Labour needs new ideas on immigration
We need to ask some fundamental questions. Why is it that with more than nine million people of working age not in the labour market that we need to bring workers in from abroad at all? Of course many of these people are not indolent; they may be students, full-time mothers, early retirees and the like.
None the less, there are millions living on benefits who could work but say they can't for a variety of reasons, often to do with physical or mental health issues. The growth in mental health claimants alone under PiP would go a long way in explaining our current labour shortages across the economy.
It is not as if the jobs aren't there but the willingness to do them is absent. The reason is that care work is hard and does not pay very much. Many on welfare will judge it is not worth the candle.
The solution, then, is either to cut benefits to the point where people have to work or pay care workers more to make the job worthwhile or a combination of both.
The Government is unlikely to risk the wrath of Labour backbenchers by cutting benefits, so Ms Cooper says she will introduce a fair wage for carers, presumably setting a floor beneath which employers cannot go. The history of governments controlling pay levels is not a good one. Moreover, care home owners claim to be operating at the margins of profitability already without having higher wages foisted upon them. The same is true of local councils, many of which are being bankrupted by high care costs foisted upon them by central government.
This is not to suggest Ms Cooper is wrong in her approach: the country is demanding a substantial cut in immigration and the two major parties are having to respond to the threat from Reform. But there are consequences that the politicians must be honest about. Ms Cooper says there are about 10,000 overseas care workers already in the country who came for jobs that did not exist and who could be recruited.
That may be so, though where they are is anyone's guess. All the talk of retraining British people to do work they have refused so far to contemplate is fanciful. Unless Labour can provide new ideas to old problems, we can expect to see the same issues over immigration repeating themselves.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amess family ‘deeply hurt' after Home Secretary letter following Prevent review
A 'dismissive' letter from the Home Secretary to the family of murdered MP Sir David Amess following a review into Prevent's contact with his killer is designed to 'protect the Government following its failings' and not support them, their spokesman has said. Radd Seiger said Sir David's family were 'deeply hurt and angered by the utterly dismissive tone' of Yvette Cooper's letter and that her 'piecemeal approach… will never deliver the whole truth, accountability and justice.' He also said the family were given 'next to no notice' of the timing or advance sight of the report, adding media leaks were a further insult to the family. The Amess family have said they will respond in full to the report once they have consulted their legal team. In her written statement laid before Parliament, Ms Cooper said: 'My department remains steadfast in its commitment to keeping the public safe and safeguarding people at risk of radicalisation. 'The victims, their families and those who survived the Southport attack but continue to live with the physical and emotional pain, and Sir David Amess's family remain in our hearts and prayers.' In his review, Independent Prevent Commissioner David Anderson KC said 'intensive' efforts have been made to improve Prevent processes, but the 'jury is out' on some of the changes In the Home Secretary's letter, seen by the PA news agency, Ms Cooper said she realises the 'seriousness' of the failings in Sir David's case and that she hoped the family found Lord Anderson's report to be 'thorough and considered'. Sir David's terrorist killer Ali Harbi Ali was referred to Prevent seven years before the so-called Islamic State fanatic stabbed the veteran MP at his constituency surgery in Essex in October 2021. He was sentenced to a whole-life order the following year. In her letter, Ms Cooper said Lord Anderson had 'conducted an incisive analysis of the perpetrator's case management, the findings of the Prevent Learning Review and the impact of changes made since then'. She added: 'I realise the seriousness of these failings and it reflects the deep concerns you have long held about what went wrong. 'Lord Anderson acknowledges improvements made to Prevent since then but also identifies further important opportunities for change in the wider Prevent system.' Her letter added: 'My determination to make whatever changes are considered necessary is unflinching and a further formal Government response to Lord Anderson's report will follow in the autumn. 'However, I want to be clear that it is without question that where recommendations can be implemented immediately, I will ensure that these are delivered.' Mr Seiger told PA the letter had left the family 'retraumatised, blindsided and feeling marginalised'. He said: 'This is an absolutely appalling letter from the Home Secretary who frankly should know better than to insult the family in this way. 'They are deeply hurt and angered, by the utterly dismissive tone as well as the timing of the Home Secretary's letter accompanying the publication of Lord Anderson KC's report. 'It is difficult to see it as anything other than a calculated exercise in damage limitation, designed not to support the family in their search for answers but to protect the Government following its failings. 'Yet again, we see victims being kicked when they are down. 'This supposed act of courtesy has left the family retraumatised, blindsided, and feeling marginalised in a process that should have had their voices and wellbeing at its heart from the outset. 'The Prime Minister and Home Secretary must understand that a piecemeal approach, which is what they are taking, however well-dressed in public relations, will never deliver the whole truth, accountability and justice for Sir David.' The Home Office has been contacted for comment.


