Provo Airport breaks ground on 3-year expansion project
The groundbreaking kicks off a three-year project to expand the airport from four to 10 gates, more than doubling the travel opportunities available at the small airport, and increase baggage handling and ticketing areas. The airport's apron, or plane loading area, will be expanded by November, while the gates are expected to open in late 2028.
The expansion was made possible through collaboration of the county, city, state, Federal Aviation Administration and Mountainland Association of Governments.
"With their help, the sky truly has become the limit for Provo Airport," Provo Mayor Michelle Kaufusi said. "For both leisure and business travelers, it offers something rare: convenience, comfort and connectivity — all from the heart of Utah Valley."
The airport is a "vital part" of Utah's growing transportation network as the state prepares for expected growth and the upcoming 2034 Olympics, she said.
This "bold and wise" project adds no new debt to the airport, preventing the need to raise costs, she added. The airport contributes approximately $203 million in annual economic impact to Utah Valley, she said.
The expansion is being funded by a $78 million commitment from Utah County. The commitment includes a $19.5 million up-front payment from the Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, and Convention Tax revenue and transient room tax revenue, and a $3.9 million annual contribution for the next 15 years.
The county called it a "smart use of tourism tax dollars" that leads to better infrastructure, more jobs and "global readiness" at the airport. Commissioner Skyler Beltran said the monetary commitment is a "historic investment" into the community and is a "smart, strategic use of resources that will bring long-term returns."
"Provo has always been a city of visionaries, and today, that same pioneering spirit leads this expansion. With increased passenger capacity, new destinations and modern amenities, this project will bring more jobs, support local businesses and enhance the quality of life for our residents for decades to come," Beltran said.
The added travel options will bring new business markets into the county and help connect students with their homes while also being a gateway to the world, he added.
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce President Curtis Blair called the area one of the fastest growing regions in the country. He said it's important to meet not only the luxury travel needs but also the business transportation needs of consumers in the community.
The airport makes it easier for businesses to have personal visits, leading to "intangible" benefits such as relationships and connections made for future investments, Blair said.
"This expansion makes that possible where we are this close from having a business-to-business connection with any city in America," he said.
More than 2 million passengers have flown through Provo Airport in the three years it has been open, including around 96,000 just last month, Provo Airport Director Brian Torgersen said. With an anticipated additional million passengers this year, Torgersen said it's likely the airport will be elevated to small hub status.
"When we first opened the doors, we knew we were building more than just an airport terminal. We were building a gateway to growth, opportunity and connection for all of Utah County and even the entire state of Utah. What we didn't expect was how quickly that vision would take flight," Torgersen said.
The airport has outgrown its space "faster than we could've imagined. That's a testament not just to the demand for air travel, but to the confidence in what we have built together," he added.
Provo will be hosting three open houses to share information on the airport's conditions and projected travel demand and to receive public feedback on what the future of the airport should look like. The first open house took place Monday.
'We need our voices as we charter our next course,' the mayor said. 'Thank you to everyone who believed in this little airport that could because now we know it can, and it will.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Skift
32 minutes ago
- Skift
The 2025 Half-Time Airline Report
In this week's show, hosts Gordon and Jay take a step back to reflect on a fascinating first six months of 2025. From geopolitical shocks to consolidation questions, we assess some of the biggest trends of the year so far. In this episode, Gordon and Jay put into perspective the first half of 2025 in the airline industry, discussing key trends such as global demand, the impact of the U.S. dollar, and the ongoing consolidation within the industry. They also explore how weather patterns are affecting tourism, the economic implications of tariffs, and the potential for mergers and acquisitions as airlines navigate a changing landscape. Looking ahead, they highlight the importance of monitoring oil prices and supply chain issues as the industry moves into the second half of the year. Listen to This Podcast Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | RSS Takeaways
Travel Weekly
an hour ago
- Travel Weekly
Don't let America's tourism marketing go dark: Why slashing Brand USA Is a costly mistake
