Louisiana to execute prisoner using nitrogen gas banned for animal euthanasia
The US state of Louisiana is set to carry out its first execution in 15 years using nitrogen gas, a method that is banned under the state's own laws for euthanizing cats and dogs.
Unless the US Supreme Court intervenes, Jessie Hoffman, a 46-year-old prisoner, is scheduled to be executed in Louisiana State Penitentiary, also known as Angola Prison.
Hoffman was sentenced to death for the 1996 rape and murder of advertising executive Mary Elliott.
If the execution proceeds, Louisiana will become only the second US state to use nitrogen gas for capital punishment.
Photo: Jessie Hoffman/ Jessie Hoffman legal team
Why Is nitrogen gas controversial?
Nitrogen gas causes death by suffocation, depriving the body of oxygen in a process called hypoxia. The method has been widely criticized as inhumane, even for animals.
The American Veterinary Medical Association states that nitrogen should not be used to euthanize conscious animals because they experience extreme distress before death.
Louisiana law explicitly bans nitrogen gas for euthanizing cats and dogs due to its inhumane nature.
A veterinarian in Louisiana, Dr. Lee Capone, recalled witnessing dogs being gassed in the 1980s and described it as horrific, with the animals showing fear, distress, and signs of suffering before they died.
Concerns over past executions using nitrogen gas
Louisiana's decision follows four recent executions in Alabama using the same method. Witnesses described disturbing scenes:
Kenneth Smith was seen shaking violently, writhing, and convulsing as he was forced to inhale nitrogen.
Alan Miller, another prisoner, shook and trembled for about two minutes before dying.
Critics argue that nitrogen gas causes immense suffering, making it a cruel and unusual punishment under international human rights standards.
Legal challenges and secret preparations
Hoffman was granted a temporary reprieve last week by a federal judge. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the most conservative courts in the US, overturned the stay on Friday, clearing the way for the execution.
Legal documents have revealed photographs from inside Louisiana's execution chamber, showing:
A blue industrial-style mask placed on the execution gurney alongside leather straps and handcuffs.
Pipes leading to nitrogen gas canisters, indicating how the lethal gas will be delivered
Did Louisiana obtain execution gas illegally?
Last year, three major US suppliers of medical-grade nitrogen—Airgas, Air Products, and Matheson Gas—banned the use of their products for executions.
Despite this, court documents show that Louisiana has acquired nitrogen gas produced by Airgas, a company owned by the French multinational Air Liquide. This appears to violate Airgas' own policy, which explicitly forbids supplying gas for executions.
The Guardian contacted Airgas for comment, but the company has yet to respond.
Growing international concern over US execution methods
The use of nitrogen gas for executions is drawing global criticism, with human rights groups and medical professionals warning against the suffering it causes. Many see Louisiana's decision as a step backward in human rights, especially considering that its use is banned for animals in the same state.
The fate of Jessie Hoffman now depends on last-minute legal appeals or intervention from the US Supreme Court before the execution scheduled for Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
French president Macron sues podcaster over claim France's first lady was born male
French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a defamation lawsuit in the U.S. on Wednesday against right-wing influencer and podcaster Candace Owens, centered on her claim that France's first lady is male. The Macrons said in a complaint filed in Delaware Superior Court that Owens has waged a lie-filled 'campaign of global humiliation' to promote her podcast and expand her 'frenzied' fan base. These lies included that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, the actual name of her older brother, the Macrons said. 'Owens has dissected their appearance, their marriage, their friends, their family, and their personal history — twisting it all into a grotesque narrative designed to inflame and degrade,' the complaint said. 'The result,' the complaint added, 'is relentless bullying on a worldwide scale.' In her podcast on Wednesday, Owens said, 'This lawsuit is littered with factual inaccuracies,' and part of an 'obvious and desperate public relations strategy' to smear her character. Owens also said she did not know a lawsuit was coming, though lawyers for both sides had been communicating since January. A spokesperson for Owens called the lawsuit itself an effort to bully her, after Brigitte Macron rejected Owens' repeated requests for an interview. 'This is a foreign government attacking the First Amendment rights of an American independent journalist,' the spokesperson said. In a joint statement released by their lawyers, the Macrons said they sued after Owens rejected three demands that she retract defamatory statements. 'Ms. Owens's campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families and to garner attention and notoriety,' the Macrons said. 'We gave her every opportunity to back away from these claims, but she refused.' High legal standard Wednesday's lawsuit is a rare case of a world leader suing for defamation. U.S. President Donald Trump has also turned to the courts, including in a $10 billion lawsuit accusing The Wall Street Journal of defaming him by claiming he created a lewd birthday greeting for disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. The Journal said it would defend against that case and had full confidence in its reporting. Macron to raise French defence targets, citing Russia threat In December, meanwhile, Trump reached a $15 million settlement with Walt Disney-owned ABC over an inaccurate claim that a jury found him liable for rape, rather than sexual assault, in a civil lawsuit. To prevail in U.S. defamation cases, public figures must show defendants engaged in 'actual malice,' a tough legal standard requiring proof the defendants knew what they published was false or had reckless disregard for its truth. Owens has more than 6.9 million followers on X and more than 4.5 million YouTube subscribers. Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan The Macrons' lawsuit focuses on the eight-part podcast 'Becoming Brigitte,' which has more than 2.3 million views on YouTube, and X posts linked to it. According to the Macrons, the series spread 'verifiably false and devastating lies,' including that Brigitte Macron stole another person's identity and transitioned to female, and that the Macrons are blood relatives committing incest. The complaint discusses circumstances under which the Macrons met, when the now 47-year-old president was a high school student and Brigitte was a teacher. It said their relationship 'remained within the bounds of the law.' According to the complaint, baseless speculation about Brigitte Macron's gender began surfacing in 2021, and the topic has been discussed on popular podcasts hosted by Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, who have many conservative followers. In September, Brigitte won a lawsuit in a French court against two women, including a self-described medium, who contributed to spreading rumors about her gender. An appeals court overturned that decision this month, and Brigitte Macron has appealed to France's highest court. The case is Macron et al v Owens et al, Delaware Superior Court, No. N25C-07-194.
