Acting President Lee: Education Must Shape Humanity In The AI Era
Jeju, Republic of Korea, 14 May 2025
Education ministers from 21 APEC economies are gathering in Jeju, Republic of Korea, today for the 7th APEC Education Ministerial Meeting, and reaffirming their shared commitment to bridging educational divides and fostering growth that benefits all people in the region through innovation and global cooperation.
Held under the theme 'Bridging Educational Gaps and Promoting Sustainable Growth in the Era of Digital Transformation: Innovate, Connect, Prosper,' the meeting comes at a moment of profound global change, as member economies confront the challenges of digital disruption, demographic shifts, climate change and widening inequalities.
'We are not simply witnessing ordinary changes—we are living through a monumental transformation in human civilization,' said Ju-Ho Lee, Acting President, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Education of the Republic of Korea, who chairs the meeting. 'Education is emerging not merely as a tool of economic competitiveness, but as a pillar of sustainable prosperity for the global community.'
In discussions throughout the day, ministers explore how digital transformation, particularly the rise of generative AI, is forcing a fundamental rethink of how education systems function and what they aim to achieve.
'What kind of human being are we truly seeking to nurture through education?' Acting President Lee posed. 'Today's students must cultivate the ability to think critically, define problems independently and seek creative solutions. Equally important is the nurturing of human values and a sense of responsibility as members of a global community.'
Korea introduces the AI Digital Textbook (AIDT), which supports learners in studying at their own pace and level, and empowers teachers to take on the role of learning designers and facilitators.
'This is more than the adoption of new tools,' said Acting President Lee. 'It is a bold and inclusive approach to unlock the potential of every learner and to transform classrooms into dynamic learning environments.'
Ministers emphasize that developing AI-powered content, modernizing assessment systems and enhancing digital skills among teachers are key areas for collaboration to ensure inclusive, high-quality education across the region.
The meeting also highlights the need for stronger cross-border partnerships to accelerate innovation and reduce educational inequality.
'Global cooperation in education is more critical than ever,' said Acting President Lee. 'We must share best practices, collaborate on policies and technologies, and work hand in hand to close persistent educational gaps.'
Ministers also underscores the importance of sharing AI-driven innovations, promoting teacher exchanges, strengthening regional learning networks and advancing digital inclusion initiatives as effective ways to reach underserved learners.
As APEC economies strive to build inclusive, future-ready societies, ministers reaffirm education's role as the foundation for economic resilience, social cohesion and long-term prosperity.
Korea shares its efforts to advance regional innovation ecosystems and digital lifelong learning systems in partnership with universities and local communities, helping all citizens adapt proactively to change.
'Education is not merely the transfer of knowledge. It is the most powerful instrument we have to design our shared future,' said Acting President Lee. 'As AI and digital technologies evolve at an unprecedented pace, we must ensure that the benefits of these advancements are distributed fairly and equitably across societies.'
