logo
Canadian legal group rocked by 2nd high-profile resignation, as treasurer steps down over 'chilling effect'

Canadian legal group rocked by 2nd high-profile resignation, as treasurer steps down over 'chilling effect'

CBC09-04-2025
The fallout over a Canadian legal organization's decision to cancel a noted Syrian Canadian entrepreneur and peace advocate's speaking invitation is deepening, with another high-profile resignation, this time by its treasurer.
Sheila Gibb, treasurer at The Advocates' Society since June 2024, who was set to take up the role of vice-president, has stepped down from the group's executive and board of directors.
In a statement posted online Wednesday, Gibb said cancelling an upcoming keynote speech by refugee-turned-entrepreneur Tareq Hadhad at TAS's upcoming event in June has caused "hurt and trauma to many members of our community."
"As an organization whose core value is to be a diverse and inclusive Society, it is TAS's responsibility to create spaces for all members to feel welcome and able to share their perspectives," wrote Gibb.
"We failed to create this space with the End of Term dinner this year."
Hadhad 'held to a standard' others weren't: ex-treasurer
Gibb's resignation comes just days after incoming president Sheree Conlon stepped down from the organization, saying in a letter obtained by CBC News that TAS had "abandoned its values" in rescinding Hadhad's invitation.
TAS has said it did so after concerns were raised by some members about Hadhad's stance on Gaza on social media, in which he has referred to Israel's actions there as "genocide."
As CBC News has previously reported, lawyer Jonathan Lisus was among those who wrote to the organization to flag what he described as Hadhad's "one-sided view" of the conflict, noting Hadhad did not appear to have posted in solidarity with the Israeli victims of Hamas's Oct. 7 attack or the hostages taken that day.
In her statement, Gibb says she believes Hadhad "was held to a standard which other speakers have not been held," adding the move has had "a chilling effect."
"In my view, it is necessary that TAS — and our bar — be able to hold space for different perspectives and difficult discussions," said Gibb.
"I see this as foundational to TAS's core values, and also critical given where we find ourselves in the world: with increasing polarization, diminishing opportunities for civil discourse on difficult topics, and the related risks to our bar, our system of justice, and our democracy — as we are seeing south of the border."
Meanwhile, in a statement Monday, Hadhad said he was moved by the outpouring of support he has received since the cancellation.
As for his stance on Gaza, he said: "to suggest that I am 'unsympathetic' or 'indifferent' to the suffering of Jewish people is both inaccurate and deeply hurtful."
"I believe that to grieve the suffering of one group does not mean the exclusion of another ... that includes civilians in Syria, in Gaza, in Israel, in Ukraine and in every corner of the world where people are caught in the crossfire of violence."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

International Criminal Court refers Hungary to its oversight body for failing to arrest Netanyahu
International Criminal Court refers Hungary to its oversight body for failing to arrest Netanyahu

Winnipeg Free Press

time12 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

International Criminal Court refers Hungary to its oversight body for failing to arrest Netanyahu

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — A panel of judges at the International Criminal Court reported Hungary to the court's oversight organization for failing to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he visited Budapest in April, saying the move undercut the court's ability to bring suspects to justice. The Israeli leader received a red carpet welcome from Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán during a state visit, in defiance of an ICC arrest warrant. Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant are accused of crimes against humanity in connection with the war in Gaza. Israel is not a member of the court and staunchly rejects the charges. In a filing released late Thursday, the three-judge panel wrote that 'the obligation to cooperate was sufficiently clear to Hungary' and the failure to arrest Netanyahu 'severely undermines the Court's ability to carry out its mandate.' The ICC has no police force and relies on countries around the world to execute arrest warrants. The court's oversight body, the Assembly of States Parties has limited powers to sanction Hungary. It will consider the next steps during its annual meeting in December. The Hungarian leader, regarded by critics as an autocrat and the EU's most intransigent spoiler in the bloc's decision-making, has defended his decision to not arrest Netanyahu. During the visit, Orbán said his country's commitment to the ICC was ' half-hearted ' and began the process to withdraw Hungary from the court. Orbán signed the Rome Statute, the treaty which created the court, in 2001 during his first term as prime minister. The court dismissed arguments from Hungary that Parliament never incorporated the court's statute into Hungarian law, writing 'it was Hungary's responsibility to ensure that such legislation was in place.' The decision comes as Gaza's population of more than 2 million Palestinians is in a catastrophic humanitarian crisis, now relying largely on the limited aid allowed into the territory. Netanyahu and Gallant are accused of using 'starvation as a method of warfare' by restricting humanitarian aid, and of intentionally targeting civilians in Israel's campaign against Hamas in Gaza. It's the third time in the past year that the court has investigated one of its member states for failing to arrest suspects. In February, judges asked Italy to explain why the country sent a Libyan man, suspected of torture and murder, home on an Italian military aircraft rather than handing him over to the court. In October, judges reported Mongolia to the court's oversight organization for failing to arrest Russian President Vladimir Putin when he visited the Asian nation.

