Why Sydney Sweeney's ‘good jeans' campaign is being compared to Nazism
'Blong (sic) hair, blue eyes, HOLDING A GERMAN SHEPHERD!!! What were you all thinking? Did you know what you were implying? This is not ok,' another commenter said.
Another clip featuring Sweeney wearing a low-cut singlet while working on a car attracted the observation: 'Leaning into eugenics is a WILD take. No thanks,' collecting more than 6000 likes in the process.
An Instagram clip of Sweeney apparently crossing out the word 'genes' on a street billboard and replacing it with the word 'jeans' was also slammed.
'It's giving 'Subtle 1930's Germany', one comment read.
Conservatives claim Sweeney
However, the campaign has also had its defenders.
'Woke advertising is dead. Sydney Sweeney killed it,' said right-wing commentator Kyle Becker on X.
' There is no 'racist undertone', unless you choose to put it there. They're about the end of cancel culture, which demonises beauty, excellence, and virtue itself,' X user Kaizen D. Asiedu said.
But the current digital fracas is not the first time US conservatives have tried to enlist Sweeney into the culture war.
Last year Sweeney appeared on a Saturday Night Live sketch as a Hooters waitperson wearing a low-cut T-shirt, prompting widespread conservative commentary that her revealing outfit on the show signalled the end of woke culture.
And Sweeney's interest in country music and trucks has also prompted some discussion about her leanings – as has her family.
In 2023, Sweeny threw a 'surprise hoedown' for her mother's 60th birthday, with some family members photographed in 'blue lives matter' T-shirts, and others seen in red MAGA caps.
Sweeney responded on X a few weeks later: 'You guys this is wild. An innocent celebration for my moms milestone 60th birthday has turned into an absurd political statement, which was not the intention. Please stop making assumptions,' she tweeted.
Sweeny has remained tight-lipped about her political views but has said she is pro-choice and has also expressed support for LGBTQI+ rights on X.
So what went wrong?
Senior lecturer in marketing at the University of Adelaide's Adelaide Business School, Dr Amelie Burgess, says it is unlikely the American Eagle campaign was deliberately provoking the controversy.
'I think that backlash is always a risk even without being deliberately provocative,' she says. 'It's rare that a company like AE with a diverse young audience would lean into something so polarising.'
Loading
As she notes, the ad's messaging 'is intersecting uncomfortably with eugenics ideologies' but 'that group of people are not dominant in our society'.
'It's not a smart business move or a good societal move either.'
Burgess believes it is more likely the misstep came from a lack of diversity among the American Eagle marketing team and Sweeney's own advisers.
'It's probably poor creative development and execution,' she says.
'You have that provocative wordplay and it's obviously not been properly assessed for cultural implication … and you have someone not very diverse leading that campaign.
Loading
'Theres a benefit in having diversity across all business functions, but especially in marketing.'
Burgess' research has shown that a lack of diversity can affect marketing imagery and messaging and make the company tone-deaf and slow to respond when issues do blow up.
As for any longer-term damage, Burgess observes that we expect brands to be accountable these days, and there are consequences for such missteps. And although Sweeney's fan base can provide a buffer for a period, it won't necessarily last.
'That sustained controversy does erode that over time, and we have seen that … It depends on how the brand responds and how Sydney Sweeney responds.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Brooke Hogan shares sad details about fallout with famous father Hulk Hogan
Brooke Hogan asked to be removed from her father's will in 2023. Wrestling legend Hulk Hogan died from cardiac arrest on July 24, aged 71, and Brooke, 37, reportedly made the will request two years ago because she 'didn't want to get caught up in a financial battle when he passed', according to TMZ. Brooke is said to have wanted to protect her father from people she believed 'were taking advantage of him' but after many years of disagreements, she contacted his financial manager and asked to be removed as a beneficiary. Brooke is reportedly set to receive a small sum from a life insurance trust and is planning to put the money towards her children's college funds. Meanwhile, following her father's death, Brooke took to social media to pay tribute and to reflect on their turbulent relationship. 'My dad's blood runs though my veins. His eyes shine through my children. And our bond has never broken, not even in his final moments,' she said in a lengthy post on Instagram. 'We had a connection deeper than words, one that spanned lifetimes. I am so grateful I knew the real version of him. Not just the one the world viewed through a carefully curated lens. 'We shared a quiet, sacred bond, one that could be seen and felt by anyone who witnessed us together. 'When he left this earth, it felt like part of my spirit left with him. I felt it before the news even reached us. I know he's at peace now, out of pain, and in a place as beautiful as he imagined. 'He used to speak about this moment with such wonder and hope. Like meeting God was the greatest championship he'd ever have.' Brooke also used her post to 'clear a few things up' regarding their estrangement. The TV personality (who featured with Hulk in the reality show Hogan Knows Best) wrote: 'It was a series of private phone calls no one will ever hear, know, or understand. 'My father was confiding in me about issues weighing on his heart, both personal and business. 'I offered to be a life raft in whatever capacity he needed. I told him he had my support. I begged him to rest, to take care of himself.' Brooke ultimately took a step back from her dad in order to 'protect (her) heart'. However, she does not have any regrets about how she dealt with the situation. She said: 'I know in my heart I did everything I could. 'He knew I would run through a burning building for him. And in many ways, along the path of life, I did. 'He knows how deeply, how hard and how purely I loved him. I am at peace knowing this.'

