Australian HIV self-testing kits now in vending machines in universities, nightclubs from Atomo Diagnostics
More Australians are getting access to free, lifesaving HIV self-testing kits through a national rollout of vending machines across the country in universities and nightclubs.
In a groundbreaking move to help break down barriers to testing and address the issue of social stigma, Sydney-based Atomo Diagnostics is now supplying thousands of self-test kits to sexual health programs across the nation.
The concept of the HIV test is similar to that of a Covid-19 rapid antigen test — but this test works with a finger prick test to get a blood sample.
The national rollout program continues to expand, with more vending machines to be installed in Australian universities, in NSW, South Australia and Victoria.
Vending machines have also been rolled out in Queensland, with a particular focus on those living in remote communities.
In universities, the Federal Government-funded tests are free for all users, John Kelly, CEO of Atomo Diagnostics said.
'The reason for that is that the government has recognised that cost, particularly for young people, could be a barrier to use and they want to make sure that there's more testing and cost isn't a kind of barrier to uptake of testing,' he said.
'So it is subsidised and free to the user and funded through the government.'
At the end of 2023, it was estimated that there were 30,010 people with HIV in Australia, according to Health Equity Matters.
Mr Kelly said one of the benefits of the tests is that they are 'quick, pretty simple, easy to do and can be done at home, you can do it pretty much anywhere immediately'.
He said the feedback from venues where the tests are available was positive, with the vending machines program proving popular with young people, particularly overseas-born migrants in Australia on student visas.
'(Many) young people don't have a GP. It's a much more transactional service now with healthcare,' he said.
'And I think for a lot of people, they don't have that doctor to go see or that clinic that they can call. So I think having a discreet, easy to use test in the university that they can access for free has been a game changer.'
In NSW, the Ministry of Health's 'My Test' vending machines, branded in distinctive purple, are placed in night-life venues, sexual health clinics, community centres, universities and even a public library.
In Victoria and South Australia, the 'CONNECT' program, co-ordinated by Dr Nikki Sullivan, is preparing for its national rollout, expanding from successful trials in South Australia and Victoria to all states and territories.
Vending machines will be installed at the University of Melbourne next month, when students return from their semester holidays.
It comes after researchers at Melbourne's Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity made a huge step towards an HIV cure by devising a method to deliver an mRNA-based therapy direct to cells, killing the virus as it circulates in the body.
Renowned HIV researcher Sharon Lewin, director of the Doherty Institute, said earlier this month that the breakthrough was made when the team was working on a therapy for Covid-19.
Meanwhile, Atomo Diagnostics has also called for the Federal Government to run a trial program in Australia, similar to ones currently being held in Spain and US, for at-home testing to be used for pre-exposure prophylaxis or PrEP.
PrEP involves HIV negative people taking antiretroviral medication to protect them and prevent HIV infection.
Mr Kelly said the rates of HIV transmission had been falling but challenges remained as people on PrEP had to test negative every 12 weeks, meaning the health system was getting clogged up with thousands of appointments for routine testing.
'In Barcelona, they have adopted an alternative approach where twice a year you can do a self-test at home and show your negative status to stay on PrEP and you then come into the clinic two times a year instead of four times a year,' he said.
Mr Kelly said the trial program showed major benefits.
'We think it's the way forward for PrEP testing, to make it more flexible, reduce the burden on clinics and get people the opportunity to do occasional tests at home so they don't have to take a half day off to go into a clinic and queue for three hours to get a test that they could easily do at home.' Read related topics: Wellness
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘One-size-fits-all approach doesn't work': Plan to save the NDIS billions
Billions of dollars in disability payments could be funnelled to struggling children through daycare programs under a plan to ease the financial strain of the nation's insurance scheme while ushering in a new era of early intervention. Taxpayers would save $12.1 billion over the next decade if 10 per cent of National Disability Insurance Scheme payments were set aside for people not currently on the scheme – including children needing temporary support – and the current model of individual support plans was reserved for Australians with life-long disabilities, a report says. It can take years of waiting and one-on-one specialist appointments to gain support under current NDIS procedures. Removing some of that red tape and allowing children with autism and developmental difficulties – and their parents – to receive support directly at childcare and primary schools would be more effective and cheaper, according to the Grattan Institute report. This new era of the disability scheme, known as 'foundational supports', could be funded using the existing NDIS envelope, the think tank's report says, and should be brought in over the next five years if the new-look system is to pile the least amount of pressure on federal and state budgets. Governments could save an additional $34 billion over 10 years by not needing to find extra money for the new disability system. Foundational supports were meant to roll out on Tuesday under the original deadline set by previous NDIS minister Bill Shorten. However, that start date has been pushed back to at least December as the states and federal government negotiate details. Grattan Institute disability program director Samuel Bennett said the NDIS had transformed the lives of tens of thousands of people but had grown 'too big, too fast'. 'Something needs to be done,' Bennett said. 'Time has shown a one-size-fits-all approach doesn't work. What children and families really need is evidence-based early intervention – preferably available where the child already lives, learns and plays – rather than navigating this bureaucratic nightmare that is today's NDIS.'