Ottawa warned early in new year of wheels wobbling on $100 billion EV strategy
Ottawa warned early in new year of wheels wobbling on $100 billion EV strategy

National Observer

timean hour ago

  • National Observer

Ottawa warned early in new year of wheels wobbling on $100 billion EV strategy

The federal government was warned early in 2025 that its $100 billion electric vehicle strategy was in danger of being run off the road by slowing North American EV sales and the economic mayhem sown by US President Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada, a newly released document reveals. François-Philippe Champagne, then federal minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, was sent a briefing note on Jan. 10 by his deputy minister, Philip Jennings, that flagged 'a decline in expectations' among EV makers that imperiled the plan's progress. 'The slowdown in growth has contributed to delays, modifications, or scaling back of planned investments' in the auto sector despite tens of billions of dollars in investments having already been announced, Jennings said in the document obtained by Canada's National Observer through an access to information and privacy request. The briefing note was delivered to Champagne only weeks after he told CNO that critics of the government's embattled EV strategy lacked 'vision and ambition.' Champagne was named Minister of National Revenue in a cabinet shuffle after the Liberals won the April federal election that also saw Mélanie Joly take over the Industry, Science and Economic Development portfolio. Developing an EV industrial ecosystem from mining critical minerals used in vehicle batteries to new assembly lines for electric vehicles would give Canada a competitive advantage in a global industry 'for decades to come — but not overnight,' Champagne said in December. Joly's office told Canada's National Observer that it 'recognizes the sector's concerns and is continuing to engage meaningfully with industry stakeholders to address and alleviate challenges' linked to US tariffs, though no specific action plan was outlined in its response. 'Despite short-term policy fluctuations, the long-term trajectory for EV adoption remains strong,' says Dunsky Energy analyst Lindsay Wiginton 'Our government is working to ensure EVs are made in Canada, so Canadian workers benefit from the growth and jobs in this industry," said a spokesperson. Canada's EV plans going flat? A total of $46.1 billion in investments across the Canadian EV supply chain was announced by automakers including Honda, Volkswagen, GM and Ford from October 2021 to April last year. Federal and provincial governments pledged $52.5 billion in incentives, tax breaks and other support, according to Canada's Parliamentary Budget Officer, which provides economic analysis to the government. But dark skies have threatened the EV strategy and long-term future of auto manufacturing in Ontario as the Canada-US trade war drags on. In April, GM shuttered its CAMI assembly plant in Ingersoll, Ont., where it builds an electric delivery van. GM expected to reopen the plant at 'half capacity' in the fall. Ford and Stellantis, which cited tariffs as a major factor in a $3.7 billion loss in the first half of 2025, have also suspended or delayed EV production in Canada. Some 40,000 EVs have been produced to-date in Canada, which in 2024 imposed a 100 per cent tariff on imports of Chinese EVs to protect the domestic industry. China made 12.4 million electric cars last year, accounting for 70 per cent of global EV output, according to the International Energy Agency. Battery makers have hit speed bumps too. A planned $7 billion EV manufacturing plant in Saint-Basile-le-Grand and McMasterville, Que, collapsed after Swedish battery maker Northvolt declared bankruptcy in March. The Quebec government lost a $270 million investment in the project. More recently, trouble emerged at the $5 billion NextStar EV battery factory being built by Stellantis and South Korea's LG Energy in Windsor, Ont. Several Canadian contractors have filed lawsuits alleging millions of dollars in unpaid work at the plant, which has received $15 billion in federal and provincial incentives, according to media reports. Jennings said in his briefing note that slowing EV purchases had 'created doubt in the trajectory of [future] sales'. Trump's executive orders soon after taking office to scrap Biden-era EV targets and tax credits, along with the end of federal EV incentives in Canada, have 'added uncertainty' in the market, the note said. 'In the long-term these impacts on their own are unlikely to jeopardize the prosperity of the automotive sector in Canada, but they depend on the electrification plans of the manufacturer and the health of the sector overall, including the impact of potential U.S. policies and tariffs,' Jennings said. EV transition 'unstoppable' The federal government should stick to its long-term plan for an EV supply chain in Canada because the global shift to EVs is 'unstoppable,' said Matthew Fortier, CEO of Accelerate, a Toronto-based zero-emissions vehicle industrial alliance. There are signs of 'underlying momentum' for Canada's EV industry, said Lindsay Wiginton, managing consultant at research house Dunsky Energy. She noted many analysts have a positive global EV outlook, including projections that a quarter of all cars sold in 2025 will be electric. That growth is 'driven in large part by the continued decline in lithium-ion battery costs that is helping to bring more affordable EV models' to market, she said. 'Despite short-term policy fluctuations, the long-term trajectory for EV adoption remains strong,' she added. Some auto makers are less optimistic. They want the federal government to drop a mandate for EVs to make up 20 per cent of cars sold in Canada by 2026 and 100 per cent by 2035 – arguing that slowing EV sales and US tariffs have delayed efforts to build an electric vehicle supply chain. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, speaking at a joint press conference on Tuesday with Alberta's Danielle Smith and Saskatchewan's Scott Moe, said: 'We have to get rid of these mandates. The companies won't be able to meet these targets. But let's not stop spending. I am confident that the EV sector will grow eventually.' Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin has been unswayed by their arguments so far, according to media reports. Canada's 'competitive advantages' Fortier said Canada's automotive sector cannot hope to be 'globally relevant in 10-15 years' unless Ottawa focuses on 'competitive advantages that our neighbours don't have' in areas including critical minerals, advanced industrial materials, and EV battery technology. 'If we do that now, Canada can become a necessary part of the continental supply chain, and we can have leverage in the auto sector when EVs are the dominant mode of vehicle production in North America,' Fortier said. The US is by far the biggest market for Canadian-made cars and trucks, with 93 per cent of the $51 billion in vehicles exported in 2023 shipped south of the border, according to the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, an industry trade body. The US imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Canadian auto makers and parts manufacturers in April, forcing hundreds of job losses in Ontario, the industry's historic heartland. Trump has threatened to raise the tariffs to 35 per cent on Aug 1. A high-profile US-Japan trade deal announced today (Wednesday) will see the US tariff on Japan's auto sector lowered to 15 per cent from 35 per cent. That deal might point to a possible reduction in US tariffs on Canadian car makers, but it is not a long-term solution, Fortier said. 'Any standing tariff on Canadian-made cars is a reminder that we urgently need to develop more negotiating leverage. The way to do this is to build upstream and midstream capacity for the batteries that will power the future of this sector,' he said.

