
China warns Britain against meddling in Taiwan
Chinese military
has warned Britain against interfering in Taiwan after its
defence secretary, John Healey
, said British forces were ready to fight if a conflict breaks out in the region.
Chinese defence ministry spokesman Col Zhang Xiaogang said on Wednesday that the
People's Liberation Army
(PLA) was ready to resist any foreign infringement on what Beijing considers its territorial integrity.
'The Taiwan question is purely an internal affair of China, which brooks no foreign interference,' said Col Zhang.
'We urge the UK side to be prudent about its words and actions on the Taiwan question, refrain from sending wrong signals to separatist forces for Taiwan independence and avoid undermining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. No one should underestimate the firm will and strong ability of the PLA to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity.'
READ MORE
China sees the self-governing island of
Taiwan
as part of its national territory and
Xi Jinping
has repeatedly affirmed his determination to reunify it with the mainland. In common with all but a handful of countries, Britain recognises Beijing as the sole legitimate government of China but insists that Taiwan should remain a self-governing island.
Western powers have traditionally remained deliberately ambiguous about how they would respond to an attempt by Beijing to reintegrate Taiwan by force. But when asked in Australia last week what Britain was doing to help partners like Taiwan defend themselves against Chinese military threats, Mr Healey was more forthright.
'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together,' he said.
Col Zhang also criticised the United States' Resolute Force Pacific, a drill involving its air force and forces from Japan and other countries in the western Pacific. The US said the exercise is designed to ensure that its forces can defend themselves and their partners in the Pacific.
'The US has been blindly flexing muscles in the Asia-Pacific region and attempting to use military drills as a pretext to gang up, intimidate and pressure other countries, and undermine peace and stability in the region,' said Col Zhang sai
He confirmed that China and
Russia
would conduct a joint naval exercise next month near the Russian port city of Vladivostok. The US and the European Union have expressed concern about the close military ties between Moscow and Beijing and about China's support for Russia since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Col Zhang said next month's exercise was an annual event that was not directed at any third party and had nothing to do with any current conflict.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ukrainian drones spark fire at Russian oil depot in Sochi, governor says
More than 120 firefighters were trying to extinguish a blaze at an oil depot in the Russian city of Sochi that was sparked by a Ukrainian drone attack, regional governor Veniamin Kondratyev said early on Sunday on the Telegram messaging app. In the Krasnodar region on the Black Sea where Sochi is located, a fuel tank with a capacity of 2,000 cubic metres (70,000 cubic feet) was on fire, Russia's RIA news agency reported, citing emergency officials. The Russian ministry of defence said in its daily morning report on Telegram that its air defence units destroyed 93 Ukrainian drones overnight, including one over the Krasnodar region and 60 over the waters of the Black Sea. The ministry reports only how many drones its units destroy, not how many Ukraine launched. READ MORE Rosaviatsia, Russia's civil aviation authority, temporarily halted flights at Sochi's airport to ensure air safety. Flights resumed as of 2am Irish time on Sunday. Reuters could not independently verify the reports. There was no immediate comment from Ukraine. The attack, which Mr Kondratyev said was in the Adler district of the coastal resort city, would be Ukraine's latest on infrastructure inside Russia that Kyiv deems key to Moscow's war efforts. A woman was killed in the Adler district in a Ukrainian drone attack late last month, but attacks on Sochi, which hosted the 2014 Olympic Winter Games, have been infrequent in the war that Russia launched in February 2022. The Krasnodar region is home to the Ilsky refinery near the city of Krasnodar, among the largest in southern Russia and a frequent target of Ukraine's drone attacks. [ We must be honest about who Vladimir Putin is. His goal is not peace, but empire Opens in new window ] Also on Sunday, the governor of Voronezh region in southern Russia said four people were injured in a Ukrainian drone strike that caused several fires, while Russia launched a missile attack on Kyiv, according to the military administration of the Ukrainian capital. The Russian ministry of defence said that its units destroyed 18 Ukrainian drones over the Voronezh region that borders Ukraine. – Reuters Ukraine war: Is President Zelenskiy losing his people's trust? Listen | 24:15


Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Let's stop glorifying motherhood and glorify parenthood instead
