logo
Alcohol sales changed subtly after Canada legalized cannabis

Alcohol sales changed subtly after Canada legalized cannabis

Canada Standard21 hours ago
Before Canada legalized recreational cannabis in October 2018, it was unclear how the change might affect beverage alcohol consumption. Would consumers drink less or more after cannabis became legal?
Drinking might decrease, for example, if people used cannabis in place of alcohol. That switch potentially could reduce alcohol-related harms. But economically, it would mean any gains in the cannabis industry would likely come at the expense of alcohol producers.
Conversely, drinking might increase if people used alcohol along with cannabis. That could boost alcohol industry profits and government tax revenues, but at the cost of increased health risks of both substances.
In response to this uncertainty, some businesses diversified. One alcohol producer bought a cannabis grower, while a cannabis firm took took over several beer brewers.
Research from the United States into the relationship between alcohol and cannabis use is inconclusive. Some studies report that alcohol use decreased in states that allowed cannabis, while others said usage increased or didn't significantly change. Those conflicting conclusions might reflect the complex legal situation in the United States, where cannabis remains illegal under federal law, even in states that allow its use.
In Canada, some studies indicate alcohol consumption declined slightly as medical cannabis use became more common. Did similar decreases follow recreational legalization?
To investigate this question, I first collaborated with health science researchers Daniel Myran, Robert Talarico, Jennifer Xiao and Rachael MacDonald-Spracklin to study Canada's overall alcohol sales.
We started our research by examining annual alcohol sales from 2004 to 2022. During that period, beer sales gradually fell, while the sale of coolers and other drinks steadily rose. That left total sales basically unchanged.
So consumers were apparently switching from beer to other beverages. But there were no obvious effects from 2018's cannabis legalization.
We also compared monthly sales during the 12 months before legalization versus the 12 after. This included national average sales by liquor retailers and beer producers. In both cases, sales trends showed no significant changes in October 2018.
However, this research on Canada-wide sales was mainly designed to detect large changes. To find subtler ones, I focused on the province of Nova Scotia.
When Canada legalized cannabis, most provinces banned liquor stores from selling it to avoid tempting alcohol drinkers into trying cannabis.
Nova Scotia did the opposite. Its government-owned liquor corporation became the main cannabis retailer. After legalization in October 2018, most provincial liquor stores kept selling only alcohol, but some began selling cannabis as well.
This unique situation prompted me to study the province's sales. I focused on the 17 months before and 17 months after legalization.
The corporation's total alcohol sales initially fell in October 2018, then slowly regrew. As a result, monthly sales after legalization averaged about $500,000 below their earlier levels.
More interestingly, the changes differed between the cannabis-selling stores and the alcohol-only ones. At the alcohol-only stores, sales immediately fell. They averaged $800,000 below previous levels.
But at cannabis-sellers, alcohol sales began growing. Total monthly sales from October 2018 to February 2020 averaged $300,000 above earlier levels.
The divergence in sales was larger for beers than for spirits or wines.
Interestingly, alcohol-only stores located near cannabis-selling stores had changes similar to those located farther away, suggesting that cannabis-seller proximity didn't matter.
My data can't say why the sales split occurred, but I can speculate.
Consider the immediate sales drop at alcohol-only stores - this could suggest some consumers switched from alcohol to cannabis right after legalization.
Meanwhile, the lack of a drop at cannabis sellers might mean some consumers simply changed where they shopped. Instead of visiting their local alcohol-only retailer, they went to cannabis sellers to shop for alcohol and cannabis together.
The cannabis sellers' ongoing growth might reflect people increasingly buying cannabis from licensed stores instead of illegal dealers. They went to those stores to buy weed, but picked up some extra booze while they were there.
My research so far has focused on the initial post-legalization period, from October 2018 to February 2020.
I plan to study later periods next, when cannabis retailing was more widespread and perhaps more influential.
That will be more challenging, however, because COVID-19 arrived in March 2020. The pandemic disrupted sales of alcohol, though not of cannabis. It will be tricky to separate cannabis effects from pandemic ones, or from Canadian consumers' evolving drinking habits in general.
My guess is that cannabis legalization had little short-term impact on existing drinkers overall. Most Canadians didn't suddenly consume cannabis with their cabernet or replace vodka with vapes.
Instead, we might see gradual long-term shifts. Young Canadians now reach legal age in a context where cannabis and alcohol are both allowed. Some folks who previously would have started drinking alcohol might now choose cannabis instead, or in addition.
For now, alcohol drinking is still three times more common than cannabis use. Whether that continues, only time will tell.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Province warns of possible measles exposure at Winkler clinic, reports 14 more cases
Province warns of possible measles exposure at Winkler clinic, reports 14 more cases

