logo

Russia Considers Visa-Free Entry For Saudi Citizens Amid Deepening Ties With Riyadh

Gulf Insider2 days ago
Russia signaled a potential step forward in easing travel restrictions for Saudi citizens, with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov confirming that Moscow is working toward waiving visa requirements for nationals of the Kingdom.
The announcement came during a joint press conference with Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan, held in the Russian capital on Friday. Lavrov praised the strength of bilateral relations and expressed gratitude for Saudi Arabia's balanced stance on the war in Ukraine.
'We appreciate the Kingdom's responsible and principled approach to the Ukrainian crisis,' Lavrov said. He also commended Saudi Arabia's role in supporting regional stability, particularly its contributions to peace efforts in Yemen.
The talks in Moscow come as part of Prince Faisal's official visit to Russia. Top among the Saudi minister's priorities was the situation in Gaza. 'Our immediate focus must be a permanent ceasefire,' Prince Faisal said, reiterating Saudi Arabia's call for sustained international pressure to end hostilities and prevent further humanitarian disaster.
The foreign minister also emphasized the urgency of reviving diplomatic efforts over Iran's nuclear program, calling on Tehran to fully cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Lavrov, meanwhile, announced that Russia is looking forward to hosting Saudi Arabia at the first Russian Arab Summit, set to be held in October in Moscow. He also confirmed that the 8th ministerial meeting of the 'Russia–GCC Strategic Dialogue' will convene in Sochi on September 11.
Russia welcomed Saudi Arabia's decision to join the 29th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum as Guest of Honor, Lavrov noted, calling the move symbolic as 2025 marks 100 years of diplomatic ties between the two nations—a centennial milestone he described as 'a testament to enduring friendship and strategic alignment.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lights Out, Europe: The Cost Of Brussels' Energy Fantasy
Lights Out, Europe: The Cost Of Brussels' Energy Fantasy

Gulf Insider

time7 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

Lights Out, Europe: The Cost Of Brussels' Energy Fantasy

Spain's leading energy companies – Iberdrola, Endesa, and EDP – remain stunned. After the nationwide blackout that cut power across Spain on April 28, the government has yet to provide a clear explanation or take technical responsibility… The companies, represented by the employers' association Aelec, have denounced 'surprising omissions' in the official investigation. They demand that the extreme voltage spikes recorded in the days leading up to the collapse be included in the analysis. They have criticized the preliminary report from ENTSO-E—the European network of electricity operators—for claiming that 'the system was operating normally' just seconds before the failure. Meanwhile, severe voltage swings were recorded, going beyond safety limits and triggering automatic shutdowns of high-voltage substations and key refineries. This episode is far more than an isolated incident. It is a metaphor for the erratic direction taken by the European Union's energy policy. In the name of climate change, Brussels has embarked on a radical overhaul of its energy model driven not by technical or economic realities, but by an ideological agenda imposed by political and bureaucratic elites. What was marketed as a smooth transition toward renewable energy has turned into a forced green agenda, with no viable alternatives and little regard for its impact on competitiveness, system stability, or citizens' well-being. At the root of this drift lies the REPowerEU plan, launched after the start of the war in Ukraine with the stated aim of 'fully decoupling' Europe from Russian energy. What initially appeared to be a justified geostrategic measure quickly became, in the hands of the European Commission, a pretext to push through renewable energies at any cost. This led to a rushed and uneven transition, with citizens and businesses footing the bill. This leap into the void has destabilized key sectors such as agriculture, transport, and industry, forcing them to absorb rising costs without receiving real technological upgrades. Countries like Germany, which shut down their nuclear plants out of political conviction, have now had to reopen coal-fired stations in a contradictory reversal. Meanwhile, state propaganda continues to promote green energy self-sufficiency, while households face record electricity bills and companies lose competitiveness. The structural failures of the European power grid are becoming increasingly evident. The continental grid was designed for stable and predictable hydro, gas, and nuclear sources. The mass introduction of intermittent sources like wind and solar makes imbalances difficult to manage: without wind or sun, generation collapses; with too much, the grid becomes dangerously overloaded. On April 28th, the Iberian Peninsula experienced those consequences firsthand. Abnormal voltage levels were detected in several substations throughout the morning. To grasp the gravity: a 'voltage oscillation' involves a sudden and significant fluctuation in the grid's voltage, which can damage equipment, trigger automatic disconnections, or, in extreme cases, cause a total blackout. At the Lancha substation, voltage reached nearly 250 kV on a line rated for 220. Another line, rated at 400 kV, surpassed 470 kV just before the collapse. According to Aelec, these anomalies began as early as 10:00 a.m. While a sudden drop of 2,200 MW in generation has been cited as the trigger, the system is theoretically built to withstand a loss of up to 3,000 MW without shutting down. This was not a coincidental failure—it was a built-in weakness. Beyond technical and political issues, the forced energy transition takes a human toll. European households are paying more for electricity, hitting middle- and lower-income families especially hard. Electrification of transport, promoted without adequate foresight, is raising the cost of mobility due to a lack of reliable charging infrastructure. Farmers and truckers, already squeezed by unmanageable climate regulations, face growing expenses while being pressured to make investments they cannot afford. Moreover, blackouts are no minor issue: their impact ranges from multimillion-euro industrial losses to the paralysis of hospitals, schools, and transport networks. In Spain, the outage even cost five people their lives. An energy model that cannot ensure a steady supply threatens the economy and public safety. European industry, particularly in the central and southern parts of the continent, is already bearing the brunt. Unable to compete with American or Asian energy prices, many companies are relocating production or shutting down. Paradoxically, even sectors the green agenda promotes, such as electric vehicles, are faltering. Once-dominant car industries in Germany and France are struggling to stay afloat in an increasingly competitive global market. While Europe imposes ideological standards, China manufactures more, better, and cheaper. Deindustrialization is no longer a threat—it's a fact. Notably, some factions on the Left even embrace 'degrowth'—deliberate economic decline—as a desirable path. Worse still, despite all these sacrifices, Europe continues to import Russian energy—now via third countries—and remains vulnerable to geopolitical pressure. The promise of energy independence often rings hollow. The Green Deal has morphed from a promise of modernization into a political myth: a story no longer grounded in reality, propped up by propaganda that refuses to confront its contradictions. The public, increasingly aware of the real costs, is beginning to push back. The farmers' resistance in the Netherlands gave rise to a political party now part of the ruling coalition. In other countries, protests and citizen discontent are multiplying. And this is only the beginning. This very week, farmers returned to Brussels to protest the suffocating policies they face. An energy transition is not inherently harmful, but cannot be imposed dogmatically. It requires realism, technological pluralism, gradual implementation, and a willingness to adopt what works. Nuclear, hydro, and natural gas must be part of the energy mix while green technologies mature. Sustainability will not be achieved by denying physics or punishing citizens, but by integrating every available tool with a long-term vision. What happened in Spain is a symptom, not an accident. Europe's current energy model is not equipped to operate under the conditions imposed by Brussels. There is an urgent need to rethink energy policy—not through ideology, but through engineering, economics, and common sense. If the energy transition is to be our path forward, let it be pursued with caution, technological plurality, and respect for the system's real limitations. Europe cannot afford to stumble in the dark in the name of a green light; it still does not know how to switch on.