In a bid to boost its disastrously low fertility rate, China has just announced a payment of Rmb3,600 (€438) a year for the first three years of a child's life. There is something obscene about pivoting to cash payments for births, given China's appalling one-child policy , which led to innumerable human rights violations. While technically only enormous fines could be levied on families having an unsanctioned child, in reality, provinces conducted forced abortions, sometimes up to nine months, and forced sterilisations. This was documented by writer and dissident Ma Jian while researching his novel, The Dark Road . Family planning officials monitored women's menstrual cycles and ruthlessly punished unauthorised pregnancies. One official had dragged his own cousin to a forced termination at six months. While few countries have as ghastly a historic record, China is not alone in offering incentives to give birth. Italy instituted a €1,000 newborn baby bonus for every child born or adopted after January 1st, 2025. Right across the world, with the exception of sub-Saharan Africa, falling fertility rates are causing alarm. READ MORE Ireland is not immune. Although the island's population reached seven million recently for the first time since the Famine, the Republic's total fertility rate in 2024 was 1.5 , far below the replacement level of 2.1. There are numerous theories about why people are no longer having enough babies to replace themselves. Economic historian Claudia Goldin won the Nobel Prize for pioneering work on women's participation in the paid economy and the gender pay gap. [ You don't need a Nobel prize to know that work has got greedy. Time we all pushed back Opens in new window ] Goldin has a new working paper, Babies and the Macroeconomy , examining demographic decline. She analyses six countries where demographic decline is not as stark: the US, Denmark, France, Germany, Sweden and Britain, and six which are considered among the 'lowest low': South Korea, Greece, Italy, Japan, Portugal and Spain. The latter countries underwent very rapid economic development after the 1950s, as opposed to steadier and more continuous growth (with some economic shocks) in the first group. She believes that in the second group there was a rapid 'transformation from a society that is less well connected, more tradition bound, relatively isolated and rural, and communal rather than individualistic, into a nation that is generally the opposite, with more developed markets, thicker communication networks and denser settlements.' Where this rapid transformation happened, gender roles did not evolve as quickly, and women were expected to shoulder caring work as well as paid employment outside the home. [ Why women are having fewer babies, in Ireland and worldwide Opens in new window ] Goldin suggests that rapid economic growth did not affect men's gender roles anywhere near as dramatically as women's. In countries where gender equity is greater, the decline in population has not been as rapid. Goldin analysed OECD time-use studies, which show that on average, women in Japan and Italy spent about three more hours a day doing household duties than men. In the US, women did around 1.8 extra hours of housework daily, while in Sweden, the gap was just under an hour more. Goldin suggests that the US provides one of the few examples of a wealthy country increasing the birth rate, albeit temporarily. During the 1950s, the birth rate peaked above 3.5 children per woman, which gave the generation its moniker, Boomers. She suggests this was accomplished by 'glorifying marriage, motherhood, the 'good wife' and the home'. In a world where women are having fewer children, she wonders whether a similar rise might be accomplished by 'glorifying parenthood, especially fatherhood?' This demands not penalising people who request flexible work arrangements. Instead, flexible working arrangements, including working from home, are being taken away, causing disquiet among employees. [ Will part-time work or staying at home with children leave you poorer in old age? Here's what to do now Opens in new window ] A report in this newspaper described the dismay of AIB staff when hybrid workers were told recently they'll need to return to the office three days a week. While Goldin's thesis is interesting and persuasive – and I am completely in favour of a cultural shift that respects parenthood – I am not sure it explains everything. For an economic historian, everything will have an economic explanation. But even the countries she lists where the total fertility rate has not fallen as far are still failing to replace themselves. Iceland has been ranked by the World Economic Forum as the best country for closing the gender gap for the 16th year in a row, but in 2024, Iceland's fertility rate fell to 1.56, the lowest ever recorded there. King's College lecturer Alice Evans says the decline in childbearing stems from three interrelated factors : a steep decline in people forming couples, the rise of personalised online entertainment via our phones, and people being put off by the costs of intensive parenting and time investment in children. [ Declining birth rate means there will be fewer people of working age to support the growing number of pensioners Opens in new window ] All three of Evans's factors relate to a rise in expressive individualism, the idea that you create your identity rather than finding it in a community. This echoes Goldin's point about moving from communities to individualism, but does not foreground gender equity alone as a solution. Instead, it focuses on cultural trends leading to growing isolation. Having children is an act of faith in the future. Despite the fact that falling fertility rates will radically undermine our capacity to navigate that future, many people's unwillingness to make that act of faith relates to something deeper than economic factors alone.