Fox Sports
7 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
Trump's Turnberry faces logistical hurdles for British Open return
Associated Press PORTRUSH, Northern Ireland (AP) — President Donald Trump is not getting a British Open to the Turnberry course he owns in the near future, an issue the R&A's new chief executive said Wednesday was more about transportation than politics. Turnberry is regarded as the most beautiful of the links on the Open rotation, set along the Ayrshire coast in Scotland across from the Ailsa Craig. It last hosted the Open in 2009, before Trump bought the resort. Mark Darbon, who took over at the R&A this year from Martin Slumbers, said Turnberry had not been taken off the list of potential British Open sites, but transportation and other issues had to be addressed. 'I think we've been extremely clear on our position in respect of Turnberry. We love the golf course but we've got some big logistical challenges there,' he said. 'You see the scale of their setup here and we've got some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry.' Darbon said the R&A met with Eric Trump and other leaders of Trump Golf a few months ago and the talks had been constructive. 'I think they understand clearly where we're coming from. We talked through some of the challenges that we have so we've got a good dialogue with them,' he said. Slumbers had previously said the R&A would not be going to Turnberry until it was comfortable the topic would be about golf and not the owner. Turnberry has only hosted the British Open four times, first in 1977 with the famous 'Duel in the Sun' when Tom Watson beat Jack Nicklaus. But the Open is getting bigger, and the roads are limited getting to Turnberry. There has been speculation Trump, whose golf courses have never hosted a men's major, might ask the British government to intercede in getting the Open back to Turnberry. 'We have an ongoing dialogue with the UK government given that we're a major event that creates significant value into the UK economy,' Darbon said. "We've spoken to them specifically about Turnberry and I think they've made it clear that the decision around where we take our championship rests with us. 'I would find it difficult to predict whether there will be any discussion on The Open if the President is making a visit here.' Turnberry is not the only Scottish links being ignored by the R&A. Muirfield, located along the Firth of Forth east of Edinburgh, is reputed to be the purest of links courses. Its first Open was in 1892, and there have been 15 others, most recently in 2013 won by Phil Mickelson. Only St. Andrews has hosted more Opens than Muirfield. But it has not been back there since 2013 as the R&A has been geared toward taking golf's oldest championship to courses that can hold big crowds. It is expected 278,000 spectators will be at Royal Portrush this week, the second-largest behind St. Andrews. The last Open at Muirfield had 142,000 spectators. The Open will be at Royal Birkdale next year, and then St. Andrews in 2027. The site for 2028 has not been announced. Muirfield has never gone more than 11 years — except for interruptions from World War I and World War II — between Opens. 'We love the golf course at Muirfield. We're in a discussion with the venue right now,' Darbon said. "There's some things that we need to evolve at Muirfield — the practice ground in particular is a challenge for us with a modern Open and there's some work we need to do with the venue to facilitate some of the infrastructure that we require. 'But it's a good dialogue and we'd love to be back there in the future.' ___ AP golf: recommended Item 1 of 1
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada weighs limits on US lumber exports to ease trade friction, British Columbia premier tells Bloomberg News
(Reuters) -Canada is open to considering limits on softwood lumber exports to the U.S. to try to ease some trade friction between the neighboring countries, British Columbia Premier David Eby told Bloomberg News in a report published on Wednesday. "One of the asks for years out of the American coalition has been a quota — that there's a fixed amount of lumber that gets to come from Canada," Eby told Bloomberg News. "And I think that, for the first time, there's some willingness to have a conversation about what that could look like." Sign in to access your portfolio