logo
Under Attack by Trump's Tariffs, Asian Countries Seek Out Better Friends

Under Attack by Trump's Tariffs, Asian Countries Seek Out Better Friends

New York Times4 days ago
For most countries that received President Trump's letters last week threatening steep tariffs, especially the Asian nations with economies focused on supplying the United States, there are no obvious substitutes as a destination for their goods.
But they are doing their best to find them.
Business and political leaders around the world have been roundly baffled by the White House's imposition of new duties, even as governments shuttled envoys back and forth to Washington offering new purchases and pledges of reform. Mr. Trump is erecting new trade barriers and demanding deep concessions by Aug. 1, claiming years of grievance because America buys more than it sells.
'Across the world, tools once used to generate growth are now wielded to pressure, isolate and contain,' Anwar Ibrahim, the prime minister of Malaysia, said at a gathering of Southeast Asian leaders on Wednesday. 'As we navigate external pressures, we need to fortify our foundations. Trade among ourselves. Invest more in one another.'
There are already a few signs of such efforts. South Korea's new president, Lee Jae Myung, sent special envoys to Australia and Germany to discuss defense and trade issues, and plans on dispatching delegations to several others. Brazil and India announced plans to increase their bilateral trade by 70 percent, to $20 billion.
Indonesia says it is nearing a treaty with the European Union that would drop most tariffs on both sides to zero. And in Vietnam, which Mr. Trump said had accepted 20 percent tariffs on its goods headed to the United States before last week's letters, the deputy trade minister emphasized efforts to reduce her country's reliance on American consumers by leveraging other trade agreements.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If You Had Bought Gold During the 2008 Financial Crisis, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
If You Had Bought Gold During the 2008 Financial Crisis, Here's How Much You'd Have Today

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If You Had Bought Gold During the 2008 Financial Crisis, Here's How Much You'd Have Today

The 2008 financial crisis had a worldwide rippling effect. The S&P 500 fell 38.5%, millions of homes went into foreclosure and U.S. households lost nearly $17 trillion in total wealth. No matter where you were at the time — but especially if you were affected by economic decline — you might not have seen that period as a time to invest. But what if you had? What if you'd purchased gold in 2008? Here's what it'd be worth today, and whether it's still a good investment in current times. Check Out: Learn More: Gold Prices Have Risen Since 2008 At the start of 2008, gold was priced at around $924 per ounce. Over the next four years, it rose to $1,788 per ounce. Like any investment, gold has had its share of fluctuation. Back in December 2015 — just shy of a decade ago — it fell to $1,060 per ounce. That's only slightly higher than its 2008 price. But as it tends to do, gold bounced back shortly thereafter. Aside from a few small dips, it's seen an overall upward trajectory. As of July 2025, it's valued at approximately $3,359 per ounce. Read Next: What Your Investment Would Be Worth Today If you'd purchased a single ounce of gold during the 2008 financial crisis, you'd have spent around $924 and it'd be worth around $3,359 today. That's a 264% increase in value over the past 17 years. But what if you'd invested more aggressively and bought, say, 10 one-ounce bars for $9,240? Using that same percentage increase, you'd have around $33,590 today. Is Gold Still Worth the Investment? You might have missed out on investing in gold when it was priced at under $1,000 an ounce. But that doesn't mean it's a bad investment now. You could use it to safeguard your other assets and build more diversity into your portfolio, especially during times of economic uncertainty and stock market volatility. It's just going to cost more than it did in 2008. 'Gold has been in an incredible bull-market cycle now for the past 25 years,' said Robert Kientz, head of operations at Kinesis Bullion. 'Gold has exceeded the returns of the major stock market indices since 2000. And while gold has been on such an incredible hot streak, it does not show signs of slowing down.' Of course, there's no guarantee that it will continue to rise in value at such an exponential rate. But Kientz said that gold may well have a solid future as an investment for the next five to 10 years. Not only do central banks still actively purchase it — they bought 244 tons in Q1 2025 — but gold prices tend to rise during times of economic uncertainty. If you're considering diversifying your portfolio, gold might be worth the investment. Just make sure it aligns with your overall strategy and goals. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs The New Retirement Problem Boomers Are Facing This article originally appeared on If You Had Bought Gold During the 2008 Financial Crisis, Here's How Much You'd Have Today Sign in to access your portfolio

Whitmer says 'massive economic uncertainty' is to blame on semiconductor project failure in Michigan
Whitmer says 'massive economic uncertainty' is to blame on semiconductor project failure in Michigan

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Whitmer says 'massive economic uncertainty' is to blame on semiconductor project failure in Michigan

