Ringgit strengthens against US dollar amid US rate cut expectations
Published on: Mon, Aug 04, 2025
By: Bernama Text Size: At 8 am, the local currency rose to 4.2350/2550 against the greenback, up from Friday's close of 4.2750/2815. Kuala Lumpur: THE ringgit opened stronger against the US dollar on Monday as renewed expectations of a Federal Reserve rate cut emerged following weaker-than-expected US labour market data. At 8 am, the local currency rose to 4.2350/2550 against the greenback, up from Friday's close of 4.2750/2815. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid attributed the ringgit's rebound to disappointing US Non-farm Payroll (NFP) figures. The US Bureau of Labour Statistics reported only 73,000 jobs added in July, well below market forecasts of 110,000. 'The weaker labour market strengthens the case for a Fed rate cut in September,' said Mohd Afzanizam. 'The US Dollar Index (DXY) has already dropped to 98.708 points, while the 2-year US Treasury yield fell sharply by 25 basis points to 3.69 per cent last Friday.' He added that the ringgit, which depreciated by 0.22 per cent on Friday, could trade between 4.26 and 4.27 today. However, the local currency weakened against other major currencies, slipping against the Japanese yen, British pound, and euro. In contrast, the ringgit strengthened against regional currencies, rising against the Singapore dollar but dipping slightly against the Thai baht. It also gained against the Philippine peso and Indonesian rupiah. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
27 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump scores major own goal with labour official firing
US President Donald Trump's decision to fire a top labour official following weak jobs data obviously sends ominous signals about political interference in independent institutions, but it is also a major strategic own goal. Trump has spent six months attacking the Federal Reserve, and Chair Jerome Powell in particular, for not cutting interest rates. The barbs culminated in Trump branding Powell a "stubborn MORON" in a social media post on Friday before the July jobs report was released. The numbers, especially the net downward revision of 258,000 for May and June payrolls growth, were much weaker than expected. In fact, this was "the largest two-month revision since 1968 outside of NBER-defined recessions (assuming the economy is not in recession now)," according to Goldman Sachs. This release sparked a dramatic reaction in financial markets. Fed rate cut expectations soared, the two-year Treasury yield had its steepest fall in a year, and the dollar tumbled. A quarter-point rate cut next month and another by December were suddenly nailed-on certainties, according to rate futures market pricing. This was a huge U-turn from only 48 hours before when Powell's hawkish steer in his post-FOMC meeting press conference raised the prospect of no easing at all this year. Trump's constant lambasting of "Too Late" Powell suddenly appeared to have a bit more substance behind it. The Fed chair's rate cut caution centres on the labour market, which now appears nowhere near as "solid" as he thought. Trump could have responded by saying: "I was right, and Powell was wrong." Instead, on Friday afternoon he said he was firing the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, for faking the jobs numbers. Trump provided no evidence of data manipulation. So rather than point out that markets were finally coming around to his way of thinking on the need for lower interest rates, Trump has united economists, analysts and investors in condemnation of what they say is brazen political interference typically associated with underdeveloped and unstable nations rather than the self-proclaimed 'leader of the free world'. "A dark day in, and for, the US," economist Phil Suttle wrote on Friday. "This is the sort of thing only the worst populists do in the worst emerging economies and, to use the style of President Trump, IT NEVER ENDS WELL." It's important to note that major – even historic – revisions to jobs growth figures are not necessarily indicative of underlying data collection flaws. As Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale, argued on X over the weekend: "BLS's first-release estimates of nonfarm payroll employment have gotten more, not less, accurate over time." It should also be noted that the BLS compiles inflation as well as employment data, so, moving forward, significant doubt could surround the credibility of the two most important economic indicators for the US - and perhaps the world. Part of what constitutes "US exceptionalism" is the assumption that the experts leading the country's independent institutions are exactly that, independent, meaning their actions and output can be trusted, whatever the results. Baseless accusations from the US president that the BLS, the Fed and other agencies are making politically motivated decisions to undermine his administration only undermine trust in the US itself. "If doubts are sustained, it will lead investors to demand more of a risk premium to own US assets," says Rebecca Patterson, Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. "While only one of many forces driving asset valuations, it will limit returns across markets." This furor comes as Fed Governor Adriana Kugler's resignation on Friday gives Trump the chance to put a third nominee on the seven-person Fed board, maybe a potential future chair to fill that slot as a holding place until Powell's term expires in May. Whoever that person is will likely be more of a policy dove than a hawk. Policy uncertainty, which had been gradually subsiding since the April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff turmoil, is now very much back on investors' radar.