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Province warns of possible measles exposure at Winkler clinic, reports 14 more cases

Manitoba public health officials are warning of possible measles exposure at a medical centre in Winkler, as the province also confirmed 14 new cases since its last update. Anyone who was in the Winkler Medical Clinic, located at 344 First St. in the southern Manitoba city, last Friday from 11:45 a.m. to 2:15 p.m is asked to monitor for symptoms until July 26, the province said in a Wednesday notice. According to the province's most recent data, also updated Wednesday, there were 14 new confirmed cases between June 29 and July 5, bringing the total number of confirmed measles infections to 130 so far this year. The number of cases spiked in May, with 72 reported. A total of 28 confirmed cases were reported in June. There have also been eight probable cases since the start of the year: four reported in April and four in June. Canada achieved measles elimination status in 1998, but imported cases have resulted in outbreaks that started in New Brunswick in October. From Dec. 29 to June 28, there had been 3,703 reported measles cases in Canada, according to the latest data from Health Canada. The highly infectious disease spreads through droplets formed in the air when someone coughs, sneezes or talks. Even a few minutes in the same space as a sick person poses infection risks, as the virus can linger on surfaces for two hours after an infected person leaves. Symptoms of measles generally appear seven to 21 days after exposure, and may include a fever, runny nose, drowsiness and red eyes, Manitoba Health says. Small white spots can also appear on the inside of the mouth or throat. Immunization is the only way to protect people from contracting measles, the province says. A two-dose measles vaccine program for measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (chickenpox) is routinely provided for kids at least one year old and again at age four to six in Manitoba. If a child is exposed to measles, the province said a second dose can be given earlier. Manitoba has expanded eligibility for vaccines to infants as young as six months old living in the Southern Health region and the Interlake-Eastern Regional Health Authority area. The province also extended vaccine eligibility to start at six months for children who were evacuated from their communities because of wildfires and who may be staying in southern Manitoba, where there have been measles outbreaks.

BREAKING: London, Ont. hospital sues former staff, contractors for $60M+ in alleged fraud and negligence
BREAKING: London, Ont. hospital sues former staff, contractors for $60M+ in alleged fraud and negligence

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

BREAKING: London, Ont. hospital sues former staff, contractors for $60M+ in alleged fraud and negligence

