How AI is helping unravel mystery of ancient scrolls buried in Mount Vesuvius eruption
Artificial intelligence is helping to solve an ancient mystery from the Roman Empire involving scrolls from a library that was buried when Mount Vesuvius erupted.
The eruption of Vesuvius in A.D. 79 not only wiped out Pompeii, but also the nearby town of Herculaneum.
Deep beneath the surface where a villa previously existed, archaeologists in the 18th century found 1,800 papyrus scrolls in the only ancient library in the world that is still intact. Attempts to unravel some of the scrolls ended in ashes as the library was carbonized, Brent Seales, a computer scientist from the University of Kentucky, explained.
"People didn't understand what they had. So, some scrolls were actually thrown away or burned and you can't put Humpty Dumpty back together again," Seales said.
Archaeologists in the 18th century found papyrus scrolls in the only ancient library in the world that is still intact.
CBS News
But thanks to 21st-century technology, experts are now able to examine those still intact.
That technology involved a particle accelerator in England. Scientists produced light that was 10 billion times brighter than the sun, much like an X-ray. AI was then used to identify ink, no matter how faint.
"I thought to myself, if you can use that technology to see non-invasively inside a human body, why can't we see everything inside an artifact like a scroll?" Seales said.
Deciphering the scroll
They still needed humans to decipher what the letters mean. So Seales launched the Vesuvius Challenge, a global competition offering $700,000 in prize money.
Three college students took it home, making history by being the first to extract words from a carbonized scroll, nearly 2,000 years old, that had been virtually unwrapped.
Thanks to new technology, experts can examine the scrolls still intact.
CBS News
With hundreds more scrolls to go, Seales has launched a second phase of the competition.
"With AI-inspired methods that are going to usher in, you know, new results that we've not dreamed of, I don't think renaissance is too strong a word," he said.
Seales said he believes there could be more scrolls out there as archaeologists are just beginning to scratch the surface.
"I believe the Villa of the Papyri, which has not been fully excavated, stands a really high chance of producing more books," he said. "So much remains for us to discover."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
New Science Shows Why Some People Just Don't Care About Climate
TURIN, ITALY - OCTOBER 11: Fridays for future protesters take part during the Fridays For Future' ... More Climate Protest on October 11, 2024 in Turin, Italy. Fridays for the Future movement is protesting in main squares in urban centers across on world to denounce perceived governments inaction towards climate change. (Photo by) What if the real obstacle to climate action isn't just political polarization, misinformation, or economic inertia—but personality? A recent study from Dalhousie University suggests that personality traits—specifically those associated with the so-called 'Dark Triad' of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—may significantly influence whether someone believes climate change is real. It's a striking idea. Not just that our politics shape our perception of science, but that the architecture of our psychology might help determine whether we accept or reject climate change altogether. The study, led by political scientist Scott Pruysers and published in Climatic Change, surveyed more than 1,700 Canadians and asked them to rank agreement with statements like 'Climate change is a scam' or 'Government should do more to address climate change.' Then it compared these answers to participants' self-assessed personality traits—using more than 160 descriptors to build out a detailed psychological profile. The results were sobering: 22% of Canadians surveyed agreed that human-caused climate change is exaggerated, and over 10% disagreed that government should be doing more to address it. Those most skeptical of climate change scored higher on scales associated with narcissism (self-importance), Machiavellianism (manipulativeness), and psychopathy (callousness). In contrast, climate believers were more likely to show traits like honesty, emotionality, openness, and humility. In other words, it's not just what you believe about climate change that matters—it's who you are. People with more empathy believe in climate change; people who lack it, don't. We're used to thinking about climate skepticism as a product of ideology, disinformation, or economic interest—and those things matter, deeply. The study acknowledges this too. In fact, the biggest single predictor of climate denial wasn't personality, but political ideology: those on the right of the spectrum were far more likely to reject climate science than those on the left. Men were more skeptical than women. Education and income also helped shape