Sinar Daily
an hour ago
- Sinar Daily
Over-50s outnumber 20s in South Korean workforce for first time
Data from corporate tracker Leaders Index showed that, as of end-2024, employees in their 20s accounted for 19.8 per cent of the workforce at 124 leading firms by sales -- down 1.2 percentage points from a year earlier. 05 Aug 2025 10:54am People hold umbrellas during light rain as they walk past a pagoda on a street in Seoul on April 5, 2025. - (Photo by PEDRO PARDO / AFP) SEOUL - Major South Korean companies now employ fewer workers in their 20s than those aged 50 and above, reflecting reduced youth hiring amid an economic slowdown, Yonhap news agency reported citing an industry data. Data from corporate tracker Leaders Index showed that, as of end-2024, employees in their 20s accounted for 19.8 per cent of the workforce at 124 leading firms by sales -- down 1.2 percentage points from a year earlier. In contrast, the share of employees aged 50 or older rose 0.6 percentage point to 20.1 per cent, marking the first time since 2015, when the index began compiling such data that younger workers were outnumbered by older ones. It also marked the first time the share of workers under 30 fell below 20 per cent. The gap was most prominent in the battery industry, where the share of employees in their 20s declined by 9.7 percentage points over the past three years, while those aged 50 and above increased by 1.2 percentage points. A similar shift was seen in the information technology and electronics sector, where the share of younger workers dropped 5.4 percentage points. "Due to sluggish economic conditions, many industries have reduced new hiring, while older employees are delaying retirement,' an official from Leaders Index said. - BERNAMA More Like This
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Fed's Daly says time is nearing for rate cuts, may need more than two
San Francisco Fed president Mary Daly observed that the job market was losing strength, without clear signs of persistent tariff-led inflation. (X/@MaryDalyEcon pic) WASHINGTON : San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank president Mary Daly on Monday said that given mounting evidence that the US job market is softening and no signs of persistent tariff-driven inflation, the time is nearing for interest rate cuts. 'I was willing to wait another cycle, but I can't wait forever,' Daly said of the Fed's decision last week to leave short-term borrowing costs in their 4.25%-4.50% range rather than cut them, as a couple of her colleagues wanted and as President Donald Trump has demanded. While that doesn't mean a September rate cut is a lock, she said, 'I would lean to thinking that every meeting going forward is a live meeting to think about these policy adjustments.' The two quarter-point interest-rate cuts that Fed policymakers back in June penciled in for this year still 'look to be an appropriate amount of recalibration, and less important is, does it happen in September and December than does it happen at all…there's all kinds of permutations to get those two cuts.' Daly said there is still plenty of data including a couple of labour market and inflation reports due out before the Fed's policy-setting meeting, in September, and she's keeping an open mind. 'We of course could do fewer than two (rate cuts) if inflation picks up and spills over or if the labour market springs back,' Daly said. But 'I think the more likely thing is that we might have to do more than two…we also should be prepared in my judgment to do more if the labor market looks to be entering that period of weakness and we still haven't seen spillovers to inflation.' A Labor Department report Friday showed US employers added just 73,000 jobs last month, and massive revisions to previously reported data showed only 33,000 jobs were added in the two prior months. Those figures, to Daly's mind, don't mean the job market is precariously weak – in times of economic flux, she said, raw employment numbers are often less informative than ratios like the unemployment rate, which ticked up just a tenth of a percentage point in July to 4.2%. Still, she said, looking at a broad dashboard of labour-market measures, there is 'evidence after piece of evidence' that the labour market is softening quite a bit compared to last year. 'I would see further softening as an unwelcome result,' she said. 'I'm comfortable with the decision we made in July, but I am increasingly less comfortable with making that decision again and again.' At the same time, she said, there's no evidence that tariff-driven price increases are seeping more broadly into inflation, and if the Fed waits long enough to be certain it won't – a process that could take six months or a year, she said – the Fed will 'for sure' be too late to move. The Fed is approaching a 'tradeoff space where you are trying to make a judgment about where does policy need to be to continue to put downward pressure on inflation, and where does it need to be to continue to make sure that sustainable employment can be achieved,' she said. 'That's why I didn't think that July was a necessary change, but I do think, increasingly, policy is not aligned.'
