5 Fantasies Women Think Are Underrepresented In Porn — And Why It Matters
Bloom, an erotic audio platform, surveyed 300 adult users about the fantasies they'd want to see more of in porn and erotica. They found these were the top five most popular themes among women (the percentage indicates the number of female respondents who said they'd like to see more of it).
1. Threesomes (77%)
2. Women receiving oral (54%)
3. Romantic sex (52%)
4. Rough sex (52%)
5. Domination (50%)
Though we were surprised to see 'threesomes' at the top of the list for women, the sex experts we interviewed didn't necessarily feel the same way. They offered some interesting insights into why some of these tropes are so popular.
Our sexual fantasies empower us to 'combat feelings of inadequacy or self-doubt,' Los Angeles clinical psychologist Nazanin Moali, host of the 'Sexology' podcast, told HuffPost. So they serve a crucial function, especially for women who may have been conditioned to feel shame around their sexuality, she explained.
'For instance, in a scenario involving a threesome, one might visualize themselves as not only desirable but also proficient in satisfying multiple partners,' Moali said. 'This serves as a counterweight to the self-doubt enforced by societal expectations.'
Therapist and sexologist Nicoletta Heidegger, host of the 'Sluts and Scholars' podcast, told HuffPost she was not surprised by anything that made it into the top five, as the findings here are in line with similar surveys and research on the topic. (She also pointed out that people who already use an erotic audio platform are not necessarily a representative sample of the general population — an important thing to note when looking at the results.)
For sex researcher Justin Lehmiller's 2018 book, 'Tell Me What You Want,' he surveyed more than 4,000 Americans about their fantasies and found that group sex — threesomes in particular — were indeed one of the most common turn-ons. But there was some variation in how likely people were to voice this fantasy, how likely they were to act on it and how likely there were to enjoy the experience if they did.
Straight women were the least likely to share their group sex fantasy, the least likely to act on it and have the least positive experience when they do. Women with any degree of same-sex attraction (lesbian, bisexual, queer or pansexual) were more likely to talk about these group sex fantasies, more likely to act on them and more likely to have a positive experience when compared with straight women.
Moali said she believes there's an 'intriguing connection' between women's fondness for romantic intimacy and their appreciation of oral pleasure, which both made the top five.
'The depiction of women receiving oral sex has witnessed a surge in various romantic storylines, like 'Bridgerton,' possibly portraying it as the ultimate gesture of love and acceptance,' she said. 'For numerous women, it goes beyond mere physicality, underscoring the importance of feeling valued and cherished. This narrative resonates with the preference for adult content that accentuates emotional bonds.'
And it doesn't come as a shock that more than half of women showed an interest in seeing more rough sex and domination in porn, both of our experts said.
According to Heidegger, there are many reasons these kinds of fantasies are so popular among cis women. For one, many women are in charge of so much at home and at work in their everyday lives that the idea of letting someone else call the shots for a bit is appealing.
For others, it's a chance to reclaim their sexual desires after having negative or unwanted sexual experiences.
'If you are a woman, chances are you have experienced some type of non-consensual encounter — unwanted eyes, unwanted comments, unwanted touch,' Heidegger said. 'Fantasy is a place for us to re-narrate and take ownership of our desires and stories again. To create a new narrative and a corrective experience in our mind for past painful experiences.'
One thing that did surprise Heidegger about the Bloom survey was what was not on the list.
'I am surprised, however, that there wasn't a higher percentage of gay and lesbian themes, as those are usually highly watched for women,' she said.
When asked about the differences between what men and women generally want to see in porn, Heidegger explained that it's 'not so binary.'
'There are some gender differences, but a lot of science, including Lehmiller's book 'Tell Me What You Want' and other research, says cisgendered men and women fantasize about many similar topics,' she said. 'The way they interact with these desires may look different, however.'
One of the differences across genders is how much men and women prioritize a narrative in the sexual content they consume. Generally speaking, cis women report caring more about the context, setting and story, Heidegger said.
'This may be due to estrogen-driven folks having more responsive desire, as opposed to spontaneous desire,' she said. 'This is often why many women turn to audio erotica or erotic content made by women.'
Moali agreed that women tend to gravitate toward porn with 'narratives that carry emotional depth and context' and 'a storyline or character development.'
Men, however, have historically been drawn to more 'visually explicit content,' Moali said, 'like videos showcasing different sexual acts.'
'Although the landscape of porn has evolved in the past decade, historically, explicit content has been primarily tailored towards men, lacking emotional depth between characters,' she said.
Another factor to consider: Women may have underlying safety concerns when it comes to sex, which makes backstory more important to their enjoyment, Moali said.
'Those with past sexual trauma might find it triggering to engage without a relational context, with fears for the safety of all involved hindering their experience,' she said. 'Contextual pornography can provide a safer avenue for sexual exploration.'
