Canada has three times as many measles cases as US
Canada has faced 4,206 measles cases this year, according to a government website, with 1,450 in Alberta, 2,301 in Ontario and 140 in British Columbia. However, the government also said 3,878 of the total cases were confirmed.
According to the CDC, there have been 1,333 confirmed cases in the U.S. in 2025, with Texas having the highest number of cases out of all of the 50 states at over 700.
The current U.S. government, especially Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been facing scrutiny over its approach to vaccination, with Kennedy previously expressing vaccine skepticism.
In April, Kennedy touted the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine as the 'most effective' method to stop measles spreading amid a visit to Texas with the family of an 8-year-old girl who was killed by the disease.
'The most effective way to prevent the spread of measles is the MMR vaccine,' Kennedy wrote in a post on the social platform X at the time. 'I've spoken to Governor Abbott, and I've offered HHS' continued support.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Multiple medical groups say they are barred from CDC's panel of vaccine advisers
Multiple medical groups say they have been barred from working on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's panel of vaccine advisers. It comes weeks after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired the original panel of independent experts and replaced them with his own handpicked members -- many of whom have expressed skeptical views on vaccines. Liaisons representing major medical groups were historically invited to meetings of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) as non-voting members to provide their independent expertise in respective fields. In a joint statement, the groups said they have now been excluded "from the process of reviewing scientific evidence end informing vaccine recommendations." MORE: Members of CDC vaccine panel ousted by RFK Jr. say committee has 'lost credibility' A total of eight groups signed on to the statement, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, teh American College of Physicians, the American Medical Association and the National Medical Association among others. In a statement provided to ABC News, an HHS spokesperson said: "Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions. The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence, and bias. We are fulfilling our promise to the American people to never again allow those conflicts to taint vaccine recommendations." The statement went on to say: "Experts will continue to be included based on relevant experience and expertise, not because of what organization they are with." MORE: CDC vaccine advisers who were removed from committee by RFK Jr. speak out In their statement, the medical organizations said they learned the groups will be excluded from the panel's work in an email late Thursday and noted they were "deeply disappointed and alarmed" by the move. "To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines," the statement read. Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines
Click in for more news from The Hill{beacon} Health Care Health Care The Big Story CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told some expert groups that they will no longer be able to help review scientific data used to issue vaccine recommendations. © APSome members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice's (ACIP) working groups, including physician groups and infectious disease specialists, were sent e-mails late Thursday notifying them that they will no longer serve on the subcommittees. The groups were removed from the subcommittees because they were deemed biased by the Trump administration, according to a copy of the email shared with The Hill. "By definition, Liason organizations are special interest groups and therefore are expected to have a 'bias' based on their constituency/and or population that they represent," the email reads. "It is important that the ACIP Workgroup activities remain free of influence from any special interest groups so ACIP workgroups will no longer include Liason organizations." Eight of the advisory groups released a joint statement Friday saying they are 'deeply disappointed' that they are now barred from informing the development of vaccine recommendations. 'For decades liaisons from our organizations have reviewed published and unpublished data and literature related to vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, and safety and provided unbiased input for ACIP's consideration,' the statement reads. 'To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines.' The groups, which include the American Medical Association, as well as the Infectious Diseases Society of America, called on the Trump administration to reconsider their exclusion from the vaccine review process. A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the CDC, said that experts will continue to be included in the review process based on 'relevant experience and expertise." 'Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions,' the spokesperson wrote. 'The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence and bias.' The notice is the latest move from the Trump administration to shake up the nation's vaccine policy and is another major change to the CDC's advisory panel on vaccines. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr abruptly fired all 17 sitting members of ACIP in early June, accusing them of having conflicts of interest and rubber-stamping decisions related to the COVID-19 vaccine. He then replaced the panel with eight hand-picked appointees, including some vaccine skeptics. Welcome to The Hill's Health Care newsletter, we're Nathaniel Weixel, Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech — every week we follow the latest moves on how Washington impacts your health. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the health care sector this week and beyond: Most adults do not plan on getting COVID-19 shot amid vaccine policy changesMore than half of American adults — 59 percent — say they do not expect to get the COVID-19 booster shot this autumn, according to new poll findings from health care policy group KFF. Poll results show 23 percent of U.S. adult respondents said they will 'probably not' get the vaccine, while 37 percent said they will 'definitely not' get the shot. Americans who said they will 'probably' or 'definitely' not get the shot were … Full Story Blue states challenge Trump's restrictions on gender-affirming care More than a dozen Democratic attorneys general announced a lawsuit challenging recent moves by President Trump's administration to severely restrict access to gender-affirming health care for anyone under 19, including in states where treatment is legal and protected by law. Full Story Fired vaccine board members warn of fallout from RFK Jr. policiesRecently removed members of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory panel warn that Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s move to replace them shows he is 'abandoning' rigorous scientific review and open deliberation. Kennedy fired all 17 sitting members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in early June, accusing members of having conflicts of … Full Story In Other News Branch out with a different read: Number of Texans receiving out-of-state abortions quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texans