logo
Watchdog says pension plan dropping net-zero target a ‘failure of its fundamental purpose'

Watchdog says pension plan dropping net-zero target a ‘failure of its fundamental purpose'

The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) has been lambasted by industry watchdog Shift Action for dropping its 2022 commitment to invest in line with the country's net-zero action targets.
Shift Action said the move by the CPP investment board (CPPIB) was an 'unacceptable abdication of responsibility' to the 22 million Canadians whose retirement savings it handles and also 'difficult to find' in the organization's 2025 Annual Report, mentioned just once on the 23rd page of the report released Wednesday morning.
'Net-zero commitments are not optional. They have become essential tools to manage risk and maximize long-term financial returns for pension funds,' said Adam Scott, Shift Action's executive director, in a statement.
'In backing out of a promise to invest in line with its net-zero by 2050 commitment, CPPIB's management has failed to undertake its most fundamental purpose — to responsibly manage the long-term collective savings of working and retired Canadians.'
Climate's 'global GDP impact'
Shift Action pointed to studies showing climate impacts were already reducing global gross domestic project growth,' threatening the stability of financial markets, and disrupting lives and livelihoods' in Canada. 'If the climate crisis isn't addressed, experts have warned that pension funds like CPPIB are unlikely to generate the stable, future returns necessary to pay out their long-term obligations.'
Ortec Finance, a consultancy specializing in risk management for financial institutions, found in a report in November that pension funds' 'heavy reliance on high-risk assets,' including in the fossil fuels sector, could result in investment return declines of 'up to 44 per cent by 2050 if climate policies remain unaddressed.'
'Many different international net-zero standards for financial institutions exist. But instead of working to improve its climate strategy, CPPIB instead retreated from its net-zero commitment." Shift Action
Shift Action said the CPPIB's 'passive approach to climate is at odds with its role as an active investor' — and out of step with seven of Canada's largest pension funds, which are making 'ongoing improvements' in moving investment capital to net-zero-aligned strategies.
'CPPIB's retreat contrasts sharply with other Canadian pension funds that are staying the course on net-zero,' said Scott, noting that his organization's latest Canadian Pension Climate Report Card highlighted progressive investment portfolios being developed by the Caisse de Dépôt et Placement du Québec, Investment Management Corporation of Ontario, Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System and Ontario's University Pension Plan.
He added the CPP's report explained its decision to abandon net-zero targets with 'a vague mention of 'recent legal developments' — most likely a reference to amendments to the Competition Act enacted in June 2024 that are designed to address greenwashing.'
Shift Action said this could be read as acknowledging that the investmetn board of CPP, which is currently valued at almost $715 billion, knew its original net-zero statements 'weren't in line with internationally-recognized standards.'
'Many different international net-zero standards for financial institutions exist. But instead of working to improve its climate strategy, CPPIB instead retreated from its net-zero commitment,' said Scott.
'This appears to be a tacit recognition that the investment manager had been greenwashing its approach to climate.'
CPPIB had not replied to a request for comment as Canada's National Observer went to press.
However, CPPIB chief John Graham told The Globe and Mail that the apparent change in strategic direction was a response to "new considerations around how net-zero commitments are interpreted.'
'That caused us to change a little bit how we talk about it, but nothing's changed on what we're actually doing,' he said.
'Long-term perspective'
'We think it is really important to incorporate climate and incorporate sustainability into the portfolio when we take a long-term perspective and as a long-horizon investor.'
Canada's eleven largest pension fund managers together manage over $2.5 trillion in savings, according to latest calculations by Shift Action.
In its most recent pension climate report card, it concluded that while the sector was now building internal climate expertise and starting to help portfolio companies decarbonize by 'strengthening fossil fuel exclusions,' Shift Action said its number-crunching 'also exposes a troubling divergence between leading and lagging institutions.'
Last December, a Shift Action study into CPPIB's climate change investment strategy found its 'insistence' that continued investment in fossil fuel assets and infrastructure was needed 'in order to generate returns while decarbonizing these assets and reducing emissions in the real economy' was "fundamentally flawed' as it hinged on dubious definitions of 'decarbonization' and 'transition to lower-carbon business models.'
'CPPIB has not provided any credible explanation for how this 'decarbonization' could work for fossil fuels or how CPPIB's fossil fuel investments or partnerships with fossil fuel companies will amount to 'financing their emissions reductions,'' it said at the time.
'CPPIB also neglects to explain how these companies will 'transition to lower-carbon business models.'.' CPPIB committed at least $3.3 billion to new oil, gas, coal and pipeline assets in 2024 alone, according to Shift Action.
The fund finished the fiscal year with $714.4 billion in assets, up from $632.3 billion in 2024. CPPIB manages a global portfolio, with 12 per cent of its investments in Canada. Forty-seven per cent of assets are in the US, 19 per cent in Europe, 17 per cent in Asia Pacific and five per cent in Latin America.
CPPIB chief John Graham told The Globe & Mail that the apparent change in strategic direction was a response to "new considerations around how net-zero commitments are interpreted.'
'That caused us to change a little bit how we talk about it, but nothing's changed on what we're actually doing,' he said.
'We think it is really important to incorporate climate and incorporate sustainability into the portfolio when we take a long-term perspective and as a long-horizon investor.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

B.C. billionaire's plan to take over Bay leases facing legal battle
B.C. billionaire's plan to take over Bay leases facing legal battle

