HHS eliminates CDC staff who made sure birth control is safe for women at risk
The Texas mother of two was diagnosed with a rare and potentially fatal heart condition after having her second child. In addition to avoiding another pregnancy that could be life-threatening, Henderson has to make sure the contraception she uses doesn't jeopardize her health.
For more than a decade, a small team of people at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention worked to do just that, issuing national guidelines for clinicians on how to prescribe contraception safely for millions of women with underlying medical conditions — including heart disease, lupus, sickle cell disease, and obesity. But the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, fired those workers as part of the Trump administration's rapid downsizing of the federal workforce.
It also decimated the CDC's larger Division of Reproductive Health, where the team was housed — a move that clinicians, advocacy groups, and fired workers say will endanger the health of women and their babies.
Clinicians said in interviews that counseling patients about birth control and prescribing it is relatively straightforward. But for women with conditions that put them at higher risk of serious health complications, special care is needed.
"We really were the only source of safety monitoring in this country," said one fired CDC staffer who worked on the guidelines, known as the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, or MEC. "There's no one who can actually do this work." KFF Health News agreed not to name this worker and others who were not authorized to speak to the press and feared retaliation.
The stakes are high for people like Henderson. About six weeks after having her second baby, she said, her heart "was racing."
Brianna Henderson poses for a portrait with her husband, Tech Henderson, and children, Rafael Bowens Jr. and Talaycia Henderson, outside their home in Grandview, Texas, on Tuesday, June 17, 2025. Brianna Henderson has become an advocate for educating women about peripartum cardiomyopathy, the rare and potentially fatal heart condition she was diagnosed with after the birth of her second child.
Desiree Rios for KFF Health News
"I feel like I'm underwater," Henderson said. "I felt like I couldn't breathe." She eventually went to the hospital, where she was told she was "in full-blown heart failure," she said.
Henderson was diagnosed with peripartum cardiomyopathy, an uncommon type of heart failure that can happen toward the end of pregnancy or shortly after giving birth. Risk factors for the condition include being at least 30 years old, being of African descent, high blood pressure, and obesity.
The CDC contraception guidelines say that combined hormonal contraception, which contains both estrogen and progestin to prevent pregnancy, can pose an "unacceptable health risk" for most women with peripartum cardiomyopathy, also known as PPCM. For some women with the diagnosis, a birth control injection commonly known by the brand name Depo-Provera also carries risks that outweigh its benefits, the guidelines show. Progestin-only pills or a birth control implant, inserted into a person's arm, are the safest.
Henderson said her cardiologist had to greenlight which contraception she could use. She uses a progestin-only birth control implant that's more than 99% effective in preventing pregnancy.
"I didn't know that certain things can cause blood clots," Henderson said, "or make your heart failure worse." Heart failure is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity in the U.S., with PPCM accounting for up to 70% of heart failure cases during pregnancy.
Sweeping HHS layoffs in late March and early April gutted the CDC's reproductive health division, upending several programs designed to protect women and infants, three fired workers said.
About two-thirds of the division's roughly 165 employees and contractors were cut, through firings, retirements, or reassignments to other parts of the agency, one worker said.
Among those fired were CDC staffers who carried out the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a survey established nearly 40 years ago to improve maternal and infant health outcomes by asking detailed questions of women who recently gave birth. The survey was used "to help inform and help reduce the contributing factors that cause maternal mortality and morbidity," one fired worker said, by allowing government workers to examine the medical care people received before and during pregnancy, if any, and other risk factors that may lead to poor maternal and child health.
The firings also removed CDC workers who collected and analyzed data on in vitro fertilization and other fertility treatments.
"They left nothing behind," one worker said.
U.S. contraception guidelines were first published in 2010, after the CDC adapted guidance developed by the World Health Organization. The latest version was published in August 2024. It includes information about the safety of different types of contraception for more than 60 medical conditions. Clinicians said it is the premier source of evidence about the safety of birth control.
"It gave us so much information which was not available to clinicians at their fingertips," said Michael Policar, a physician and professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive sciences at the University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine.
"If you've got a person with, let's say, long-standing Type 2 diabetes, someone who has a connective-tissue disease like lupus, someone who's got hypertension or maybe has been treated for a precursor to breast cancer — something like that? In those circumstances," Policar said, "before the MEC it was really hard to know how to manage those people."
The CDC updates the guidelines comprehensively roughly every five years. On a weekly basis, however, government workers would monitor evidence about patients' use of contraception and the safety of various methods, something they were doing when HHS abruptly fired them this spring, two fired workers said. That work isn't happening now, one of them said.
