logo
People are only just realising why we always board a plane from the same side

People are only just realising why we always board a plane from the same side

Daily Mail​02-06-2025
From stressful airport experience, to pre-flight jitters, you've never probably had time to realise why all passengers board airplanes from the same side.
No matter what country you visit and regardless of airline, you'll likely always board and disembark the aircraft from the left hand side.
Food catering and luggage is then loaded on the right side of the plane, a practice that has steadfastly remained the same for decades.
But how did it come about and why don't we ever board from the right side?
Michael Oakley, the managing editor of The Aviation Historian, has revealed exactly why, and it dates back to historical times.
He started by explaining: 'Much of aviation terminology had its origins in maritime lore (rudder, cockpit, cabin, bulkhead, knots, etc), and similarly, the aeronautical ways of doing things owe a lot to sailing.'
The travel expert continued: 'Just as boats and ships have a port side – the side of the vessel conventionally adjacent to the dock when in port – aircraft are the same.
'Sensibly, people decided to continue to board on the port (or left) side.'
No matter what country you visit, and regardless of airline, you'll likely always board and disembark the aircraft from the left hand side
As air travel began to quite literally take off, the practice was carried over to the industry.
However, in the 1930s, United Airlines decided to turn the process on its head, and started boarding passengers on the right-hand side of their planes.
Bosses at the airline eventually reverted back to boarding on the left as air travel became more popular and it became apparent it was more efficient.
Matthew Burchette from the Museum of Flight in Washington explained: 'Since the pilot sits on the left, airports began to be built with gates on the left so the pilot could better judge distances as they taxied to the gate.
'As soon as more complex airports were developed, with passengers using Jetways as a means of walking directly aboard from the terminal, ground operations were a lot easier if every aircraft did the same thing in the same direction.'
Fast forward to today, the setup means passengers can board and disembark aircraft without getting in the way of ground staff, who can work on making sure the plane is fueled and your bags are loaded on board.
Meanwhile, a China Eastern Airline flight recently turned chaotic upon landing when a passenger suddenly opened an emergency exit - claiming he wanted 'to get some fresh air.'
Footage showed the aftermath of the random act, which saw a male passenger yank the emergency handle before deploying the evacuation slide on flight MU5828, which was still taxiing on the runway as it arrived in Kunming from Changsha on 11 May.
Bosses at the airline eventually reverted back to boarding on the left as air travel became more popular and it became apparent it was more efficient
According to witnesses, the man appeared calm, but had told others he opened the door to get a breath of fresh air.
But his bizarre actions reportedly caused chaos in the cabin, and passengers were prevented from disembarking the plan for around 20 minutes as crew members dealt with the situation.
Though no one was hurt, the suspect, described as a young male, was escorted off the plane by police for further questioning, as reported by NeedToKnow.
The flight took off from Changsha, China, and arrived at Kunming Changshui International Airport at around 8.42am on 11 May.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leeds Bradford Airport loses appeal over night-time flights limit
Leeds Bradford Airport loses appeal over night-time flights limit

BBC News

time21 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Leeds Bradford Airport loses appeal over night-time flights limit

Leeds Bradford Airport has failed in its appeal against a decision to limit the number of night flights it can City Council rejected the site's interpretation of night-flying rules in 2024 after accusations the limit on permitted night flights had been breached over several years, but the airport appealed the decision.A public inquiry took place in March and April to determine the legal meaning of the night-time flying rules, with the government planning inspectorate dismissing two of the airport's three airport spokesperson said they were "reviewing the outcomes of the public inquiry and will be working closely with the council to determine the best path forward". Council officers were "working through the detail of the decisions to assess any potential planning implications," a spokesperson for the authority Leeds Bradford Airport is permitted 2,920 take offs and landings between 23:00 and 07:00 during the campaign group Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport (GALBA) said the airport had breached that limit in each of the past three inspectorate's decision was welcomed by members of GALBA, with secretary Ian Coatman describing it as "a victory for local people, our environment and common sense". The airport previously admitted it did "accidentally" breach the night-time regulations in 2022 due to "errors taking place in reporting procedures", but claimed it had not gone over the limits in 2023 and 2024 based on its interpretation of the rules."While it doesn't mean an end to all night flights, it does mean the airport must stick to the rules that limit the number of planes allowed to fly at night," said Mr Coatman, who lives near the airport in bosses had wanted newer aircraft to be exempt from the cap, as well as smaller planes and flights which had been made three applications to the council for Certificates of Lawful Existing Use or Development (CLEUDs), asking them to reinterpret the meaning of the local night flight planning conditions.A spokesperson said updating the rules would "provide the correct legal interpretation of the existing planning conditions governing the operation of night flights at LBA".However, two CLEUD applications were rejected by the council and the third was left "undecided", prompting LBA to planning inspectorate dismissed two of the three appeals, but said the council's decision to reject an exemption for some smaller, less noisy planes was "not well-founded". Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