(L-R) Dipesh Patel, Neel Modi, Paresh Soni, Derek Lall, are all named in a fraud lawsuit by London Health Sciences Centre. London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) is suing several former employees and contractors, alleging a fraudulent scheme that defrauded the hospital of tens of millions of dollars over more than a decade. In a statement of claim filed in court, LHSC is first seeking $50-million in damages, plus an additional $1.5-million in punitive damages, against former executive Dipesh Patel, Derek Lall, and Neel Modi, as well as director of BH Contractors Paresh Soni and construction firms BH Contractors and GBI Construction. The hospital alleges the group conspired to manipulate procurement processes, submit fraudulent documents, inflate invoices, and improperly award contracts to companies with undisclosed conflicts of interest, actions LHSC believes amount to civil fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. Patel, who served as a senior executive overseeing facilities management between 2013 and 2024, is accused of being a central figure in the scheme. According to LHSC, Patel helped direct millions of dollars in contracts to companies linked to Soni, a close associate, without disclosing the conflict of interest. Patel was terminated in August 2024. Between 2015 and 2024, BH Contractors, which LHSC claims was controlled by Soni, received nearly $30-million in payments, including over $21 million for a window replacement project at University Hospital. LHSC alleges the bid for that project was irregular and non-compliant, and that BH inflated costs by about $10 million above independent estimates. In a separate instance, GBI Construction, also linked to Soni, allegedly invoiced LHSC more than $330,000 for services tied to an allegedly fictitious system. Between 2013 and 2024, LHCS alleges GBI received more than $11 million from the hospital. The hospital alleges the defendants used aliases and forged documents to secure contracts, including submitting falsified insurance and safety certifications. For example, in 2022, BH Contractors renewed its vendor-of-record status with documents allegedly signed by 'Paul Smith,' an alias LHSC says was used by Soni. The statement of claim also outlines what is believed to be suspicious real estate activity. Patel is said to have acquired or controlled at least 22 properties, 17 of which were purchased after BH won the University Hospital window contract. According to the statement of claim, Soni is linked to at least 43 properties valued at nearly $14 million, most acquired after GBI secured long-term contracts with LHSC. Modi and Lall, both former LHSC employees who reported to Patel, were also terminated — Modi for cause in February 2025 and Lall retroactively in April of the same year, due to their alleged involvement in the scheme. LHSC terminated its agreements with GBI and BH Contractors in September 2024 and June 2025, respectively. The hospital says it uncovered the alleged fraud in late 2024 during a probe into irregularities in procurement. The claim stated that full details of the alleged damages will be provided before trial but estimates current losses at approximately $50 million. The allegations have not yet been tested in court. LHSC sues ex-executives over alleged cover-up of fraud scheme In their second statement of claim, London Health Sciences Centre is also suing three former executives and a consulting firm for $10 million, alleging they ignored or concealed evidence of fraud that may have cost the hospital millions of dollars. LHSC filed a statement of claim in Ontario Superior Court, accusing former CEO Jackie Schleifer Taylor, former CFO Abhijeet Mukherjee, former executive Bradley Campbell, and consulting firm Corpus Sanchez International, of breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and willful misconduct. The lawsuit claims the defendants failed to act after being made aware of a confidential report in 2022 that raised concerns about possible fraud in hospital procurement and construction contracts. LHSC alleges the executives didn't inform the board, internal auditors, or external audit firm Ernst & Young about the allegations. Instead, the statement claims, the accused allowed staff implicated in the report to oversee an internal cost review that made no mention of the suspected wrongdoing. The hospital further alleges that Schleifer Taylor and Mukherjee signed audit representations falsely affirming there were no known issues of fraud, in breach of professional and legal standards. The defendants are jointly and severally liable, according to the claim, and the hospital is seeking to recover employment compensation paid to them, plus $100,000 in punitive damages. None of the allegations have been proven in court, and no statements of defense have been filed.

Fredericton creates strategy to recruit more family doctors
Fredericton creates strategy to recruit more family doctors

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Fredericton creates strategy to recruit more family doctors

The City of Fredericton is supporting provincial efforts to attract more doctors with a welcome strategy that targets family medicine residents and medical students. The welcome strategy highlights the city's close community and quality of life through information and activities. The city's goal is to support Horizon Health Network and the Department of Health hire and retain more professionals in Fredericton. The initiative first began in 2021, but recently videos highlighting the benefits of living and working in the Fredericton region have been an added element. 'What new graduates want, and we've learnt from them, is what we are offering is collaborative practices,' said Health Minister John Dornan. 'Where you can work with other new graduates, senior graduates, mid-career graduates, as well as other care providers, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, physiotherapists.' Nearly four in 10 New Brunswickers currently living in the province's Health Zone 3, don't have access to primary care. 'The City of Fredericton resides in Health Zone 3, where only 63.5% of provincial population reported having access to a primary health care provider in 2024 according to the New Brunswick Health Council. The provincial average is 77.2 per cent,' a news release from the city said. In addition to provincial partners, the city is working with: 'As municipal leaders, we hear firsthand how the lack of access to primary care is impacting our residents and our local economy,' Mayor Kate Rogers said. 'Becoming engaged on the physician attraction file through promoting all our city has to offer is one way to support provincial partners as they work to recruit more healthcare professionals to the Fredericton region.' Fredericton city council contributed $10,000 earlier this year to the New Brunswick Medical Education Foundation to support scholarships for two family medicine residents who commit to working in Fredericton. With files from Avery MacRae For more New Brunswick news, visit our dedicated provincial page.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store