Wet'suwet'en complaint to bank puts Ottawa on notice over nation-building agenda
Wet'suwet'en complaint to bank puts Ottawa on notice over nation-building agenda

National Observer

timean hour ago

  • National Observer

Wet'suwet'en complaint to bank puts Ottawa on notice over nation-building agenda

The Wet'suwet'en Nation has spent years fighting fossil fuel projects that rip through their land in British Columbia without consent. Now, as familiar threats mount, the nation has taken the issue to Tokyo — where a corporate battle could serve as a warning for Prime Minister Mark Carney as he pursues his infrastructure agenda. Wet'suwet'en hereditary Chief Na'Moks filed a complaint last week with the Japan Bank for International Cooperation's (JBIC) independently appointed environmental examiners — tasked with investigating alleged environmental wrongdoing — detailing environmental harms and human rights abuses from the construction of the Coastal Gaslink project that transports fracked gas from the Montney region in the province's northeast to LNG Canada's export terminal on the coast. The bank loaned US $850 million to the project in 2021. 'Despite the Wet'suwet'en having repeatedly rejected the project, JBIC proceeded to approve financing for the LNG Canada terminal and the associated Coastal GasLink pipeline without securing proper [free, prior and informed consent],' the filing reads. The filing called the approval without the hereditary chiefs' consent 'a fundamental breach of both Canadian law and international human rights standards.' The issues raised in the complaint may hinge on actions taken in the past, but as Carney prioritizes major projects in the name of nation-building, the concerns detailed in the filing serve as a warning for the risks ahead, Na'Moks told Canada's National Observer. 'We're living in a petrostate being enforced by a police state,' he said in a phone call from the sidelines of the First Nations major projects summit. 'Everybody goes 'Oh not in Canada.' 'I said, 'Wait until they come through your doors with axes and power saws. Wait until you step outside and have snipers.'' 'We're living in a petrostate being enforced by a police state,' Wet'suwet'en Nation Hereditary Chief Na'Moks said. "Wait until they come through your doors with axes and power saws. Wait until you step outside and have snipers.' At the First Nations summit last week, Carney said no major projects have been finalized and he was there to listen to Indigenous leadership. However, as Canada's National Observer reported, there are more than a dozen megaprojects already under consideration. Multiple government sources have told Canada's National Observer that an expansion to LNG Canada is very likely to make Carney's list. Ultimately the decision to invest rests with LNG Canada's owners (Shell, Petronas, PetroChina, Mitsubishi and the Korean Gas Corporation), but incentivizing the companies to invest appears to be a major priority for Carney's government. That's concerning to We'suwet'en hereditary leadership. The complaint filed against JBIC urges the bank to 'immediately suspend any further financing' of the LNG Canada project, including potential expansions. Na'Moks said his experience watching a major project built through his nation's territory without consent gives him an up-close view to the risks that are now afoot as Ottawa contemplates a renewed push to build. 'We know we were the template for how they're going to protect industry without our approval,' he said. Battling the banks As the Coastal Gaslink pipeline was being built four years ago, land defenders from the nation and its allies blockaded roads and set up camp at the Gidimt'en Checkpoint to slow construction and push costs up in a bid to stop the pipeline. Armed RCMP officers hacked through the door of one small cabin to arrest those inside in a dramatic scene captured by photojournalist Amber Bracken and filmmaker Michael Toladano (an event that is now the subject of a lawsuit from Bracken's employer, The Narwhal). Weeks later, more land defenders were arrested at standoffs with police, with several claiming dehumanizing treatment as they were hauled to police headquarters and held in enclosures the size of a 'dog kennel.' The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination said in 2022 it 'profoundly regrets and is concerned' that Canada is forcibly removing Indigenous land defenders from their unceded