Sometimes the agency would issue interim changes outside the larger updates if new evidence warranted it. Now, if something new or urgent comes up, "there's not going to be any way to update the guidelines," one fired worker said.
In 2020, for example, the CDC revised its contraception recommendations for women at high risk of HIV infection, after new evidence showed that various methods were safer than previously thought.
HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard declined to say why CDC personnel working on the contraception guidelines and other reproductive health issues were fired, or answer other questions raised by KFF Health News' reporting.
Most women of reproductive age in the U.S. use contraception. CDC data from 2019, the most recent available, shows that more than 47 million women ages 15 to 49 relied on birth control. About 1 in 10 used long-acting methods such as intrauterine devices and implants; 1 in 7 used oral contraception.
The latest guidelines included updated safety recommendations for women who have sickle cell disease, lupus, or PPCM, and those who are breastfeeding, among others. Clinicians are now being told that combined hormonal contraception poses an unacceptable health risk for women with sickle cell disease, because it might increase the risk of blood clots.
"It can really come down to life or death," said Teonna Woolford, CEO of the Sickle Cell Reproductive Health Education Directive, a nonprofit that advocates for improved reproductive health care for people with the disease.
"We really saw the CDC guidelines as a win, as a victory — they're actually going to pay attention," she said.
The 2024 guidelines also for the first time included birth control recommendations for women with chronic kidney disease. Research has shown that such women are at higher risk of serious pregnancy complications, including preeclampsia and preterm delivery. Their medical condition also increases their risk of blood clots, which is why it's important for them to not use combined hormonal contraception, fired CDC workers and clinicians said.
The CDC information "is the final say in safety," said Patty Cason, a family nurse practitioner and president of Envision Sexual and Reproductive Health. Having only static information about the safety of various types of birth control is "very scary," she said, because new evidence could come out and entirely new methods of contraception are being developed.
Henderson said it took her heart two years to recover. She created the nonprofit organization Let's Talk PPCM to educate women about the type of heart failure she was diagnosed with, including what forms of birth control are safe.
"We don't want blood clots, worsening heart failures," Henderson said. "They already feel like they can't trust their doctors, and we don't need extra."
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
17 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
HHS eliminates CDC staff who made sure birth control is safe for women at risk
For Brianna Henderson, birth control isn't just about preventing pregnancy. The Texas mother of two was diagnosed with a rare and potentially fatal heart condition after having her second child. In addition to avoiding another pregnancy that could be life-threatening, Henderson has to make sure the contraception she uses doesn't jeopardize her health. For more than a decade, a small team of people at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention worked to do just that, issuing national guidelines for clinicians on how to prescribe contraception safely for millions of women with underlying medical conditions - including heart disease, lupus, sickle cell disease, and obesity. But the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, fired those workers as part of the Trump administration's rapid downsizing of the federal workforce. It also decimated the CDC's larger Division of Reproductive Health, where the team was housed - a move that clinicians, advocacy groups, and fired workers say will endanger the health of women and their babies. Clinicians said in interviews that counseling patients about birth control and prescribing it is relatively straightforward. But for women with conditions that put them at higher risk of serious health complications, special care is needed. "We really were the only source of safety monitoring in this country," said one fired CDC staffer who worked on the guidelines, known as the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, or MEC. "There's no one who can actually do this work." KFF Health News agreed not to name this worker and others who were not authorized to speak to the press and feared retaliation. The stakes are high for people like Henderson. About six weeks after having her second baby, she said, her heart "was racing." "I feel like I'm underwater," Henderson said. "I felt like I couldn't breathe." She eventually went to the hospital, where she was told she was "in full-blown heart failure," she said. Henderson was diagnosed with peripartum cardiomyopathy, an uncommon type of heart failure that can happen toward the end of pregnancy or shortly after giving birth. Risk factors for the condition include being at least 30 years old, being of African descent, high blood pressure, and obesity. The CDC contraception guidelines say that combined hormonal contraception, which contains both estrogen and progestin to prevent pregnancy, can pose an "unacceptable health risk" for most women with peripartum cardiomyopathy, also known as PPCM. For some women with the diagnosis, a birth control injection commonly known by the brand name Depo-Provera also carries risks that outweigh its benefits, the guidelines show. Progestin-only pills or a birth control implant, inserted into an arm, are the safest. Henderson said her cardiologist had to greenlight which contraception she could use. She uses a progestin-only birth control implant that's more than 99% effective at preventing pregnancy. "I didn't know that certain things can cause blood clots," Henderson said, "or make your heart failure worse." Heart failure is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity in the U.S., with PPCM accounting for up to 70% of heart failure cases during pregnancy. Sweeping