who sought an abortion out of state more than quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 after a state law went into effect that bans the procedure in almost all cases. Data from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) shows at least 7,844 Texas residents received an abortion in a different state in 2023, up from 4,718 in 2022 and 1,712 in 2021. Still the total number of abortions for Texas residents … Full Story Around the Nation Local and state headlines on health care:More than 2,000 DACA recipients in California to lose health insurance (the San Francisco Chronicle) Some rural Texas seen THC as a lifeline for their health and economy (The Texas Tribune) Illinois becomes first state to require mental health screenings for students (ABC) What We're Reading Health news we've flagged from other outlets: Medicare, Medicaid plans to experiment with covering weight loss drugs (The Washington Post) Wildfire smoke and unhealthy air fill the Midwest before spreading to the East (The Washington Post) Remember running a mile in school? The Presidential Fitness Test is coming back (NPR) You're all caught up. See you next week! Close Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here The latest in politics and policy. Direct to your inbox. Sign up for the Health Care newsletter Subscribe
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What are the best and worst ice cream bars for your health? Ranking frozen treats — from Drumsticks to frozen yogurt bars
They're all tasty. But are any actually good for you? Whether they're eaten on a long weekend family roadtrip or enjoyed in the backyard after a tasty BBQ, ice cream bars are one of summer's most-loved treats. Given the portability and nostalgia, it's not surprising Canadians are obsessed with these yummy indulgences. But how do these frozen delights stack up nutritionally — especially if you're trying to watch your sugar and fat intake? Below, we run down how some of the country's most popular frozen treats — including ice cream bars, frozen yogurt and sorbet bars — stack up. This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Contact a qualified medical professional before engaging in any physical activity, or making any changes to your diet, medication or lifestyle. Frozen yogurt bars Frozen yogurt bars have gotten a major glow-up over the past decade. These days, grocery store shelves sport frozen yogurt treats enrobed in chocolate and featuring jammy fruit swirls. Brands like IOGO offer a little something for your sweet tooth in both dipped and non-dipped varieties. They'll set you back around 100 calories and about 14 per cent of your daily recommended sugar intake. It's worth noting that unlike un-frozen yogurt, most of these treats don't add much nutritionally to your diet. For example, other than being scant on sugar and fat, the nutritional breakdown of Chapman's frozen yogurt bars clocks only 2 per cent of your daily recommended calcium intake. If only the real deal will do? For roughly the same amount of fat and calories, you could chow down on a mini-sized ice cream bar. The takeaway: Frozen yogurt bars are great to scratch the ice cream itch without costing you too much of your daily caloric intake. But they don't have much of an edge in terms of added nutrition. Frozen fruit and ice bars Chapman's also sells a frozen sorbet stick dipped in chocolate that looks luscious and stacks up similarly to yogurt bars nutritionally. Del Monte, meanwhile, makes bars that are mainly frozen fruit puree bars (with a few additives, of course). Each of these bars — which are smaller in size than other brands — are 50 calories a piece, making them a lower (if not the lowest) calorie treat. They're fat-free and even provide a small amount of vitamin — around 5 per cent of your recommended daily value of vitamin C, for example. You might also be surprised to find out one bar has only 10 grams of sugar. Compliments brand also offers fruit puree bars that are similar nutrition-wise: 80 calories and sugar ranges in the teens — but almost double the size of their Del Monte competitors. Chapman's Lil Lolly bars are possibly the best-scoring treat: For a mere 40 calories and no fat, you can go for a Popsicle vibe that only has 8 grams of sugar. Considering these bars are essentially frozen flavoured water, this nutritional profile makes sense. It's up to you if the icier texture of this genre of treat outweighs the numbers: Sometimes that texture is more refreshing, but sometimes you might prefer something richer. The takeaway: Frozen fruit bars are often the healthiest option you'll find at the grocery store — Del Monte's frozen fruit puree bars are only 50 calories and even have a small amount of vitamin C. Dipped ice cream bars Haagen-Daaz. Magnum. Chapman's. This category belongs to the heavy-hitters: Decadent ice cream covered in chocolate, nuts or candy. Naturally, no diet frontrunners are here, but that doesn't mean you need to swear off your favourites. Haagen-Daaz, the epitome of grocery chain luxury, offers its classic takes — like vanilla in a chocolate-almond coating or vanilla in dark chocolate — in mini form, which carry an almost-identical nutritional breakdown to the average fro-yo bar. Full-size bars — which are 88ml instead of a mini's 55ml — are a different story. They can be around 300 calories and a quarter of your daily recommended sugar intake. Then there's the maximalist Haagen-Daz EXTRAAS bars: Flavours like key lime pie and salted caramel crunch are slightly smaller than the brand's original line, but carry similar nutritional info, with enough carbs and sugar content to make those calorie-conscious people take note. Magnum, another high-end treat, carries about half your daily allotment of saturated fat per bar, as well as nearly 20 grams of sugar. The brand's mini bars also have more calories and fat than other bite-sized bars from most competing brands. Chapman's ice cream bars fare surprisingly similar to their frozen yogurt counterparts; one bar has around 150 calories and 10 grams of sugar. They fall closely in line with Nestle's Parlour dipped bars, which have a mere seven grams of fat, giving more of a middle-road indulgence. The takeaway: Much akin to the above fro-yo bars, dipped ice cream bars don't offer a ton in terms of adding nutrients to your diet, but unlike those dieter's dreams, these treats generally are more of a spend in terms of calories, fat and sugar. Frozen ice cream cones Nestle's Drumsticks — possibly the most iconic in the frozen cone genre — feature more than 15 grams of fat and 20 per cent of your daily sugar allotment. Chapman's Super Cones fair marginally better, but if you're looking for a waffle cone with something to sink your teeth into on top, you'll be looking at a fat content in the teens and sugar in the low 20s. The takeaway: The fat, sugar and calorie content of these tasty treats makes them a great occasional indulgence. Like their dipped ice cream counterparts, these treats offer little-to-nothing in terms of added nutrients. The bottom line So, what to do when your sweet tooth conspires with sultry summer heat to make reaching for ice cream the only option? If you're looking to watch your sugar and fat intake, we suggest going with a frozen yogurt bar or frozen fruit stick — or sticking with a mini size of your favourite ice cream bar. That said, there's no harm in enjoying the occasional full-sized ice cream bar or Drumstick if you indulge in them as part of a balanced diet.
