New details of failed police sting linked to Sydney's most notorious cold case
Monet King eases his way into the conversation. King, 61, is writing an autobiography, exploring his extraordinary journey: from being born Arthur Montgomery King, to becoming Marilyn King – Miss New Zealand Drag Queen and, later, a cocktail waitress in Kings Cross – to finding God and now identifying as a man.
He's chosen the name Monet as a tribute to his favourite artist. He tells Trigg he wants to write about their life together in the 1970s and the wild days they shared in the Cross.
And he wants to talk about their connection to one of Sydney's most enduring mysteries; the 1975 disappearance of 38-year-old journalist and anti-development campaigner Juanita Nielsen. Trigg and King had both been at the Carousel Cabaret in the Cross on the day Nielsen vanished.
King says it's difficult to write about because it is 'a forbidden subject' between them.
Trigg seems wary. In fact, scared. He appears to be genuinely afraid of Sydney crime figure Abe Saffron, the owner of the Carousel. 'Abe Saffron's not someone to f--- with [even] though he's f---ing 80-f---ing-something, he's f---ing nearly a billionaire, and he's got contacts everywhere,' he tells King as they sit in the pub. 'You could put yourself in a lot of f---ing jeopardy, even if he doesn't go hard, he could sue your arse off.'
If Trigg talks, though, he could solve the Nielsen case. That's the hope of the third, silent party to this meeting. King is wired and Detective Inspector Nigel Warren is listening outside the pub, hanging on every word.
This is the covert operation that NSW Police hope will solve one of the state's most notorious cold cases. And this is the first time the recorded conversation can be reported in detail, courtesy of material newly released to the Herald on the eve of the 50th anniversary of Nielsen's disappearance.
The time: July 1, 2005.
The place: The Royal Exhibition Hotel in Surry Hills.
The target: Eddie Trigg, the former night manager of the Carousel, sitting in the front bar. He is the last known person to see Nielsen alive at the club on the morning of July 4, 1975.
The bait: Trigg's former lover, Monet King.
The cop: Detective Inspector Nigel Warren, who hopes the meeting will elicit a confession from Trigg.
The detective knows the meeting of the two old lovers might be the best, and perhaps last, chance to answer the question for years written on walls around Sydney: 'Who killed Juanita?'
Warren has worked hard to get to this moment. He flew to New Zealand to interview King and obtained a statement that implicated Trigg in the murder. Up to a point. But he needs more. A confession. He figures that if Trigg is ever going to open up to anyone, it will be to someone who's been in a relationship with him. He persuades King to come to Sydney and take part in the operation.
'[He] agreed to talk to Eddie for me,' Warren tells the Herald in an exclusive interview. 'When you look at them being in a relationship, Monet knows everything about him, what he does, what his movements were [in 1975].
'So, it would have made it very difficult for [Trigg] to lie, or try and pass things off because, in my view, Monet would know what was truth or lie.'
Since leaving Sydney in 1982 to return to New Zealand, King has embraced Christianity, returned to living as a man, and become a community health worker. But the Nielsen case has never left him, and King believes he has a role to play to encourage Trigg 'to confess before he dies'.
But Trigg does not play ball. 'Be very careful what you say, or what you have to say about [Saffron] or his involvement or what you think his involvement is,' he tells King.
He urges King to stick to the story. Perhaps tellingly, he says: 'Just say what you've always been saying. Don't f---ing elaborate and get carried away. It's been 30-odd f---ing years, and you could buy yourself f---ing trouble to gain a little bit of notoriety, which is pretty ridiculous.
'I won't go out of my way to antagonise a f---ing person like Abe because it's just not f---ing worth it.'
King counters that Saffron, who was 86 at the time, was 'almost dead', and pressed on, wanting to know what Trigg would do about the Nielsen mystery. 'You've got to put it all down on paper.'
Trigg responds: 'Well, I can only put down what's already been f---ing, what's already down.
'I can't add any more to it than what's already there. Everybody assumes and, probably rightly so, that I know the answer, and I don't.
'I have an idea, but I don't really know for a fact.'
King turns the conversation to what happened on July 4, 1975, in particular, that Trigg went upstairs at the Carousel with a woman – Nielsen.
Trigg replies: 'Which I did. That is public knowledge.'
Trigg has long claimed he asked Nielsen to the club to discuss buying advertising in the local newspaper she ran. They agreed on a price and he paid her. She gave him a receipt, then left.
It's at this point that Trigg's wariness turns to suspicion: 'You're on a fishing expedition, aren't you?'
Hearing this, Warren, outside the hotel, is immediately concerned that the operation might fall apart and King might be in danger.
'I started to get quite worried at this point,' he says. He has a team ready to act if it all goes pear-shaped, and he perceives there is a risk to Monet's safety.
