Green Party leadership candidates accuse Polanski of using ‘polarising' language
The co-leadership contenders did not give specific examples of 'polarising' language he had used.
Former Green Party leader and MP Caroline Lucas said Ms Chowns and Mr Ramsay's membership of the House of Commons gave them more authority compared with Mr Polanski.
They represent North Herefordshire, and Waveney Valley in East Anglia, respectively.
They are standing against Mr Polanski, the party's deputy leader and a member of the London Assembly. He has previously told the Guardian his bid would be focused on transforming the Greens into an 'eco-populism' mass movement.
The Green Party had four MPs elected in July 2024, its highest number. Meanwhile, the party has more than 850 councillors after May's local elections, also a record total.
Voting in the leadership contest will open on Friday. The result will be announced on September 2.
The election was called after Carla Denyer (Bristol Central) announced her decision not to stand again in May.
Ms Chowns said: 'As the current Labour government balances the books on the backs of the poorest, and backslides on its commitments to counter climate breakdown, it's crucially important that the Green Party keeps its distinctive identity as the only party in British politics with climate and environment front and centre.
'To win under first-past-the-post, we have to connect with a wide range of voters. We do that not through polarising language that appeals only to a narrow segment, but with the language of fairness, compassion and hope for a thriving, sustainable future.'
Zack Polanski during the general election campaign in July 2024 (Dominic Lipinski/ITV/PA)
She added voters had indicated they would be more willing to back the Green Party than the new party which is being set up by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana.
'Polling by YouGov shows that people who voted for all the other parties in 2024 are much more likely to consider voting Green next time than for a Corbyn-led party, and our ability to keep winning over voters from every other party is a huge strength in an increasingly crowded political landscape,' she said.
Ms Lucas, who represented Brighton Pavilion for 14 years until last year, said: 'It's a huge advantage for our party to be led by people who are holding the Government to account every day of the week in Parliament, with the mandate that comes from being an elected MP.
'It reminds voters that the Green Party is a serious political party winning power at every level, as well as being part of the wider environmental and social justice movement.'
Mr Ramsay, who has been co-leader with Ms Denyer since 2021, said: 'In recent years we've had unprecedented success, doubling our councillor numbers and winning four new Green MPs.
'This has come from a laser-like focus on elections, and from successfully building trust and sustained support in communities all across the country.
The Green Party's four MPs Sian Berry, Carla Denyer, Adrian Ramsay and Ellie Chowns (Ian West/PA)
'Building that level of trust with voters is a massive achievement and, with the two-party system now clearly finished, it puts us in an excellent position to make much bigger gains.
'Ellie and I are hugely ambitious for the future of the party. We can't be complacent about the Green Party's hard-won credibility.
'As more and more people align with our values and vision, that credibility and wide appeal is what will enable us to play a central role in the future of British politics.'
