‘We'll never leave again:' Spring Arbor couple back home
Their return to Michigan comes after a Thursday court hearing, in which the court ruled that the Akeos were to be released from custody. The Akeos and U.S. Rep. Tom Barrett (R-Charlotte) say they are no longer facing charges, and the entire case against them has been dropped.
The pair was on March 4 at an airport in Cancún on fraud allegations. They were accused of defrauding resort chain out of more than $116,000 by breaching a timeshare contract and illegally cancelling membership charges to an American Express credit card.
6 News spoke with , who said his parents could have been held for up to six months, as a judge previously gave the company that much time to gather evidence.
The Akeos' release comes a day after Barrett . Barrett told 6 News he also spoke with the president of the Quintana Roo Supreme Court to work on getting the couple released.
'We are so happy that it's over,' said Christy.
6 News captured the moment when the Akeo's reunited with their family. Paul Akeo shared what happened after police arrested the couple on March 4th.
'We were whisked off to another facility and then we were sent directly to prison. We weren't able to talk to anybody, didn't have any contact with lawyers, didn't have our phones, so we were just sitting there,' said Paul.
The two say days went by before they could talk to their family or even each other. Now, they're sharing what their time spent inside a maximum security prison in Mexico was like.
'It's awful. It's nothing like you would ever want to go through, it's unbelievable. The language barrier is unreal,' said Christy.
Congressman Tom Barrett shared what he saw in the prison as well when he visited the couple in Mexico.
'I walked through part of the interior of the prison, and it was enough for me to see that no person would want to be detained there, no American should have to go through that, especially under the conditions they were in for the amount of time that they were,' the Congressman said.
Christy's kids started reaching out for help after they heard about the arrest. Word go to U.S. Representative Tom Barrett, who flew to Mexico Wednesday to meet with them.
'I insisted when I went down there that I wasn't going to leave empty handed, and I wasn't going to leave without bringing them back,' Rep. Barrett said.
By then the Akeos felt hopeless, even after meeting with Congressman Barrett.
'I never thought we would be coming home for months,' Christy said.
Congressman Barrett said he met with Mexican officials, who arranged a hearing Thursday. That's when the charges against the Akeos were dropped.
'There were some things that were getting a little uncertain at the end and we were able to resolve those quickly, took a lot of effort from all parties involved,' said Rep. Barrett.
The Congressman adds that every level of both the United States and Mexican Governments were involved in this conversation, including President Donald Trump.
'The president was very excited to hear this and expressed his excitement and welcomed them back to America,' Congressman Barrett said.
Christy said now that the couple is home, the first thing she is going to do is take a shower.
'There were no showers there, and if you could take a shower it was cold,' Christy said.
After a month of uncertainty, this family can now rest easy with the Akeos back in the United States.
'Be thankful for what America has given us,' Paul continued. 'And just be thankful for the little things.'
Thursday evening, 6 News received a statement from the Akeo children, saying:
The Akeo family wishes to thank President Donald J. Trump, his Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs Adam Boehler and Congressman Tom Barrett(R-Lansing) for working tirelessly for the release of Paul and Christy Akeo. We also want to express our deepest gratitude to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Mark Coolidge Johnson, Charge d 'Affaires, U.S. Embassy Mission Mexico and his dedicated team. Through four straight weeks of fear and uncertainty, Congressman Barrett's commitment to bringing our parents' home safely provided us with hope and reassurance. He traveled to Cancun at great personal risk, camped out at the prison and made it clear that he would not return home without them. His heroic efforts as a veteran represent the finest traditions of our nation's military to never leave an American behind. No American should be held hostage to the demands of a private company anywhere in the world. Paul and Christy are under the care of physicians and therapists to be treated for illnesses and trauma inflicted upon them during their captivity. We ask that their privacy be respected as they rest and heal. The family will have much more to say about this ordeal in the coming days.