King is determined to do his best to have Trigg confess before he dies, and denies that he is on a fishing expedition.
Trigg: 'F---ing bullshit.'
Undaunted, King presses on, telling Trigg: 'It would be lovely to know [about Juanita].'
Trigg: 'I don't know any more than what's already a public record – I do have private opinions, which I would never voice while Abe was alive.'
King: 'It looks as though it's fated, that the mystery will continue.'
Trigg: 'There'll only be value in the story while there is still a mystery, once the mystery is solved, that's the end of it.'
King: 'To solve the mystery, you would have to discover her.'
Trigg: 'You've got a closed mind. You, like everyone else, assumes she's dead. You haven't done your homework. You're here on a fishing expedition.'
Trigg then makes bizarre allegations, claiming that Nielsen had a dungeon, was satanic and was doing drugs while making out as 'a goody, goody, looking after the residents of Victoria Street'.
He asserts that Frank Theeman, the developer who wanted to raze the Victorian terraces Nielsen was fighting to protect, had 'nothing to do with Juanita'. It was a 'cock and bull story, put out to feed the f---ing public, to feed the police, to feed investigators, whatever'.
When talk turns to how the Carousel nightclub ran, with black money being creamed off, Trigg says: 'I'm not telling you anything at the time about what I was doing. Why would I do that? F---in' Abe would put a bullet in my head.'
Again, King is not to be put off, bringing the conversation back to July 4, telling Trigg: 'I saw a bit of blood on your shirt.'
He hits back: 'You never saw me that day. Listen to me. I don't give a shit if you say you saw me on the day and I had a bucket of blood on me, not a spot, a bucket of blood. I don't give a shit.'
Undeterred, King says: 'Rubbish, it was only a spot.'
After about 90 minutes, Trigg says: 'It's time to go anyway. Write what you want. You won't get any backlash from me. I can tell you, I can sit here opposite you right now and say to you, I don't think for a moment that Juanita Nielsen is dead ... Juanita Nielsen is living, is alive and well in f---ing Russia.'
Listening to the conversation, Inspector Warren isn't sure whether Trigg is just throwing random thoughts around to throw King off the track or, because of his age and drinking history, is actually delusional. The covert operation has failed to get a confession to Nielsen's murder. And eight years later, Trigg dies a lonely alcoholic death in a small room at the Abbotts Hotel in Waterloo.
A disappointed Warren has to accept that the operation failed. 'As it progressed, I could see it start to fall away and ultimately not lead to any information we could rely on,' he tells the Herald. 'I was disappointed on a number of levels; for Monet because he very much wanted answers himself. I think Monet still had a soft heart for Eddie and wanted the truth, and hopefully have Trigg reveal the truth.
Loading
'I was disappointed and frustrated about it because I could not see another avenue or opportunity like this, under these circumstances, which would likely be successful in drawing out the truth. It was very disappointing.'
But 50 years on, police are prepared to rule out some of the more outlandish theories about Nielsen's death, to say who their main suspects are and who was pulling the strings.
King's evidence, including the blood he saw that day, is crucial to what police believe happened to the anti-development campaigner at the Carousel 50 years ago.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Courier-Mail
11 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Lawyer claims Hannah Thomas ‘punched in face' by cop at anti-Israel protest
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Lawyers have claimed a police officer used excessive force with 'brutal and life-changing consequences' when former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas was allegedly 'punched in the face' during a scuffle at an anti-Israel protest. Ms Thomas was involved in a protest picketing SEC Plating in Belmore in Sydney's southwest on June 27, following reports the company provided jet components used by the Israel Defence Forces. Police issued a move-on order to about 60 people, but a scuffle broke out when some failed to comply with directions, a NSW Police spokesperson previously said. Ms Thomas was pictured with a swollen eye and blood caked on her face following the protest, with the former Greens candidate claiming she may have suffered permanent vision damage as a result. Former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas was charged over an anti-Israel protest in June. Picture: Supplied. She was spotted with a swollen eye and blood dripping down her face following the protest. Picture: Supplied. Ms Thomas was charged with hinder/resist police and refuse to comply with direction to disperse, with an additional charge related to a rarely-used emergency anti-riot power since dropped. Her lawyer, Peter O'Brien from O'Brien Solicitors, has since called for all charges against Ms Thomas to be dropped, claiming he is 'satisfied' his client was 'punched in the face'. 'My office has now viewed all available footage of the incident giving rise to the moments leading to the injury to Ms Thomas' eye on the 27th of June, and I am satisfied that Ms Thomas was punched in the face by a male police officer, causing extensive and serious injury to her eye,' Mr O'Brien said in a statement. Mr O'Brien claimed Ms Thomas was an 'innocent victim of gratuitous police brutality', condemning the actions of police as 'completely and entirely unjustifiable'. He said he's called on the NSW Police and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) to withdraw all the charges, and confirmed Ms Thomas would file a civil claim for compensation against the state over her 'apprehension, injury, detention, and prosecution'. 