Tax rises 'increasingly likely' after DWP savings 'dwindle to nothing'
The benefits cut U-turn has left Rachel Reeves with a £4.8billion hole to fill
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves
Labour faces renewed speculation over its tax plans after concessions to the party's welfare rebels left a £4.8 billion hole in Rachel Reeves's spending plans. The concessions, including the last-minute shelving of plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), were enough to head off the Government's first Commons defeat on Tuesday evening.
But they also removed a key plank of Sir Keir Starmer's welfare reform agenda, delaying changes to Pip until after a review of the benefit not due to conclude until autumn 2026. With no clarity on when the changes will be enacted or what they might entail, the Chancellor now faces a fiscal headache as a forecast £4.8 billion in welfare savings have been whittled away to nothing.
Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and Resolution Foundation think tanks warned that Tuesday's concessions meant Ms Reeves could now expect no 'net savings' by 2029/30 – a key year for meeting her fiscal targets. IFS deputy director Helen Miller said the move had effectively halved the Chancellor's 'margin of error' against her main fiscal rule, once again raising the possibility of tax rises in the autumn.
On top of that, a stuttering economy and global instability could mean she has even less room for manoeuvre than expected. Ms Miller said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.'
The Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice agreed that there would be no savings in 2029/30, but suggested changes to universal credit – almost the only part of the Government's proposals still standing – could save money in the longer term. On Wednesday morning, the Conservatives accused Labour of making billions in unfunded spending commitments, including both the U-turns on welfare and the partial reinstatement of winter fuel payments.
Article continues below
In a letter to Ms Reeves, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride demanded to know where the money was coming from, asking: 'Will you raise tax or increase borrowing?'
Ministers have repeatedly insisted that Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT. But Ms Reeves also remains committed to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues – not borrowing – in 2029/30.
Meanwhile, Sir Keir himself will face a grilling from MPs on Wednesday as he attempts to repair relations with his backbenchers.
Article continues below
The weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions comes just a day after 49 of his own MPs voted against his welfare reforms – the biggest rebellion of his premiership so far – while several backbenchers described the Government's handling of the issue as 'chaotic' and 'a shambles'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cash Isa bickering masks the real crisis for savers
The debate about whether Rachel Reeves should or should not limit the amount that people can save into a cash Isa has been heated. A good argument can be made that too much money has sat in low-yielding cash accounts that could be working harder in the stock market. But many people still feel, with some justification, that this is just another raid on prudent people trying to do the right thing. The problem with this debate is that most people expressing an opinion have a dog in the race. The Chancellor says she wants people to earn more on their savings – of course she does. But she also has her eye on £300bn of idle cash that would provide a useful boost to the growth promise on which she was elected if it were redirected towards UK-listed companies. That cash would also raise a useful amount of fresh revenue if, as is more likely, it simply moves from a tax-free cash account to a taxable one. You may not be surprised to learn that banks and building societies view that same money as a funding source for the mortgages and other loans they offer. They, therefore, make the case for precautionary saving, and they highlight the danger of putting money to work in the market that you might need soon to pay for a wedding, school fees or a house move. It is no surprise that their counterparts in the asset management and investment platform industry (full disclosure: that's me) prefer to focus on the historical outperformance of stock market investments over cash. We warn that holding too much cash for too long poses a different kind of threat to your financial security. We are all right, of course. There is a place for both cash and investments in our financial lives. The bigger problem is that most people don't understand financial risk. So they don't know how much importance to attach to the arguments on either side of this debate. Or what the right balance of cash and shares should be for them. Reeves highlights one risk of holding too much cash. Doing so usually means you are paying too high a price for certainty. You prefer a return of your money to a return on it. Which is reasonable for some of your savings, but not for all of them. Everyone should set aside a cash buffer before they start to think about investing in the stock market. But once they have done that, there is no reason to park any more in cash. How big that cushion should be is harder to say – it will vary according to your age, your ability to find new work if you lose your job and many other factors. Most people don't know how much cash they should sensibly hold. Consequently, some will hold too little and others far too much. But there is a long list of other risks over which they don't have a good grasp either. And, until