HHS layoffs in late March and early April gutted the CDC's reproductive health division, upending several programs designed to protect women and infants, three fired workers said. About two-thirds of the division's roughly 165 employees and contractors were cut, through firings, retirements, or reassignments to other parts of the agency, one worker said. Among those fired were CDC staffers who carried out the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a survey established nearly 40 years ago to improve maternal and infant health outcomes by asking detailed questions of women who recently gave birth. The survey was used "to help inform and help reduce the contributing factors that cause maternal mortality and morbidity," a fired worker said, by allowing government workers to examine the medical care people received before and during pregnancy, if any, and other risk factors that may lead to poor maternal and child health. The firings also removed CDC workers who collected and analyzed data on in vitro fertilization and other fertility treatments. "They left nothing behind," one worker said. U.S. contraception guidelines were first published in 2010, after the CDC adapted guidance developed by the World Health Organization. The latest version was published last August. It includes information about the safety of different types of contraception for more than 60 medical conditions. Clinicians said it is the premier source of evidence about the safety of birth control. "It gave us so much information which was not available to clinicians at their fingertips," said Michael Policar, a physician and professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive sciences at the University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine. "If you've got a person with, let's say, long-standing Type 2 diabetes, someone who has a connective-tissue disease like lupus, someone who's got hypertension or maybe has been treated for a precursor to breast cancer - something like that? In those circumstances," Policar said, "before the MEC it was really hard to know how to manage those people." The CDC updates the guidelines comprehensively roughly every five years. On a weekly basis, however, government workers would monitor evidence about patients' use of contraception and the safety of various methods, something they were doing when HHS abruptly fired them this spring, two fired workers said. That work isn't happening now, one of them said. Sometimes the agency would issue interim changes outside the larger updates if new evidence warranted it. Now, if something new or urgent comes up, "there's not going to be any way to update the guidelines," one fired worker said. In 2020, for example, the CDC revised its contraception recommendations for women at high risk of HIV infection, after new evidence showed that various methods were safer than previously thought. HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard declined to say why CDC personnel working on the contraception guidelines and other reproductive health issues were fired, or answer other questions raised by KFF Health News' reporting. Most women of reproductive age in the U.S. use contraception. CDC data from 2019, the most recent available, shows that more than 47 million women ages 15 to 49 relied on birth control. About 1 in 10 used long-acting methods such as intrauterine devices and implants; 1 in 7 used oral contraception. The latest guidelines included updated safety recommendations for women who have sickle cell disease, lupus, or PPCM, and those who are breastfeeding, among others. Clinicians are now being told that combined hormonal contraception poses an unacceptable health risk for women with sickle cell disease, because it might increase the risk of blood clots. "It can really come down to life or death," said Teonna Woolford, CEO of the Sickle Cell Reproductive Health Education Directive, a nonprofit that advocates for improved reproductive health care for people with the disease. "We really saw the CDC guidelines as a win, as a victory - they're actually going to pay attention," she said. The 2024 guidelines also for the first time included birth control recommendations for women with chronic kidney disease. Research has shown that such women are at higher risk of serious pregnancy complications, including preeclampsia and preterm delivery. Their medical condition also increases their risk of blood clots, which is why it's important for them not to use combined hormonal contraception, fired CDC workers and clinicians said. The CDC information "is the final say in safety," said Patty Cason, a family nurse practitioner and president of Envision Sexual and Reproductive Health. Having only static information about the safety of various types of birth control is "very scary," she said, because new evidence could come out and entirely new methods of contraception are being developed. Henderson said it took her heart two years to recover. She created the nonprofit organization Let's Talk PPCM to educate women about the type of heart failure she was diagnosed with, including what forms of birth control are safe. "We don't want blood clots, worsening heart failures," Henderson said. "They already feel like they can't trust their doctors, and we don't need extra." ____ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Medscape
40 minutes ago
- Medscape
Emotional Response to Music May Enhance Memory Specificity
