Why UAE schools deployed metal detectors, CCTV for over 2,000 Indian expat students' NEET exam
Centres in Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Sharjah implemented rigorous protocols, including the use of highly sensitive metal detectors, full CCTV coverage and videography of candidates, aligning with directives from India's National Testing Agency (NTA).
The intensified scrutiny follows the 2024 NEET scandal in India, which prompted national outrage over alleged malpractices. In response, the NTA rolled out robust reforms this year. In India, more than 2.27 million students appeared for the exam under similar surveillance, aiming to restore trust in one of the world's largest professional entrance tests.
However, biometric attendance verification, which became mandatory in India, was not enforced in the centres abroad, including in the UAE.
3 UAE centres
One of the largest NEET venues outside India, The Indian High School in Oud Metha, Dubai, accommodated around 900 candidates. 'This year, approximately 900 aspiring medical students took the exam in our halls, and we had meticulously prepared around 40 examination halls to meet the stringent specifications set by the National Testing Agency, India,' said Punit MK Vasu, CEO of The Indian High Group of Schools.
'To ensure integrity, we deployed close to 110 trained staff members, including coordinators, supervisors, invigilators, and support personnel. Comprehensive security measures were in place, including extensive frisking with highly sensitive metal detectors, temperature checks, and continuous CCTV surveillance.'
Students were videographed throughout the exam for verification purposes. Additionally, a dedicated photo studio was set up at the centre to assist students with missing photos, ensuring a smooth registration process. Exam papers were unsealed under CCTV surveillance in the presence of multiple examiners to prevent tampering.
'We aim to provide a safe, secure, and stress-free environment,' Vasu said. Counsellors and medical staff were also on site, while students of determination were given extended time in compliance with NTA guidelines.
At Sharjah Indian School, around 730 students appeared for the exam. 'Each and every child had to pass through metal detectors. We ensured CCTV coverage, videography, and photography,' said Principal Pramod Mahajan.
In Abu Dhabi, 517 students appeared at Abu Dhabi Indian School (ADIS). Principal Neeraj Bharagava confirmed that all materials, including recordings and answer sheets, were 'packed in diplomatic bags under the supervision of Indian missions,' to be sent to India.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Air India cockpit recording suggests captain cut fuel to engines before crash, source says
A cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the Air India flight that crashed last month supports the view that the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines, said a source briefed on US officials' early assessment of evidence. The first officer was at the controls of the Boeing 787 and asked the captain why he moved the fuel switches into a position that starved the engines of fuel and requested that he restore the fuel flow, the source told Reuters on condition of anonymity because the matter remains under investigation. The US assessment is not contained in a formal document, said the source, who emphasised the cause of the June 12 crash in Ahmedabad, India, that killed 260 people remains under investigation. There was no cockpit video recording definitively showing which pilot flipped the switches, but the weight of evidence from the conversation points to the captain, according to the early assessment. India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which is leading the investigation into the crash, said in a statement on Thursday that "certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting." It added the investigation was ongoing and it remained too early to draw definitive conclusions. The Wall Street Journal first reported similar information on Wednesday about the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade. The Federation of Indian Pilots, through its Indian law firm APJ-SLG Law Offices, sent a legal notice to Reuters about a July 17 story published by the news agency which referenced the WSJ article. The notice asked Reuters to desist from publication of any content "that speculates on the cause of the crash or attributes fault to any individuals, especially deceased pilots, in the absence of official confirmation and final report." Most air crashes are caused by multiple factors, and under international rules, a final report is expected within a year of an accident. A preliminary report released by the AAIB on Saturday said one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel and "the other pilot responded that he did not do so." Investigators did not identify which remarks were made by Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and which by First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3,403 hours, respectively. The AAIB's preliminary report said the fuel switches had switched from "run" to "cutoff" a second apart just after takeoff, but it did not say how they were moved. Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines. The London-bound plane began to lose thrust, and after reaching a height of 650 feet, the jet started to sink. The fuel switches for both engines were turned back to "run", and the airplane automatically tried restarting the engines, the report said. But the plane was too low and too slow to be able to recover, aviation safety expert John Nance told Reuters. The plane clipped some trees and a chimney before crashing in a fireball into a building on a nearby medical college campus, the report said, killing 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 on board the 787. NO SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS In an internal memo on Monday, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The AAIB's preliminary report had no safety recommendations for Boeing or engine manufacturer GE. After the report was released, the US Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The US National Transportation Safety Board has been assisting with the Air India investigation and its Chair Jennifer Homendy has been fully briefed on all aspects, a board spokesperson said. That includes the cockpit voice recording and details from the flight data recorder that the NTSB team assisted the AAIB in reading out, the spokesperson added. "The safety of international air travel depends on learning as much as we can from these rare events so that industry and regulators can improve aviation safety," Homendy said in a statement. "And if there are no immediate safety issues discovered, we need to know that as well." The circumstantial evidence increasingly indicates that a crew member flipped the engine fuel switches, Nance said, given there was "no other rational explanation" that was consistent with the information released to date. Nonetheless, investigators "still have to dig into all the factors" and rule out other possible contributing factors which would take time, he said. The Air India crash has rekindled debate over adding flight deck cameras, known as cockpit image recorders, on airliners. Nance said investigators likely would have benefited greatly from having video footage of the cockpit during the Air India flight. Reuters
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Indian court acquits 12 in deadly 2006 Mumbai train blasts case
An Indian court acquitted on Monday 12 men previously convicted for a series of bomb blasts that ripped through packed commuter trains in Mumbai in 2006 that killed 187 people. The men were convicted in 2015 of murder, conspiracy, and waging war against the country over the attacks during the evening rush hour of July 11, 2006 that also injured more than 800 people. Five were sentenced to death, while the other seven were given life imprisonment. But, 10 years later, the Bombay High Court set aside a lower court's verdict and acquitted the 12 men. Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak said in their judgement, the prosecution had "utterly failed to establish the offence beyond the reasonable doubt against the accused on each count." The men were ordered to be released from jail "if they are not required to be detained in any other case." The prosecution can appeal against the order in the Supreme Court. 209 people were killed in 2006 Mumbai train bombings. It was series of 7 bomb blasts. Photo / X A total of seven blasts ripped through the trains after the bombs, packed into pressure cookers, were placed in bags and hidden under newspapers and umbrellas. Prosecutors said the devices were assembled in Mumbai and deliberately placed in first-class coaches to target the city's wealthy Gujarati community. They said the bombings were intended as revenge for the riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, which left some 2,000 people dead, most of them Muslims. Agence France-Presse
Khaleej Times
12-07-2025
- Khaleej Times
India association rejects 'bias towards pilot error' in preliminary report on Air India crash
The Airline Pilots' Association of India rejected a "bias toward pilot error" after the preliminary report on the Air India plane crash was released by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). The Indian pilots association also claimed that the "report was leaked to media without any responsible official signature or attribution". In a statement, the association alleged a "lack of transparency in the investigation". A key finding of the report found that the fuel switches had flipped to cutoff shortly after takeoff, starving engines of fuel. One pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. "The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said. India's pilots association said "the tone and direction of the investigation suggest a bias toward pilot error. We categorically reject this presumption and insist on a fair, fact-based inquiry." APAI also alleged that "investigations continue to be shrouded in secrecy, undermining credibility and public trust." The association said that "qualified, experienced personnel, especially line pilots, are still not being included in the investigation team."