belief. But here's the twist: the second strongest predictor of climate skepticism was not age, education, or income. It was openness—a personality trait associated with curiosity, creativity, and willingness to consider new ideas. That means the shape of your character may be more determinative than your diploma or your paycheck when it comes to how you think about the planet's future. This matters, because climate action is not just a technological problem—it's a human one. As the world races to decarbonize, behavioral change is becoming just as critical as innovation. And if personality plays a role in shaping belief, then it also influences whether people are willing to make sacrifices, adopt greener habits, or vote for climate-forward policies. There's no vaccine for narcissism. We can't legislate openness. You can't change people's personalities. But we can design systems and messages that meet people where they are. Advances in artificial intelligence—particularly in analyzing social media behavior—could allow for micro-targeted communications tailored to personality types. That could mean, for example, emphasizing the status signaling of eco-friendly behavior to appeal to narcissists ('drive this EV to show you're ahead of the curve'), or using stories of personal harm and community disruption to engage those who may not respond to statistics. In fact, we already do this—just not systematically. Advertisers have long known that emotion and identity sell more than facts. The climate movement, historically grounded in scientific consensus and future-oriented morality, is starting to adopt this logic. Climate-conscious brands now market solar panels and electric cars not just as responsible choices, but as aspirational ones. Policymakers are experimenting with incentives and social norms to drive change. To be clear: this doesn't mean all climate skeptics are sociopaths. The study doesn't pathologize individuals—it works on a spectrum. Most of us have at least a few drops of the Dark Triad in us, just as we all have moments of altruism or doubt. But it does mean that the old model—present data, expect belief—isn't enough. The climate crisis is a test of our technologies, our institutions, and increasingly, our psychologies. If we want to reach the remaining skeptics, we may need to stop preaching and start profiling—not to divide, but to understand. The planet doesn't care why you act, only that you do. But to get there, we need to understand who doesn't care—and why.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Puzzling' bronze discs adorned with lion heads discovered in Roman-era grave
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Archaeologists in Israel have discovered four "unique" bronze artifacts, adorned with elaborate 3D lion heads, that are roughly 1,900 years old. Researchers uncovered the rare bronze discs during a salvage excavation conducted by the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) at a site named Khirbat Ibreika — located in the center of the country — prior to the laying of a railroad, according to a study published in the latest issue of the official IAA journal, 'Atiqot. The excavation, which took place in 2018, revealed eight Roman-era stone-lined graves. Archaeologists found the bronze discs in an orderly pile at the southern end of one of the graves, dated to the first or second century A.D. Alongside the discs, archaeologists found four bronze ring-shaped handles that were likely once attached to the tops of the lions' heads. This finding is an unusual one because while similar bronze discs with lion head reliefs have been found across the Roman world, the ring handles were usually attached through the mouth. "This is a unique and rare set of finds," Elie Haddad and Elisheva Zwiebel, the archaeologists who directed the Khirbat Ibreika excavation on behalf of the IAA and authors of the study, said in a statement. Researchers also identified a large iron nail preserved with traces of wood, indicating the existence of a wooden coffin that did not survive, according to the report. Related: 2,300-year-old grave in Israel contains remains of Greek courtesan who may have accompanied Alexander the Great's army While the discs likely played a decorative role, the researchers propose that the bronze objects and attached rings may also have served as handles, enabling people to carry the coffin or lower it into the grave. They also suggest that it would have been possible to insert two long wooden rods through the rings, making the task of carrying the coffin easier. But the authors acknowledge that one aspect of this hypothesis remains puzzling. "If the discs were coffin handles, why were they stacked in what seems to have been a deliberate pile on one side of the tomb? While it may be claimed that they fell off the wooden coffin during the burial ceremony, it seems unreasonable that all four discs fell on the same side," the researchers wrote in the study. This raises the possibility that the