'It is our position that the charges against Ms Thomas are wholly unsustainable and should be immediately withdrawn,' Mr O'Brien said. Ms Thomas challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in the federal seat of Grayndler at the federal election earlier this year. Picture: Tim Hunter. He argued the charge of resisting police could not hold up, citing claims police were acting outside their powers by enforcing an unlawful direction and using excessive force 'with brutal and life-changing consequences'. Further, failing to comply with a direction would 'most certainly fail', he claimed. 'The charge of failing to comply with a direction will most certainly fail as the direction was plainly and on its face unlawful, and reflected the directing police officer's complete misunderstanding of the law,' Mr O'Brien said. He noted it was 'not ordinary' for lawyers to comment on cases against their clients, but that there were 'such stark and serious concerns' raised by evidence which required an immediate public response. 'This is especially so where comments have been made by senior police officials and politicians downplaying the gravity of the incident, apparently justifying police actions and comments that have been detrimental to my client's position,' Mr O'Brien said. Peter O'Brien from O'Brien solicitors has called for all charges against Ms Thomas to be dropped. Picture: Supplied Ms Thomas earlier claimed her injuries were a result of the 'draconian anti-protest laws' currently subject to a constitutional challenge in the NSW Supreme Court launched on behalf of the Palestine Action Group. The laws in question gave police fresh powers to prevent protesters from harassing, intimidating or threatening people accessing or leaving — or attempting to access or leave — places of worship, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The laws were brought in less than a month after news of an explosives-laden caravan being found in Dural broke, which later proved to be a fake terrorism plot rather than an anti-Semitic attack. Mr O'Brien claimed it was 'noteworthy' the incident at the June protest happened amid an attempt by the state government to broaden police powers regarding public assemblies, which he called 'arguably contrary to constitutional principles'. 'It cannot be known what goes through the mind of a police officer who uses gratuitous violence like this, but the context and timing appear unavoidably revealing,' Mr O'Brien said. Ms Thomas is set to face Bankstown Local Court on August 12. Four others were handed various charges following the protest in June. NSW Police were unable to comment on calls for the charges to be dropped, or Mr O'Brien's claims, as a critical incident investigation remains ongoing. The ODPP declined to comment on the matter as it's before the court. Originally published as Lawyer claims Hannah Thomas was 'punched in the face' by cop at anti-Israel protest


Perth Now
14 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Brutal': New claim on ‘attacked' protester
Lawyers have claimed a police officer used excessive force with 'brutal and life-changing consequences' when former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas was allegedly 'punched in the face' during a scuffle at an anti-Israel protest. Ms Thomas was involved in a protest picketing SEC Plating in Belmore in Sydney's southwest on June 27, following reports the company provided jet components used by the Israel Defence Forces. Police issued a move-on order to about 60 people, but a scuffle broke out when some failed to comply with directions, a NSW Police spokesperson previously said. Ms Thomas was pictured with a swollen eye and blood caked on her face following the protest, with the former Greens candidate claiming she may have suffered permanent vision damage as a result. Former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas was charged over an anti-Israel protest in June. Supplied. Credit: Supplied She was spotted with a swollen eye and blood dripping down her face following the protest. Supplied. Credit: Supplied Ms Thomas was charged with hinder/resist police and refuse to comply with direction to disperse, with an additional charge related to a rarely-used emergency anti-riot power since dropped. Her lawyer, Peter O'Brien from O'Brien Solicitors, has since called for all charges against Ms Thomas to be dropped, claiming he is 'satisfied' his client was 'punched in the face'. 'My office has now viewed all available footage of the incident giving rise to the moments leading to the injury to Ms Thomas' eye on the 27th of June, and I am satisfied that Ms Thomas was punched in the face by a male police officer, causing extensive and serious injury to her eye,' Mr O'Brien said in a statement. Mr O'Brien claimed Ms Thomas was an 'innocent victim of gratuitous police brutality', condemning the actions of police as 'completely and entirely unjustifiable'. He said he's called on the NSW Police and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) to withdraw all the charges, and confirmed Ms Thomas would file a civil claim for compensation against the state over her 'apprehension, injury, detention, and prosecution'. 'It is our position that the charges against Ms Thomas are wholly unsustainable and should be immediately withdrawn,' Mr O'Brien said. Ms Thomas challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in the federal seat of Grayndler at the federal election earlier this year. Tim Hunter. Credit: News Corp Australia He argued the charge of resisting police could not hold up, citing claims police were acting outside their powers by enforcing an unlawful direction and using excessive force 'with brutal and life-changing consequences'. Further, failing to comply with a direction would 'most certainly fail', he claimed. 