territory, and the provincial and federal governments have been similarly condemned by leading human rights group Amnesty International. As the furor around those arrests faded, Wet'suwet'en hereditary leadership continued to fight the pipeline by targeting its financiers. They attended shareholder meetings and confronted bank leadership. Nevertheless, the pipeline was built and the first shipment of LNG from Kitimat departed this summer. Na'Moks said the nation decided to file a complaint with the JBIC because the bank finances LNG Canada. The bank has environmental and social guidelines to help determine which projects to invest in, but the complaint alleges JBIC failed to meaningfully implement them. Na'Moks said that filing the complaint is to provide the 'right information' because the reports the bank has received are 'a copy and paste from industry and government.' 'Without the CGL pipeline, the LNG Canada terminal would not be viable; and without JBIC's financing, this export infrastructure system would not have progressed at its current scale,' the complaint reads. 'JBIC's financing played a decisive role in enabling this interconnected system. And by failing to adequately review the impacts of its associated facility, JBIC bears responsibility for contributing to the resulting harm.' JBIC did not return a request for comment. De-escalating a fraught situation LNG Canada's first shipment overseas marks a turning point for the gas sector in Canada. Before the LNG export terminal began sending shipments abroad, 99.9 per cent of Canadian gas exports headed into the United States. With US President Donald Trump threatening a drawn-out trade war, Carney riding to victory in April's election on a promise to build up Canada's economic resilience, and the fossil fuel industry lobbying for more oil and gas infrastructure, the country is staring down the barrel of a major fossil fuel expansion — including in Kitimat itself. If LNG Canada Phase 2 is built, expanding export capacity at the site will involve increasing storage tanks, new processing facilities and more tanker traffic through vulnerable coastal waters. But it will also mean increasing the amount of gas fracked in northeastern BC, and sending more gas through the Coastal GasLink pipeline. To do that, additional compressor stations will need to be built to squeeze more gas into the pipeline. 'With more gas flowing you have increased risk,' said Richard Brooks, climate finance director at To stay onside with UNDRIP, as Carney has committed, communities like the Wet'suwet'en First Nation would have to consent to new facilities like compressor stations being built — otherwise their rights under both Canadian and international law would be violated. For Brooks, this is a major lesson Ottawa must learn. When Indigenous rights are 'trampled,' opposition to proposed projects skyrocket — and that then impacts the viability of the projects. He pointed to increased legal costs, security costs and lengthy delays that push construction costs higher. 'Indigenous communities have proven time and time again … that they have the power to slow and stop projects from moving ahead,' he said. 'So this is why it's so important to have First Nations involved from the beginning to be proponents of these projects, to have the process be one that is not imposed, but rather is a collaborative process, whatever project it is.' Carney has said projects will proceed with Indigenous consent, but by putting in place legislation to fast-track projects before securing consent from nations who could be affected, there are plenty of risks ahead, said Senwung Luk, a partner at law firm Olthuis Kleer Townshend LLP, specializing in Aboriginal rights and title and the Crown's fiduciary obligations to First Nations. Luk said Carney would have been better off starting with a list of projects, and thinking about which nations would need to consent to figure out how to build them — rather than starting with a new law that gives the federal government the ability to bulldoze over concerns. 'It's an odd way to start a conversation, to point a nuclear weapon at the person that you're trying to talk to,' he said. 'If you believe in free, prior and informed consent, you can't only believe in that except for when Indigenous people oppose your project,' he said. 'That wouldn't be any sort of meaningful concept of consent.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store