Explained: What Russia's Recognition Of Taliban Government Means For Afghan Diplomacy
Sources told News18 that Russia's recognition is considered a step in the right direction for the Taliban regime but short of full international legitimacy.
Russia officially recognised the Taliban government of Afghanistan on July 3, 2025, becoming the first nation to do so and signaling a major diplomatic change in the region. The step, which was announced following a meeting in Kabul between Russian Ambassador Dmitry Zhirnov and Afghanistan's Acting Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi, has been labeled by Afghan officials as a 'historic step" and the start of a new era in bilateral relations. But the significance of this recognition remains complicated, since formal international validation of the Taliban is still dependent upon the United Nations and global opinion.
Sources told News18 that Russia's recognition is considered a step in the right direction for the Taliban regime but short of full international legitimacy. Sources highlight that formal recognition from the UN protocol division is required, and until that time comes, the Taliban will be diplomatically isolated. The development is considered part of a larger trend with most nations interacting with the Taliban at various levels to secure their interests and ensure regional stability.
India has followed a watchful but pragmatic policy towards the Taliban regime. Although New Delhi has not officially recognised the Taliban, it has resumed a diplomatic mission in Kabul and permitted the Taliban to send a Consul General to Mumbai. Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri just held talks with Taliban representatives, which was the highest level of interaction since the Taliban came to power. India's engagement is motivated by security interests, competition for influence in the region against China, and an interest in keeping a handle on Afghanistan.
Russia's Diplomatic Revitalisation: From Isolation to Engagement
Russia's relationship with the Taliban has evolved dramatically over the past two decades. In 2003, Russia designated the Taliban as a terrorist organisation due to its support for separatists in the North Caucasus. However, the Taliban's resurgence in 2021 and the shifting geopolitical landscape prompted Moscow to reassess its stance. In April 2025, Russia's Supreme Court removed the Taliban from its list of banned organizations, paving the way for official recognition.
The Announcement and What It Means
Russia's Foreign Ministry made the announcement that it accepted credentials from Afghanistan's newly appointed Ambassador Gul Hassan Hassan, marking the beginning of 'productive bilateral cooperation." The ministry highlighted that this acknowledgement would promote cooperation in the fields of energy, agriculture, and anti-terrorism. Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi welcomed the move, terming it a 'good example for other countries" and hoping that it would spur further global involvement.
Why did Russia Embrace the Taliban?
Strategic Interests
Russia's move is based on pragmatic reasons. Moscow considers the Taliban a ground reality and feels that talking to them is necessary in order to protect its interests in Central Asia. The Kremlin is seriously troubled by the ISKP threat, which carried out attacks in Afghanistan as well as Russia. By accepting the Taliban, Russia hopes to enhance security cooperation and counter-terrorism.
Economic Opportunities
Russia is also interested in huge economic benefits that can be derived from Afghanistan, especially in areas like energy, transportation, and agriculture. The Russian Foreign Ministry pointed to the promise of trade and infrastructure initiatives, which could be mutually advantageous for both nations. This economic aspect is a major reason Moscow is ready to normalise relations with the Taliban.
Regional Influence
By assuming the lead in recognising the Taliban, Russia becomes a central figure in deciding Afghanistan's future. This decision is most probably aimed at projecting greater Russian influence in the region and establishing a precedent for other nations to do the same. It also constitutes part of Russia's larger policy of interacting with regimes that risk being isolated by the West and thus increasing its diplomatic presence.
Engagement Without Recognition: The Global Approach
China has also dealt with the Taliban at multiple levels. Beijing has entertained Taliban ambassadors and permitted them to hold sway over Afghanistan's embassy in China, but not formal recognition. China is guided by economic interests, security concerns, and also a reluctance to be seen as the first major power to recognise the Taliban's controversial policies.
top videos
View all
Other Countries
Some other nations, such as Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan, have established diplomatic ties with the Taliban but stopped short of conferring formal recognition. Such engagement is usually driven by regional, economic, or security interests, but all fall short of overt diplomatic support.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Congress targets govt, SEBI on Jane Street ‘market manipulation'
The Congress on Tuesday hit out at the SEBI and the government for not taking timely action against US algorithm trading firm Jane Street for 'stock market manipulation'. Congress head of social media department Supriya Shrinate said Jane Street had in 2024 admitted in a US court it made $1 billion in India in 2023 from the Indian options market by exploiting 'inefficiencies'. 'By 2024, that amount grew to $2.3 billion, which was 11.2% of all the money it made around the world. But SEBI didn't act on this information, it was only in February 2025 that SEBI issued a mild warning, a cautionary letter to Jane Street, warning against its questionable trading patterns. But the firm continued its manipulative trades till as late as May 2025,' Shrinate said. Criticising SEBI, she said its 'report shows that 93% of retail investors lost money in derivatives trading between FY2021 and FY2024'. 'In FY2024 alone, 91.1% of traders lost Rs 52,400 crore,' she said. She said instead of protecting small investors, SEBI turned a blind eye to 'rampant fraudulent activities'.
