
Unpacking the dangers of the proposed amendments to Zambia's constitution, Part II
In this series on Zambia, Part II looks at legalising the use of public resources for election campaigns. (
The second benefit that Zambia's President Hakainde Hichilema seeks to achieve through
Article 81 (3) of
Once parliament is dissolved by operation of law, MPs are no longer MPs and lose access to all the
Dissolving parliament long before the election is important to the democratic process for two reasons.
First, it allows those who were MPs before dissolution to focus on political campaigning instead of being encumbered by parliamentary business. Second, it prevents MPs from using
Through Bill 7, Hichilema is proposing two amendments to the provisions governing dissolution.
The first proposal is to amend article 81 (3) to read: 'Parliament shall stand dissolved a day preceding the date of the next general election
.
' The
The second proposal is to make MPs retain their position for this additional three-month period but
In making these two proposals, Hichilema has three objectives.
The primary objective is to entice all MPs to support the passage of Bill 7 by dangling a carrot in front of them. If there is anything that Hichilema learnt from his predecessor's
This lesson explains why Hichilema could not embark on these constitutional changes
Hijack and take control of the opposition Patriotic Front (PF) by
Delay the resolution of the resultant PF leadership wrangles using
Induce vacancies in several constituencies by using the police to arrest incumbent MPs on what appears to be
Prevent the main opposition party from sponsoring candidates in the ensuing parliamentary by-elections either by
Use incumbency advantage and
Combined, these legal manoeuvres have enabled the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND) to easily secure
This abbreviated history of Hichilema's political schemes provides the clearest evidence that the president knew earlier that he would take self-serving and personally-driven amendments to the Constitution to parliament, rather than implementing his party's 2021 manifesto that
Hichilema's hope is that the UPND will win the forthcoming by-elections before Bill 7 is tabled in parliament to reduce by one or two the number of MPs whom the ruling party might need to bribe to pass the dire constitutional changes.
In the meantime, however, the president is offering a more transparent form of bribery that he hopes will appeal to all MPs — a
The second objective is to enable MPs to campaign for their own re-election using public resources. Campaign finance is ordinarily difficult to raise in Zambia, making attractive any interventions that would help deflate
Moreover, MPs receive constant requests for financial support from their constituents and are required to make monthly financial contributions to their political parties for by-election and day-to-day operational expenses. Allowing them to draw salaries for three months,
The third objective is enabling MPs to campaign for Hichilema using public funds drawn from the free salaries and the consequent increase in their pensions
.
Currently, lawmakers receive about 3 million kwacha (the equivalent of $110 000) as payment for
Altogether, the proposed changes would encourage electoral fraud, corruption and unfair practices during campaigns and gravely
Furthermore, the proposals are likely to work to the advantage of the UPND because candidates belonging to parties in government generally find it much easier to attract external financing or resources from
Sishuwa Sishuwa is a senior lecturer in the department of history at Stellenbosch University.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
Zuma's MK party wants Ramaphosa removed in motion of no confidence
In a draft motion, the MK party claims that Ramaphosa's leadership has 'eroded public trust and allowed the country to unravel'. Former president Jacob Zuma's MK party has written to Parliament to consider its motion of no confidence in President Cyril Ramaphosa, accusing him of economic mismanagement, law enforcement failures, and 'failure to act decisively against corruption.' In a draft motion to the National Assembly Speaker, Thoko Didiza, on Tuesday, MK party parliamentary leader Dr John Hlophe claims that Ramaphosa's leadership has 'eroded public trust and allowed the country to unravel.' Draft motion 'Lack of transparency regarding campaign funders, including the sealing of court records related to his campaign funding, failure to act decisively against corruption within state-owned enterprises and government institutions,' are some of the reasons Hlophe cites in a letter to Didiza. ALSO READ: 'Ramaphosa will go down in history as one of the most useless presidents' – analyst Last week, the MK party issued a similar motion against Ramaphosa if the president did not reverse his decision to appoint Wits University law professor Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister and place police minister Senzo Mchunu on a leave of absence following explosive allegations by KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) top cop Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. 'Urgent' In the letter, Hlophe said the matters against Ramaphosa are 'urgent.' 'I write to formally submit a motion of no confidence in Mr Cyril Ramaphosa as President of the Republic of South Africa, in terms of Section 102(2) of the Constitution and Rule 129 of the Rules of the National Assembly.' Hlophe said the motion requests the urgent convening of a special sitting to debate and vote on the matter within two weeks of receipt. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa's response 'a direct spit in the face of our revolutionary forefathers' – Sisulu foundation 'Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. I trust that the motion will be scheduled for debate and vote at the earliest opportunity to ensure the stability and governance of our nation,' Hlophe wrote. 