they do, tweaking contribution limits may make less of a difference than the Chancellor hopes. You can lead a horse to water, as they say. There are a few things we, as an industry, have not done a great job of explaining. The first is the difference between volatility and risk. Volatility is the natural ups and downs of the market. This is only ever a risk if we sell our investments in response to a fall in their value and crystallise the loss. The stock market fell 20pc between February and April. But unless you sold at the bottom, you won't care now because it quickly recovered. Another point of the cash buffer is to prevent the next risk – being a forced seller. You should always have enough cash in the bank to be able to ignore short-term market volatility. Or to actively desire it as a chance to buy assets at a discount to their real value. Holding that cash is a first step towards avoiding another poorly understood risk: putting our eggs in too few baskets. One of the reasons I have been able to shrug off the market's change of heart on US assets this year is that America is only a part of my portfolio. Yes, there have been times in the past 10 years when I wished it was a bigger part than it was, but broad diversification has felt like a pretty good strategy in the first half of 2025. The biggest risk for most people when it comes to investing (or saving, come to that) is to put it off. I often tell a story about twin sisters, one who starts saving young and one who for too long finds other things to spend her money on. The prudent sister gets to a point in mid-life when she has so much capital that further saving is largely pointless. The other, meanwhile, can never catch up, no matter how long she keeps putting money aside. The point rightly made by the pro-investment lobby is that achieving the first sister's happy state is really only possible by tapping into the stock market's superior returns. The final risk that very few people properly understand is the ravage of inflation. Even those of us who think about how much we might need to fund our retirement fall into the trap of thinking about this in today's money. What we need to understand is that even at the Bank of England's 2pc target for inflation, the pot we manage to accumulate will buy us half as much in 36 years' time as it does today. At 3pc inflation, our purchasing power will halve in just 24 years. This is the strongest argument for shares over cash, which in the long run tends only to match, not beat, inflation. So while I support the Chancellor's desire to get people more focused on their investment returns than the return of their investments, this is just the start of it. Informing people how to save and invest sensibly is more important than bickering over whether they should do so via cash or the stock market.
The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
New four-day working week trial has perfect success rate
All of the companies that took part have decided to continue working a shorter working week at the end of the trial. One chief executive praised the pilot and said they "expect that most organisations will be doing this in the next 10 years". New four-day working week trial has perfect success rate The six-month trial began last November and was organised by the 4 Day Week Foundation. According to a report on the trial, organisations involved were able to maintain service levels and key performance indicators whilst observing several benefits for employee wellbeing. It added that almost two-thirds of workers registered a reduction in how often they experienced burnout. Meanwhile, two in five found an improvement in their mental health and almost half said they felt more satisfied with life. Joe Ryle, campaign director of the 4 Day Week Foundation, said: 'With greater knowledge, expertise and experience of what it takes to successfully implement a four-day week, we're really pleased to see such a high success rate. 'People are happier, businesses are thriving, and there's no turning back. 🚨NEW PILOT LAUNCH🚨 This Autumn, join the movement that's redefining the future of work. Start date: Thursday 25th September 🗓️ Our annual UK Four-Day Week Pilot has successfully supported hundreds of companies to move to a four-day week. Find out more via the link below ⬇️ — 4 Day Week Foundation (@4Day_Week) June 2, 2025 'We've proved it again and again: a four-day week works and should now be implemented more widely across the economy.' Bron Afon Community Housing has 420 staff and is extending its pilot further. Chief executive Alan Brunt said: 'Almost as soon as we started talking about it, our teams got together to set about making it work, which was brilliant. 'We've closely monitored our performance and customer satisfaction. We're happy with the results so far and will continue to make sure we're delivering for our customers. 'I expect that most organisations will be doing this in the next 10 years or so.' Will the UK have a four-day work week? Ongoing discussions and trials surrounding the four-day work week in the UK are continuing; however, the Government has previously ruled out immediate plans for a nationwide, mandated four-day work week. The Department for Business and Trade said last year: "We have no plans to impose a four-day working week on employers or employees." Despite this, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has voiced support for a four-day working week. The 4 Day Week Foundation is a group that leads the UK's national campaign for a four-day working week. They are pushing for a four-day, 32-hour working week, meaning no loss of pay for workers. Would you like to see a four-day working week? Let us know in the comments.