When talking about these differences, it's important to consider the 'why' behind them, said Heidegger. Some believe innate gender differences determine what sexual content we're drawn to, while others acknowledge the role that social and cultural conditioning play 'in our beliefs about what is acceptable for us to like,' she said.
This 'can affect what kinds of content or things we interact with — or give ourselves permission to interact with,' Heidegger said.
'In other words, are 'boys' just born to love trucks and the color blue? No. Though the research is growing, there is still a greater need for studies that looks at more diverse, cross-cultural LGBTQ+ fantasies and desires.'
HuffPost.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
What It Means If You're A 'Paragraph Texter'
Emmanuel Jamir, a sketch comedy content creator from New York, is a proud member of the 'paragraph texter' club. You'll know Jamir has arrived to the group text when you receive long, big blocks of prose. For him, sending jumbo texts is just about efficiency. 'Paragraphs make it easier for me to divulge information,' Jamir, 22, told HuffPost. 'When I send paragraphs I'm usually explaining something or trying to convey a thought.' 'Plus, I don't want to blow up my friends' phones with multiple texts, even though they don't really care,' he said. I am a paragraph texter. I have points and you will read them. — Emmanuel Jamir (@emmanueljamiir) June 8, 2023 Funnily enough, when it comes to incoming texts, he prefers to read single-sentence messages: 'It just makes it easier for me to receive information.' Jamir isn't alone in his verbose texting style. Some of us just can't get our thoughts down to a drip, and prefer getting everything off our chest at once. If we're planning a Friday night out, we try to include all the details from the jump: time, place, dress code. If we're in a heated conversation with our partner, expect a novel. Kathilia Edghill, a therapist who lives in Barbados, is also a paragraph texter, though she prefers to think of it more as being an intentional communicator. 'My thoughts or feelings about something are usually multifaceted and layered,' she said. 'Communicating in blocks helps me to keep things together, and creates a space where my thoughts can flow well together, which hopefully results in more clarity for the reader.' 'I find that exercising thoughtfulness, giving context, and being thorough helps ensure clear communication over texts,' she explained. Not everyone loves paragraph texters, though. Social media is full of short-sentence texters ― or dry texters, as they've also been called ― sharing how they like to troll the paragraph communicators in their lives: Mastering the art of replying to the most useless part of the text when she sends paragraphs >>>>> — Mùsakùrù (@musakuru45) November 25, 2022 I rarely read my mothers texts, i just be putting "okay" to everything. Especially when she sends paragraphs. — KaySam. (@whiteg0ld_) February 9, 2012 Given the minor #discourse about texting preferences, we decided to ask therapists why they think some of us prefer to go long in this particular format. Does the habit reveal something deeper about our personalities? (While we had them, we also asked for some advice on how paragraph texters and dry texters can better communicate.) You may have an anxious attachment style. Our attachment style informs so much about the way we communicate with and relate to one another ― including, sometimes, how we text, said Chadley Zobolas, a therapist and owner of CZ Therapy Group in Denver. If your texts tend to contain magnitudes, for instance, you may have an anxious attachment style, which means you struggle to feel secure in relationships and you tend to cling to your partner, fearing they may leave you. 'Although it isn't an exact science, I think it's safe to say that many paragraph texters have an anxious-leaning attachment style,' Zobolas said. 'When I think about a 'paragraph texter,' I envision someone who prioritizes consistent and in-depth communication with the important people in their life.' If we throw anxious-leaning attachment into the long-texting equation and peek underneath the surface, Zobolas said we might also find a deep longing for validation and a desire to feel wanted, seen and valued by others. 'As humans, we're wired to try to get our basic attachment needs met at all costs,' she said. 'For someone with an anxious-leaning attachment style, paragraph texting ― and everything that comes along with it ― likely serves as one avenue for that instinctual process to take place.' Tess Brigham, a psychotherapist and host of the pop culture podcast 'Psychlegalpop,' also saw a connection between an anxious attachment style and paragraph texting. (You might also be anxiously attached if you're a rapid-fire constant texter ― someone who sends barrages of short texts, one after the other, even when there's no reply from the other person.) 'Anxiously attached people need to get what they're thinking and feeling out as soon as possible, even if they know they're making things worse, and even if they know they should wait until the two of you are in the same room or over the phone,' she said. 'Their anxiety gets the best of them and pushes them to get everything out at once. They're seeking out validation.' Conversely, a very short texter is more likely to be avoidantly attached, Brigham said. That's exactly why they bristle at overly long texts. 'The more the anxious person pushes, the more the avoidant pulls away, which means the more one person writes, the more the other person feels compelled to keep their part short,' she explained. The avoidant person doesn't want to feel forced to do anything they don't want to do, so responding with 'K' is their way of asserting their independence, Brigham said. Still, just because someone primarily sends long and thorough text messages doesn't mean they are automatically venturing into anxious/insecure attachment or seeking connection from a wounded place, Zobolas said. 