Global News

time5 hours ago

  • Global News

B.C. billionaire's plan to take over Bay leases facing legal battle

A group of Hudson's Bay's landlords don't want to transfer more than two dozen leases to British Columbia billionaire Ruby Liu, but the department store still has a chance to get its way. The Bay, which filed for creditor protection in March, ran a process over the last several months to find buyers for leases belonging to it and Saks Canada. It agreed to sell up to 28 spaces to Liu. Three leases were transferred to her without any hiccups because they're in B.C. malls she owns, but another 25 are at properties held by a who's who of Canadian commercial real estate firms. 2:00 What will Montreal do with the vacant Hudson's Bay building? Landlords for 23 of those sites oppose the transfer. Several have said in court they've been 'very troubled' with their interactions with Liu and have had 'no productive discussions, no meaningful disclosure.' Liu insists if the court hands her the leases, landlords will warm to her and her plan to open a new department store in their properties. Story continues below advertisement While the disagreement could serve as a roadblock to the Bay closing on its agreement with Liu, lawyers not involved in the case say the retailer has another route it can take to get a deal done. That route lies in changes to the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act — Canada's main insolvency law — made in 2009, said Jeff Lee, a Saskatoon-based partner at MLT Aikins LLP. The changes laid out three criteria courts must consider when asked to assign leases to a new tenant. The first is whether or not the sale has the support of the monitor, a court-appointed, independent third party which helps guide businesses through creditor protection. In the Bay's case, the monitor is Alvarez & Marsal. It has yet to reveal whether it supports the Liu deal and did not respond to requests for comment. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Before any court application is brought forward, typically the company will test that out with them,' Lee said. 'They're not going to just sort of fly in blind and hope for the best.' The second aspect for the court to mull is whether the proposed new tenant is suitable. Lee said that's determined by looking at whether they can perform the duties of the tenant and pay rent. Liu, who made her money in Chinese real estate, appears to have deep pockets, but her experience comes from being a landlord rather than a tenant. Story continues below advertisement 1:47 Nostalgic Vancouver shoppers flock to 'The Bay' on its final day The final aspect the court will consider is whether a transfer of a lease to Liu is 'appropriate.' Lee said people should think of it as asking this question: 'Is what's proposed for this post-assignment lease relationship what people signed up for, or are they seeking to rewrite the lease or change the playing field so radically that it's not appropriate?' That's where much of the tension could lie in the Bay case. 'You can't go into CCAA as a tenant and then force your landlords to renegotiate their leases as a result,' said Peter Tolensky, a Vancouver-based partner at Lawson Lundell LLP. The Canadian Press obtained a document last week that Liu's lawyer sent landlords outlining her plans. It says she will take on the leases on an 'as is, where is' basis but doesn't mention the dining, entertainment, children's and fitness experiences she's told media she'd like to include in her department stores. Story continues below advertisement It's unclear whether the leases allow for uses other than a Bay-like department store. A court faced with a request to reassign leases will weigh this context and think about whether 'the landlord's world is being turned upside down by having this new tenant,' said Geoffrey Dabbs, a B.C.-based founding partner at Gehlen Dabbs Cash. 'The more it's a minor inconvenience for the landlord, the more likely the judge will order it,' he said. While the Bay hasn't said whether it will seek an assignment, it's likely because any company in creditor protection has a duty to show the court it's doing its best to pay back companies and people it owes money to, Dabbs said. The Bay has a 26-page list of creditors, with some lenders owed more than $100 million each. 2:08 Hudson's Bay last day Liquidation sales and a deal to sell the Bay trademarks to Canadian Tire for $30 million have put a dent in what's owed but selling leases to Liu would also help. Story continues below advertisement Anyone who made an offer for leases had to make a deposit of 10 per cent of their estimated purchase price. Court documents show Liu made a deposit of $9.4 million, in addition to $6 million for the three approved leases, which would equate to a purchase price of $100 million for 28 leases. When a deal like this is reached, Dabbs said a company typically seeks landlord consent because commercial leases tend to have provisions stopping anyone from transferring a lease without a property owner agreeing. It's not uncommon for landlords to object because any leases that can't be sold and aren't assigned get turned back over to property owners who can choose how to fill them and under what terms. 'Remember, these are anchor leases, so they're probably very favourable to the Bay or to the tenant in a lot of respects,' said Tolensky, alluding to the fact that anchor tenants are often given attractive rents or terms. Thus, it's more advantageous for landlords to get their properties back, said Monica Beffa, founder of an Oakville, Ont., law firm. If they do, they can then charge higher rents, develop them for entirely new uses such as residential units or break them up into smaller parcels that can be rented by a wide array of tenants. If they don't and a court assigns the leases to Liu, landlords will likely be watching her closely to ensure she doesn't violate any terms of the agreement. Story continues below advertisement 'The landlord may be cranky, if the tenant breaches, but put it this way, they don't want to rely on that,' Dabbs said. 'If they don't want this lease being assigned, they will fight it right up front.'

Ottawa orders Chinese tech firm to close Canadian operations over national security
Ottawa orders Chinese tech firm to close Canadian operations over national security

Global News

time5 hours ago

  • Global News

Ottawa orders Chinese tech firm to close Canadian operations over national security

The federal government is ordering a Chinese maker of surveillance camera systems to shutter its Canadian business and leave the country over national security concerns. Industry Minister Mélanie Joly says in a post on X the orders issues to Hikvision Canada Inc. are the result of a national security review under the Investment Canada Act. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy As part of the review, Joly says the government looked at information and evidence provided by Canada's security and intelligence community. She says the government ultimately determined allowing the company to keep operating in Canada would be harmful for the country's national security. On top of ordering Hikvision Canada to shut down, Joly says she is also moving to ensure the federal government, its departments, agencies and Crown corporations do not use or purchase equipment from the company. Story continues below advertisement She says the government is also conducting a review of its properties to ensure legacy Hikvision products are not used going forward. She says the public should make note of these moves but stopped short of urging them to stop using Hikvision technology as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store