'Not politically motivated' In the draft motion, Hlophe claims the motion is not politically motivated but is a 'necessary step to prevent South Africa from spiralling further into instability and to restore public trust in governance.' Hlophe listed charges of governance failures for which Ramaphosa must be removed. Persistent high levels of crime and lawlessness under his leadership, including marked increase in murder, robbery, and gender-based violence cases. Failure to address the deteriorating state of the South African Police Service (Saps), which has been unable to maintain public safety or prosecute high-profile offenders. Allegations of interference in law enforcement agencies, as highlighted by the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Commissioner's media briefing, which revealed syndicate involvement in Saps and the broader criminal justice system. Economic mismanagement Under economic mismanagement, Hlophe cites record-high unemployment rates, with no actionable economic recovery plans to address the economic despair in rural and urban communities. 'Failure to achieve acceptable economic growth rates, exacerbating poverty and inequality'. Hlophe also mentions security concerns. Failure to secure South Africa's borders, leading to an influx of undocumented foreign nationals and compromising the safety of citizens. Inadequate response to organised crime, including construction mafia criminality, kidnappings, and gang violence. Motion of no confidence While Zuma and the MK party hope that Ramaphosa will be removed, it's unlikely that the motion will pass or succeed in the National Assembly without the support of the coalition of parties in the government of national unity (GNU) if they vote against it. In his eight years as president of the country, Zuma survived eight motions of no confidence. ALSO READ: WATCH: Moeletsi Mbeki criticises Ramaphosa: 'He's been a very weak president'


Daily Maverick
14 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Escalating Kenyan unrest marks tense midpoint on road to 2027 elections
Not only are protests in Kenya occurring more often, they are more widespread, spanning regions far beyond the usual centres of political activism like Nairobi, Kisumu or Mombasa. For three consecutive weeks in June and July 2025, Kenya witnessed some of its most sustained and widespread protests in recent memory. On key protest days — particularly on Wednesday 25 June and Monday 7 July — Kenyans took to the streets across the country to once again voice their grievances against President William Ruto, a year after the infamous June/July 2024 unrest that culminated in the storming of Parliament. But this year's unrest has been notably more intense. Protests have extended beyond traditional hotspots, lasted longer and, worryingly, have been marked by a higher degree of violence. As Kenya reaches the halfway point to its 2027 general elections, this shift signals a concerning deterioration in both its political climate and security landscape. Why Kenyans are taking to the streets Several issues are driving the current wave of discontent. Foremost among them are political and socioeconomic grievances, particularly perceived poor governance and heavy-handedness by the current administration, coupled with rising unemployment and living costs. Unlike the June 2024 unrest, which was primarily triggered by the Finance Bill that introduced steep taxes and culminated in the breach of Parliament on the very day the bill was passed, this year's unrest appears to be driven by persistent political grievances and violations of human rights. Public concern over police conduct has continued to grow. One of the key triggers in the latest series of unrest was the death of blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, followed by the fatal shooting of unarmed civilians, including a street vendor and a 12-year-old girl. Protesters argue that these incidents reflect a broader pattern of impunity among Kenya's security forces — and human rights organisations appear to agree. Organisations like Human Rights Watch have recently called for authorities to be held accountable for such violence. What distinguishes these protests from past movements is their youth-led, decentralised nature. Organised primarily through social media, with hashtags like #RutoMustGo gaining traction, the protests lack formal leadership. While this helps with mobilisation, it presents a challenge to predicting when, where and how they might occur. A surge in unrest What we do know is that the level of protest activity is rising. Kenya has already recorded more protest activity in the first half of 2025 than during the same period in previous years, including during the 2022 election cycle. Not only are protests occurring more often, they are more widespread, spanning regions far beyond the usual centres of political activism like Nairobi, Kisumu or Mombasa. Historically volatile regions such as Kisumu, Homa Bay, Siaya, Migori (in Nyanza) and parts of Mombasa are now being overshadowed by rising tensions in central Kenyan counties — including Kiambu, Murang'a, Embu, Meru, Nyandarua and Laikipia. Central Kenya, which has remained largely peaceful over the past three electoral cycles, is now experiencing increasing volatility. At the same time, the protests have also been sustained, now entering their third week with persistent rumours and indeed fears of further activity. Perhaps most concerning is the rise in violence. Official figures are still emerging, but reports indicate that 52 people have been killed and 1,500 arrested during confrontations with the police in recent weeks. Moreover, some protests have turned destructive, with instances of looting, arson and even sexual violence, including rape, reported during the chaos. Such incidents not only harm communities but also risk undermining the legitimate grievances of the broader movement. Kenyan institutions are also feeling the weight of these protests, with the justice system under growing scrutiny over how it will handle so many cases. Most suspects face serious charges, including terrorism, homicide, robbery with violence, sexual assault, arson, malicious damage to property and attacks on strategic infrastructure; yet, the majority of those arrested — mostly youth aged 18 to 35 — do not have prior criminal records. This has sparked national