As an executive at the former creative agency of record for Brand USA, I've seen firsthand how powerful a well-funded national tourism campaign can be. That's why the proposed 80% budget cut to Brand USA is both baffling and dangerous. This isn't just bean-counting; it's effectively pulling the rug out from under an entire sector of our economy. Dulani Porter is executive vice president and partner at Spark, a creative and strategy agency, which was recently the creative agency of record for Brand USA. Travel and tourism supports millions of American jobs and generates trillions of dollars in economic output. Gutting the nation's destination marketer would ripple far beyond lost ads; it would harm local businesses, cost jobs and diminish America's standing on the world stage. Brand USA is one of those rare public programs that more than pays for itself. Independent research has shown that its marketing efforts deliver some of the highest returns in the industry, translating into real dollars spent by international travelers. Since its inception, Brand USA's work has driven millions of additional visitors and helped inject billions of dollars into communities across all 50 states. These visitors don't just touch down in major cities; they fan out to small towns, mountain regions, coastal hideaways and desert parks. They fill hotels, dine in restaurants, visit attractions and shop on Main Street. In doing so, they help sustain tens of thousands of U.S. jobs every year, not only in hospitality but also in manufacturing, construction, finance and retail sectors that benefit indirectly from tourism. Let's dispel the myth that tourism marketing only helps big coastal cities or giant corporations. In truth, the vast majority of travel-related businesses in America are small businesses, from family-run outfitters in Alaska to B&B owners in Appalachia. These are the businesses that often lack any marketing presence abroad. Brand USA's storytelling is often the only megaphone they have on the global stage. Its campaigns have long encouraged travelers to go beyond the usual tourist hubs and explore hidden treasures, like a blues festival in Mississippi, a mountain town in Colorado or a barbecue trail in Kansas. In my work with Brand USA, I saw firsthand how highlighting these places helped spread visitor spending in meaningful ways. When international tourists venture off the beaten path, they're booking local tours, buying from local artisans and eating at local diners, spending money that might never have reached these communities otherwise. Now, imagine turning off this marketing engine. What happens if we stop telling America's story to the world? Unfortunately, we don't have to imagine: history offers a cautionary tale. In 1993, Colorado eliminated its state tourism promotion budget to save money. The result was an economic disaster: within two years, Colorado's share of U.S. tourism plummeted about 30%, costing the state over $1.4 billion in lost revenue annually. It took years for Colorado to claw back its reputation and visitor numbers. Fast forward to 2011, when Washington State became the only state in the nation with no tourism office due to budget cuts. Industry leaders practically begged them not to do it; Colorado's tourism director famously called Washington's decision "foolish," noting how badly his state had suffered when it made the same mistake. The lesson from these examples is laid out plainly: when you stop marketing, visitors stop coming. Once lost, travel demand is hard to rebuild, and the businesses that fold in the interim don't magically reappear when you realize the error. We must also consider the broader competitive landscape. Pulling 80% of Brand USA's funding is akin to unilateral disarmament in a global tourism battle. Rival destinations in Europe, Asia and beyond are spending aggressively to attract the very travelers we'd be ignoring. If America goes dark, we essentially concede market share to our competitors. Fewer people will choose the U.S. for their vacations if they aren't being reminded of what makes this country special. And those who do still come might stick to the obvious attractions, bypassing the smaller cities and rural areas that no longer have a national campaign spotlighting them. This would hurt thousands of communities that rely on tourism dollars. The U.S. Travel Association warned that not funding Brand USA would "effectively end international travel promotion for regions that simply can't afford to reach global travelers on their own," especially hurting non-metropolitan areas that need those jobs the most. Even before this proposal, America's share of global long-haul travel was shrinking -- not due to lack of appeal, but because other countries are out-marketing us. Slashing Brand USA now would pour gasoline on that fire, just as worldwide travel is rebounding. It's a formula for losing visitors, losing revenue and losing our competitive edge. The timing couldn't be worse. The next few years will bring the U.S. onto some of the biggest stages imaginable. These are moments we've been planning for and dreaming of. In 2026, the United States will co-host the FIFA World Cup, with matches in cities across the country. And we'll commemorate America's 250th birthday with a yearlong semiquincentennial celebration in all 50 states. Just two years later, in 2028, Los Angeles will welcome the world for the Summer Olympics. These events will thrust America into the global spotlight and have the potential to draw millions of international visitors. Brand USA has been gearing up by developing campaigns, partnerships and itineraries to capitalize on the surge of interest. To pull the plug on