‘BA cancelled my flights and refuses to refund me — help'
‘BA cancelled my flights and refuses to refund me — help'

Times

time4 hours ago

  • Times

‘BA cancelled my flights and refuses to refund me — help'

✉ Last July I booked two premium economy tickets with British Airways, flying from Heathrow to Kuala Lumpur, for a trip in November to visit my nephew. On October 11 I was told the direct route was cancelled (the restart was pushed to April 2025). I called BA and accepted an alternative flight via Singapore, but the next day the airline called back to say Malaysia Airlines wouldn't confirm the leg from Singapore to Kuala Lumpur. Instead, I was told to book that part myself and claim the cost after travel. I followed these instructions, submitted my claim in December and since then have received four rejections, two of which cited air traffic control issues because of adverse weather conditions, which clearly don't apply. The latest says I didn't accept BA's rerouting offer, despite the fact I have the confirmation email. BA's own call recordings will verify this sequence of events. I've also raised this twice via the chatbot service, with no success. It's now been seven months, I'm at my wits' end and I'm no closer to getting my money back. Can you help?Tessa Vernon There are few things more infuriating than robotic and irrelevant customer service replies and I think you would have had to wait a very long time to get a sensible response from BA. It told you that 'as with any large organisation, it can sometimes take time for us to fix problems, but nothing is forgotten'. After I sent details of your case it quickly contacted you to offer a refund of £491 for the extra flights you had to buy from Singapore to Kuala Lumpur, and gave you an unusually generous £700 voucher because your experience didn't meet its 'usual standards'. ✉ I travelled to Jersey in May with my partner and her elderly mum. Our flights were booked with the Channel Islands airline Blue Islands. The trip itself was lovely but the return was chaotic. At 12.30pm on the day we were scheduled to fly home, we got a text saying our 4.40pm flight was cancelled. The next option was 6.25pm the following day and the flight didn't actually take off until after 10pm. The airline was unreachable and we racked up more than £400 in extra costs, including accommodation, car hire and parking, as well as missing out on our plans at home. To make matters worse, Blue Islands says it's not subject to UK/EU rules and won't compensate us. Can you help us recover our outlay?Jon Roberts Blue Islands has had to remove 28 flights from its summer schedule because one of its aircraft was damaged and a new plane has been delayed; as a result there have been many cancellations and delays. But unfortunately you can't claim for your extra costs because, as the airline happily explains on its website: 'As Guernsey and Jersey are non-EU jurisdictions, are not within the UK, and Blue Islands is a non-EU/UK air carrier, EU261/2004 and UK261 does not apply to Blue Islands flights departing the Channel Islands.' So you'll have to get in touch with your travel insurance company to see if you can claw any money back. Blue Islands was contacted for comment. ✉ My late husband and I had always dreamt of visiting Barbados, and now I'd like to make the trip in his memory. I'm in my late seventies, in good health, and a fairly confident traveller, but I do feel a little anxious about going alone. I'd prefer to fly with Virgin Atlantic because we'd built up some air miles, and I'm working with a modest but reasonable budget. Ideally, I'd like to travel in February. Could you suggest a suitable itinerary or accommodation?Pauline Purnell I'm sorry to hear about your husband and obviously this will be an emotional trip for you. I'd suggest you stay in one of the smaller boutique hotels on the island where staff will quickly get to know you and can arrange for you to be picked up from the airport as well as suggest excursions and activities. But you may have to rethink your travel dates: February isn't the ideal month if you're on a moderate budget because it's peak season and prices at beachfront hotels are eye-watering. Rates drop after Easter and the weather is still great. Try Little Arches, a relaxed and friendly ten-bedroom adults-only hotel next to a white sand beach on the south coast. It has a highly rated rooftop restaurant. A garden room costs £274 including B&B in mid-April ( If you weren't able to use your Virgin air miles and decided you'd rather book a package, a week's B&B plus flights would cost £2,496 in mid-April ( ✉ Next year, my wife and I will be flying to Rome for the Italy v England rugby international on March 7 and will then travel on to Paris for the France v England match on March 14. We'd like to take the train from Rome to Paris with a couple of two-night stops, possibly including Annecy, but are struggling to choose the best/most picturesque routes. Our budget for hotels is about £200 a night. Could you suggest an itinerary?Dave Toogood Fingers crossed you'll be celebrating an England win as you hop on the train in Rome. One option with spectacular views would be to travel via Milan and Tirano to Chur on the famous narrow-gauge Bernina Express, one of the world's most scenic train rides (the route is Unesco listed). Stay at the Central Hotel Post, near the station and the cable car, where doubles start at £135 in March ( Then make your way to lakeside Annecy via Zurich and Geneva. Stay at Allobroges Park Hôtel, near the station and on the edge of the old town; room-only doubles start at £195 in March ( From Annecy it's about four hours to Paris and the first part of the journey is along the shore of the spectacular Lac du Bourget, north of Aix Les Bains. ✉ We're celebrating a milestone anniversary next year and would like to spend a week away in a villa with the kids and grandkids during the summer holidays. There will be eight adults and eight children, including three babies. None of us wants to have to rely on cars and therefore walking to a beach and shops would be ideal. A pool and not too long a flight would also be great and we have a budget of up to £15,000. Any ideas? Jeremy Lewis Family-friendly Casa do Conde is a sunny eight-bedroom villa in underrated Galicia, northern Spain, which escapes the country's punishing summer heat. It will sleep your party of 16 easily (it also has three cots) and sits in lovely large gardens. There is a pool (with Roman steps), plus a swing and slide for your gang. A two-minute stroll will take you to the restaurants, shops and beach of O Grove, a pretty port town and an excellent spot for a seafood supper. In August next year, a seven-night self-catering stay will cost from £5,150, which will leave you a lot of leeway for flights (into Porto, Vigo or Santiago de Compostela) and car hire. Some of Galicia's best attractions, including the spa island of La Toja, are an easy drive away (