Throughout the meeting, ministers are aligned on the need to adapt domestic education strategies to APEC-wide priorities and committed to strengthening collaboration through the Human Resources Development Working Group and other multilateral platforms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
19 hours ago
- Scoop
Final Weeks To Register Payment Preferences For 2025 Entrust Dividend
There's just two weeks left for more than 368,000 Aucklanders living in the Entrust District to update their payment preferences to receive this year's dividend. Eligible power account holders get to choose whether they want the dividend paid into their bank account, or as a credit to their power account, says Entrust Chair Denise Lee. 'Back in June we asked power account holders living in our district of central, east, and south Auckland to update their payment preferences for this year's dividend. 'The quickest way to update payment preferences is via Entrust's secure web platform. If everything is the same as last year, do nothing. 'We only want to hear from people if they want to change payment methods, update their bank account details, or if that section is blank. We need updated details from people by 5:00pm on Friday, 08 August,' says Ms Lee. The annual Entrust dividend, usually paid in late September provides a $120m+ cash injection to communities in central, east, and south Auckland. Since 1994, these communities have received more than $2 billion in dividends from Entrust that come from its majority ownership of listed energy company Vector. To be eligible for this year's dividend, you must be a power account holder connected to Vector's electricity network within the Entrust District as of the roll date. 'Entrust is pleased to be able to give back to our community through the dividend. For many people living in our district the dividend is a welcome windfall, and we're delighted to be able to make a small difference,' says Ms Lee. For those unsure about their eligibility for this payment, check out the map and list of eligibility criteria along with FAQs at or About Entrust: Entrust (formerly called the Auckland Energy Consumer Trust), is a private trust that owns the majority of Vector on behalf of its beneficiaries. Entrust owns 75.1% of shares in Vector which are held in trust for energy consumer beneficiaries in central, east, and south Auckland. These beneficiaries are paid a cash dividend each year, usually in late September. The organisation was created in 1993 to make sure power lines remained in the control of electricity consumers and was established under a trust deed on behalf of electricity consumers in the area previously served by the Auckland Electric Power Board.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Auckland councillors agree on desired helicopter saga outcome - but not how to get there
Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee has filed two motions of notice calling for the prohibition of private helicopters in residential neighbourhoods. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly A motion to block helicopters from Auckland's residential areas has become ensnared in a web of bureaucracy. Councillors gathered on Thursday to discuss Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee's two motions of notice calling for the prohibition of private helicopters in residential neighbourhoods. It comes after Auckland rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams were approved to build a helipad at their Westmere home , a decision now being challenged in the Environment Court . Councillor Lee's first motion urged the council to change the city's Unitary Plan to make private helipads in residential areas a prohibited activity city-wide. The second motion called for the same change, but only for the Hauraki Gulf Islands section of the council's District Plan. The second motion was passed by the council, though it would still need to be approved by the central government. However, the motion to change Auckland's Unitary Plan proved to be much more complicated. Council advisory staff said a city-wide ban would be too difficult to implement. It would require the council to seek permission from the Minister Responsible for RMA Reform Chris Bishop, a request many councillors believed he would decline. Councillor Richard Hills, chairing the meeting, instead proposed an amendment to Lee's motion requesting the council seek a declaration from the Environment Court to strengthen its case before approaching the Minister. "What I'm trying to do here is give us a chance," he told councillors. "You can bet when we have to go and beg to the minister to put through a plan change ... If we said we don't have staff backing and we don't think we have experts, there is no way the minister would say yes to that." Councillor Richard Hills proposed an amendment to one of the motions. Photo: Alexia Russell Councillor Lee described the amendment as an ambush. "There have been ample breaks in this meeting today and this obviously didn't fall out of the air, I would have appreciated the courtesy of some consultation," Lee said. "This outcome-by-ambush approach with no forewarning whatsoever is not going to help the reputation of the council." Speaking after the meeting, Hills said he felt proceeding without the amendment would have only led to disappointment. "We would be giving false hope to people if we went ahead, against advice, over a two year period and spent millions of dollars for an outcome that everything points to we wouldn't have had," he said. "It might make us feel good in the moment, but actually we have to try and get the best, clearest, strongest [outcome] as quick as possible." Councillor Shane Henderson said he voted in favour of the amendment because it was more likely to be approved by the minister. "We were kind of worried it would fail at the end of the day and we would be in a very difficult position," he said. "So we wanted to get something that was more practical and workable over the line." Lee disagreed with the others councillors' assertion that the minister would block the change. "The minister's intention is to stop councils spending a fortune on 10-year reviews of their district and regional plans, I don't think the minister would attempt to block plan changes which correct or modify the existing plan." He believed prohibiting helipads in residential areas was an obvious move and would bring Auckland more in line with its international counterparts. "Internationally, Auckland is an outlier. Just about all the major international cities strictly control or prohibit private use of helipads in residential areas." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