'The most important thing to remember about attachment is that it exists on a spectrum (avoidant-secure-anxious), with the majority of people finding a home base with secure attachment and only leaning into anxious or avoidant realms in response to triggers (i.e. relationship conflict of any kind),' Zobolas explained. It may be a generational phenomenon. Brigham thinks that your texting style and your preference for a particular communication method (e.g. text versus a phone call versus sending something quick on BeReal) probably say more about your generation than they do anything else. Brigham, a member of Gen X, said texting was never part of dating for her or her husband, so they never really got into pattern of texting each other all day long. They've also never had a fight or a serious conversation via text. Millennials are different, she said. 'Since I specialize in working with young people, what I've noticed over the years is that my millennial clients who are on the older side ― 30-40 ― tend to text their partners a lot throughout the day, and they'll get into long, drawn-out fights via text,' she said. Then there's Gen Z. 'I notice with my younger clients ― my Zennials and Gen Zers ― they text but they have all these other platforms like TikTok, Snapchat, and other ways to communicate with each other and their partners, and they don't get into these long texting fights the way my [millennial] clients have in the past,' she said. Or it could be a gender thing. Anecdotally, more women cop to being verbose over text than men, and that syncs up well with one of our earlier points: Women tend to be more anxious in relationships, while men tend to be more avoidant. 'While there are a ton of different factors that influence which attachment style we ultimately lean toward, research examining attachment through a cisgender, heteronormative lens does show a higher likelihood for women to lean anxious and men to lean avoidant,' Zobolas said. Women and girls are socialized to express emotions (though when they do so, they're often labeled 'hysterical' or 'dramatic'), so an inclination toward wordy texts would make sense. 'Boys and men are socialized to 'stop acting like a girl' and push their emotions and needs down to appear 'tough' and unbothered,' which may result in more brevity in conversation, via text or otherwise, Zobolas said. Danielle Wayne, an anxiety therapist based in Boise, Idaho, said that if there is a gender breakdown in communicating style, it's something society has taught us, not something innate. 'Those of us who tend to use more language to explain ourselves do so because we don't feel heard,' she said. 'So minorities, including women, tend to use more text to explain themselves than men, but this tends to happen with all minorities and not just women.' If you're a paragraph texter, here's some advice on how to better communicate with the dry texters in your life. The first rule of being a paragraph texter? Being OK with the fact that the other person is going to respond how they respond, Brigham said. 'You have to take into consideration everything that's happening at that moment,' she said. 'Are they at work? Are they having a stressful day? Do they have their phone on them during the day?' 'You don't know what's happening in their world at that moment,' she explained. Jamir, the comedy content creator, doesn't expect his friends to respond to every part of his paragraphs. 'I just trust that they read it and understand it,' he said. 'I try to adapt my texting style depending on who I'm talking to, so everyone might not get the lengthy responses. But most times my friends just get it.' Sometimes, after firing off a missive, a paragraph texter will realize that they just needed to get something off their chest and put it into words. Pressing 'send' wasn't even that important, Brigham said. 'If you find that you tend to write long messages to a lot of people, journaling can be a great way to get all of your thoughts and feelings out of your head,' she said. 'Many times that's all you need, is to simply get the feelings out.' It's also important to acknowledge that receiving a long block of text can be anxiety-inducing for some, said Edghill, the therapist and paragraph texter. 'Seeing a long message can elicit a measure of anxiety, too, and there may be a degree of emotional space and intentionality that someone requires before they engage with your message,' she said. 'What I've learned is that if I say something and it's not acknowledged and I want it to be, it's OK to bring it up again.' At the same time, if you're the one receiving paragraph texts, it's OK to propose setting some healthy boundaries. For instance, maybe you don't talk about weighty emotional issues over text, instead tabling them for in-person chats. 'You can decide that certain topics are best talked about in person, to avoid miscommunications that can easily happen over texting,' Wayne said. If you're not sure what to say, but you want to acknowledge you've heard what the other person has to say, Zobolas shared a helpful prompt. 'If you need some more time before you respond, just say, 'Hey! Just responding to let you know I saw this so you aren't left hanging. This is super important and I want to be able to give it my full attention. I'm busy with ___ right now until around ___ but will reach back out when I'm done!'' The bottom line is, a paragraph texter just wants to be heard. 'Active listening can help a lot here,' Wayne said. 'In written format, this could mean using a short summary of what they typed out. Or using open-ended questions to ask more about the situation. These things help us feel like someone is actually listening, and not just waiting for their turn in the conversation.' Related... 'Hey Hanging' Is The Rudest Workplace Behavior. Are You Guilty Of It? How To Talk To Someone You Seemingly Have Nothing In Common With Let's Normalize Sending Memes During Hard Times To Maintain Friendships