Delta flight was traveling 60 mph down runway when AeroMéxico plane landed in front of it
Delta flight was traveling 60 mph down runway when AeroMéxico plane landed in front of it

The Independent

time6 hours ago

  • The Independent

Delta flight was traveling 60 mph down runway when AeroMéxico plane landed in front of it

A Delta flight was traveling 60 mph down a runway in Mexico City on Monday when an AeroMéxico plane landed in front of it. The Delta Air Lines Boeing 737 jet bound for Atlanta had to stop its takeoff and return to its terminal at Benito Juarez International Airport after an AeroMéxico Embraer 190 regional jet flew over the plane and landed in front of it on the same runway, according to multiple reports. FlightRadar24, a flight tracking site, showed the two aircraft about 200 feet apart, according to the reports. The Delta flight, which had 144 passengers and six crew members on board, departed to Atlanta about three hours late, CNN reported. Delta and AeroMéxico both said in separate statements obtained by ABC News the companies were cooperating with authorities as the incident is investigated. Both airlines said maintaining passenger safety was their number one priority. ABC reported on air traffic control recordings from the incident, in which the Delta pilot was reportedly heard saying, "We are holding on the runway.' Another voice can be heard in the recordings saying, 'Wow" and "Increíble." The Independent has reached out to the Federal Aviation Administration and Mexico's civil aviation agency for comment. Steve Ganyard, an ABC News aviation contributor and former fighter pilot, explained what could have gone wrong in the near collision. "There are parallel runways at Mexico City. So we don't know if the controller told the Aeromexico aircraft to land on the left-hand and not the right-hand runway where the Delta jet was," he said. The aviation expert continued: "We also don't know, perhaps the tower controller didn't understand that they had cleared the Aeromexico aircraft to land while simultaneously clearing the Delta jet to take off."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store