Man arrested after Utah 'No Kings' rally shooting is released as investigation continues
Salt Lake District Attorney Sim Gill's office said Friday that it was unable to make a decision on charges against Arturo Gamboa, who had been jailed on suspicion of murder following the June 14 shooting.
Salt Lake City police had said Gamboa brought an assault-style rifle to the rally and was allegedly moving toward the crowd with the weapon raised when a safety volunteer for the event fired three shots, wounding Gamboa and killing a nearby demonstrator, Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.
Gamboa did not fire his rifle and it is unclear what he intended to do with it. His father Albert Gamboa, told The Associated Press earlier this week that his son was 'an innocent guy' who was 'in the wrong place at the wrong time.'
Utah is an open-carry state, meaning people who can legally own a firearm are generally allowed to carry it on a public street. The volunteer has not been publicly identified as investigators have worked to determine who was at fault.
Judge James Blanch said in the release order that Gamboa must live with his father and is forbidden from possessing firearms. The conditions terminate after two months or if criminal charges against him are pursued, Blanch wrote.
Gamboa's attorney, Greg Skordas, did not immediately respond to a telephone message left for him seeking comment.
Police said the day after the shooting that witnesses reported seeing Gamboa lift the rifle when he was ordered to drop it and that instead he began running toward the crowd. He fled but was arrested nearby, accused of creating the dangerous situation that led to Ah Loo's death.
Salt Lake City police said in a statement the next day that Gamboa 'knowingly engaged in conduct ... that ultimately caused the death of an innocent community member.'
But three days after Gamboa was booked into jail, with no formal charges filed, police acknowledged that the circumstances surrounding the shooting remained uncertain. They issued a public appeal for any video footage related to the shooting or Gamboa, and said detectives were still trying 'to piece together exactly what happened.'
The volunteer who confronted Gamboa was described by event organizers as a military veteran whose role as a safety volunteer was to maintain order.
Experts say it's extremely rare for such individuals, often called safety marshals, to be armed. They typically rely on calm demeanor, communication and relationships with police and protesters to help keep order, said Edward Maguire, an Arizona State University criminology and criminal justice professor.
Police said the permit for the protest did not specify that there would be armed security.
Protest organizers have not said whether or how the safety volunteer who shot Ah Loo was trained or explained why he was armed. All attendees, including those in safety roles, were asked not to bring weapons, according to Sarah Parker, a national coordinator for the 50501 Movement. Parker's organization on Thursday said it was disassociating from a local chapter of the group that helped organize the Utah protest.
The demonstration involving some 18,000 people was otherwise peaceful. It was one of hundreds nationwide against President Donald Trump's military parade in Washington, which marked the Army's 250th anniversary and coincided with Trump's birthday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Giuffre family asks Trump not to pardon Maxwell
The family of one of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's victims has asked US President Donald Trump not to consider pardoning the late financier's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. "Ghislaine Maxwell is a monster who deserves to rot in prison for the rest of her life," said the family of the late Virginia Giuffre. Their statement also questioned Trump's recent remark that Epstein "stole people that worked for me", including Giuffre, who was once an employee at the president's Florida golf club, has recently faced questions over his historical friendship with Epstein, including whether he might pardon Maxwell. He has never been accused of any criminal wrongdoing in the matter. The BBC has contacted the White House for comment on the Giuffre family a statement, family members Sky and Amanda Roberts and Danny and Lanette Wilson said they were still "reeling" from Giuffre's suicide in made his allegation that Epstein had poached his employees during remarks to reporters on board Air Force One on said one of that group had been Giuffre. Giuffre had said in a 2016 court deposition that she began working at Mar-a-Lago in the summer of 2000, when she was their statement, her family members said they "would like to clarify" that their sister was "preyed upon" by Maxwell during her time working for Trump. They said this was in 2000, four years before Trump and Epstein reportedly fell out."It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago," wrote the family. "It makes us ask if he was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal actions." Giuffre's family also condemned federal prosecutors for recently holding meetings with Maxwell at the Florida jail where she is serving a 20-year sentence. They said Maxwell had already been convicted for lying under oath and "will continue to do so for as long as it affects her position"."A predator who thought only of herself, she destroyed the lives of girls and young women without conscience," Giuffre's family said."Virginia always said that Ghislaine Maxwell was vicious and could often be more cruel than Epstein."They also said Giuffre's ordeal had continued as she helped prosecutors."She endured death threats, threats against the lives of her children and family, financial ruin, and her physical and mental well-being were destroyed," they called on Trump to "never consider giving Ghislaine Maxwell any leniency".The statement ended: "She must remain in prison – anything less would go down in history as being one of the highest travesties of justice." Last week, Trump was asked whether he was considering granting clemency to Maxwell. He said he had "not thought" about is being interviewed by justice department officials as part of an effort by the Trump administration to quell the backlash it has faced over its handling of files relating to former British socialite recently spent two days in talks with the department's second-highest ranking official, Todd Blanche. Maxwell's lawyers have said she is willing to testify to Congress if she is granted immunity from future Trump administration has faced pressure to release files related to Epstein after failing to disclose a rumoured client list of the disgraced 2006, Epstein was indicted in Florida for solicitation of prostitution and later pleaded guilty to the charges. He was arrested in 2019 over federal charges of sex trafficking, and died by suicide in prison before his trial. The White House has said that Trump banned Epstein from his club because he was a "creep". Other reports say they fell out in 2004 over a Palm Beach oceanfront property when Trump ultimately outbid Epstein for the real estate.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Virginia council member attacked and set on fire