Lindsey Lemke Hull and Michael Lemke, April 4.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
a few seconds ago
- Miami Herald
Roy Black, one of the nation's premier defense lawyers, dies in Coral Gables at 80
When he earned it is not an exact science, but Roy Black's reputation as one of America's premier criminal defense attorneys defined him for decades. Certainly long before Black won an acquittal in 1991 for William Kennedy Smith on a rape charge in Palm Beach, the first trial of its kind to be televised nationally. Black, a New York native who moved to South Florida for his studies as an undergraduate and law student at the University of Miami, died on Monday at his home in Coral Gables at 80 after battling an illness while still continuing to work at his storied law firm on Biscayne Boulevard. 'Roy Black was the greatest criminal lawyer of our generation, perhaps in American history, achieving acquittals over a span of 50 years in some of the most challenging and notorious cases of all time,' said his partner, Howard Srebnick, who joined Black's law firm 30 years ago. Srebnick recalled working as a law clerk for federal appeals court Judge Irving Goldberg in New Orleans in the early 1990s when he saw his future law partner for the first time on a black and white television in the judge's chambers. Black was cross-examining the accuser in the Kennedy Smith trial that was being broadcast on Court TV. 'Judge Goldberg knew I was leaning hard in favor of a career in criminal defense and after watching Roy in action, Judge Goldberg said that Roy's were the footsteps I should follow,' Srebnick said on Tuesday, describing Black as his teacher, mentor and friends. One of Srebnick's peers, David O. Markus, was the first to report early Tuesday on Black's death. 'This one really hurts,' Marcus wrote on his Southern District of Florida blog, which he founded 20 years ago. 'And he really was the GOAT of criminal defense lawyers. There are so many of us that want to be Roy in the courtroom — commanding, persuasive, funny. ... The hardest working. The most determined. And always so positive about winning.' Marcus said he 'was lucky enough to try a 6 week trial with him out of town when I was a young lawyer. I learned so much. And he often helped me brainstorm my cases and trials after that.' Black wove a successful career — one that made him a fixture on the 'Today Show' and 'Larry King Live' — by representing some of South Florida's most famous — and infamous — criminal defendants, from Kennedy Smith, the nephew of JFK, to William Lozano, the Miami police officer who shot a motorcyclist that led to the Overtown and Liberty City street riots of 1989. Black, who was known by his colleagues as the Intellectual Lawyer for his voracious reading, wrote his own book, 'Black's Law,' in 1999, in which he chronicled four Miami trials. All four cases — three murders and a money laundering — appeared to involve impossibly long odds. But through meticulous preparation, improvisation and long hours at the office, Black found holes in the opposition's cases and proceeded to stretch them open, a Miami Herald reporter wrote in a 1999 profile. Sometimes he seized on the smallest of details, Rick Jervis wrote. In the case of Luis Alvarez, the Miami police officer who shot and killed a youth in an Overtown arcade and sparked the 1982 riots, Black suggested that Alvarez shave his mustache to detract from the officer's rough-guy image. He did. In the trial of Steve Hicks, accused of murdering his girlfriend in her Fort Lauderdale apartment, Black illustrated how police investigators botched the crime scene, from blurry Polaroids of the murder scene to not following evidence through to the lab. In each case, Black walked the reader through the process — from the defendant's detainment to research to jury selection to verdict. Tip: He won them all. 'I was trying to give a different viewpoint on what goes in these cases,' Black said at the time. 'Everybody looks at it from one way. But you never really think about what it must be like to be the defendant.' Black is survived by his wife, Lea, their son RJ, and his daughter, Nora, along with his law partners at Black Srebnick, including Howard Srebnick, Scott Kornspan, Maria Neyra, Jackie Perczek, Mark Shapiro and Jared Lopez. This obituary will be updated with more information.
