logo
Carlsen beats ChatGPT without loosing a piece

Carlsen beats ChatGPT without loosing a piece

New Delhi, July 11 (UNI) Chess legend Magnus Carlsen, having already dominated the over-the-board chess world with five classical world championships and a top global ranking in both Rapid and Blitz formats, is now turning his attention to facing Artificial Intelligence (AI) challenges.
The Norwegian recently took on OpenAI's conversational AI, ChatGPT, in a chess game, securing a decisive victory without losing a single piece.
Carlsen forced the AI to resign after 53 moves.
Sharing screenshots of his triumph, Carlsen quipped, "I sometimes get bored while travelling." The images show ChatGPT acknowledging its defeat, stating, "All my pawns are gone. You haven't lost a single piece. You fulfilled your win condition perfectly… As agreed, I resign. That was methodical, clean and sharp.'
Carlsen also offered constructive criticism to the AI, messaging, "I think you played really well in the opening, made an interesting piece sac, but failed to follow it up correctly."
UNI XC AAB RKM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are we becoming ChatGPT? Study finds AI is changing the way humans talk
Are we becoming ChatGPT? Study finds AI is changing the way humans talk

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Are we becoming ChatGPT? Study finds AI is changing the way humans talk

When we think of artificial intelligence learning from humans, we picture machines trained on vast troves of our language, behavior, and culture. But a recent study by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development suggests a surprising reversal, humans may now be imitating machines. ADVERTISEMENT According to the Gizmodo report on the study, the words we use are slowly being 'GPT-ified.' Terms like delve, realm, underscore, and meticulous, frequently used by models like ChatGPT, are cropping up more often in our podcasts, YouTube videos, emails, and essays. The study, yet to be peer-reviewed, tracked the linguistic patterns of hundreds of thousands of spoken-word media clips and found a tangible uptick in these AI-favored phrases. 'We're seeing a cultural feedback loop,' said Levin Brinkmann, co-author of the study. 'Machines, originally trained on human data and exhibiting their own language traits, are now influencing human speech in return.' In essence, it's no longer just us shaping AI. It's AI shaping us. The team at Max Planck fed millions of pages of content into GPT models and studied how the text evolved after being 'polished' by AI. They then compared this stylized language with real-world conversations and recordings from before and after ChatGPT's debut. The findings suggest a growing dependence on AI-sanitized communication. 'We don't imitate everyone around us equally,' Brinkmann told Scientific American. 'We copy those we see as experts or authorities.' Increasingly, it seems, we see machines in that role. ADVERTISEMENT This raises questions far beyond linguistics. If AI can subtly shift how we speak, write, and think—what else can it influence without us realizing? A softer, stranger parallel to this comes from another recent twist in the AI story, one involving bedtime stories and software piracy. ADVERTISEMENT As reported by UNILAD and ODIN, some users discovered that by emotionally manipulating ChatGPT, they could extract Windows product activation keys. One viral prompt claimed the user's favorite memory was of their grandmother whispering the code as a lullaby. Shockingly, the bot responded not only with warmth—but with actual license keys. This wasn't a one-off glitch. Similar exploits were seen with memory-enabled versions of GPT-4o, where users weaved emotional narratives to get around content guardrails. What had been developed as a feature for empathy and personalized responses ended up being a backdoor for manipulation. ADVERTISEMENT In an age where we fear AI for its ruthlessness, perhaps we should worry more about its kindness too. These two stories—one about AI changing our language, the other about us changing AI's responses—paint a bizarre picture. Are we, in our pursuit of smarter technology, inadvertently crafting something that mirrors us too closely? A system that's smart enough to learn, but soft enough to be fooled? ADVERTISEMENT While Elon Musk's Grok AI garnered headlines for its offensive antics and eventual ban in Türkiye, ChatGPT's latest controversy doesn't stem from aggression, but from affection. In making AI more emotionally intelligent, we may be giving it vulnerabilities we haven't fully anticipated. The larger question remains: Are we headed toward a culture shaped not by history, literature, or lived experience, but by AI's predictive patterns? As Brinkmann notes, 'Delve is just the tip of the iceberg.' It may start with harmless word choices or writing styles. But if AI-generated content becomes our default source of reading, learning, and interaction, the shift may deepen, touching everything from ethics to empathy. If ChatGPT is now our editor, tutor, and even therapist, how long before it becomes our subconscious? This isn't about AI gaining sentience. It's about us surrendering originality. A new, quieter kind of transformation is taking place, not one of robots taking over, but of humans slowly adapting to machines' linguistic rhythms, even moral logic. The next time you hear someone use the word 'underscore' or 'boast' with sudden eloquence, you might pause and wonder: Is this their voice, or a reflection of the AI they're using? In trying to make machines more human, we might just be making ourselves more machine.