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Recognition of a Palestinian state has become a punishment for Israel, says its former prime minister
In declaring that they intend to recognise a Palestinian state , Britain , France and Canada have moved closer to a step that Palestinians have sought for decades. But their announcements leave unanswered a crucial question: in the gritty context of today's conflict – with Israel waging war in a shattered Gaza Strip , threatening to annex the occupied West Bank and administering East Jerusalem as part of its own capital – what is left of Palestine to recognise? They also upend the sequence of the now-moribund Middle East peace process, in which detailed talks between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) were intended to be followed by international recognition of whatever Palestinian state emerged from those discussions. Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert said the gesture by Israel's western allies of recognising Palestine had taken on a different meaning. READ MORE What was intended to be a reward for Palestinians – a celebration for successfully ending more than eight decades of conflict – had in 2025 become a punishment for Israel . Ehud Olmert was the last Israeli prime minister to truly address the complexities of a two-state solution. Photograph: Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images It was a reflection of 'the real desperation of losing trust', said Olmert, whose premiership between 2006 and 2009 was the last time an Israeli leader seriously tussled with the complexities of a two-state solution. To Olmert, it is as if they are saying to his successor, prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu: 'You didn't listen to us, to anything we are trying to do – so what else do we have but to use this, something you are so opposed to.' Olmert said the promised recognitions amount to a threat to dismantle the legacy of Israel's longest-serving premier, who has spent his nearly two decades in power blocking a Palestinian state from taking shape. Netanyahu's governments have expanded settlements, taken more land into Israeli state control and demonised the internationally accepted Palestinian Authority (PA) as supporters of terrorism akin to Hamas, the militant group that wrested Gaza from the PA in 2007. Netanyahu has lambasted the British and French proposals as a reward for Hamas, which triggered the current war with its cross-border attacks on southern Israel on October 7th, 2023. Now Netanyahu, who refuses to take responsibility for the scale of civilian suffering that Israel has wrought on Gaza, faces the prospect of four out of five permanent UN Security Council members recognising the state of Palestine. China and Russia have already done so. This would deepen Israel's diplomatic isolation as it fights accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice, the UN's highest court, and as the premier himself faces charges of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. The pledges by three G7 nations to recognise a Palestinian state ahead of the UN General Assembly in September all come with conditions. Mahmoud Abbas, Palestinian Authority president, speaks during the United Nations General Assembly in New York last year. Photograph: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg via Getty Images UK prime minister Keir Starmer's hinge on Netanyahu ending the crisis in Gaza, while Canada is demanding that the PA, run by the ageing and unpopular president Mahmoud Abbas, enacts serious reforms and hold its first elections in nearly two decades. The announcements have been met with deep hostility from Netanyahu's far-right coalition, which is propped up by parties seeking to annex the West Bank. The last time Netanyahu – reluctantly – engaged with the peace process was in 2014, under great pressure from the Obama administration. The process of recognising a Palestinian state would also run up against the limits of international law: the 1933 Montevideo Convention sets out minimum criteria for a state, which include a permanent population, defined borders and a government. Two-year-old Yazan Abu Foul, held by his mother Naima, is suffering from severe malnutrition as a result of Israel's campaign in Gaza. Photograph: Haitham Imad That is one reason that Canadian prime minister Mark Carney has insisted that the PA – a semi-autonomous body set up by the Oslo Accords in the 1990s – commit to reforms that would restore a measure of democratic legitimacy to Abbas's government, said a Canadian diplomat briefed on