Ukraine Says Talks To Join NATO Becoming 'Very Toxic'
Ukraine Says Talks To Join NATO Becoming 'Very Toxic'

Gulf Insider

time7 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

Ukraine Says Talks To Join NATO Becoming 'Very Toxic'

Ukraine's talks with NATO over a path to future membership have become increasingly tense and unproductive, according to Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Georgy Tikhy. In a recent interview, Tikhy described the discussions as 'toxic' (something he said elsewhere weeks ago too) – characterizing the negotiations as repetitive and are no longer making progress. He also indicated there does not appear to be a chance for breakthrough anywhere on the horizon. The foreign ministry official conveyed his assessment in a recent interview featured on the YouTube channel of journalist Aleksandr Notevsky. The words gained attention in Russian state media, which subsequently translated some of Tikhy's key statements. 'All the arguments and counterarguments have already been presented, and each new round of negotiations on Ukraine's accession to NATO goes in circles,' he said. The discussions 'have become, to put it simply, very toxic,' he emphasized. The NATO bloc has consistently held out that 'Ukraine's future is in NATO.' Secretary-General Mark Rutte had at this summer's annual NATO defense summit, hosted in The Hague, issued similarly optimistic words. However, what's become clear is that waning American support for Ukraine's military, and even President Trump's stated desire to step back from leadership in NATO amid lack of fair cost-sharing among allies, has resulted in a broad decline in enthusiasm and momentum for Ukraine's accession. This is where things stand following NATO's June summit: It was therefore something of a relief that Nato's summit in The Hague produced a short joint declaration on June 25 in which Russia was clearly named as a 'long-term threat … to Euro-Atlantic security'. Member states restated 'their enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine'. While the summit declaration made no mention of future Nato membership for Ukraine, the fact that US president Donald Trump agreed to these two statements was widely seen as a success. Yet, within a week of the summit, Washington paused the delivery of critical weapons to Ukraine, including Patriot air defence missiles and long-range precision-strike rockets. The move was ostensibly in response to depleting US stockpiles. Simultaneously Russia has made steady gains along the almost 1,000km long frontline, and is even expanding operations into a central oblast, beyond the Donbass region. Russian forces have also in the last days declared that it maintains full control over the whole region of the Luhansk, where Russian forces made quickest gains early on. The Kremlin has shown patience in this grinding war of attrition, though its advances have been costly in terms of manpower, as it taps reserves and continues recruitment efforts back home.

Egypt Introduces Pre-departure Training
Egypt Introduces Pre-departure Training

Gulf Insider

time16 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

Egypt Introduces Pre-departure Training

In a move to better prepare its citizens for employment abroad, Egypt has introduced a mandatory pre-departure training programme for workers heading to Kuwait, aimed at equipping them with both vocational skills and knowledge of local labour laws. Under the initiative, each worker will complete a three-month training course in Egypt before travelling. The programme includes orientation on job responsibilities and a detailed overview of Kuwait's labour regulations, with the goal of reducing legal violations that often stem from a lack of awareness. 'This step is designed to ensure that workers are not exposed to exploitation or contractual misunderstandings once they arrive,' said Osama Shaltout, Egyptian Ambassador to Kuwait. 'By familiarising them with their rights and responsibilities in advance, we're setting them up for success and safeguarding their welfare.' The initiative follows a recent meeting between the Egyptian Embassy in Kuwait and the Kuwaiti Public Authority of Manpower, during which both sides reaffirmed their commitment to deeper coordination on labour issues. To support the rollout of the training programme, Egyptian authorities have established 85 vocational training centres across the country. These centres will serve as hubs for skill development, legal education, and pre-departure orientation. The move signals a broader effort by Egypt to modernise its labour export policies and strengthen protection mechanisms for its workforce abroad—particularly in GCC countries where large numbers of Egyptians are employed. Also read: SR200,000 Fine For Saudi And Egyptian In Cover-Up Case

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store