The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
‘One-size-fits-all approach doesn't work': Plan to save the NDIS billions
Billions of dollars in disability payments could be funnelled to struggling children through daycare programs under a plan to ease the financial strain of the nation's insurance scheme while ushering in a new era of early intervention. Taxpayers would save $12.1 billion over the next decade if 10 per cent of National Disability Insurance Scheme payments were set aside for people not currently on the scheme – including children needing temporary support – and the current model of individual support plans was reserved for Australians with life-long disabilities, a report says. It can take years of waiting and one-on-one specialist appointments to gain support under current NDIS procedures. Removing some of that red tape and allowing children with autism and developmental difficulties – and their parents – to receive support directly at childcare and primary schools would be more effective and cheaper, according to the Grattan Institute report. This new era of the disability scheme, known as 'foundational supports', could be funded using the existing NDIS envelope, the think tank's report says, and should be brought in over the next five years if the new-look system is to pile the least amount of pressure on federal and state budgets. Governments could save an additional $34 billion over 10 years by not needing to find extra money for the new disability system. Foundational supports were meant to roll out on Tuesday under the original deadline set by previous NDIS minister Bill Shorten. However, that start date has been pushed back to at least December as the states and federal government negotiate details. Grattan Institute disability program director Samuel Bennett said the NDIS had transformed the lives of tens of thousands of people but had grown 'too big, too fast'. 'Something needs to be done,' Bennett said. 'Time has shown a one-size-fits-all approach doesn't work. What children and families really need is evidence-based early intervention – preferably available where the child already lives, learns and plays – rather than navigating this bureaucratic nightmare that is today's NDIS.'


7NEWS
12 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Patients seek reassurances after IVF mix-ups at Monash
Alarms firing off in an IVF lab as work grinds to a halt may sound like the start of a technology meltdown but at many of Australia's major fertility clinics it's actually a sign safety systems are kicking into gear. Known as electronic witnessing, the mechanism prevents tissue mix ups and involves multiple layers of identity-document checks by humans and computers. While rarely needed, it's a safeguard standard that's becoming the norm in an industry suddenly needing to win back public trust following revelations of two devastating errors at one of Australia's biggest facilities. The first saw a mother give birth to another couple's biological child after she was impregnated with the wrong embryo at Monash IVF in Brisbane some years ago. The other involved a woman incorrectly receiving her own embryo instead of one from her same-sex partner as requested, which happened at the company's Melbourne clinic earlier in June. Trust 'eroded' The bungles have sparked a rush of patients reaching out to fertility clinics seeking reassurances about their own sperm, eggs, embryos and children. 'At the moment, the trust in the industry has been eroded,' says Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser. 'It certainly opened up the conversation again. 'I do believe those questions inherently are always there but it's probably made patients verbalise it a little.' She's found explaining electronic and human witnessing practices at her own facility in Sydney have put patients' minds at ease but knows it will take time for confidence to return. Monash IVF has repeatedly apologised and vowed to introduce additional verification processes over and above normal practices. About 40 IVF-related rules Official probes into what happened are under way, with the company yet to offer explanations for how the mix ups occurred beyond two ASX announcements. Pink Elephants Support Network chief operating officer Jen Tupaea is among many Monash IVF patients wanting to know more. She's noticed a general sense of uneasiness set in among IVF parents across Australia and believes patients need more reassurances that all due diligence is done. 'There's already a lot of uncertainty and worry and sort of lack of control and I think this just adds another element to that,' Ms Tupaea says. 'Patchwork' is a term often used to describe the 40-odd pieces of legislation affecting IVF in Australian states and territories. There's variations on anything from how long embryos can be stored to how many families can use the same sperm donor and even certain states banning overseas donor eggs. Until now, the industry has largely been left to regulate itself through yearly accreditations but the mix ups spurred health ministers including Victoria's Mary-Anne Thomas to unite behind a push to explore national regulation. It's something Pink Elephants supports, with Ms Tupaea describing IVF regulation as 'a bit of a black box'. Add-on treatments She's aware of parents worried about what would happen if a similar devastating mix up occurred at a smaller clinic that doesn't have ASX reporting requirements. 'The main concern when something like that comes up is, why are we hearing about it now, and what are we not hearing about?' she says. Australia's first IVF baby was born 45 years ago and now some 20,000 babies conceived through IVF are born here each year. Greater regulation is also something clinicians want, Ms Hiser explains. 'We regulated ourselves because no one enforced it upon us and because we saw the need for patient safety,' she says. 'We've done a very good job of that up until now, and that's why I'm very curious to find out exactly what went wrong (at Monash IVF) because we're having a hard time ... understanding how it did happen.' IVF researcher and University of Melbourne Senior Research Fellow Sarah Lensen wants any future regulation to also include greater monitoring of 'add-on' treatments. She specialises in evaluating their safety and effectiveness, saying for the most part there isn't a lot of good evidence they help patients. 'The banking industry is highly regulated and I think for the better, so I don't know why we wouldn't accept independent regulation in this space,' Dr Lensen says. City Fertility Group's Victorian Scientific Director Jayne Mullen wants patients to have confidence regardless of how big a clinic is, professionals are bound by strict accreditation and licensing requirements so any mistakes must be reported to health authorities. 'We're continuously monitored and audited, we are obliged to report any serious adverse event,' she says. The scientist is also fielding more calls than usual from concerned parents, offering to take them through laboratories. While fully confident in their use of electronic witnessing and human verification, she says the Monash IVF mix ups still cause her to pause and review protocols. 'Doctors, nurses, scientists, everyone that's working in our IVF industry, we have the best of intentions, we want everyone to walk away with a happy, healthy baby,' she says. 'Mistakes are so rare.' Both Ms Mullen and Ms Hiser find explaining safety controls has put many patients at ease, urging anyone still feeling nervous about treatments to reach out to their providers. 'If they don't, say, have an electronic witnessing system in place ask them why don't you, why do my fees not cover you having this extra layer of security?' Ms Hiser says. 'If you don't have that, fine, that's okay but tell me how you control (safety). 'If you still have questions after that, then maybe ask yourself are they the people that I want to be doing my IVF journey with?'