Mr Polanski has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
16 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Kemi Badenoch's position on Israel is discrediting the Conservative Party
Photo byandWhen Kemi Badenoch became leader of the Conservative Party, she very sensibly aimed not to rush into early statements of detailed policy. Unfortunately, her appointment of Priti Patel as shadow foreign secretary was its own statement. Following her unauthorised 2017 trip to Israel while secretary for international development, Patel has been a disgraced figure. While there, accompanied by the peer Stuart Polak of the Conservative Friends of Israel, she met the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu without UK government officials or the British ambassador. Afterwards, she advocated a change in UK policy which, in breach of long-established humanitarian practice, would have included the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) in its aid delivery. This episode could not have been a starker example of impropriety. It merited her dismissal but Theresa May was too weak to wield the axe. Instead, Patel was allowed to resign. And yet, Badenoch saw fit to appoint her to the shadow cabinet. Patel is now in a position to perpetuate her views at a critical moment in world events. Badenoch has shown no indication of knowing anything about Israel and Palestine, and has not made any profound statements on this, the one foreign issue, other than Ukraine, that has dominated global news since she was elected. All she utters is uncritical support for Israel. The Conservative Party used to have a world-view. It supported enlightened international cooperation, and institutions such as the UN along with its accompanying treaties, rules and conventions. More broadly, it was the UK that pledged to support a homeland for the Jewish people, and a future for the Palestinians next door. To their shame, while successive governments have forever delayed implementing that commitment, the Israelis each and every day have violently stolen ever more Palestinian land. Palestine is the only populous legally undisputed land in the world not allowed to call itself a state. It does not belong to Israel, and Israel's determination to annex it does not mean it is disputed. The illegality of Israeli encroachment is cast-iron in international law, a belief that has been the policy of Conservative and Labour governments for decades. Badenoch, however, seems to share the view of those like Patel who do not believe in their own policy. They can never bring themselves to say explicitly that settlements are illegal. The charge sheet against Israel is growing every day: disproportionate force, indiscriminate bombing, mass displacement, food deprivation, the replacement of the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA with mercenaries, the killing of tens of Palestinians each day as they desperately scramble for food, state-backed support for settler terrorists, and the banning of journalists from Gaza. Badenoch and her front bench have done nothing to condemn any of it. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Jonathan Sumption on Israel and Gaza: A question of intent] Amid all this, Priti Patel has refused in the Commons to condemn settler violence – all she would say was that settlers are a barrier to a two-state solution. And when extremist Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir were sanctioned in June, she declined in her response even to mention their names. The likes of Suella Braverman, meanwhile, have branded pro-Palestine demonstrations 'hate marches'. Contemptibly, any pro-Palestinian voice within the Conservative Party is almost systematically accused of anti-Semitism and put into its complaints procedure, which silences and bullies. And as Michael Gove increases his hold on appointments to the leader's office, what could be more warped than his recent recommendation that the IDF be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize? It has now reached the point where Conservative comment has become so extreme it has discredited their entire foreign policy and is making them despised more widely. The party is increasingly becoming defined by its lack of humanity. The world is watching the extermination of an entire country. Palestine is being annihilated. Meanwhile the Conservative Party is covering itself in shame, and will stand no chance of re-election unless it states a clear policy based on international law, and promotes the UK's historic understanding of the region. This issue is and always has been about land. Israel's extremist government has only one objective, and that is to make all of Palestine theirs. All other talk, horrendous though the facts may be, is second to that. As leader, Kemi Badenoch could redeem herself speedily by stating loudly what all should be saying to Israel: 'Get out of Palestine, it isn't your country.' [See also: Keir Starmer alienates left and right on Gaza] Related
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Corbyn hits back at Rayner's war on allotments
Jeremy Corbyn has accused Angela Rayner of hammering a 'nail in the coffin' of community allotments after she said councils could sell them off to raise money. The former Labour leader criticised his former colleague after The Telegraph revealed she had agreed for eight allotments across England to be sold since last year's general election. Writing for The Telegraph, Mr Corbyn said the decision would 'fill many with deep dismay' and accused Ms Rayner of making 'the future of these precious spaces even more perilous'. Praising the Diggers, English Civil War dissidents who sought common ownership of land, he said: 'Is this government going to put the nail in the coffin of the joy of digging ground for potatoes on a cold, wet February Sunday afternoon?' Mr Corbyn, who has recently turned his back on Labour to launch a new party, is a keen horticulturist and uses an allotment near his north London home. He has said his favourite crop was marrows, and that time spent growing produce helped alleviate the stress of working in Westminster. Ms Rayner has changed the rules on local government assets to give cash-strapped councils more 'flexibility' to sell off land, including allotments and school playing fields. Some of the land, including a community allotment in Storrington, West Sussex, has been sold to developers to build new homes. Mr Corbyn said Labour should have more regard for the 'troubled history of land ownership, and the struggle over access by those who simply want to grow their own crops'. He wrote: 'Of course, social housing is desperately needed, but we need not sacrifice these vital green spaces to build it,' he wrote. 