India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
As U.S. Pressures Lebanon To Disarm Hezbollah, What It Means For The Region
New Delhi: On a humid Beirut morning, an American envoy left the Lebanese presidential palace holding a confidential seven-page letter. Tasked by Washington to deal with the Syrian crisis, the man had just received Beirut's official reply to a proposal – disarm Hezbollah. The visit came while Israeli warplanes were still bombing what they claimed were Hezbollah targets across southern Lebanon. Civilians had died. A ceasefire signed in November last year was still, technically, in place, but its cracks were showing. The United States wanted Lebanon to act fast. The envoy hinted that time was running out. Inside Lebanon, the pressure is mounting. Outside, the stakes are higher. What was the core demand? Hezbollah must pull its fighters back beyond the Litani River and surrender its military assets in the region. But that was not all. Now interpreting the ceasefire deal through a much wider lens, Washington was pushing for Hezbollah to give up all its weapons not just in the south, but everywhere. Beirut's response has not been made public. But reports, quoting diplomats with access to the discussions, suggest that Lebanon has asked for something first. They want Israel to vacate every last inch of Lebanese territory it holds from Shebaa Farms to Kfarchouba Hills. The Lebanese state has also reportedly asked for the return of its prisoners, compliance with the United Nations resolution that ended the 2006 war and a halt to Israeli air raids. The American envoy did not reveal much after his meeting, but called the letter 'spectacular'. He hinted that if Lebanon cooperated, like Syria claims it might, help would follow. Possibly in the form of reconstruction funds. Possibly in the form of diplomatic pressure on Israel. But nothing was guaranteed. Behind this diplomatic choreography lies a much deeper tension. The United States sees Hezbollah as an arm of Iran. Israel views the group as its most dangerous enemy. For decades, Hezbollah has operated with relative freedom in Lebanon – militarily strong, politically entrenched and supported by large sections of the Shia population. Critics inside Lebanon accuse the group of turning the state into a hostage. Supporters call them a shield against Israeli aggression. The pressure on Lebanon is not only military. It is financial. The economy is battered. Inflation is brutal. The World Bank estimates the country needs at least $11 billion for post-war recovery. But aid, especially from Western governments, may come with conditions, including disarming Hezbollah. Even Hezbollah, reportedly, is aware of this. Source-based reports say that the group is open to dialogue and aware that many of its own supporters live in homes reduced to rubble. But disarming Hezbollah is easier said than done. As long as Israel keeps shelling Lebanon or stays inside contested areas, the group insists its weapons stay. They have said it before. They repeated it during a recent religious gathering in Beirut's southern suburb. For them, laying down arms while the threat remains is not only unthinkable but suicidal. Meanwhile, Israel continues its strikes. No sign of slowing down. No public commitment to fully honour the ceasefire. And no clear indication that Monday's talks in Washington between the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the US President Donald Trump even mentioned Lebanon. Yet something has shifted. For India, the situation is not just a distant geopolitical subplot. The same region holds key interests. India imports oil through these waters. It has growing stakes in regional stability, especially after joining infrastructure and trade projects connecting the Gulf and the Mediterranean. And India has long maintained troops in Lebanon under the UN peacekeeping umbrella. If this fragile process collapses, the fallout will not stay local. It will spill into energy prices, maritime routes, refugee flows and broader alignments. It could also impact India's relations with both Israel and the Arab world. Washington wants to redraw the lines in West Asia. Caught in the middle, Beirut is asking for sovereignty before surrender. Hezbollah will not back down unless Israel steps back. And Israel shows no intent of doing so without U.S. nudging. In the background, the old map of power is cracking, but no one yet knows what the new one will look like.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
PM Modi likely to visit UK this month, free trade deal on agenda
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit the United Kingdom by the end of July, marking a high-profile diplomatic engagement, news agency PTI reported citing visit is likely to culminate in the formal signing of the long-anticipated India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and explore avenues to deepen bilateral cooperation in defence, technology, and regional governments are currently finalising the dates for the visit, which would mark PM Modi's first trip to the UK since negotiations on the FTA were formally concluded earlier this While initial expectations had suggested that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer would visit India first, it is now understood that his visit may follow later in the visit follows a series of recent high-level exchanges, including a meeting between Modi and Starmer on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Alberta and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval's trip to have indicated that the UK leg of the trip may be combined with a visit to the Maldives, though final confirmations are still India-UK Free Trade Agreement, finalised in May after three years of negotiations, is poised to significantly enhance economic ties between the two deal is expected to eliminate tariffs on nearly 99 per cent of Indian exports, while also improving market access for British goods such as whisky and to S&P Global Market Intelligence, the FTA is projected to provide a strong economic boost to India. With Indian remittances from the UK, currently the third-largest source after the US and UAE, already contributing to a USD 130 billion inflow in 2024 (or 3.3 per cent of India's GDP), the agreement is likely to further stimulate remittance flows.A key provision of the deal includes a national insurance waiver of up to three years for Indian ICT professionals working in the UK, potentially increasing their savings and FTA aims to double bilateral trade in goods and services by 2030, from the current USD 56.7 billion in 2024. Indian exporters, particularly in textiles and apparel, sectors facing challenges in the US market—are set to gain from improved access to UK Britain, the agreement opens up India's rapidly expanding middle class, with notable opportunities in the beverage the FTA, the two sides have also concluded a double taxation convention and are expected to advance defence and security cooperation during Modi's visit is seen as a strategic milestone in strengthening the India-UK Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in the post-Brexit era.- EndsTune InMust Watch