A councilman in Danville, Virginia, was attacked and set on fire on Wednesday over what police are describing as a 'personal matter' not related to his position or politics. According to a statement released by the Danville police department, the councilman, Lee Vogler, 38, was attacked at the offices of a local magazine, where he is also employed. The police said officers were dispatched at about 11.30am after receiving a report that a man had been set on fire. Witnesses told police that the suspect 'entered into the victim's place of employment, confronted him and doused him with a flammable liquid'. Then, witnesses said Vogler and the suspect 'exited the building, where the suspect then set the victim on fire'. The suspect then reportedly fled the scene, and witnesses provided a description of the suspect and his vehicle to the responding officers. Police said officers located and stopped the vehicle several blocks from the incident, and the driver was taken into custody. The driver, identified by the police as Shotsie Michael Buck Hayes, 29, of Danville, was identified as the suspect in the attack. In the statement, the police said: 'Based on the investigation at the time of this release, the victim and the suspect are known to each other and the attack stems from a personal matter not related to the victim's position on Danville city council or any other political affiliation.' The full extent of Vogler's injuries were not known, the police said on Wednesday afternoon. The Danville fire department and the Danville Life Saving Crew also responded to the scene to render aid, police said. Vogler was airlifted to a regional medical facility for treatment. The police department added that 'due to the ongoing investigation, the Danville police department will not provide any further details about the incident itself. However, charge information will be forthcoming.' The news was first reported by Andrew Brooks, the publisher and owner of Showcase magazine, the publication where Vogler works, who posted a video on Facebook stating that Vogler had been attacked in the magazine's offices. 'An individual forced his way into to our office, carrying a five-gallon bucket of gasoline, and poured the gasoline on Lee,' Brooks said. 'Lee attempted to flee and ran in front of the building. The individual followed him and set him on fire.' Brooks said Vogler was awake and talking and that he was en route to the burn center in Lynchburg. 'Our hearts and prayers are with him,' Brooks said, adding that he and his colleagues were cooperating with the local police. 'This type of senseless act of violence has to stop,' Brooks said. 'You do not have the right as a human being to get upset with someone enough to lash out and attempt to harm them in any way, much less this way.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Diddy files motion to overturn two prostitution convictions or demand a new trial
Sean ' Diddy ' Combs and his defence team are trying to overturn two prostitution convictions, saying that if the motion is unsuccessful, they will demand a new trial. The disgraced rap mogul has asked that his conviction for prostitution-related offenses under the federal Mann Act be changed to an acquittal, according to documents obtained by TMZ. The Mann Act involves transporting someone across state lines for sex. But, Diddy's lawyers says they believe he's the only person ever convicted under this statute who did not make money off prostitution, did not have sex with an alleged prostitute, and did not arrange the prostitute's transportation. They claim this means the 55-year-old has not done any of the things stipulated in the Mann Act. During the trial, none of the sex workers, nor Cassie Ventura or 'Jane' testified Diddy had sex with the hired escorts. They all said he was either observing and/or filming the so called 'freak-off' sessions while the women had sex with the sex workers. Testimony also revealed it was usually the women, not Diddy, who made travel and hotel arrangements for the hired escorts involved. Diddy's defence team also point out that his sexual involvement was basically voyeurism, and highlight 'multiple state courts have held that paying for voyeurism - to watch other people have sex - is not prostitution.' The rapper also says the male sex workers they hired were not only consenting, but they 'enjoyed the activities and had friendships with [Cassie and 'Jane'] and were not merely traveling to have sex for money.' Finally, Diddy says the freak-offs were protected under the First Amendment, because they were 'producing amateur pornography for later private viewing.' Diddy's defence team say if the court does not overturn his Mann Act convictions he deserves a new trial, where only evidence related to those counts is admitted. His lawyers say this would not include the video of Diddy beating his then-girlfriend Ventura. According to the documents the clip was only admitted in his trial because of the RICO and sex trafficking charges of which he's been cleared. The Mann Act involves transporting someone across state lines for the purpose of sex. But, Diddy's team says they believe he's the only person ever convicted under this statute who did not make money off prostitution, did not have sex with an alleged prostitute and did not arrange the prostitute's transportation And, if Diddy were facing the Mann Act charges alone, the footage wouldn't be relevant and could be unfairly prejudicial. It comes as Donald Trump is 'seriously considering' a pardon for Sean 'Diddy' Combs as the disgraced rap mogul awaits his sentencing in a Brooklyn jail. As the judge prepares his punishment for the former producer over prostitution charges, a source told Deadline that Trump has been mulling the reprieve. Diddy has been acquitted on three of his most serious charges. Insiders told the outlet that the idea had advanced from 'just another Trump weave to an actionable event.' The mogul was found not-guilty of sex-trafficking and racketeering earlier this month, but was convicted of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs is set to receive his sentencing on October 3 and faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. A presidential pardon has been talked of since the beginning of Combs' trial, and Trump even indicated in May that he was open to the idea. The President said, when asked on the matter in the Oval Office, that 'nobody's asked but I know people are thinking about it.' 'I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking,' he added. 'First of all, I'd look at what's happening. And I haven't been watching it too closely, although it's certainly getting a lot of coverage,' Trump continued. 'I haven't seen him, I haven't spoken to him in years. He used to really like me a lot, but I think when I ran for politics he sort of, that relationship busted up from what I read. I don't know. He didn't tell me that, but I'd read some nasty statements in the paper all of a sudden.' 'So, I don't know. I would certainly look at the facts. if I think somebody was mistreated, whether they like me or don't like me it wouldn't have any impact,' he concluded.