'We can build on ex-industrial land and take over empty properties. Even then, we should ensure social housing is accompanied by community gardens and adequate growing space.' Under a century-old law, the Housing Secretary is required to give permission for any to be sold off by local authorities. The list of eight allotments she has agreed to be sold were revealed in Parliament last month, and include sites in Somerset, Nottinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Hertfordshire. Mr Corbyn has said he does not use any weedkiller on his allotment, which can make the process of weeding it laborious, but believes that each gardener has their own 'philosophy'. 'I like a marrow,' he told his local newspaper earlier this year. 'You get a long marrow which is basically a courgette and cut it long ways; take out the seeds to plant again for next year, then fill it with chopped vegetables, onions, make some indentations in it and smother that in olive oil and bake it very slowly.' His intervention on allotment policy is one of the first criticisms of the Labour Government since he launched his new political outfit, which will be called 'Your Party' until supporters have voted on a name. The party supports nationalisation of public utilities and infrastructure, and will have the support of trade unions, he said. It is also opposed to the Israeli government's assault on Gaza, but other policy decisions will be taken after a vote of members later this year. Ms Rayner previously served in Mr Corbyn's top team as shadow education secretary, before winning the deputy leadership of the party in the year Sir Keir Starmer became the party leader. Her department said that councils should only sell off allotments 'where it is clearly necessary and offers value for money'. A spokesman added: 'We know how important allotments are for communities, and that is why strict criteria is in place to protect them, as well as school playing fields.' But the Conservatives said the policy was 'a kick in the teeth to local people who don't have access to their own gardens' and called for the Government to do more to protect green spaces. The loss of allotments makes us all poorer By Jeremy Corbyn News that Angela Rayner may approve allotment sales will fill many with deep dismay. Allotments have always been under threat from developers. Now, that threat seems to have government backing, which makes the future of these precious spaces even more perilous. Those advising government and local authorities should have some regard for the troubled history of land ownership, and the struggle over access by those who simply want to grow their own crops. The debate goes back to the English Civil War, when the King wanted to secure control of the land he had gained, while Cromwell claimed to speak for the farmers. In truth, it was the Diggers who were the real revolutionaries. They wanted land to be in common ownership. Despite the restoration of the monarchy, huge areas of land were known as the Commons and survived for almost another two centuries. That is, until the greed of big landowners won out once again. The Enclosure Acts, one of the most grotesque abuses of power by Parliament, took away the growing and grazing rights of the rural poor. A monstrous attack on working-class life, the enclosures represented the widespread theft of public land, sanctioned by a parliament that was dominated by landowners. The rural poor, left with nothing and facing starvation, were forced to migrate to industrial cities. It was in these rapidly growing industrial cities – notably in Birmingham – that allotments started to grow. Allotments, then, grew out of opposition to enclosures and the privatisation of common land. Allotments were regulated in the late 19th and 20th century and, even though numbers have since fallen, there are about 330,000 allotment plots. At least 100,000 people are on waiting lists. 'Once lost, they never return' Allotments have been crucial in times of national stress. Many came out of the Second World War. Indeed, many that were established in the First World War, such as the one I enjoy in north London, have survived to this day. Once lost, they never return. Their loss makes us all poorer, as we become more and more detached from how food is grown and how nature interacts with us. Allotments provide a vital space for community cohesion, biodiversity and social solidarity. These parcels of land, that cannot be individually fenced, provide growing space for many people. Many people have no access to their own garden, and an allotment gives them the opportunity to grow vegetables and fruit and observe nature. Allotments are particularly important for people who experience stress and mental health problems. I speak to many people who would love access to them for this very reason. Property developers have always had their eyes on these parcels of land. Together with local authorities, they construct various arguments for building over them. Instead of contemplating sales of these wonderful spaces, the Government should be encouraging the growth of allotments, or where there is insufficient land, the growth of community and school gardens. In my own borough of Islington, community gardens have played a vital role in bringing the community together and encouraging sustainable food production. Of course, social housing is desperately needed, but we need not sacrifice these vital green spaces to build it. We can build on ex-industrial land and take over empty properties. Even then, we should ensure social housing is accompanied by community gardens and adequate growing space. Is this Government going to put the nail in the coffin of the joy of digging ground for potatoes on a cold, wet February Sunday afternoon? The battle for the grass roots is on!