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Starmer outlines six-day a week neighbourhood health hub plan after backing Reeves
Update: Date: 07:19 BST Title: Reeves doing excellent job, PM tells BBC after Commons tears Content: The prime minister has backed Rachel Reeves to stay on as chancellor for "many years to come" after she was seen crying during PMQs. In the Commons, Starmer didn't say whether Reeves would still be in her job at the next election. But later, speaking to BBC Radio 4's Political Thinking with Nick Robinson, Starmer said he worked "in lockstep" with Reeves and that she was "doing an excellent job as chancellor". He also insisted her tearful appearance had "nothing to do with politics". You can watch a clip of the conversation below. This video can not be played Reeves will be chancellor 'for a very long time to come', says Starmer Update: Date: 07:06 BST Title: 'Deeply upsetting' to see chancellor in tears - shadow minister Content: The NHS reform plan set to be announced today comes after yesterday's PMQs, where Chancellor Rachel Reeves was seen in tears. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride tells BBC Breakfast he sent Reeves a message yesterday 'just to say I hope that she was all right'. 'I felt for her,' he says. He adds it was 'deeply upsetting to see', especially as it was 'such a public moment'. 'We are all human beings at the end of the day - politicians are human beings - they do have feelings,' he says. But on the business side, he says the welfare U-turn shows the government 'is not gripping things', and adds the bond markets 'are quite twitchy'. Update: Date: 06:53 BST Title: 'It's reform or die' for the NHS, says Starmer Content: Keir Starmer during a visit to the Elective Orthopaedic Centre at Epsom Hospital in January In comments released overnight, Keir Starmer says the health system the government has inherited is "in crisis". "That ends now," he says. "Because it's reform or die. "Our 10 Year Health Plan will fundamentally rewire and future-proof our NHS so that it puts care on people's doorsteps, harnesses game-changing tech and prevents illness in the first place." This means, Starmer says, giving everyone access to GPs, nurses and wider support all under one roof in their neighbourhood, and "rebalancing our health system so that it fits around patients' lives, not the other way round". He says it's not an overnight fix, but the government is already "turning the tide on years of decline", with four million extra NHS appointments, 1,900 more GPs and waiting lists at their lowest level for two years. "But there's more to come. This government is giving patients easier, quicker and more convenient care, wherever they live." Update: Date: 06:45 BST Title: What will the 'Neighbourhood Health Service' look like? Content: Keir Starmer says today's plan will "fundamentally rewire" the NHS in England, with a focus on three areas: moving from treatment to prevention, analogue to digital, and hospital to more community care. What does that mean in practice? Update: Date: 06:43 BST Title: Starmer sets out 10-year NHS plan amid 'tough' few days for Labour Content: This video can not be played Watch: Starmer says past few days have 'been tough' Prime Minister Keir Starmer is today setting out a 10-year plan for the NHS in England, aiming to move the health service towards prevention and community care, as well as digitalising it. The prime minister says his NHS plan will "fundamentally rewire" the service, with the aim that by 2035 most outpatient care - including eye care, cardiology and mental health - will happen outside hospitals. But while the government is selling the "Neighbourhood Health Service" as a major overhaul, others are asking how soon people will see a difference - and exactly how, and if, it will work. Today's announcement follows Starmer giving his "full backing" to Chancellor Rachel Reeves after her tearful appearance in the Commons yesterday. The last few days have been "tough" for Starmer's government, the PM said, after a major climbdown over welfare changes left a hole in Labour's spending plans. Speaking to Nick Robinson, Starmer admitted he "did not engage" properly with Labour MPs on the issue, and praised Reeves for "doing an excellent job as chancellor". We'll bring you all the latest updates, analysis and reaction to all of the above throughout the day. This video can not be played Reeves appears tearful during PMQs