New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Pro-Trump group says Cracker Barrel's DEI programs violate federal, state civil rights laws
Conservative pro-Trump law group America First Legal (AFL) filed complaints Monday with the Tennessee Attorney General and the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EEOC), alleging Cracker Barrel is maintaining discriminatory employment practices stemming from its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies. The complaints point to public documents, internal reports, and Cracker Barrel's own language to allege the company maintains illegal DEI frameworks, such as race- and gender-conscious hiring, leadership and promotion pipelines, which provide benefits to employees on the basis of protected characteristics. AFL also slammed Cracker Barrel for rebranding its dedicated DEI website to 'Culture and Belonging,' arguing that the name change did not halt Cracker Barrel from using 'diversity' as a proxy for race or sex. Advertisement 'Americans are fed up with major American corporations serving up DEI as if it is entirely okay,' said AFL legal counsel, Will Scolinos. 'Treating people differently because of the color of their skin or their sex is not only wrong, it is illegal. AFL has fought DEI since the Biden Administration spent four years celebrating and encouraging its wholesale implementation across the country. Now, companies are retreating from the term 'DEI' but retaining their discriminatory policies. Cracker Barrel and other American corporations must take discrimination by any name off the menu once and for all.' 4 The complaints point to public documents, internal reports, and Cracker Barrel's own language to allege the company maintains illegal DEI frameworks. Christopher Sadowski AFL's complaint points to Cracker Barrel's Business Resource Groups (BRGs) as one example of alleged discrimination, outlined in public Securities and Exchange Commission documents, Cracker Barrel's website and other places. According to AFL, these groups offer employment benefits only available to employees belonging to certain races or sexes. Advertisement The 'Be Bold' BRG helps 'cultivate and develop Black Leaders within the Cracker Barrel organization utilizing allyship, mentorship, and education to create a path to continued excellence,' Cracker Barrel's website states. Meanwhile, the HOLA BRG 'promote[s] Hispanic and Latino culture through hiring, developing, and retaining talent within Cracker Barrel.' Other BRGs revolve around LGBT folks, 'neurodiversity,' and women's issues, among others. 4 According to AFL, these groups offer employment benefits only available to employees belonging to certain races or sexes. AP Another part of Cracker Barrel's alleged promotion of discriminatory DEI practices cited by AFL includes the company's focus on 'attract[ing], develop[ing] and retain[ing] high performing talent with diverse backgrounds, experiences and perspectives,' which is laid out on Cracker Barrel's 'Culture, Belonging and Inclusion' website underneath the heading 'STRATEGY TURNS INTO ACTION.' This focus on promoting and hiring based on 'diverse' characteristics can be seen in action via Cracker Barrel's categorization in internal company reports of board members as 'Diverse' or 'Not-Diverse,' AFL points out. Advertisement Per a public filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Cracker Barrel notes that when 'evaluating potential candidates for Board membership' the nominating committee 'considers, among other things … diversity of age, gender, race, and ethnic background.' 4 This focus on promoting and hiring based on 'diverse' characteristics can be seen in action via Cracker Barrel's categorization in internal company reports. Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images Cracker Barrel also proudly touts its Diverse Employee Leadership Talent Advancement (DELTA) program in public filings, which the company describes as an effort meant to identify 'diverse managers who have exhibited all the skills we value in our top-performing managers' and position them 'to advance to their next role.' 'Our new, robust diversity training includes education throughout all levels of the Company about unconscious and implicit bias and focuses on creating an inclusive culture and fostering a sense of belonging for all,' a Securities and Exchange Commission filing discussing the DELTA program also adds. Advertisement AFL argues that, in practice, these policies from Cracker Barrel appear to have achieved their intended effect, with the company's representation of women and ethnic minorities among Cracker Barrel professional staff, store level management and hourly workers, having each increased by at least 3% since fiscal year 2022. AFL said only women hourly staff remained constant across the same period, though Cracker Barrel touts in its Securities and Exchange Commission filings that 70% of its employee population is female. 4 Cracker Barrel also proudly touts its Diverse Employee Leadership Talent Advancement (DELTA) program in public filings. AP 'Cracker Barrel's policies openly discriminate against heterosexual, white, and male employees in favor of diverse employees,' AFL's complaint, which asserts the policies violate Tennessee's Human Rights Act and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, argues. 'Discrimination advocates — under the guise of 'diversity' and 'equity' — have for years claimed that straight white men must be treated differently than diverse individuals by holding them to a higher evidentiary standard; however, the Supreme Court has directly addressed this claim, holding that 'Title VII does not impose such a heightened standard on majority-group plaintiffs,'' the complaint continues. 'Decades of case law hold that — no matter how well-intentioned — policies that seek to impose racial balancing are prohibited by Title VII.' Through its complaint, AFL is calling for Cracker Barrel and the EEOC to launch investigations into the matter, including a review of internal communications and a probe into whether the company used contractors with 'reckless disregard' to circumvent civil rights laws. AFL is also requesting the Tennessee Attorney General and EEOC enforce state and federal laws that would compel the company to halt its allegedly discriminatory DEI practices. Cracker Barrel did not respond to repeated requests for comment in time for publication.
Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
What if the Parties Struck a Truce on Self-Destructive Gerrymandering?