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Small boat migrant deportation scheme to begin this week
The process of deporting the first Channel migrants under a new deal with France will begin within days, Sir Keir Starmer has announced. The Prime Minister disclosed that Britain had ratified a treaty with France which means those entering the UK on a small boat can now be detained on arrival and returned across the Channel. It is believed that around 50 migrants will be returned to France each week, with the numbers expected to climb by the end of the year. Migrants will be detained for deportation in the coming days before being deported. Sir Keir is facing continued public dissent over mass migration, with protests outside hotels housing migrants across Britain, prompted in part by reports of crimes by asylum seekers. As it tries to quell mounting anger and show it is taking the concerns seriously, on Monday, Downing Street said that the police should be able to release information on the ethnicity of criminal suspects, after demands for more clarity. Sir Keir's deal with France will mean that about 800 people will be taken back by France by the end of the year, compared with tens of thousands of migrants who have arrived since Labour won the election last July. The 'one-in, one-out deal' means that a similar number of asylum seekers with family connections to the UK will be accepted by Britain. British authorities are now said to be 'operationally ready', with detentions expected to begin within days. Sir Keir said: 'This Government has been fixing the foundations of the broken asylum system we inherited and today we send a clear message – if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France. 'This is the product of months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve and strike at the heart of these vile gangs' business model. 'The days of gimmicks and broken promises are over – we will restore order to our borders with the seriousness and competence the British people deserve.' Plans for the one-in, one-out deal were signed by the Prime Minister and Emmanuel Macron last month. It had been expected that the scheme would not come into operation until the end of the month, but it has now been brought forward. As part of the quid pro quo with France, the UK will take an equal number of migrants from France if they have not attempted an illegal crossing before. These will be subject to full documentation and security and eligibility checks. The EU Commission, Germany and other EU members have given the green light to the plan. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said: 'This is an important step towards undermining the business model of the organised crime gangs that are behind these crossings – undermining their claims that those who travel to the UK illegally can't be returned to France. 'It is also right to make clear that – while the UK will always be ready to play its part alongside other countries in helping those fleeing persecution and conflict – this must be done in a controlled and managed legal way, not through dangerous, illegal, and uncontrolled routes.' Immigration Enforcement has set aside space at immigration removal centres, while Border Force has an operational strategy ready to identify and process groups of inadmissible migrants for removal. The treaty governing the pilot scheme will remain in force until June 2026, and over this period both countries have committed to continually review and improve the process and effectiveness of this innovative approach. As part of the deal, the French authorities have agreed to increase their enforcement activity to prevent small boat crossings, disrupt supplies of equipment to the French coast, and arrest members of the criminal groups behind the trade. A new Compagnie de Marche of specialist enforcement officers, supported by increased local policing, has been put in place and a specialist intelligence and judicial police unit has been established in Dunkirk to speed up the arrest and prosecution of people-smugglers. A review of the French maritime approach has been undertaken to allow greater interception of boats in shallow waters. Migrants in France who want to come to the UK legally, will be able to submit an Expression of Interest application for the new legal route online and the Home Office will make a decision. France long resisted signing the treaty because the Dublin returns agreement was scrapped after Brexit. They also argued that new agreement would have to be EU-wide. Separately, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said that law enforcement agencies and governing authorities 'should always be as transparent as possible' about criminal cases. He spoke after two male asylum seekers in Warwickshire were charged in connection with the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton last month. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, said that the migration status of suspects should 'absolutely' be released in order to quell online conspiracy theories.
