entry points,' the strategists said. External risks, but bulls unshaken Some analysts flagged external risks, including tariff uncertainty and US inflation data. 'The upcoming US June Consumer Price Index is worth watching, as it could reflect the inflationary impact of Trump's tariff measures,' said Kang Jin-hyuk of Shinhan Securities. Na added, 'If inflation indicators come in high in the third quarter due to tariffs, it could delay the US Federal Reserve's rate-cut timeline — an emerging risk worth monitoring." Still, some see any pullback as a buying opportunity. 'Even as Kospi earnings forecasts are being revised downward, the index is outperforming global peers on the back of a broader market rerating, rather than earnings strength,' said Shin Seung-jin of Samsung Securities. 'If a tariff deal sparks rotation into previously lagging sectors, the Kospi could break past its 2021 peak and move to a new level.'
Korea Herald
7 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Tesla deepens CATL ties to reshape ESS rivalry in US
Unusual US-China link-up may challenge LG's early lead in American ESS market Tesla dropped a bombshell by recently sharing a video clip on X showing drone footage of its lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery cell manufacturing facility for energy storage systems in the US state of Nevada. The post read, 'Nearing completion' of its first-ever LFP cell production site in North America. While the electric vehicle giant is known for pioneering cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells for cars, Tesla's venture into LFP cells sends a warning signal to Korean battery manufacturers, as it potentially enables the Chinese battery giant CATL to indirectly enter the US market despite trade barriers against China. Rare US-China tie-up According to Bloomberg, Tesla — already using CATL's LFP cells in its 'Megapack' product for utility- and grid-level ESS, manufactured outside the US — will utilize equipment and battery design from CATL at its Nevada facility. 'Tesla's completion of its LFP cell factory will effectively be equivalent to an indirect entry of CATL into the US market,' said Park Cheol-wan, a car engineering professor at Seojeong University. 'Tesla sources LFP batteries for energy storage and electric vehicles from CATL and BYD, with BYD's long cells serving Europe and CATL's prismatic cells targeting Asia and North America,' Park added. 'With increased US sanctions on China under the Biden administration, Tesla planned to start local production at its Nevada factory. This strategy has shown unexpected foresight, especially in light of the tariffs imposed during Donald Trump's presidency.' Park noted that CATL's entry through Tesla differs from its 'de facto failed attempt' to build a joint battery manufacturing plant with Ford Motor Company, which involved licensing its battery technology. With Tesla having full control over the Nevada factory, CATL can still benefit financially from supplying equipment, thereby deepening its reach into an otherwise 'impenetrable' US market. Fresh threat to LG? Tesla and CATL's LFP battery production intensifies pressure on LG Energy Solution, which last month became the first among US-based players to begin mass production of LFP cells for ESS at its Michigan plant. An LG Energy Solution official noted that the company is now supplying long-cell-based LFP battery pack products to major US energy solution providers, including Terra-Gen and Delta Electronics. The combined annual supply volume to these two firms is projected to reach 12 gigawatt-hours, valued at approximately 3 trillion won ($2.2 billion). In 2022, LG Energy Solution also entered the ESS system integration sector, moving beyond battery supply to the construction and operation of large-scale ESS in North America. 'Although this move strengthens their market position, we'll need to wait and see whether they can maintain price competitiveness against Tesla, which is collaborating with the cost-efficient CATL,' Park said. While Tesla does not disclose its exact market share in the US ESS sector, it is known to be a dominant player in residential ESS and a key supplier for utility-scale storage. In 2024, the combined energy storage capacity of Tesla's Megapack and Powerwall products soared 114 percent year-on-year to 31.4 gigawatt-hours. The company projects at least 50 percent growth in this segment for 2025. No clear leader Industry watchers expect the LFP battery rivalry between LG Energy Solution and Tesla — backed by CATL — to expand into the US electric vehicle market. 'While Tesla has so far only revealed plans for ESS production at its Nevada plant, it seems only a matter of time before it begins manufacturing LFP cells for EVs as well, given that these products use the same battery design,' said a researcher at a major Korean battery company. Park also noted that Tesla's local production of LFP cells is likely to spur LG Energy Solution — which is set to begin large-scale LFP battery supplies to Renault Group from its plant in Poland — to explore new partnerships with legacy US automakers such as Ford Motor Company and General Motors. In the first quarter of this year, GM's brands — Chevrolet, Cadillac and GMC — ranked second in US EV sales with 31,886 units, following Tesla's 128,100 units, according to data from Cox Automotive. Ford came in third with 22,500 units sold.