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
What Would Americans Really Do for $1 Million? New Survey Reveals Shocking Truth
Americans would ditch love, betray friends and even risk their lives for a seven-figure payday, a new survey reveals. Over 40% would walk out on their romantic partner in a heartbeat for a cool million, according to a poll of 2,000 people by Gamblizard, a website that tracks and shares online casino deals. And plenty of Americans seem willing to risk their own skin, too. 4 Friendship, love and ethics all take a back seat when seven figures are on the table, according to a new survey on money and morals. New Africa – Nearly half, 46%, said they'd step right into a real-life 'Squid Game' — the Netflix hit where contestants face certain death — to pocket $33 million, just like the winner on the show. Even more chilling, four in ten Americans said they would gladly bankrupt a stranger to secure $33 million for themselves. Another 46 percent said they might consider it, depending on whose finances were at risk. Nearly 60% would ditch technology entirely and live off the grid, and forget Netflix and chill: 41% of Americans would completely swear off sex for that same million-dollar check, the survey found. An alarming 15% admitted they'd frame a friend for a crime they didn't commit to get their hands on that kind of cash. 4 The hit series 'Squid Game' pits desperate players in deadly games for money — and nearly half of Americans say they'd sign up in real life for $33 million. New Africa – But Americans do have priorities, with 10 percent saying they would reject the money if they couldn't share it, while 21% value social media access more than a million bucks. More than half would reject the cash if their parents controlled it, and 38% would hesitate if their enemy benefited too. The findings 'reveal more about human psychology than moral decay,' said Nina Mazar, behavioral scientist at Boston University's Questrom School of Business. 'While some people might never compromise their values regardless of the sum, others have thresholds — and the data suggests that as incentives rise, more people admit they'd waver.' But Carnegie Mellon University economics and psychology professor George Loewenstein thinks the issue runs deeper. 4 The survey suggests that when the stakes are high enough, even the most unthinkable choices start to seem tempting. New Africa – When money's tight, people are more willing to stretch their morals to make ends meet, he said. Some might laugh off these survey answers as just hypothetical fun, but Loewenstein warns the truth might be darker. 'Are these responses likely to reflect real behavior? They probably understate the actual fraction of people who would actually do these things if faced with the temptation,' said Loewenstein, who specializes in social and decision sciences. Ben Bradley, a philosophy professor and ethics expert at Syracuse University is worried about the nation's moral compass. 4 A shocking number of Americans say they'd dump their partners without hesitation if it meant walking away with a million-dollar check. New Africa – 'People often think they would act a certain way when confronted with a scenario, but are wrong,' he said. 'Framing a friend for murder is much more disturbing. A non-trivial number of people regard morality as a sucker's game.'
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Paramount, Skydance expected to close deal on Aug. 7
Paramount and Skydance announced Friday that, with the Trump administration's approval, the highly anticipated merger between the entertainment giants is expected to take place next month. The Aug. 7 date, unveiled in a press release, comes after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Thursday allowed Skydance's acquisition of Paramount to move forward after the merger was first proposed last year. FCC Chair Brendan Carr in announcing the decision said he welcomed Skydance's commitment to remaining 'unbiased' in its journalism and willingness to promote 'a diversity of viewpoints across the political and ideological spectrum.' 'Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly,' Carr added. 'It is time for a change.' The move caps off months of turmoil between Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, and President Trump. Trump sued CBS's '60 Minutes' last year after he argued an interview it aired with former Vice President Harris was altered in her favor during the 2024 presidential election cycle. While the company fought the claims, including releasing a full transcript from the episode, it ultimately settled with the administration for $16 million. Those funds are set to go to Trump's eventual presidential library. The news outlet has also faced criticism in recent days after CBS made the decision to sunset 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' next May, after more than 30 years on air. Paramount said the move was based on finances, but critics have argued the settlement and Skydance deal were likely involved — and bribery allegations have been floated. Comedian Stephen Colbert, who has hosted the show since 2015, has been openly critical of the merger. Colbert blasted the network earlier this week for choosing to axe the show and thanked those who have reached out in support, including Democrats, press freedom advocates and many of his late-night counterparts. He added that 'one key mistake' the network made when moving forward with the plan is that 'they left me alive.' Colbert also lashed out at Trump after the president said in a post online that he 'absolutely' loved that the comedian was getting 'fired.' 'How dare you, sir,' the host responded. 'Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism: 'Go f‑‑‑ yourself.'' Under the terms of the $8 billion merger, the company will become 'New Paramount' and will be led by Trump-ally and billionaire David Ellison, the son of tech tycoon and Oracle founder Larry Ellison.
