UN Chief: Israeli-Palestinian Conflict At 'Breaking Point', Urges Push For Two-State Solution
Addressing the high-level conference on the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and the implementation of the two-State solution, Mr. Guterres delivered a stark message about the urgency of action and the cost of delay.
' For decades, Middle East diplomacy has been far more process than peace, ' he said.
' Words, speeches, declarations may not have much meaning to those on the ground. They have seen it before. They have heard it before. Meanwhile, destruction and annexation bulldoze ahead. '
He reiterated that the only just and sustainable path forward is the establishment of two independent, democratic States – Israel and Palestine – living side by side in peace and security, with Jerusalem as the capital, based on pre-1967 lines and in line with international law and UN resolutions.
UN Secretary-General addresses the opening segment of the high-level conference.
There is no alternative
Mr. Guterres challenged those resisting that vision.
'What is the alternative? A one-State reality where Palestinians are denied equal rights, and forced to live under perpetual occupation and inequality? A one-State reality where Palestinians are expelled from their land?' he asked.
'That is not peace. That is not justice. And that is not acceptable.'
Earlier remarks: 'The truth is: we are at a breaking point'
Speaking earlier in the day at the conference's pre-opening session, Mr. Guterres warned that the conflict had reached 'a breaking point'.
It has endured for generations, 'defying hopes, defying diplomacy, defying countless resolutions, defying international law,' he said.
'But we also know its persistence is not inevitable. It can be resolved. That demands political will and courageous leadership.'
He urged Member States to move beyond 'well-meaning rhetoric' and make the conference a turning point 'towards ending the occupation and realising our shared aspiration for a viable two-State solution'.
' It is the sine qua non [Latin for indispensable or absolutely essential] for peace across the wider Middle East, ' he said.
About the conference
The three-day conference, mandated by the General Assembly through resolutions ES-10/24 and 79/81 and co-organized by France and Saudi Arabia, brings together Member States, observers and regional stakeholders.
It features plenary discussions and thematic roundtables on issues ranging from security arrangements and humanitarian response to reconstruction and economic viability.
Time is running out
In his opening address, the Secretary-General stressed the need for swift action: ' With every passing day, trust is slipping. Institutions are weakened. And hopes are dashed. '
He laid out a clear list of required steps: an immediate end to violence, annexation and settlement activity; rejection of forced displacement; accountability for violations of international law; and a recommitment to a credible political dialogue rooted in the equal rights and dignity of both peoples.
Gaza, a cascade of catastrophes
Turning to the war in Gaza, Mr. Guterres reiterated his condemnation of Hamas' 7 October 2023 terror attacks on Israel, but said the response has brought unprecedented destruction.
' Gaza has descended into a cascade of catastrophes, ' he said. 'Tens of thousands dead. Virtually the entire population displaced many times over. The shadow of starvation looming over everyone.'
He called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, the unconditional release of hostages, and unfettered humanitarian access.
' These are not preconditions for peace. They are the foundation of it. '
Resolve, not manage
Closing his remarks, the Secretary-General urged all parties to choose peace not as an aspiration, but as a duty.
' This conflict cannot be managed. It must be resolved. We cannot wait for perfect conditions. We must create them. We cannot defer peace efforts until suffering becomes unbearable. We must act before it is too late,' he said.
He called for peace not as a concept, but a commitment.
' Not as a dream, but as a reality – for Palestinians, for Israelis, for the people of the Middle East, and for the world. '
Assembly President: 'We cannot go on like this'
Also addressing the opening, UN General Assembly President Philémon Yang said the Gaza war and the wider crisis have made it 'painfully clear – we cannot go on like this.'
President of the General Assembly addresses the opening segment of the high-level conference.
He called for 'decisive change' and warned that further delay would deepen suffering and destroy any remaining hopes for peace.
' This conflict cannot be resolved through permanent war, nor through endless occupation or annexation…We simply cannot afford more excuses, more delays. We must act now. '
He reiterated the Assembly's recent demands, including an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, the release of all hostages and full humanitarian access. He also highlighted growing global recognition of Palestinian statehood, citing President Emmanuel Macron's announcement that France will extend formal recognition.