Music that evokes an emotional response may influence the specificity of memory recall, new research suggests. Investigators found that participants who were shown a series of images of everyday items before listening to music were more likely to remember only general details of the photos if they experienced a more emotional response to the music, while those who had a moderate emotional response were more likely to recall specific details. Stephanie L. Leal, PhD 'Most people think that emotional things are better remembered, but they actually aren't. It's just parts of the memory that are affected, not the whole memory,' co-investigator Stephanie L. Leal, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Integrative Biology & Physiology at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), told Medscape Medical News . 'One size doesn't fit all when it comes to music and memory.' Interestingly, familiarity with a song was not associated with either general or detailed memory. 'We played the same songs for everybody, but importantly, everyone responded differently. So I think personalization and taking individual preferences into account is going to be important for interventions,' said Leal, who is also director of the Neuroscience of Memory, Mood, and Aging Laboratory at UCLA. The findings were published online on July 23 in The Journal of Neuroscience . Memory Complexities As previously reported by Medscape Medical News , previous research has shown that both music appreciation and participations are tied to improvement in executive function and memory. For this study, researchers wanted to dive into the complexities of memory, including the possible connection between music and differing aspects of memory. 'We tend to remember more of the gist of something emotional that happened and not as much of the details. So we wanted to see if music could boost certain parts of memory but not all of the parts,' she said. Many previous music studies have included older individuals, especially those with dementia. For this project, investigators chose instead to assess a younger population because they wanted to use their data as a 'baseline' before moving on to further research in groups that are older and/or have impaired conditions such as depression or Alzheimer's disease, Leal said. 'We wanted to see what happens in healthy people first and then apply it to other populations,' she said. The study included 130 healthy undergraduate students between the ages of 18 and 35 years from Rice University, Houston. During the initial phase of memory formation — called the 'encoding' phase — each participant was shown 128 images of common household objects and asked to choose whether the object should be considered as an indoor or outdoor item. Participants then donned headphones and listened to 10 minutes of classical music pieces, ambient soundscapes, or silence while they filled out questionnaires about their medical history. After the music ended, participants spent about 20 minutes filling out additional questionnaires, including a rating of the music or sounds they heard on the basis of emotional arousal, positive or negative reaction, or familiarity. They then viewed a set of 192 images that included some they hadn't seen before (foils) and others that were identical (targets) or similar (lures) to the photos viewed earlier. Participants were asked to classify an image as old or new, allowing the researchers to measure target recognition — a measure of general memory — or lure discrimination — a measure of detailed memory. Big-Picture Recall General recall of the images was greater among those who experienced either low or high emotional response to music than among those who experienced moderate changes in emotional arousal ( P for both < .001). More detailed memories were reported by those who reported only a moderate emotional response to music than those who reported a low or high emotional response ( P for both < .001). There were no significant associations between memory of the images and song familiarity or whether a song was happy or sad. 'Overall, music modulated both general and detailed memory, but individual differences in emotional response were crucial — participants listened to the same music yet responded differently,' the investigators wrote. 'These findings suggest that music interventions may not uniformly enhance memory, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches in treating memory and mood impairments,' they added. The research suggests that a high emotional response may cloud details more than a moderate response. 'Yes, the idea is that if something is very emotionally arousing, maybe we don't want to remember the details associated with it. Maybe we just want to remember that general feeling or the bigger impact of that event, whether it's positive or negative,' Leal said. 'Maybe we just want to take the 'big picture' from that.' Early Days Commenting on the findings for Medscape Medical News , Daniel L. Bowling, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, noted that the study 'follows the general trend' of research that breaks down large concepts, such as memory, into specific features. Daniel L. Bowling, PhD Bowling, who is also director of the Music and Brain Health Lab at Stanford, was not involved with the current study. 'This showed different levels of responses to music that were differentially related to varying types of memory that you might want to target,' Bowling said. For example, if a clinician's purpose is cognitive training, with more of an emphasis on details, 'you might want more moderate levels of [emotional] arousal. But if you want more big-picture stuff, which could be critical when asking people about their life, then higher levels of arousal may be better,' he added. He noted that because the researchers used almost a 'pretreatment,' with music used before the recall task, it would be interesting to know if using such a pretreatment before taking a test could possibly improve performance. There are interventions, some of which Bowling is involved with, that are looking at supporting arousal and attention during studying. A controlled study comparing these things and looking systematically into effects on different types of memory would be helpful, 'but we're really at the beginning of figuring all of this stuff out,' he said. Although the current study has some limitations and needs to be replicated, 'any kind of talk toward systematic effects of different musical parameters or emotional modeling starts to help us bring this into the scientific-medical realm. And that's a real strength here,' Bowling concluded.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
I assumed I'd never need Medicaid. I was wrong.
Madison Chapman is a cancer survivor and a federal worker in D.C. I never expected to go on Medicaid. I grew up in a comfortable household, had worked since high school, and was a generally healthy 24-year-old public policy graduate student. I also never expected the stubborn lump above my collarbone would be Hodgkin's lymphoma.