'The charge of failing to comply with a direction will most certainly fail as the direction was plainly and on its face unlawful, and reflected the directing police officer's complete misunderstanding of the law,' Mr O'Brien said. He noted it was 'not ordinary' for lawyers to comment on cases against their clients, but that there were 'such stark and serious concerns' raised by evidence which required an immediate public response. 'This is especially so where comments have been made by senior police officials and politicians downplaying the gravity of the incident, apparently justifying police actions and comments that have been detrimental to my client's position,' Mr O'Brien said. Peter O'Brien from O'Brien solicitors has called for all charges against Ms Thomas to be dropped. Supplied Credit: Supplied Ms Thomas earlier claimed her injuries were a result of the 'draconian anti-protest laws' currently subject to a constitutional challenge in the NSW Supreme Court launched on behalf of the Palestine Action Group. The laws in question gave police fresh powers to prevent protesters from harassing, intimidating or threatening people accessing or leaving — or attempting to access or leave — places of worship, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The laws were brought in less than a month after news of an explosives-laden caravan being found in Dural broke, which later proved to be a fake terrorism plot rather than an anti-Semitic attack. Mr O'Brien claimed it was 'noteworthy' the incident at the June protest happened amid an attempt by the state government to broaden police powers regarding public assemblies, which he called 'arguably contrary to constitutional principles'. 'It cannot be known what goes through the mind of a police officer who uses gratuitous violence like this, but the context and timing appear unavoidably revealing,' Mr O'Brien said. Ms Thomas is set to face Bankstown Local Court on August 12. Four others were handed various charges following the protest in June. NSW Police were unable to comment on calls for the charges to be dropped, or Mr O'Brien's claims, as a critical incident investigation remains ongoing. The ODPP declined to comment on the matter as it's before the court.

Sky News AU
16 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'I like to fly under the radar': Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh, breaks her silence on being called the Royal Family's 'secret weapon' during emotional visit to Bosnia
Duchess Sophie has spoken for the first time about being labelled the Royal Family's "secret weapon" and revealed what she thinks she should be called instead. The Duchess of Edinburgh, 60, gave a rare and candid interview to The Mirror UK while on a three-day visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina on behalf of King Charles III. The mother-of-two travelled to the region to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre, in which around 8,000 Muslim men and boys were brutally killed during the Bosnian War in July 1995. While there, she delivered a speech on behalf of the King, visited a memorial cemetery and met with members of the 'Mothers of the Enclaves of Srebrenica and Zepa' group, hearing first-hand from the families of victims about efforts to heal the wounds of war and ensure justice is done. Just one day before departing for Bosnia, Sophie and her husband, Prince Edward, 61, joined the royal family at a state banquet in honour of French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron. The Duchess, who has increasingly stepped into higher-profile roles as the monarchy continues to slim down, acknowledged the "secret weapon" label but suggested she prefers a quieter approach. "I like to fly under the radar," she told The Mirror after laying a flower at the Srebrenica Memorial Cemetery. "It's all very well being a secret weapon but if no one knows, maybe it's too secret." She added: "I suppose I should take it as a backhanded compliment. I don't see myself in a frontline position per se, that said admittedly there are fewer working members of the family these days so I suppose more and more I'm becoming less secretive. I just wonder what they are going to describe me as next!" When asked how she would describe herself, Sophie said: "I don't know, I am going to leave that for others, it would be very presumptuous for me to suggest something, that could go badly wrong." Sophie also reflected on becoming the Duchess of Edinburgh two years ago- a title once held by her beloved late mother-in-law, Queen Elizabeth II. "First of all it was quite large shoes to fill because not as many of the population alive today will remember but the Queen was Duchess of Edinburgh for the first few years when she and my father-in-law first married," she said. "For me, it was quite an emotional thing to sort of step into her shoes … it felt like quite a big moment." On a more "practical" note, Sophie said hers and her husband's role "is to support the King as it was to support the Queen". Since meeting Queen Elizabeth's youngest son at a tennis event in 1993 and marrying into the Royal Family six years later, Sophie has built a reputation not only for her loyalty but also for her commitment to championing causes that are close to her heart. As patron of more than 70 charities and organisations, each year the Duchess carries out hundreds of visits to schools, hospitals, military bases, charities and community groups both in the UK and abroad. With such a demanding schedule, she admitted that the emotional weight of her work, which often focuses on issues facing women, can sometimes be heavy. "It can take its toll on emotions, that's for sure," she said after watching others pay their respects at the Srebrenica memorial cemetery. "I can be emotional but that's not going to help them. I have to be able to take their message and amplify it and that's what I am here to do."