Concluding, Mr. Yang urged action towards a peaceful settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
' The focus of this conference must therefore be concrete and action-oriented, identifying steps the international community must take to realise the two-State solution, ' he said.
'One that upholds international law, the UN Charter and relevant UN resolutions. And especially one that achieves justice for Palestinians and Israelis. One that ensures a peaceful, prosperous, and equitable future for everyone in the Middle East.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
British Prime Minister expected to set out proposals in what insiders envisage as public ‘moment'
Emmanuel Macron, the French President, last week became the first leader of a G7 nation to announce that he would take the step , with the formal change coming at the United Nations General Assembly in September. It came after weeks of private discussions with the United Kingdom and other allies about how and when to announce the recognition of Palestine. British officials have long favoured attaching conditions to the move to deliver tangible changes in the stance taken by Hamas, the terror group that rules Gaza and was responsible for the October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Macron argued that the announcement alone could trigger progress towards peace. Today Donald Trump, the United States President, appeared to clear the way for Starmer to change the UK's stance on recognition, saying the Prime Minister was free to take a new position. But No 10 will still be carefully calibrating Washington's reaction to any new declaration after Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, last week accused Macron of serving 'Hamas propaganda'. Today a US State Department spokesman described a United Nations conference to discuss recognition of Palestine – being attended by David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary – as 'unproductive and ill-timed'. The spokesman said: 'This is a publicity stunt that comes in the middle of delicate diplomatic efforts to end the conflict'. Around 150 of the countries that are members of the UN, some three-quarters of the total, have already recognised Palestine as a state – but not the UK, the US or the biggest European economies. Britain's long-standing position has been that the step will be taken but only when it can help the peace process in the Middle East. The images of malnutrition in Gaza, including of starving children, that have made the front pages as Israel limits access to aid have fuelled renewed debate within the UK about recognition. Behind the scenes, Cabinet ministers including Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, are pushing Sir Keir to take the step. Last week, 135 Labour MPs signed a letter calling for the recognition of Palestinian statehood, while Labour mayors and the party's Scottish leadership are also piling on the pressure. Starmer has recalled his Cabinet from the northern summer parliamentary recess for a discussion about Gaza at 2am Wednesday NZT which is expected to include the approach on statehood and increased delivery of aid. Speaking to reporters during his meeting with Trump in Scotland today, the Prime Minister made clear his shock at the photographs of starvation coming from Gaza. He said: 'Certainly, speaking for the British public and myself, those images of starving children in particular are revolting and there's a sense of revulsion in the British public at what they're seeing. And they know and we know that humanitarian aid needs to get in at speed, at volume.' Trump also publicly pressed Israel to do more to get food to the Palestinians, saying there was 'real starvation' in Gaza and that the US would be setting up places with 'no boundaries' that people could reach by walking. Starmer has been hardening his rhetoric on recognising Palestine in recent days, when he also has been talking to both Macron and Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, about Gaza. On Friday NZT, he said it was the 'inalienable right' of Palestinians to have their own state. The following day he said he was 'unequivocal' that recognition was necessary for 'lasting peace'. But placing caveats on the declaration when he unveils his plan later this week, rather than announcing the move immediately, would risk a backlash from some in Labour. Labour MPs have expressed concerns to the Telegraph that delays could benefit the new hard-left party being set up by Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, which is championing Palestine. One Labour MP said: 'There are millions of voters deeply worried about Gaza. I think the Government are in deep trouble on the issue. 'They need to move fast but it may be too late to win voters back … This is why so many Labour MPs are so worried about their own seats.' Sir Keir is taking part in discussions, led by Jordan, about whether aid can be dropped into Gaza to help ease malnutrition. At the weekend, Israel announced that it would suspend fighting in three areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery. Starmer's official spokesman said the plan coming later this week would build 'on the collaboration to date that paves the way to a long-term solution on security in the region'. He added: 'The Prime Minister will be presenting that plan to other key allies, including the US and Arab states, over the coming days, and indeed convening Cabinet this week. You can expect to see more coming out of that.'