artifacts carried a special symbolic or ritual significance yet to be uncovered. The lion was an important symbol throughout antiquity across various cultures and civilizations, with the animal frequently appearing in ancient art. It symbolized strength, courage and nobility, among other traits. In the Greco-Roman world, lions were known as guardians of fountains, gates, palaces, cemeteries and temples, according to the study. In some cases, these animals were also considered to be protectors of the dead, according to a 2022 paper discussing Roman-era lion-headed coffin handles resembling the Khirbat Ibreika finds. Considering this symbolism, the researchers propose that the lion motifs found in the Khirbat Ibreika grave may signify the deceased's elevated rank or social standing. RELATED STORIES —'Extraordinary' sarcophagus discovered in Israel shows carving of Dionysus beating Hercules in a drinking contest —'Very rare' African ebony figurines found in 1,500-year-old Christian burials in Israeli desert —2,800-year-old structure unearthed in Israel was likely used for cultic practices and sacrifice, archaeologists say It's also possible, they noted, that the ring handles above the lions' heads may represent the "wheel of the zodiac, the wheel of life," they wrote in the study. This interpretation was based on certain potential depictions of Aion — a Hellenistic deity associated with the cyclic nature of existence and the zodiac — in ancient art. Some scholars associate a naked, human-bodied, lion-headed figure entwined by a serpent (or serpents) with Aion. But this representation is not his classical portrayal — primarily appearing in ancient syncretic traditions — and remains subject to debate.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exploration Mysteries: Lost Cosmonauts
'Listen! Listen! Talk to me! I am hot!…oxygen…oxygen…am I going to crash?' For several decades, these chilling words, which screeched through a makeshift radio in the 1960s, have refused to fade. A choppy, distorted, and panicked voice of a woman in trouble was one of the many recordings which gave rise to one of the most persistent urban legends of the Space Age: the lost cosmonauts. Believers in the lost cosmonauts reject Yuri Gagarin's title as the first man in space. Their theory insists that the Soviets were secretly launching humans into space before Gagarin made his pioneering flight aboard Vostok I in 1961. The cosmonauts on these supposed earlier flights had all died. It is four years after World War II. Italian brothers Achille and Giovanni Battista Judica-Cordiglia had a vested interest in radio technology. They spent their adolescence saving up to buy parts to make radio antennas. Along with other pieces of radio equipment that they bought from American soldiers, they built an enormous antenna, which they mounted on the roof of their apartment. For fun, they enjoyed tuning into frequencies from around the world. However, one moment changed everything for them. When Russia successfully sent Sputnik I into orbit in 1957, it also launched the space race. In 1958, the United States followed with Explorer I. The brothers managed to capture the frequencies of both missions. Achille and Giovanni wanted in on this space race in their own way, by eavesdropping. In a repurposed World War II German bunker just outside of Turin, where their parents had moved the family, they continued their radio work. Eagerly, they set up an experimental listening station, with their homemade radios tuned into happenings in the night sky. For months, the brothers worked tirelessly to perfect their system to track all Soviet missions. One night, they held their breath as faint beeping started to come through their headphones. Morse code. More accurately, an SOS. They believed it must have been a manned launch that went wrong. However, at this time, only dogs were used on space flights. The next odd occurrence was the sound of a human heartbeat accompanied by heavy breathing, most likely coming from a male in distress. After that, panicked transmissions from a team of three people (two men and one woman) said, 'Conditions growing worse. Why don't you answer?...Remember us to the Motherland! We are lost! We are lost!' Over the years, such dire transmissions continued and further fueled the rumors that the Soviets were regularly losing their cosmonauts. News outlets caught wind of the story, but it wasn't the first of its kind. In 1959, an article from the Continentale in Italy claimed that a Czechoslovakian official gave a list of the names of cosmonauts who died during their missions: Alexei Ledovsky, Andrei Mitkov, Sergei Shiborin, and Maria Gromova. In a Soviet periodical called Ogoniok, Pyotr Dolgov and Ivan Kachur were declared dead, not during a clandestine mission to space, but after conducting a parachute test at high altitude. No one was able to confirm and clarify these details. This begs the question: Were these "cosmonauts" actually high-altitude test pilots or