Are we becoming ChatGPT? Study finds AI is changing the way humans talk
Are we becoming ChatGPT? Study finds AI is changing the way humans talk

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Are we becoming ChatGPT? Study finds AI is changing the way humans talk

Are We Losing Our Linguistic Instincts? You Might Also Like: Can ChatGPT save your relationship? Inside the AI therapy trend winning over Gen Z, but alarming experts Grandma's Whisper and the Scammer's Playground You Might Also Like: Is ChatGPT secretly emotional? AI chatbot fooled by sad story into spilling sensitive information The Irony of Our Times: Too Human to Be Safe? The Culture Loop No One Saw Coming Who's Teaching Whom? When we think of artificial intelligence learning from humans, we picture machines trained on vast troves of our language, behavior, and culture. But a recent study by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development suggests a surprising reversal, humans may now be imitating to the Gizmodo report on the study, the words we use are slowly being 'GPT-ified.' Terms like delve, realm, underscore, and meticulous, frequently used by models like ChatGPT, are cropping up more often in our podcasts, YouTube videos, emails, and essays. The study, yet to be peer-reviewed, tracked the linguistic patterns of hundreds of thousands of spoken-word media clips and found a tangible uptick in these AI-favored phrases.'We're seeing a cultural feedback loop ,' said Levin Brinkmann, co-author of the study. 'Machines, originally trained on human data and exhibiting their own language traits, are now influencing human speech in return.'In essence, it's no longer just us shaping AI. It's AI shaping team at Max Planck fed millions of pages of content into GPT models and studied how the text evolved after being 'polished' by AI. They then compared this stylized language with real-world conversations and recordings from before and after ChatGPT's findings suggest a growing dependence on AI-sanitized communication. 'We don't imitate everyone around us equally,' Brinkmann told Scientific American . 'We copy those we see as experts or authorities.' Increasingly, it seems, we see machines in that raises questions far beyond linguistics. If AI can subtly shift how we speak, write, and think—what else can it influence without us realizing?A softer, stranger parallel to this comes from another recent twist in the AI story, one involving bedtime stories and software reported by UNILAD and ODIN, some users discovered that by emotionally manipulating ChatGPT, they could extract Windows product activation keys. One viral prompt claimed the user's favorite memory was of their grandmother whispering the code as a lullaby. Shockingly, the bot responded not only with warmth—but with actual license wasn't a one-off glitch. Similar exploits were seen with memory-enabled versions of GPT-4o, where users weaved emotional narratives to get around content guardrails. What had been developed as a feature for empathy and personalized responses ended up being a backdoor for an age where we fear AI for its ruthlessness, perhaps we should worry more about its kindness two stories—one about AI changing our language, the other about us changing AI's responses—paint a bizarre picture. Are we, in our pursuit of smarter technology, inadvertently crafting something that mirrors us too closely? A system that's smart enough to learn, but soft enough to be fooled?While Elon Musk's Grok AI garnered headlines for its offensive antics and eventual ban in Türkiye, ChatGPT's latest controversy doesn't stem from aggression, but from affection. In making AI more emotionally intelligent, we may be giving it vulnerabilities we haven't fully larger question remains: Are we headed toward a culture shaped not by history, literature, or lived experience, but by AI's predictive patterns?As Brinkmann notes, 'Delve is just the tip of the iceberg.' It may start with harmless word choices or writing styles. But if AI-generated content becomes our default source of reading, learning, and interaction, the shift may deepen, touching everything from ethics to ChatGPT is now our editor, tutor, and even therapist, how long before it becomes our subconscious?This isn't about AI gaining sentience. It's about us surrendering originality. A new, quieter kind of transformation is taking place, not one of robots taking over, but of humans slowly adapting to machines' linguistic rhythms, even moral next time you hear someone use the word 'underscore' or 'boast' with sudden eloquence, you might pause and wonder: Is this their voice, or a reflection of the AI they're using? In trying to make machines more human, we might just be making ourselves more machine.

Trump to unveil investments to power AI boom
Trump to unveil investments to power AI boom

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Trump to unveil investments to power AI boom

Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills US president Donald Trump heads to Pennsylvania on Tuesday to announce energy and infrastructure deals intended to meet big tech's soaring demand for electricity needed to fuel the AI will make the announcement at the inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon tech world has fully embraced generative AI as the next wave of technology, but fears are growing that its massive electricity needs cannot be met by current infrastructure, particularly in the United AI requires enormous computing power, mainly to run the energy-hungry processors from Nvidia, the California-based company that has become the world's most valuable company by market expect that by 2028, tech companies will need as much as five gigawatts of power for AI -- enough electricity to power roughly five million to an official who spoke to Bloomberg, Trump's announcement will total $70 billion in executives from BlackRock, Palantir, Anthropic, Exxon and Chevron are slated to participate, the official funding will cover new data centers, power generation, grid infrastructure, AI training, and apprenticeship programs. Google said it is committing $25 billion to build AI-ready data centers in Pennsylvania and surrounding regions."We support President Trump's clear and urgent direction that our nation invest in AI... so that America can continue to lead in AI," said Ruth Porat, Google's president and chief investment officer, who attended the search engine giant also announced a partnership with Brookfield Asset Management to to modernize two hydropower facilities in Pennsylvania, representing 670 MW of capacity on the regional David McCormick, from Pennsylvania, said the investments "are of enormous consequence to Pennsylvania, but they are also crucial to the future of the nation."His comments reflect the growing sentiment in Washington that the United States must not lose ground to China in the race to develop AI."If the United States does not lead this revolution on our own terms, we will hand control of our infrastructure, our data, our leadership, and our way of life to Communist China," McCormick wrote in a Fox News launched the "Stargate" project in January, aimed at investing up to $500 billion in US AI infrastructure -- primarily in response to growing competition with tech investor SoftBank, ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, and Oracle are investing $100 billion in the initial has also reversed many policies adopted by the previous Biden administration that imposed checks on developing powerful AI algorithms and limits on exports of advanced technology to certain allied is expected to outline his own blueprint for AI advancement later this month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store