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
‘Whatever it takes': Why Trump's vow is so dangerous
Ominously for copyright holders, he said that AI companies had to be able to use 'that pool of knowledge' without experiencing the complexity of contract negotiations. The administration's objective is to make America's AI sector and its technologies the global standards for AI, exporting the technologies to its allies. 'We want the entire world to be running on American artificial intelligence stack. That is our cloud, our chips, our algorithms, all of that needs to be exported and packaged to the world so that we become the ecosystem of choice globally,' the White House science and technology director, Michael Kratsios, told Bloomberg. China's approach, or at least the approach it publicly stated last week at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, is very different. China's premier, Li Qiang, said AI innovation was being hampered by bottlenecks, like access to semiconductors, that could lead to AI becoming an 'exclusive game for a few countries and companies'. Loading 'Currently, overall global AI governance is still fragmented. Countries have great differences, particularly in terms of areas such as regulatory concepts and institutional rules. 'We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus, as soon as possible,' he said. China has proposed creating a new international organisation to develop AI, arguing that AI has risks that require nations to collaborate. Denied access by the US to the most advanced semiconductors, China has adopted an 'open source' approach to AI, with its leading AI companies – companies like DeepSeek and Alibaba – making their large language models available to developers within and outside China as a strategy for fast-tracking a low-cost approach to developing AI and differentiating itself from Trump's America First approach. Beijing wants China, not the US, to influence international standards for AI and its AI companies to win a bigger proportion of the global AI market. It is placing a particular emphasis on the development of AI within the 'Global South' group of loosely aligned countries that it has been working to bring within its sphere of influence. In the US, the race is on between the mega tech companies to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI), or human-level artificial intelligence. In China, Xi Jinping appears more focused on AI applications, or usages with practical applications for industries. The two countries are therefore pursuing somewhat different AI goals, which might reflect the success of America's export controls in denying China access to the most advanced chips and chip-making equipment required to pursue AGI. It might also be that China doesn't believe AGI will be attainable within a reasonable timeframe. In Europe, as you'd expect, the focus has been on heavily regulating AI, prohibiting some AI practices that manipulate behaviours or are exploitative: imposing rules on the use of AI in critical infrastructure, employment and other sectors regarded as high-risk and legislating in areas like the transparency of the data used for the models, the protection of copyright and the management of risks. The competition between the US and China in particular, and the differing nature of their strategies, might accelerate the development and deployment of AI, but it could also inflate the risks. In Australia, where there aren't yet any AI-specific regulations, the prevailing sentiment appears to be for 'light touch' regulation, with safeguards. Trump has effectively abandoned the safeguards the Biden regime tried to erect around the development of AI, essentially adopting the laissez-faire approach that most of the big US technology companies (which contributed heavily to his presidential campaign) have been lobbying for. Having jettisoned Biden's guardrails, he's told the technology advisers in the administration that they have six months to come up with a new set of AI policies that support his plan to fast-track AI projects, boost US technology exports and expunge the 'woke' out from AI. He has said he will use every rule at his disposal to facilitate the building of AI infrastructure like data centres and chip-manufacturing plants and the energy infrastructure they require, and use the US export-Import Bank and Development Finance Corp to help spread US AI technologies to other countries. The US will do 'whatever it takes to lead the world in artificial intelligence,' he said. Given that those developing AI systems have themselves warned that it poses risks, not just to individuals but humankind, Trump's deregulatory approach is itself risky. Moreover, the competition between the US and China in particular, and the differing nature of their strategies, might accelerate the development and deployment of AI, but it could also inflate the risks. Loading That could particularly be the case if one of the superpowers were to establish a clear lead in AI technologies and the other feared having to deal with the entrenched technological and geopolitical dominance of the winner of the race to become the global standard for AI. Given how world-changing and disruptive AI might be, and the pace at which AI developments are occurring, the stakes in this contest for AI leadership – not just for the US and China – are extremely high.


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
SBS Japanese Newsflash Wednesday 30 July
LISTEN TO SBS Japanese 04:28 Japanese Listen to SBS Japanese Audio on Tue, Thu and Fri from 1pm on SBS 3. Replays from 10pm on Tue, Thu and Sat on SBS1. Listen to past stories from our podcast. Download the free SBS Audio App and don't forget to visit SBS Japanese Facebook and Instagram page!