concern, especially among human rights groups and legal experts who view the charges as potentially disproportionate and politically driven. Perceptions that the government is using the judiciary to suppress dissent and intimidate the youth could trigger further protests. Countdown to 2027 This past week, Kenya took one its first major steps towards organising its next general elections in 2027, appointing a new chairperson and six commissioners for the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission. However, the road ahead looks far from smooth. If current trends persist, the country may face two more years marked by elevated (violent) protest activity, heightened political tensions, and mounting pressure on state institutions. The first litmus test will be the by-elections that the commission is mandated to host before the 2027 general elections. These elections will give an early indication of political grievances and rivalries, potentially increasing the risk of election-related violence among an already charged population. Addressing the root causes of public frustration and engaging in dialogue with key members of civil society will be critical if Kenya is to avoid further unrest. DM


Daily Maverick
14 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
MPs recommend that ad hoc committee probes Mkhwanazi's allegations within 90 days
A joint committee meeting in Parliament has also recommended that the committee should identify any legislative or policy failures that may have contributed to the policing crisis. Parliament's police committee chair, Ian Cameron, says the formation of an ad hoc committee to probe KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's allegations of police corruption is a 'positive process'. Cameron was speaking at the Cape Town Press Club on Tuesday, 22 July, about the policing scandal that has exposed rival factions in South Africa's law enforcement arena. Watch: Inside Mkhwanazi's claims: South Africa held hostage by criminal cartel A joint meeting of Parliament's police committee and its justice and constitutional development committee on Tuesday agreed to adopt their report recommending to the National Assembly that an ad hoc committee be formed to investigate Mkhwanazi's allegations. The decision followed a directive from National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza earlier this month asking the committees to come up with an appropriate approach to oversight concerning the allegations. The committees had considered options including conducting a full investigative inquiry under the Powers, Privileges and Immunities Act and exercising their conferring powers in terms of National Assembly Rule 169 — which dictates how committees can or must consult or meet with each other. Ultimately, it decided on the ad hoc committee because it is 'task-specific and time-bound'. 'The Committees are acutely aware of the need for the National Assembly to ensure an expeditious process. The Committees, therefore, recommend the establishment of an ad hoc Committee in accordance with National Assembly Rule 253,' stated the report. 'This is because the scope of an ad hoc committee is task-specific and time-bound, contrary to the general oversight function of portfolio committees, which, in contrast, is ongoing and often requires juggling competing priorities.' The recommendation of an ad hoc committee comes after Mkhwanazi held a press conference on 6 July and claimed that a drug cartel in Gauteng was controlling a high-level criminal syndicate that extended into the South African Police Service, the Police Ministry, Parliament, official prison structures, the judiciary and other law-enforcing authorities. He also alleged that Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, along with several other figures, including the deputy national commissioner for crime detection, Lieutenant General Shadrack Sibiya (who has since been told to take special leave), had undermined investigations into political killings and organised crime. President Cyril Ramaphosa has since announced that a judicial commission of inquiry will probe Mkhwanazi's allegations, and placed Mchunu on leave with immediate effect. Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe is filling Mchunu's position until August, when Firoz Cachalia, the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council's chairperson and former Gauteng community safety MEC, will take over. Cameron said Ramaphosa's response to Mkhwanazi's allegations felt 'like burying one's head in the sand'. 'None of these inquiries or judicial commissions have really shown any form of result — apart from destroying tax coffers. [They haven't] shown any form of real justice,' said Cameron. Good result However, Cameron said he was 'confident' that the ad hoc committee in Parliament could 'have a good result'. 'It depends on how the Speaker also structures it — we don't have a direct say over that. Then that ad hoc committee would sit and determine their terms of reference, and obviously that is the critical part,' he said. 'We don't want to unnecessarily have duplication over anything that the commission is doing, but I think Parliament is already perfectly positioned to do the relevant interrogation of many of the allegations that have been made, and hopefully then we would be able to see quicker results and recommendations.' Cameron said the report was expected to be tabled in the National Assembly on Wednesday, 23 July. The committees have recommended that the ad hoc committee process be concluded within 90 days from it being formed. 'We have recommended three months for the ad hoc committee process, and hopefully we'd be able to get through it in that time. I don't think it needs to take much longer for the scope of what we would look at,' said Cameron. While the terms of reference are expected to be decided only once the ad hoc committee has been formed, the committees, in their report to the National Assembly, have recommended that, in addition to Mkhwanazi's allegations, 'consideration is given to identifying any legislative and/or policy failures or gaps that may have contributed to this matter'. DM