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
When Israelis Call It Out: Finding Genocide In Gaza
It's been almost an article of faith among Israeli officials: the state they represent is incapable of genocide, their actions always spurred by the noblest, necessary motivations of self-defence against satanic enemies who wish genocide upon Jews. Over time, as Holocaust scholar Omer Bartov writes, 'Ethical concerns and moral qualms were brushed aside as either marginal or distracting in the face of the ultimate cataclysm that is the genocide of the Jews.' This form of reasoning, known otherwise as 'Holocaust-ism' or 'Shoah-tiyut', is a moral conceit left bare in the war of annihilation being waged in Gaza against the Palestinian populace. Israeli human rights groups have taken note of this, despite the drained reserves of empathy evident in the Israel proper. (A Pew Research Center poll conducted last month found that a mere 16% of Jewish Israelis thought peaceful coexistence with Palestinians was possible.) In its latest report pointedly titled Our Genocide, the Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem offers a blunt assessment: 'Israel's policy in the Gaza Strip and its horrific outcomes, together with statements by senior Israeli politicians and military commanders about the goals of the attack, leads us to the unequivocal conclusion that Israel is taking coordinated action to intentionally destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip. In other words: Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.' The infliction of genocide, the organisation acknowledges, is a matter of 'multiple and parallel practices' applied over a period of time, with killing being merely one component. Living conditions can be destroyed, concentration camps and zones created, populations expelled and policies to systematically prevent reproduction enacted. 'Accordingly, genocidal acts are various actions intended to bring about the destruction of a distinct group, as part of a deliberate, coordinated effort by a ruling authority.' Our Genocide suggests that certain conditions often precede the sparking of a genocide. Israel's relations with Palestinians had been characterised by 'broader patterns of settler-colonialism', with the intention of ensuring 'Jewish supremacy over Palestinians – economically, politically, socially, and culturally.' B'Tselem draws upon three crucial elements centred on ensuring 'Jewish supremacy over Palestinians': 'life under an apartheid regime that imposes separation, demographic engineering, and ethnic cleansing; systemic and institutionalized use of violence against Palestinians, while the perpetrators enjoy impunity; and institutionalized mechanisms of dehumanization and framing Palestinians as an existential threat.' The attacks on Israel by Hamas and other militant groups on October 7, 2023 was a violent event that created a 'sense of existential threat among the perpetrating group' enabling the 'ruling system to carry out genocide.' As B'Tselem Executive Director Yuli Novak notes, this sense of threat was promoted by an 'extremist, far-right messianic government' to pursue 'an agenda of destruction and expulsion.' Israeli policy in the Strip since October 2023 could not be rationalised as a focused, targeted attempt to destroy the rule of Hamas or its military efficacy. 'Statements by senior Israeli decision-makers about the nature and assault in Gaza have expressed genocidal intent throughout.' Ditto Israeli military officers of all ranks. Gaza's residents had been dehumanised, with many Jewish-Israelis believing 'that their lives are of negligible value compared to Israel's national goals, if not worthless altogether.' The report also notes the use of certain terminology that haunts the literature of genocidal euphemism: the creation of 'humanitarian zones' that would still be bombed despite supposedly providing protection for displaced civilians; the use of 'kill zones' by the Israeli military and the absence of any standardised rules of engagement through the Strip, often 'determined at the discretion of commanders on the ground or based on arbitrary criteria.' Wishing to be comprehensive, the authors of the report do not ignore Israel's actions in the West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem. Airstrikes regularly take place against refugee camps in the northern part of the territory since October 2023. Even more lethal open-fire policies have been used in the West Bank, with the use of kill zones suggesting 'the broader 'Gazafication' of Israel's methods of warfare.' Another group, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (PHRI), has also published a legal-medical appraisal on the intentional destruction of Gaza's healthcare system, finding that the Israeli campaign in Gaza 'constitutes genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention.' The evidence examined by the group 'shows a deliberate and systematic dismantling of Gaza's healthcare system and other vital systems necessary for the population's survival.' The evolving nature of the campaign suggested a 'deliberate progression' from the initial bombing and forced evacuation of hospitals in the northern part of the Strip to calculated collapse of the healthcare system across the entire enclave. The dismantling of the health system involved rendering hospitals 'non-functional', the blocking of medical evaluations and the elimination of such vital services as trauma care, surgery, dialysis and maternal health. Added to this has been the direct targeting of health care workers, involving the death and detention of over 1,800 members 'including many senior specialists' and the deliberate restriction of humanitarian relief through militarised distribution points that pose lethal risks to aid recipients. 