'Torches' and 'pitchforks': Rotorua council's turbulent water debate
Rotorua Lakes Council has thrashed out two proposals that will shape the city's future approach to water and treated wastewater services. But it was not straightforward in the meeting on Wednesday, with councillor Robert Lee's suggestion to dump treated wastewater into a stream rebuked by fellow councillors, and debates over mana whenua and te ao Māori principles. Rotorua's current wastewater system uses spray irrigation in the Whakarewarewa Forest under a temporary agreement until 2026. The council was voting on whether to establish a Recovered Water Working Group to assess alternatives and recommend a new permanent discharge method by early 2027. The vote was divided into two sections, with the criteria and values of a working group to consider as well as the weighting of those values. ADVERTISEMENT Lee labelled the process "overly complex and complicated" and any working group a "recipe for disaster". Councillor Robert Lee of Rotorua Lakes Council. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) He suggested a simple solution existed, which was to drain treated wastewater into Puarenga Stream. He said this would be the "cheapest solution" for ratepayers. Councillor Gregg Brown said that would be a "pretty quick" way to end up in the Environment Court. Councillor Don Paterson then suggested the people of Ngapuna would be "lighting torches and coming with pitchforks" should that be the plan. Councillor Conan O'Brien insisted a complete consensus on the issue was unlikely, before Mayor Tania Tapsell emphasised a need to go "above and beyond" to ensure all wastewater decision-making was made in the public eye. Rotorua Lakes Council Mayor Tania Tapsell. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) ADVERTISEMENT Councillor Lani Kereopa also expressed her concerns about the plan putting costs ahead of mana whenua engagement. She and Lee both voted against the criteria and values. Councillors were asked to vote on how to prioritise the outcomes the working group should focus on. One option gave more weight to financial and practical concerns, assigning 35% each to total lifecycle cost and implementation risk, while giving just 10% each to relationships with mana whenua, community acceptance and environmental outcomes. The alternative was to treat all five areas equally at 20% each. Most councillors supported the first option with the heavier weighting on cost and risk. However, Kereopa, Paterson and Trevor Maxwell voted against it, raising concerns that mana whenua engagement was being undervalued. Lee abstained. There was more heated debate as councillors confirmed the Water Services Delivery Plan. The plan, required by the Government's Local Water Done Well legislation, stated Rotorua would continue managing water services in-house until at least 2028. ADVERTISEMENT Meanwhile, the council would explore forming a joint water services organisation with neighbouring councils, then make a final service delivery model decision in 2027. Lee signalled an intention to abstain from voting, saying he was sceptical of the ability of a council-controlled organisation to deliver and of some wording around te ao Māori and mana whenua. He highlighted a recent agreement with Ngāti Kearoa-Ngāti Tuara over Karamū Tākina Springs, which supply 60% of the city's drinking water, saying it meant rates rises for constituents. Despite their concerns about changes being forced upon them by central government, Lee's abstention was rebuked by Brown and O'Brien. Councillor Gregg Brown. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) "For a mayoral candidate to sit on the fence is not great fella," said Brown. "Abstain? Come on. You've got all the information make a decision." "I won't be abstaining despite my concerns," said O'Brien. "Because I am here to make decisions. I believe that is why people put me here. Not just to blab, continue on and sit on the fence and not make a decision or follow principles." ADVERTISEMENT Lee suggested abstaining was one of three voting options, along with yes and no. 'Continuing bashing of Māori and iwi' Tapsell said his voting options were yes or no and that abstaining was considered a non-vote. The mayor praised council staff for putting together a "strategic document', which gave the council time and opportunity to decrease costs and ensure they make the right long-term decision. She then called out Lee for what she described as his "continuing bashing of Māori and iwi". Tapsell suggested the Karamū Tākina Springs agreement potentially saved a sum approaching $100 million. Lee's attempt to raise a point of order in response was shot down by Tapsell, who gave him one more chance to "please be quiet" to allow the meeting to continue. ADVERTISEMENT The motion then carried, with Lee abstaining and Paterson voting against – believing it was unfair Rotorua be treated the same as other areas with poorer performing water systems. Tapsell and Lee previously confirmed to Local Democracy Reporting they would run for mayor in the October election. By Matthew Nash, Local Democracy Reporter LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