America's two major political parties are about to exchange the next salvos in a decades-long battle where—as is typical of trench warfare—they both stand to lose. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is under severe pressure from President Donald Trump to restart one of the most craven and self-destructive practices of American politics in the 21st century: predatory gerrymandering. California Governor Gavin Newsom has made clear that, if Abbott goes through with it, he stands ready to retaliate. If you're thinking "gee, this sounds like a boring, technical issue for government nerds to fuss over," it's not. It's been a poison that's seeped further into our political life than most realize. Here's what happened. Partisan gerrymandering—drawing legislative and congressional districts to maximize your party's power—goes back literally to the birth of the republic. But for most of the 20th century, state political leanings were so stable that parties kept their maps in place. Even after Supreme Court rulings in the mid-1960s forced change, the parties settled into a fairly anodyne process, forming districts once every ten years after the new national census with only minor angling for political advantage. In 2003, then-House Majority Leader Tom DeLay broke the tacit truce. After Texas drew its districts following the 2000 census, he waited for Republicans to gain complete control of Texas government, and then maneuvered an ambush: a sudden redraw that gave Republicans six more congressional seats. Once DeLay started this new predatory approach—grabbing for power at any opportunity—others followed. Republican-dominated states started to copycat Texas, and Republicans saw an opportunity if they were really willing to push the envelope. Political strategist Karl Rove crafted a project called REDMAP to win key state legislative seats all over the country in order to drive an even more aggressive round of congressional redistricting. It worked: in 2012, Democrats won 1.4 million more votes for the U.S. House than Republicans, but Republicans won the chamber 234-201. In the Wisconsin legislature, as just one state example, Republicans won less than half of the statewide vote but took 61 percent of the legislative seats. These outrageous power tilts still exist around the country. US President Donald Trump (L) listens to Texas Governor Greg Abbott speak during a meeting with local officials and first responders in Kerrville, Texas, on July 11, 2025, following devastating flooding that occurred in the... US President Donald Trump (L) listens to Texas Governor Greg Abbott speak during a meeting with local officials and first responders in Kerrville, Texas, on July 11, 2025, following devastating flooding that occurred in the area over the July 4 weekend. More BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images Most Americans might dismiss all this as another instance of all's-fair-in-love-and-war political skullduggery. Why was it actually so bad? For Republicans, gerrymandering helped drive the MAGA-fication of the party. To achieve the 2010 backlash that would fuel their predatory gerrymandering scheme, Republican leaders engineered an angry populist movement—the Tea Party. That Frankenstein's monster came alive and helped Republicans shellack Democrats in the 2010 midterms, but then escaped lab containment. Feuds between Tea Party-aligned activists and establishment Republicans roiled the party in 2012 and sank them in 2014, leaving the party rudderless, confused, and ripe for Trump's takeover. Then the Trump faction became a force inside America's gerrymandered districts. Since his endorsement was seen as the critical factor in winning Republican primaries, and with almost all Republicans districts being "ultra-safe," the majority of state and U.S. House elected officials became Trump acolytes. Democrats in turn became both politically neutered and schizophrenic: in a few places successfully depoliticizing redistricting through independent commissions, in other places trying (unsuccessfully) to even the score after the 2020 census with their own aggressive gerrymanders. So they remain boxed out of power in most states, still trying to land a feeble counterpunch. It's left them with a severe case of "don't wrestle a pig in the mud; you get dirty and he has fun." And we Americans ended up with a mess. Trump's gerrymandering-enabled leveraged buyout of the Republican Party—and now the U.S. government—means his faction of MAGA Republicans (which represents only 16 percent of Americans) gets to drive a radical agenda that the majority of us oppose. So everyone has lost—Republicans as much as anyone, as their party has been coopted and as their ultra-aggressive tactics have sometimes backfired. But, addicted to a toxic formula that has worked out well for him so far, Trump is now looking for even more aggressive gerrymandering, and California Governor Gavin Newsom is threatening to retaliate with some partisan redistricting of his own. So the cycle will restart, and the screws will continue to tighten. But what if the few remaining adults in American politics said, "enough?" There's actually a model in 20th century political history for one way it could work. In 1940s and 1950s, it was common for U.S. senators of opposing parties to form a "voting pair" on a bill. Since their votes would cancel each other out, they would skip the vote together. Greg Abbott could call Gavin Newsom and say "hey, we're a couple of Washington outsiders with national ambitions—let's pair up on a ceasefire. I'll carve out a little space from Trump, you'll show that you can work with Republicans. Our parties will breathe a sigh of relief, and we'll do our country a lot of good. We could even start a trend for other states to follow." Likely? No. But possible? Absolutely. It wouldn't undo the damage that's been done. But the first rule when you're in a hole is to stop digging. Matt Robison is a writer, podcast host, and former congressional staffer. The views in this article are the writer's own.