the matter. Palestinian statehood also faces practical difficulties as formidable today as it did in 1988, when PLO chair Yasser Arafat first set out a formal claim to a Palestinian nation that mingled the poetry of Mahmoud Darwish with the prose of UN resolutions. He created a government in exile, based in Algiers. Most crucially, Israel controls all the borders and occupies the land on which any Palestinian state could be built. World powers have largely supported Palestinians governing an area that roughly aligns with the 1967 armistice line, which includes the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip – territories wrested from Jordan and Egypt by Israel. Israel's defence minister Israel Katz, whose government in May announced plans to build 22 new West Bank settlements , has said of the push for recognition: 'They will recognise a Palestinian state on paper – and we will build the Jewish-Israeli state on the ground.' Yet even if western recognition would bring little change in the territory, Palestinians say it would buoy morale and add weight to the beleaguered PLO's claim to statehood. Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu with US president Donald Trump at the White House. Photograph: Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times 'It would still be very useful because it confirms the right of self-determination for the Palestinian people, which Israel is trying to eliminate,' said Mustafa Barghouti, a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council and regular interlocutor with western diplomats. 'The issue of recognition is a political matter – admitting into law what these countries always speak about, the two-state solution.' Palestinian delegations to the UK, France or Canada would also become fully fledged embassies, getting diplomatic rights and immunities, and able to sign treaties as a state. 'States have allies, allies have responsibilities,' said a Palestinian diplomat based in the UK. 'Until then, all we have as Palestinians are friends.' These recognitions would undermine Israel's traditional argument that it is not alone in opposing unilateral Palestinian statehood, said Victor Kattan, who has served as a legal adviser to the Palestinian Negotiations Affairs Department in Ramallah. Some 147 countries already recognise a Palestinian state, but the addition of the UK, France and Canada would represent a significant shift on the part of powerful western states traditionally seen as Israel's unflinching allies. That shift is especially resonant on the part of the UK, the colonial power that administered Mandate Palestine after the first World War, issuing the Balfour Declaration that paved the way for a Jewish state to take shape on Palestinian land and fuelling a conflict that rages decades later. 'The Israelis had always had a strong 'moral minority' argument, that so long as some of the major western states . . . still don't recognise Palestine, there will always be a question mark over its claims to statehood and sovereignty,' said Kattan, who now teaches international law at the University of Nottingham. Protesters hold a banner showing starving Palestinian children during a rally in solidarity with the Palestinian people, at Sana'a University in Yemen. Photograph: Yahya Arhab/EPA 'But now that that's crumbling – it looks like nearly everybody is going to recognise Palestine, except for the United States – it greatly strengthens Palestinian claims to statehood.' The moves by the UK, France and Canada have infuriated the White House, with US president Donald Trump saying they pose a threat to trade talks with Canada. The US's long-standing policy has been to resist attempts by supporters of Palestine to assume some of the markers of statehood. On Thursday, the state department imposed sanctions on the PLO, for among other things 'taking actions to internationalise its conflict with Israel such as through the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice'. Other diplomatic efforts to upgrade Palestinian claims to statehood are also under way, said western diplomats based in Jerusalem, including an attempt to upgrade the fledgling state of Palestine's UN 'observer status' to full membership. The US has twice vetoed those attempts, most recently in April 2024. One of the diplomats said: 'They will undoubtedly veto again – but this time, they will be running against a large wave of international opinion, not just a technical vote that is ignored as a matter of course.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025 International recognition of Palestinian statehood