'This coordinated assault has produced a cascading failure of health and humanitarian infrastructure, compounded by policies leading to starvation, disease and the breakdown of sanitation, housing, and education systems.' PHRI contends that, at the very least, three core elements of Article II of the Genocide Convention are met: the killing of members of a group (identified by nationality, ethnicity, race or religion); causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of that group and deliberately inflicting on the group those conditions of life to bring about its destruction in whole or in part. In accepting that genocide is being perpetrated against the Palestinians, Our Genocide makes that most pertinent of points: the dry legal analysis of genocide tends to be distanced from a historical perspective. 'The legal definition is narrow, having been shaped in large part by the political interests of the states whose representatives drafted it.' The high threshold of identifying genocide, and the international jurisprudence on the subject, had produced a disturbing paradox: genocide tends to be recognised 'only after a significant portion of the targeted group has already been destroyed and the group as such has suffered irreparable harm.' The thrust of these clarion calls from B'Tselem and PHRI is urgently clear: end this state of affairs before the Palestinians become yet another historical victim of such harm.
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Russia Must Act To End Long-Standing Trafficking For Labour Exploitation Of Migrant Women: UN Experts
GENEVA (28 July 2025) – UN experts* today expressed grave concern over credible and well-documented allegations of long-standing trafficking and forced labour of migrant women in the Golyanovo district of Moscow, in Russia. The victims, primarily from Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, have reportedly been subjected to extreme forms of exploitation and violence for decades. 'The facts described reveal deeply disturbing patterns of trafficking in persons and contemporary forms of slavery, enabled by systemic failures in the Russian legal and institutional framework,' the experts said. 'The lack of effective and timely investigations and the fact that perpetrators are not held accountable fuels impunity which is unacceptable.' According to information received, dozens of women were lured to Russia with false promises of legitimate employment in small shops. Once there, their documents were confiscated, and they were held in captivity, forced to work up to 20 hours a day in inhumane conditions without pay. Victims were reportedly subjected to torture, sexual violence and forced abortions, and their children were abducted. 'These women were isolated, abused, and stripped of all autonomy. The scale and duration of the abuse, coupled with the authorities' failure to act despite repeated complaints, point to a deeply entrenched system of exploitation,' the experts said. Despite dozens of complaints from victims and civil society organisations since the 1990s, Russian authorities have failed to conduct effective investigations, even refusing to register cases. The experts noted that investigations were often closed on the false assumption that victims had given consent, ignoring compelling evidence of coercion and abuse. They also raised alarm over Russia's failure to enact a comprehensive anti-trafficking legal framework, the criminalisation of assisting undocumented migrants, which deters victims from seeking help, and obstructs the work of civil society organisations, as well as individuals. 'We urge Russian authorities to take immediate and decisive action,' the experts said. 'This includes launching a comprehensive investigation, cooperating with Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, and ensuring justice and redress for all victims.' The case was recently considered by the European Court of Human Rights, which found Russia in violation of its obligation to prevent trafficking and protect victims (final judgment in the case of F.M. and Others v. Russia). 'Victims of human trafficking must not be punished for unlawful acts committed as a direct consequence of their exploitation,' the experts said. 'In violation of article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Russian authorities failed to prevent trafficking, protect victims, or hold perpetrators accountable.' The experts are in contact with Russian authorities on this issue. Notes *The experts: Tomoya Obokata, Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences; Gehad Madi, Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants; Mariana Katzarova, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Russian Federation, Siobhán Mullally, Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children. Special Rapporteurs/Independent Experts/Working Groups are independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Together, these experts are referred to as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. While the UN Human Rights office acts as the secretariat for Special Procedures, the experts serve in their individual capacity and are independent fromany government or organization, including OHCHR and the UN. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UN or OHCHR.