Express Tribune
17 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Italy cracks down on fashion sector
A few unlawful businesses in the fashion supply chain have tainted the image of 'Made in Italy', Italy's industry minister said on Tuesday, adding that he is working on a certification scheme to remedy this after the latest high profile case. Cashmere company Loro Piana, controlled by French luxury group LVMH, was put under judicial administration last week after prosecutors uncovered evidence of worker abuses in its supply chain. The label was the fifth high-end brand to undergo such court monitoring in Italy since early 2024. "We cannot allow the illicit behaviour of a few to compromise the reputation of the entire sector, penalising many virtuous companies and, consequently, our Made in Italy brand, which is a symbol of excellence and quality," minister Adolfo Urso told fashion trade bodies during a meeting, according to a source. The ministry is working on a measure to certify the sustainability and legality of companies in the supply chain in advance, he added, so that brands do not have to answer for the conduct of their suppliers or subcontractors. Units of fashion brands Valentino, Dior, Armani and Italian handbag company Alviero Martini were previously placed under administration in Italy for similar alleged worker exploitation. In the case of Loro Piana, the Court of Milan found it "culpably failed" to adequately oversee its suppliers in order to pursue higher profits, according to the ruling. Prosecutors in that case said the violation of rules among fashion companies in Italy was "a generalised and consolidated manufacturing method". Italy is home to thousands of small manufacturers that make up 50 to 55 per cent of global luxury goods production, consultancy Bain has calculated. Italian legal and political authorities, fashion industry bodies and trade unions signed an action plan in May to fight worker exploitation in the apparel and accessories supply chain, after prosecutors uncovered widespread abuse. Reuters
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
France's culture minister to be tried on corruption charges
France's Culture Minister Rachida Dati is to go on trial accused of corruption and abuse of power while she was a European Parliament member, a judicial source told AFP on Tuesday. Dati, a high-profile minister who holds ambitions to become Paris mayor next year, was placed under investigation in 2019 on suspicion she lobbied for the Renault-Nissan car group while at the European Union institution. French investigating magistrates also ordered that Carlos Ghosn, the former Renault-Nissan chairman and chief executive, be tried, a judicial source said. Ghosn, 71, who has been living in Lebanon for years after escaping arrest in Japan, has rejected the charges against him. Dati, 59, also denies the allegations, and lashed out at some of the investigating magistrates on her case, accusing them of "trampling" on her rights. "I condemn magistrates who refuse to do their job according to the code of procedure," she told news channel LCI, denouncing what she called a case "marred by incidents". "I will not give up, on anything," added Dati, who is mayor of the French capital's seventh district, home to most French ministries, the country's parliament and many foreign embassies. Dati is accused of accepting 900,000 euros ($1 million) in lawyer's fees between 2010 and 2012 from a Netherlands-based subsidiary of Renault-Nissan, but not working for them, while she was an MEP from 2009 to 2019. Her lawyers told AFP they would appeal the decision to place her on trial. Dati, a daughter of working-class North African immigrants, has accused enemies of "trying to attack me over my private life". A powerful political player who was justice minister under right-wing leader Nicolas Sarkozy from 2007 to 2009, Dati will remain in the government, said an associate of President Emmanuel Macron. "The president has taken note of the decision to refer Rachida Dati to the criminal court. As a referral is not a conviction, she will continue her work," said the associate, speaking on condition of anonymity. Investigations have sought to determine whether she carried out banned lobbying for the carmaker at the European Parliament. Initially placed under the more favourable status of assisted witness — a step before being indicted — in 2019, Dati was charged in 2021.