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Plans to build a semiconductor manufacturing plant in Michigan have fallen through and Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said Wednesday that 'massive economic uncertainty' is to blame. Bringing the company to Michigan was a key goal for Whitmer, a Democrat and potential 2028 presidential candidate who is in her final years as governor of the battleground state. Domestic manufacturing is a priority of President Donald Trump's second administration and the president has leveraged tariffs as a way to incentivize companies to build and stay in America. While Whitmer did not mention Trump by name in her remarks, she pointed the finger at his tariffs that have shaken up the economy periodically this year. 'Their board came to this decision amid national economic turmoil, which is at risk of worsening amid threats of even higher tariffs,' Whitmer said in a statement. Whitmer did not name the company but state records show California-based technology firm Sandisk Corp. was considering the sprawling 1,300-acre site near the city of Flint and forecasted 9,400 jobs and 5,000 construction jobs as a result. Sandisk declined to comment on Wednesday. The news quickly set off dueling political statements from Republicans and Democrats in the state. The Trump administration is using tariffs and other tactics to bring manufacturing in critical areas like semiconductors back to the U.S., White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement in response to Whitmer's remarks. Desai pointed to new semiconductor development in Texas and Arizona this year as wins garnered by the Trump administration in the chips and technology industry. Other Democrats were quick to attribute the loss in Michigan to Trump's economic policies Wednesday. 'Trump's abandonment of long-term investments and chaotic tariff practices are not only raising costs, they just killed 10,000 good-paying jobs,' U.S. Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet, a Democrat who represents the area, said in a statement. 'This could have been a game-changer for mid-Michigan's economy.' Michigan House of Representatives Speaker Matt Hall, a Republican, said he supports Trump's strategy of relying on tariffs and incentives in the tax and spending bill to bring manufacturing development to America, not overseas. 'We simply need state leaders who are focused on making sure Michigan is the best possible place to build and grow,' he said. Sandisk, known for making flash drives and memory cards, was looking to break ground on the project in 2025, according to documents provided by the Michigan Economic Development Corporation. Michigan offered Sandisk $1.925 billion in cash grants, $250 million in workforce development funding and about $3.76 billion in tax breaks, according to documents dated to August 2024. Congress passed the CHIPS and Science Act incentivizing technology development about halfway through former President Joe Biden's term. Even as Trump and Republican lawmakers have since threatened to put an end to the act, the Department of Commerce was collaborating with Sandisk on securing federal incentives through the package. Whitmer in her statement said that the company is no longer looking to build a semiconductor facility anywhere in the U.S. In a speech in May, Whitmer said she had been advocating with the Trump administration directly to help bring a chip plant to the state. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

S&P 500 Gains & Losses Today: Johnson & Johnson Stock Jumps; Universal Health Services Shares Slide
S&P 500 Gains & Losses Today: Johnson & Johnson Stock Jumps; Universal Health Services Shares Slide

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

S&P 500 Gains & Losses Today: Johnson & Johnson Stock Jumps; Universal Health Services Shares Slide

Key Takeaways The S&P 500 ticked 0.3% higher on Wednesday, July 16, 2025, as President Trump addressed concerns that a dismissal of Fed Chair Jerome Powell could be imminent. Johnson & Johnson shares pushed higher after the health care giant reported better-than-expected quarterly results. Shares of Universal Health Services fell after BofA analysts downgraded the stock, citing headwinds related to recent health care U.S. equities indexes ticked higher Wednesday as President Donald Trump refuted reports that he is planning the immediate dismissal of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and questions about his legal ability to do so. The S&P 500 added 0.3% in the midweek trading session. The Nasdaq also gained 0.3%, notching a record closing high for a third straight day. The Dow was up 0.5%. Read Investopedia's full coverage of today's trading here. Shares of Global Payments (GPN) surged 6.5%, the most of any S&P 500 stock, following reports that activist investor Elliott Management has accumulated a significant stake in the financial technology firm. Global Payments shares took a hit in April when the company agreed to acquire payment processor Worldpay in a cash-and-stock deal worth more than $24 billion. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) shares jumped 6.2%. The medical device and drug maker topped sales and profit forecasts with its second-quarter results and boosted its full-year guidance. CEO Joaquin Duato said Johnson & Johnson is positioned for growth in the second half of 2025, highlighting approvals and expected submissions across various medical areas. U.S.-based asset manager Apollo Global Management (APO) is reportedly in discussions about a potential investment in Spanish soccer club Atletico Madrid. Although Apollo's initial meetings with the club were focused on financing Atletico's 800-million-euro development project surrounding Madrid's Metropolitano Stadium, the firm is now reportedly interested in acquiring a stake in the team's majority owner. Apollo Global Management shares gained 4.8%. Shares of engineering and design software firm Ansys (ANSS) fell 4.7%, posting the benchmark index's weakest daily performance. Wednesday's downturn gave back some of the gains posted by the stock earlier in the week after regulators in China granted conditional approval for the $35 billion buyout of Ansys by fellow software provider Synopsys (SNPS). S&P Dow Jones Indices said Tuesday that Ansys stock will exit the S&P 500 later this week following the closure of the deal, to be replaced by digital advertising firm The Trade Desk (TDD). Bank of America analysts downgraded Universal Health Services (UHS) stock to "underperform" from "neutral" and lowered their price target. Shares of the hospital operator fell 3.8%. Analysts cited concerns about health care legislation, including cuts to Medicaid and Affordable Care Act, or ACA, exchanges, which they believe could pressure patient volumes and increase hospitals' exposure to bad debt. BofA indicated that UHS is highly vulnerable to changes in state directed payments. Shares of memory chipmaker Micron Technology (MU) sank 3.1% after Goldman Sachs initiated coverage of the stock with a "neutral" rating. Although Goldman analysts said Micron could benefit from an eventual rebound in the NAND flash memory market heading into 2026, they maintain a cautious stance on the overall semiconductor space, revenues for which it expects will remain relatively stable through next year. Read the original article on Investopedia

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store