Russian forces expand fighting to new region of eastern Ukraine
Advertisement
Like other officers quoted in this article, he asked to be identified by his first name or call sign only, in keeping with military protocol.
Advertisement
Russia's Defense Ministry first claimed on Sunday that some of its forces had reached the administrative border between Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk and were 'continuing their offensive.' Ukraine's top military command has so far denied that Russian troops have entered Dnipropetrovsk.
The Ukrainian officers said Russian forces had advanced, at most, along a few tree lines into Dnipropetrovsk and had yet to capture any settlement. Whether they can secure their advance, capitalize on the breach and push deeper into the region remains to be seen.
Still, by pushing into Dnipropetrovsk, Russian forces are taking the fight to a region that many Ukrainians thought would remain untouched by ground fighting.
Dnipropetrovsk is one of Ukraine's largest regions, with a major industrial base and about 3 million residents. Those people include many who fled there from cities under attack in Donetsk, meaning the Russian advance could force some to flee for a second time.
Russia's push also comes amid cease-fire talks that are taking place even as both sides have tried to demonstrate that they have the ability to keep fighting. Should Russia capture a sizable portion of the Dnipropetrovsk region, it could complicate Ukraine's position in any negotiations to trade land.
Controlling the border area between Dnipropetrovsk and Donetsk would also give Russia a stronger foothold to complete its takeover of Donetsk, around 70 percent of which it already controls. In particular, it would facilitate an assault on Pokrovsk, a Ukrainian stronghold in Donetsk it has so far failed to capture.
The advance also highlights Russia's momentum on the battlefield. Last month, Russia captured over 200 square miles of territory in Ukraine, more than double its gains in April and the second-highest monthly advance since the first year of the war, according to the Black Bird Group, a Finland-based research organization tracking battlefield developments.
Advertisement
Months of slow but steady gains lie behind the push into Dnipropetrovsk. It took Russian forces a year of grinding combat to advance roughly 30 miles and finally cross into the region.
Along the way, Russian forces captured town after town, shifting tactics from the meat-grinder approach seen in the brutal battle for Bakhmut to a more adaptive strategy, using small assault squads to look for weaknesses and punch through Ukrainian lines.
'The enemy uses small-group tactics — two to four, sometimes six soldiers, moving from tree line to tree line or building to building,' said Barbarossa, from Ukraine's 72nd Brigade.
The Russian advance is reflected in the retreat of medics from Ukraine's 33rd Mechanized Brigade, who treat wounded soldiers at so-called stabilization points, small field hospitals typically set up several miles behind the front line.
Since the fall, the medics have relocated their stabilization point westward four times. They crossed into Dnipropetrovsk late last year, setting up in a building in Novopavlivka, near the administrative border between the two regions.
As Russian forces advanced in recent weeks, the medics were forced to move deeper into Dnipropetrovsk, according to soldiers from the 33rd Brigade. The building they were using in Novopavlivka, which a New York Times team visited this year, was later heavily damaged in a Russian strike.
Viktor, a Ukrainian army officer fighting in the area, said he expected Russian forces to try to capture Novopavlivka, which sits on strategically advantageous high ground, before pushing north toward Mezhova, the main town in the area.
Securing that stretch of land, he said, would allow Russia to carve out a roughly 6-mile-deep buffer zone to protect its flanks in neighboring Donetsk, and set the stage for a new assault on Pokrovsk.
Advertisement
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Trump team hurls accusations at Obama over 2016 election interference
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Wednesday continued to accuse former President Obama's administration of a "manipulation of intelligence" around Russia's interference in the 2016 election. The big picture: Nearly a decade after he won, President Trump remains fixated on disproving the thoroughly investigated and widely held conclusion that Russia interfered to aid his campaign. Back in 2020, the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee — including now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio — concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win but did not hack election infrastructure to manipulate cast ballots. State of play: Gabbard released a document Wednesday that she alleges undermines previous findings from the Obama-era intelligence community that Russia favored a Trump win in 2016. She wrote that the Obama administration was "promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election." Gabbard released another memo last week, with which she accused the Obama administration of a "treasonous conspiracy" to sabotage Trump's presidency in 2016. Driving the news: During a White House press briefing Wednesday, Gabbard again accused Obama and his national security team of directing "the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false." She alleged, "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump when selling it to the American people as though it were true." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt doubled down on the claims, saying, "The truth is that Trump never had anything to do with Russia" and alleging that "the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth." Zoom out: Asked for comment Wednesday, Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush referred Axios to his Tuesday statement where he called the allegations "outrageous" and "bizarre." He said in that statement, "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes." In response that statement, Gabbard said Wednesday that Obama's office is "trying to deflect away from their culpability in what is a historic scandal." Asked if the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity protects Obama from any possible prosecution, Leavitt said Trump "wants to see all those who perpetuated this fraud against our country, who betrayed our country and the Constitution to be thoroughly investigated and held accountable."
Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
Protests flare in Ukraine as Zelensky reins in corruption watchdogs
Advertisement The law, which was passed by parliament deputies and signed quickly by Zelensky on Tuesday, places Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the control of the general prosecutor's office. Critics say this will effectively abolish the two bodies' independence. The two institutions, which have previously functioned free of outside control, are the main anti-corruption bodies created since Ukraine's 2014 Maidan Revolution, when hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians took to the streets in part because they were fed up with rampant corruption under Ukraine's president at the time, Viktor Yanukovych. On Wednesday, Zelensky met with the heads of the country's law enforcement and anti-corruption bodies, including NABU and SAPO, he wrote on social media. Advertisement 'We all hear what society has to say,' Zelensky wrote, adding that the group would draft an 'action plan' in two weeks time. However, after the meeting NABU and SAPO issued a joint statement, in which they said that the 'legislative changes adopted yesterday significantly limit' their independence. 'To restore full and independent work, clear and unambiguous steps are needed at the legislative level to restore the guarantees that were abolished by parliament,' the statement said. In Zelensky's regular evening address posted on social media, he framed the law as an effort to strengthen the work of the two bodies so that they can conclude cases more quickly. Criminal cases against officials have been 'hanging for years' without any results, he said. But Ukrainian lawmakers who voted against the legislation said Zelensky severely underestimated both the domestic and international response to the move, which critics see as an effort to rein in groups tasked with investigating legitimate corruption cases — including those that may be close to the president's inner circle. 'My assumption is that he probably thought that if he did it very quickly, it would just fade away,' said Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze, a lawmaker from Ukraine's European Solidarity party who voted against the law and has worked extensively on Ukraine's bid to join the European Union. The move appeared to reflect Zelensky's growing distance from the generation that ushered in a new democratic era after the 2014 revolution — many of whom are now among those fighting on the front lines for the same democratic values they protested for more than a decade ago. Hearing her fellow lawmakers whoop and cheer as they passed a law she saw as scraping away the democratic foundations of Ukraine's society was surreal, Klympush-Tsintsadze said. 'It was the sound of revenge,' she said, from lawmakers who she believes were angry that anti-corruption groups were getting too close to them or Zelensky. Advertisement 'The scariest thing is that it will be used by our foes,' she said, to try to paint Ukraine as a nation that remains mired in corruption. Russia, which has long amplified the narrative of corruption in Ukraine, was quick to leap on the development. 'There is a lot of corruption in the country. The money of American taxpayers and European taxpayers has been plundered to a large extent. This can be said with a high degree of certainty,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Wednesday. Zelensky's signing of the law tested the unwritten agreement between Ukrainian society and government that there will not be a political uprising during wartime due to the shared understanding that Russia is the enemy, said Volodymyr Ariev, a lawmaker who belongs to the same party as Klympush-Tsintsadze. 'He really miscalculated the reaction of the society,' he said of Zelensky. 'We are fighting against Russia not only as a country but as a model.' The reaction by his fellow lawmakers when the bill was passed was like 'euphoria,' Ariev said — a feeling that deeply shook him. 'They are just talking about European integration but in their activities they are still dreaming of preserving the post-Soviet, pro-Russian model where they have impunity,' he said. 'I don't know whether Zelensky understands how seriously it could harm relations between Ukraine and the United States, and Ukraine and the European Union as well.' On Wednesday, President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen called Zelensky to convey 'her strong concerns about the consequences of the amendments' and 'requested the Ukrainian government for explanations,' a spokesperson for the European Commission said. Advertisement 'The respect for the rule of law and the fight against corruption are core elements of the European Union,' the spokesperson said. 'As a candidate country, Ukraine is expected to uphold these standards fully. There cannot be a compromise.' On Monday, agents from Ukraine's security service (SBU), general prosecutor's office, and State Bureau of Investigation raided NABU offices, claiming the existence of a 'Russian 'mole' in one of the bureau's elite units,' SBU head Vasyl Maliuk said. 'In the conditions of the full-scale war, the presence of Russian agents in any state agency is completely unacceptable,' Maliuk said in a meeting with representatives of the Group of Seven countries in Kyiv on Tuesday, according to the SBU website. Many Ukrainians flatly rejected the government's explanations for the legislation, however. The move against the agencies also comes just a month after NABU opened a criminal case against then-Deputy Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov on charges of 'abuse of office and receiving undue benefits in substantial amounts for himself and third parties,' it said in a statement at the time. It was one of the highest-level corruption cases since Zelensky became president six years ago, targeting one of the closest allies of his powerful chief of staff, Andriy Yermak. Chernyshov denied the charges, but he lost his position in last week's government reshuffle.
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Chinese hackers breach US nuclear security agency in cyberattack operation, officials say
A sweeping cyberattack breached the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) through Microsoft's Sharepoint document software, the Energy Department confirmed to Fox News Digital on Wednesday. The agency does not know of any sensitive or classified information that has been stolen at this time. "On Friday, July 18th, the exploitation of a Microsoft SharePoint zero-day vulnerability began affecting the Department of Energy, including the NNSA," a Department of Energy (DoE) told Fox News Digital, referring to the agency responsible for maintaining and designing the nation's nuclear weapons stockpiles. Microsoft warned that Chinese state-sponsored actors were exploiting flaws in the SharePoint software of institutions across the globe. Netherlands-based Eye Security told Reuters the breach has now claimed 400 victims. Linen Typhoon and Violet Typhoon, the two groups backed by the CCP involved in the hack, utilized flaws in the document-sharing software that exist for customers who run it on their own networks rather than through Microsoft's cloud software. But DoE said it largely utilizes the cloud, so only a "very small number of systems were impacted." "All impacted systems are being restored." Another hacking group based in China, Storm-2603, also exploited the vulnerabilities, according to Microsoft. Asked about the hack on Wednesday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said he wasn't aware of the specifics, but: "China opposes and fights hacking activities in accordance with the law. At the same time, we oppose smears and attacks against China under the excuse of cybersecurity issues." Charles Carmakal, technology chief of the Google-owned Mandiant cybersecurity consulting group, confirmed Monday in a LinkedIn post that at least one of the organizations involved in the hack was a "China-nexus threat actor." On Sunday, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency said it was "aware of active exploitation" of the SharePoint vulnerability. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella vowed last year to make cybersecurity a top priority after a government report criticized the company's handling of a Chinese breach of the emails of U.S. government officials. Just last week, the company vowed to stop using engineers based in China to provide technical support for clients within the Defense Department using the company's cloud services. That came after a ProPublica report revealed the practice and said it could expose the DoD to Chinese hackers.