parachutists? Achille and Giovanni's discoveries did not escape notice. Soon enough, there was an ominous knock at their door from none other than the KGB. Writer Micah Hanks at The Debrief wrote that years later, a journalist named Kris Hollington tracked down a KGB visitor in 2008, who admitted: 'Of course, we were interested in the Judica-Cordiglia brothers; they were hacking into our communications. Imagine that today, a pair of amateur kids taking apart the Russian space program like it was a toy…' To their surprise, the man let them off with a warning. Nonetheless, the visit itself was ominous and made them question whether or not the Soviets were trying to cover up or silence any interested parties. The brothers' work earned them a well-received visit to NASA headquarters, where scientists and communications specialists praised them for their inventions and self-taught knowledge. They also recorded John Glenn's communications during his mission in 1962. Seeing their value, NASA and the brothers exchanged information, with NASA trading American mission frequencies for Russian frequencies. Achille and Giovanni established the Zeus Network, which allowed radio enthusiasts around the world to tap into spaceflights. This lasted until at least the 1969 moon landing. Did the brothers actually overhear dying cosmonauts crying out to the ether for help? The many cryptic and terrifying jumbled cacophonies suggested a failing Soviet space program that could leave America the victor of this highly politicized race. Some believe the brothers lied or exaggerated to gain notoriety. According to writer and science scholar Maria Rosa Menzio, the brothers received two kinds of translations from the mostly indiscernible recordings they intercepted. When they sent them to native Russian speakers, the translations made little sense. However, when they took the recordings to a German teacher who spoke Russian, the teacher only gave them what she thought she heard or was able to make out. Therefore, skeptics find the brothers to be an unreliable source. Space historian James E. Oberg provided his own take on the lost cosmonauts. Digging into some of the names, he claims to have clarified the story of one of the victims mentioned in Ogoniok. He said: Dolgov, an experienced test pilot and stratospheric parachutist, really did disappear under mysterious circumstances about that time. More than two years later the Russians announced that he had just died in a high-altitude jump in November 1962. He also quoted Dr. Charles Sheldon, a Washington expert on the Soviet space program, who said: Those who would believe in these purported Soviet orbital deaths must think there is a second and independent Soviet manned program. In contrast to the open program which always brought the man back until 1967, the secret program always failed. Why the Russians would want to run a secret failure program parallel to their open success program is not clear. It is no secret that the Soviet space program had its share of bad luck. There were many accidents, probably more than we know, which were never made public. But most importantly, one of the main reasons why many people believe in the lost cosmonauts is the highly secretive and authoritarian character of the Soviet Union. Media, higher education, culture, and even thought were under heavy state control and censorship. No one truly knew what was going on. From assassinations and undercover operations to mysterious disappearances, it was always tempting to lean toward the theory of a big cover-up. The behavior of Soviet leaders fomented further suspicion. Sometimes, Nikita Khrushchev teased at upcoming launches that they were ready to send men into space. Then nothing would happen, which made people believe the launches occurred but failed. This brings us to another strange story. In the newspaper The Daily Worker, journalist Dennis Ogden wrote about a cosmonaut named Vladimir Ilyushin who was supposedly the first man in space. He launched two days before Yuri Gagarin's flight, but his flight crashed in China, and he suffered severe brain damage. Officials claim Ilyushin was the victim of a car accident, while others say this was an excuse to explain away Ilyushin's injuries. The Cold War was a battle between the West and the East, but also a fight between what was real and what wasn't. Truth and propaganda came head to head. It's hard to get to the bottom of propaganda. Oberg says: The only safe answer still is that no one outside a small coterie in the USSR can know. We can say, however, that there is no hard evidence available to indicate that any such fatal secret missions ever took place… As we examine the evidence, it is possible that the "lost cosmonauts" could have been a group of ill-fated high-altitude test pilots or parachutists who might have been destined to go into space one day. Unfortunately for them, they didn't make it. In the craze of one of the world's most intense periods, truth was sometimes mixed with fiction.