funding now, on the eve of these bonanza events, is strategically incoherent. It would be like hosting a huge party but ditching the invitations and welcome signs. If we underfund our marketing at this critical moment, we risk squandering the tourism windfall these events should bring. The world will literally be watching us; we want them booking trips, not just watching from afar because we failed to make the case to visit. Finally, consider the intangible stakes. Tourism is a form of public diplomacy. When we invite someone from abroad to discover America, we're also shaping their perceptions of our country. Every traveler who hikes in our national parks, chats with locals at a farmers' market or attends a jazz festival in New Orleans goes home with their own small understanding of what America is really about. That kind of person-to-person connection is invaluable. Brand USA's mission from the start has been not only to fuel our economy through tourism but to "enhance the image of the United States worldwide." In an era when misinformation and geopolitical tensions often skew how nations perceive each other, welcoming visitors is one of the most effective, organic forms of soft diplomacy we have. I've watched Brand USA craft campaigns that celebrate our diversity and warmth, essentially countering negative stereotypes by letting people experience the true fabric of America. Pulling back on these efforts would forfeit tourist visits and diminish America's voice in the global conversation. It's telling the world that we don't care to reach out, that maybe we're closed off. That is the opposite of what made America a beacon for generations of travelers and admirers. The budget bill passed by the Senate reduced funding by 80%, but the House of Representatives must reject this draconian cut for what it is: a penny-wise, pound-foolish move that undermines a proven economic engine and America's brand all at once. Brand USA has a proven track record of success, boosting visitation, creating jobs and generating a return on investment that private companies would envy. It helps ensure that small businesses thrive, that all regions share in the tourism pie and that the American story is told by us, not by our competitors. With so much at stake, from a once-in-a-lifetime convergence of global events to the livelihoods of workers in travel, hospitality and creative industries, now is the time to double down on Brand USA, not to abandon it. The cost of cutting Brand USA far outweighs any short-term savings. In fact, it's not really savings at all - it's forfeited revenue, forfeited jobs, and forfeited influence. As someone who has spent a career sharing America's wonders with the world, I can say confidently: this is an investment worth protecting. Let's keep the welcome mat out for the world and keep Brand USA doing what it does best - inviting travelers to experience the United States, and in turn, keeping America's economy and spirit open for business. ___________________________________________________________ Travel Weekly accepts opinion pieces on subjects of interest to the travel industry and, most importantly, to travel advisors. Forums should be 550 words and must be exclusive to Travel Weekly; no part of the writing can have been published anywhere else. Forums must not be self-promotional and should be submitted with the understanding that Travel Weekly reserves the right to edit the content for length, style, spelling, clarity, structure, etc. Submissions, along with a high-resolution headshot and a short bio, should be emailed to editor in chief Arnie Weissmann and deputy managing editor Gerry Bourbeau.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
North Korea Opens Seaside Resort With Fanfare but No Foreign Tourists
A new waterfront resort opened for business this week in North Korea with P.R. hype — but without the foreign visitors that the country's leader, Kim Jong-un, hoped would one day arrive with tourist cash to offset financially punishing sanctions. On Thursday, state media reported on North Korean families crowding a 2.5-mile-long scenic sandy beach on its central east coast, which began accepting tourists two days earlier. 'The joy and optimism of the tourists were overflowing everywhere, and the song of happiness resounded in the windows of bright lodgings,' the North's official Korean Central News Agency said. The resort, which is called Wonsan Kalma and can accommodate 20,000 people, is the most ambitious among the seafront or mountainside spa and ski resorts Mr. Kim has been building to attract foreign tourists. Mr. Kim, his wife and his daughter attended a ceremony in late June marking the completion of the facility. Mr. Kim began promoting tourism after the United Nations imposed severe sanctions in 2017 that banned all of his country's main exports, including coal and textiles. The sanctions were designed to strip North Korea of the means of earning foreign currency to finance its nuclear and missile programs. But they did not affect tourism, which Mr. Kim saw as a new source of sorely needed foreign currency. Mr. Kim's aims were best displayed in the transformation of Kalma Beach. North Korea used to fill it with pieces of artillery during military drills. In recent years, however, Mr. Kim has lined the beach with newly built water parks and multistory resort hotels. South Korean media nicknamed Kalma Beach 'North Korea's Waikiki.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
